Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Students Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Due Date
2
Introduction
For millennia, poverty has been a central issue in intellectual, religious, and social
disputes. By contrast, the majority of the world has enjoyed the great escape from economic
misery during the last two centuries, The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) may have
helped in certain ways to alleviate poverty in the last few decades by providing a baseline for
progress monitoring and drawing attention to poverty-related issues, among other things. On the
other hand, the bulk of credit must go to capitalism and free trade since they enable economies to
grow—and growth, in particular, has led to the global elimination of poverty (The Economist,
2013).
The goal of this chapter is to discuss both theoretical and practical approaches to poverty
alleviation in the developing countries. When it comes to theoretical notions, the focus has been
these nations' experience, economic possibilities for the poor, asset development for the poor,
and market access are all critical components of a potentially effective poverty reduction plan.
Premier, SocINDEX, and Google Scholar were used to perform my literature search. I ran a fast
search in the journal databases using key phrases such as poverty, empowerment, non-
governmental organizations (NGOs), sustainability, and economic development. The goal of this
literature review is to discuss both theoretical and practical approaches to poverty alleviation.
If the economy doesn't change, good management will become even more important in
the fight against poverty. Pro-growth policies have helped billions of people around the world
get out of poverty. A good manager helps this happen, which leads to a rise in total factor
productivity (TFP). This is called the pro-growth approach."To sum up, people who are in charge
can help the world's poor by learning how to run things well.
Europe had annual income growth of more than 1.5% over the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries, but the US had annual income growth of more than 1.7% during this time. This is
according to Noel, Smith, and Webb. During the 1800s, the average income in the United States
was about $1,980. In 2000, the average income in the United States was about $43,200. The
huge changes in physical well-being that we now take for granted were made possible by the
huge changes in money that happened during this time. Governments can use economic
frameworks that reward all types of physical and human capital investment and allow markets to
work safely and affordably to achieve this kind of development, say Noel, Smith, and Webb.
This is one way to do this. During the last two centuries, the world's economy has grown, which
has caused extreme poverty to fall to its lowest point in history (Chandy & Gertz, 2011).
Globalization, capitalism, and better economic management have all helped the
developing world catch up to the developed world's earnings after decades of being isolated from
the rest of the world. Because they allow market forces to balance supply and demand and
distribute scarce resources, and because they use fair and practical economic policies to
encourage investment, commerce and job creation, the poorest countries in the world now live in
the countries that do this. The modern era stands out from a long history of slow progress and
cruel poverty because of this powerful combination. Economists David Dollar and Aart Kraay
(2002) found that policies and institutions that help the economy grow help the poor just as
4
much as the rest of society. These policies and institutions include openness to trade, low
inflation, a moderate government size, financial development, strong property rights, and a
strong law. People who have a hard time making money and being productive can thrive in an
environment where these pro-growth policies are in place, according to the study (Dollar &
Kraay, 2002).
Globalization has made it easier for businesses to grow and for people to get out of
Andreas Bergh and Therese Nilsson (2014) looked at data from 114 countries between
1983 and 2007. They found that there was a statistically significant negative correlation between
poverty and globalization. People who are poorer have been linked to less trade barriers and
more knowledge exchanges. According to a 2010 study that looked at data from 131
industrialized and developing countries, lowering trade barriers led to a higher per capita income
for the countries that were looked at (Manole & Spatareanu, 2010). At least from 1950 to 1998,
countries that opened their trade systems grew faster than those who didn't open their trade
systems, on average, by 1.5% per year. Investment rates rose by 1.5–2.0 percentage points after
the country was freed up. This supports the idea that freeing up the economy changes how
physical capital is built up. In the long run, changes in foreign trade have a big impact on the
There's new data that shows that commerce in every country is skewed in favor of the
poor. This may be the most important thing that has happened (Fajgelbaum & Khandelwal,
2016).
Economic Freedom
5
During the years from 1980 to 2005, an economist named Joseph Connors looked into the
effects of economic freedom, democracy, and foreign aid on the world's poor. There was a 11.41
percentage point drop in severe poverty in 2005 when there was a one-unit increase in the
average level of EFW over a 25-year period. It also didn't help that democratic institutions had a
very small effect on poverty, and that foreign aid had no effect on poverty in general (Connors,
2011).
According to Harvard's Andrei Shleifer (2011), the world's per capita income rose about
2% per year during the same time. The global median inflation rate, the population-weighted
global average of top marginal income tax rates, and the global average tariff rate have all gone
down over the last 2.5 decades, which shows that economic freedom is becoming more available
to more people. According to Shleifer, (2011) when Milton Friedman lived, the global economy
grew a lot, many people's lives got better, and extreme poverty was reduced. At the same time,
Several of these policies and events have been singled out for special attention because
they have been shown to be important for economic progress. This data should be used to look at
how economic growth can help people out of poverty and improve their quality of life, among
other things. They say "growth-enhancing strategies should be at the heart of every effective
poverty reduction program." This is because economic development is the only way to get out of
Paul Krugman said that "productivity is not everything in the short run," but "it is almost
everything in the long run" when it comes to a country's ability to improve its standard of living
(Krugman, 1997). Greg Mankiw, an economist at Harvard, says that almost all of the differences
6
in living standards are caused by differences in the amount of money people make (Mankiw,
2015). Diego Comin found that total factor productivity (TFP) is the main reason for economic
growth. TFP is the amount of output that can't be explained by the amount of inputs used to
make it. Levels are determined by how efficiently and quickly the inputs are used in
production (Comin, 2008). Total factor productivity (TFP) changes have been the main reason
for changes in living standards in the United Kingdom since at least the mid-18th century
(Haldane, 2017).
In a new study, management is very important when it comes to a country's total factor
productivity (TFP) and, therefore, economic growth. According to research done by McKinsey
and the London School of Economics' John Dowdy and John Van Reenen, people who have a lot
of debt are more likely to be in debt than people who don't have debt.
Besides that, well-managed businesses have more productivity and market value as well
as a better ability to deal with things like global financial recessions. This is just one example
from our analysis: It shows that a single sector is responsible for more than 80% of a country's
productivity variation, and that all countries and sectors have a "long tail" of companies that have
been mismanaged for a very long time. These findings show that every country on the planet has
a good chance of increasing productivity with good management strategies (Dowdy & Van
Reenen, 2014).
According to empirical research, good management has a big impact on total factor
It's not just manufacturing and small businesses that use these kinds of tactics. It could help
people stay alive in hospitals, get better grades in school, spend less time at drug rehab centers or
7
universities, or do better research and teaching if managers do a better job (McComark et al.,m
2014).
Economic historian Deirdre McCloskey argues in her Bourgeois Era trilogy that the
preceding two centuries' "Great Enrichment" was the outcome of altering attitudes about the
reputation and dignity in Europe throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
(McCloskey, 2010). As a result of the evidence discussed above, it is feasible that management's
reduction. Economic growth requires a high level of total factor productivity (TFP). Effective
On the basis of these three concepts, it is fair to think that competent management will
benefit the poor and needy worldwide in a modest but meaningful way. To improve their current
management methods, businesses may choose to consider supporting the less fortunate in
addition to growing profits. Managers who think they have the potential to have a substantial
influence on the business may be motivated to develop their management abilities and
competences.
On the basis of the literature, it is nearly impossible to define (or even envision) a single
abstract approach for poverty reduction that can be declared wonderful a priori. This is because
the many causes and aggravators of poverty, as well as the numerous variations of poverty, are
often context-specific. To summarize, for policy solutions to be effective, they must not only
take a comprehensive approach to the myriad of factors affecting this problem, but also be
8
constructed within the context of the society in which they will be implemented. Regardless of
your position on the preceding, there are a number of "success stories" in the development debate
that may be utilized to make broad generalizations about how to eliminate poverty. While these
broad conclusions cannot ensure success, they may serve as a helpful starting point for poverty
reduction efforts in developing nations. In summary, governments should pursue policies that
economic growth.
Implications
Without a doubt, the elements that lead to poverty alleviation are constant. According to
the evidence from these examples, a potentially effective plan for poverty reduction should have
targeted programs, are critical components of creating economic opportunity for the poor
9
References
Development, 62, 42-61.
Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and poverty in the poor countries. American
Chandy, L., & Gertz, G. (2011). With Little Notice, Globalization Reduced Poverty. YaleGlobal
Online, 5.
Chandy, L., & Gertz, G. (2011). Poverty in numbers: The changing state of global poverty from
Macmillan, London.
Connors, J. S. (2010). Global poverty: the role of economic freedom, democracy, and foreign
Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape. In The Great Escape. Princeton University Press.
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is Good for the Poor. Journal of economic growth, 7(3),
195-225.
Dowdy, J., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). Why management matters for productivity. McKinsey
Quarterly, September.
hospital, school, or retail outlet against others in your country, industry or size
class. https://worldmanagementsurvey.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/
boespeech_220317.pdf
10
Manole, V., & Spatareanu, M. (2010). Trade openness and income—A re-
Chicago Press.
McCormack, J., Propper, C., & Smith, S. (2014). Herding cats? Management and university
Noell, E. S., Smith, S. L., & Webb, B. G. (2013). Economic growth: Unleashing the potential of
Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2013/06/01/towards-the-end-of-poverty
Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The