Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: N. A. Hampson & N. E. Spencer (1968) Anodic Behaviour of Tin in Potassium
Hydroxide Solution, British Corrosion Journal, 3:1, 1-6, DOI: 10.1179/000705968798326523
Article views: 20
Results of galvanostatic polarisation of tin anodes in potassium hydroxide solutions are reported.
The orientation of the anode plays an important part in the observed behaviour. Permanent passivity
occurs when the potential rises to that required for oxygen evolution from a film of stannic oxide, 50-100 . \,
thick. At [KOHl up to and including 7 M, the prepassivation 'active' region of the potential-time beha-
viour conforms to a 'solution-controlled' reaction; at higher [KOH] anode films are formed with less and
less dependence on mass transport in the electrolyte.
Interpretations of the observed behaviours are given.
B 0·3
F
o·g
0·2
Horizontal
anodes
0'7
>
E 0·1
.0
o
o
F
B
V~rtical
anodu
o A 0·1
2000
Values in parentheses are approximate; dashes indicate that the values were not
calculable from the experimental data.
o·rM
TABLE II
G2 O~ 0·6
(TIME) -t2, sec-1f2 Typical results of current interruption experiments
Horizontal anodes (passivation time, tF) were polarised for
FIG. 4. Passivation time (tF) vs. current density data correlated in
the/orm 0/ Equation (6) time ft, rested and then polarised to the point of passivation,
Horizontal electrodes, 22°c t2. Total polarisation time is (ft + t2). (Rest period 600 sec.)
5M I 10 14",
0·5
I J ,
I I ,
I, I
0·4 o-s ,.,
16
/
~
II
III
It I
<{
II I-
i tel I
~ 0·3
w 0·4
19 ~
o til
I II I
E
I-
Z
W «
u II I
0:=
~ 0.2
0:=
2M
>•.
t-
i" p'
• f!
(J
(j)
I
••:f/ ,/
Z
~ 0·3
• FI I
:/1 "
f! c;-
Q-2
(TIME) -'12,
0'4
sec-'t2
0·6 0·8 " t'
I'
19 ./
FIG. 5. Passivation time (tF) vs. current density data correlated in 0-1
It I
theform of Equation (6) !.I ,<
Vertical electrodes, 22°c J.~ /..,
increase in integral passivation time was observed due to the
~
inclusion of rests in the polarisation schedule (current inter- 0'2 0-4 0'6
ruption experiments) for both horizontal and vertical elec- (TIME)_1/2,sec- ~2
trodes. FIG. 6. Passivation time (tF) vs. current density data correlated in
the form of Equation (6)
Structure of the anode film on passive anodes Horizontal (0) and vertical (e) electrodes, 22°c
(iii) Electrode is 'blocked' with Sn(ll) when the capacity of observed at horizontal electrodes). Oscillations in potential
the electrolyte layers surrounding the electrode for either follow these local concentrations variations.
Sn(OH)2 (Equation 9) or HSn02- (Equation 10) is exceeded. The results of experiments with 14 M-KOH are unexpected
The electrode is 'blocked' by a solid film based on SnO. The in view of the solubility curve of SnO in KOH, Fig. 7, since
film might be, and certainly contains, 5SnO' ZH20. appreciable solubility of SnO in high [KOtl] is indicated.
(iv) First transition occurs when the potential of the One explanation, adsorption of anode product at the electrode,
'blocked' electrode rises to that required for the formation of receives support from Tafel plots. These indicate that the
Sn02. reaction is charge-transfer controlled (e.g. Fig. Z - insert), and
SnO + ZOH- = Sn02 + H20 + Ze. .' (11) a value of the charge-transfer coefficient lX, '" O· 9, suggests
adsorption of SnO at the electrode.20
(v) Second transition occurs on the completion of a coherent
A more likely explanation is that the product of the electron
film of Sn02 and the potential rises to that required for
transfer reaction Equation (9), is only slowly soluble in very
oxygen evolution. concentrated (14 M)KOH and remains as a solid phase on the
The two successive reactions (i), Equation (9), and (ii), anode. If the dissolution of Sn(OHh proceeded via various
Equation (10), are consistent with the observed breaks in the hydrated intermediates, the rate of dissolution in 14 M-KOH,
i vs. t fit lines Figs 4 and 5. Transition is due to the attain- in which the concentration of free water is very small, might
ment of the critical concentration of either Sn(OH)2 or be very slow indeed. Supporting evidence for this suggestion
HSn02-. At high current density the critical concentration is the observation that the attainment of equilibrium between
of Sn(OH)2 is obtained before the critical concentration of SnO and 14 M-KOH is slow. In addition with electrolytes of
HSn02-. At low current density the conversion of Sn(OH)2 a higher concentration of free water (10 M) there was some
into HSn02- by Equation (10) offsets the accumulation of dependence of tF on electrode orientation' and evidence of
Sn(OH)2 to such an extent that the critical concentration anode product transport in the electrolyte.
of HSn02- is attained first. The accumulation of critical
concentrations of both Sn(OH)2 and HSn02- follow the laws
of non-steady-state diffusion modified for limited amounts
of convection (on the experimental time scale employed in
these experiments). Transition, due to attainment of the
solubility limit of either Sn(OHh or HSn02-, follows tp!
equations as is observed in practice. The break in the; vs.
tpt curves occurs at the current at which transition may be due
to reaching the solubility limit of either Sn(OH)2 or HSn02-.
The limiting current density, iI, represents the rate of removal
of anode products other than by diffusion in the electrolyte.
The extrapolated current density, ;2, represents the rate of
conversion of Sn(OH)2 into HSn02- under steady-state
conditions (no net accumulation of Sn(OH)2).
The effects of modes of mass transport other than diffusion
(convection) is indicated by comparing horizontal and
vertical electrode systems. Convection increases limiting
current density but has little effect upon k (Table I); both of
these observations conform to expectations and have been
discussed in detail.13,15 A major difference in the anodic
behaviour of horizontal and vertical electrode systems is the
continuous corrosion of vertical electrodes at low current 8 12
density. When diffusion is the only mode of mass transport, KOH CONCN., tel
every final anode product (except OH- discharge) irrespective FIG. 7. Solubility curve for SnO in KOH (4 weeks equilibrium
of current will ultimately reach the critical concentration time)
required for a process transition: horizontal electrodes will 2rc
therefore ultimately passivate. Vertical electrodes, subject to
convection may depassivate if the passivating species is removed
more quickly than it is formed. It is suggested that when the Conclusions
critical concentration of Sn(ll) is reached, Sn02 forms but At [KOH] up to and including 7 M, anodic behaviour is
being more acidic10 dissolves more rapidly in KOH than broadly typical of a metal with an anodic product freely
Sn(II): hence depassivation may occur and the anode corrodes soluble in the electrolyte. At higher [KOH], anode films are
continuously. The small 'rise and fall' in the overpotential- formed with less and less dependence on mass transport in
time behaviour reflects the 'formation and removal' of the electrolyte.
Sn(IV) at the anode and marks the first transition (Fig. 5). For the Sn-Sn(ll) process two successive reactions occur at
The greater [KOH] the more readily Sn02 is likely to dissolve the interphase. The first, electron transfer, in which an
(at least up to a limit of [KOH]), thus the current at which initial Sn(lI) product, probably Sn(OH)2, is formed, is followed
continuous corrosion of vertical electrodes occurs should by a second in which stannite is produced.
increase with [KOH] as observed. A 'similar mechanism Transition to the Sn(II)-Sn(IV) process occurs when the
accounts for the potential oscillations after the small hump. anode is 'blocked' by hydrated oxide. Electrode blocking
If the faradaic current density is sufficiently high, a· local may be due to the attainment of a critical concentration of
concentration of Sn(IV) may build up until it is removed by either the initial Sn(ll) product (at high current density) or
turbulent flow, e.g. eddy currents (oscillations were never stannite (at low current density).
References
1. Goldschmidt, H., & Ekardt, E., Z. phys. Chem., 56, 385, 1906 13. Hampson, N. A., Tarbox, M. J., Lilley,J. T., & Farr, J. P. G.,
2. Foerster, F., & Dalch, M.,Z.Elektrochem.,angew.phys. Chem., Electrochem. Technol., 1964, 2, 309
1909, 16, 599 14. Eisenberg, M., Electrochem. Technol., 1965, 3, 340
3. Newbery, E., J. chem. Soc., 1916, p. 1066 15. Hampson, N. A., Jones, P. C., & Phillips, R. F., Can. J. Chem.,
4. Hansel, G., & Gravel, A., Z. Elektrochem., angew. phys. Chem., 1967, 45, 2093
1935, 41, 314 16. Levich, V. G., Fiziko Khemiceskaja Gidrodinamika, Moscow,
5. Kerr, R., J. chem. Soc. Ind., Lond., 1938, 57, 405 1952
6. Bachvalow,G. T., J. apple Chem., Moscow, 1941, 14,469 17. Farr, J. P. G., & Hampson, N. A., Electrochem. Technol., in
7. Bachvalow, G. T., & Titov, P. S., Khim. ref. Zh., 1941, 4, 85 press
8. Bianchi, G., Chim. Ind., 1947, 29, 295 18. Latimer, W. M., 'Oxidation Potentials', 1953. (New York:
9. EI Wakkad, S. E. S., EI Din, A. M. Shams, & Sayed, J. A., Prentice Hall)
J. chem. Soc., 1954, p. 3103 19. Vogel, A. I., 'Textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis',
10. EI Din, A. M. Shams, & El Wahab, F. M. Abd, Electrochim. Third Ed., 1961, 503 (London: Longmans)
Acta, 1964, 9, 883 20. Randles, J. E. B., Trans. Symp. on Electrode Processes (1959),
11. Shah, S. N., & Davies, D. E., Electrochim. Acta, 1963, 8, 663 1961 (Ed. E. Yeager), (New York: J. Wiley & Sons)
12. Hampson, N. A., & Tarbox, M. J., J. electrochem. Soc., 1963,
110, 95