Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. Starbuck’ strategy
The Starbucks Company was built using both a decentralized structure and a centralized cost
control approach. Its unique approach to espresso mixing and preparing yields a wide product
selection, its well-trained reps provide excellent service, and it strategically places its shops, all
of which demonstrate the company's strategy of distinction. As a result, they were able to
increase their market share in a specific section of the city and strengthen their regional name,
both of which contributed to the public's perception of them as being of exceptionally high pride
and prestige. For these factors and more, buyers were willing to spend a higher price. Their
adaptable chain allocations helped them get the best delivery rates and take advantage of
economies of scale through waste reduction and skill improvement, two hallmarks of their cost
authority approach. Starbucks was also a cost champion because of the close relationships it
maintained with espresso importers who were "very anxious to become Starbucks suppliers,"
allowing the company to wink at cost reductions and reduce bean-sourcing costs (Dawson,
2019).
There is now a joint venture between Albertsons, Safeway, and Draft Foods.
9. Risk
This company strategy has a low chance of failure, despite the high cost of getting started. There
are some barriers to entry for new companies in this market.
Economic situation
Separation of products
Access to distribution channels
For Starbucks to keep up with rising customer demand, the company needs reliable vendors it
can trust despite the fact that they may be constrained in their operations by factors such as
budgetary constraints, government regulations, and production limits. In order to secure the
premium Arabica coffee upon which Starbucks' reputation rests, the company is presently
willing to give its vendors an average of 23% more than the going rate. If the company's strict
criteria aren't met in a given crop, it confronts the risk of scarcity and soaring costs of its main
product due to the limited quantity of legumes that satisfy them (Khan, 2015).