Professional Documents
Culture Documents
……………………….3
strength…………………………………….3
C. Non- destructive
test………………………………………………………………………4
Equipment used.
Calibration of hammer
D. Procedure of
testing……………………………………………………………………
…...6
E. Description of
Structure…………………………………………………………………...
F. Desk
study………………………………………………………………………
…………………8
2 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
G. Observation………………………………………………………………
……………………….9
H. Discussion…………………………………………………………………
………………………10
I. Conclusion and
Recommendation…………………………………………………....11
APPENDIX
A. SYNOPSIS
The purpose of this investigation is to ascertain the on-site compressive strength
test on the reinforced concrete columns on the residential development for Mr. &
Mrs. Chuka Eseka at Banana Island, Lagos
B. Background on Compressive strength Test
The compressive strength of concrete is one of the important parts of material
specifications. It is part of the factors required to determine the size of the
structural members to accommodate the design loads of the structure.
3 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
It is very necessary to determine whether a delivered concrete mixture meets
the strength specified to guarantee the structure’s ability to perform adequately
under the applied loads.
Test results are derived from the average strength of a number of specimens
usually 3Nos specimens cast from the same sample and tested at the same age of
curing, generally specified to have full designed capacity at 28 days (28-day
strength).
4 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
machine. However, a variety of factors can affect the quality of hardened finished
concrete. These include differences in concrete batches, variations in the
placement of concrete in forms, over- or under-vibration of the mix, settlement of
aggregate, and others. It is important in many cases to determine the
compressive strength of aged concrete elements engineer to guarantee the
structure’s ability to perform adequately under the applied static or dynamic
loads.
Therefore, non-destructive testing (NDT) performs a vitally important role in the
assessment of finished concrete structures increasing the confidence level of
destructive tests such as concrete cube test that have already been carried out.
The Rebound Hammer Test
It is one of the most widely used NDT methods for determination of in-situ
concrete strength. The test hammer uses a spring-actuated mass that is released
to impact the surface of a concrete sample with a defined amount of energy. The
rebound distance following impact is then measured. The hammer is held
perpendicular to the surface being tested and the rebound varies according to the
hardness of the sample point. This rebound measurement is then converted into
compressive strength by means of a conversion chart. Different conversion charts
have been generated to compensate for instrument orientation. These charts
were developed by carrying out rebound tests on concrete samples before being
crushed under compression
5 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
Figure 2: Rebound Hammer Positions for Testing Concrete Structure.
EQUIPMENT USED.
The Proceq SilverSchmidt Hammer was used for performing the non-destructive
test. This device is a quality testing on materials in accordance with set
specifications. The SilverSchmidt is a unique integrated concrete test hammer
featuring true rebound value calculated from the quotient of the impact velocity
and rebound velocity to provide maximum accuracy. The test is carried out to
ascertain the strength of concrete on-site without destroying existing structural
members as such the name Non-Destructive Test (NDT).
.
Fig.3: Proceq Schmidt hammer
6 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
CALIBRATION OF HAMMER: Periodically, at an average of six-month interval,
we send our rebound hammer to Proceq service center in the United States for
checks, updates and to ensure that its result is within tolerance. Afterwards,
regular calibration checks are done in our office using a calibration steel anvil
which has a Brinell hardness value of 5000Nmm-2
D. Procedure of testing
(a) loose particles were rubbed off from the concrete surface to ensure that
the surface is smooth, clean and dry.
(b) The Rebound hammer is held at right angles to the surface of the concrete
structure as shown in Fig. 2 and the plunger of rebound hammer is pressed
against the surface of concrete.
(c) Readings of rebound number is taken at each point of testing and an
average of value of the readings is taken as rebound index for the
corresponding point of observation on concrete surface.
Fig 4: Picture showing NDT being conducted on one of the columns on site
7 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
Fig 5: Picture showing NDT being conducted on the column on site
E. Description of Structure
i. The referenced structure is a proposed Residential building located at
Plot P83, close 301, Banana island, foreshore estate, Ikoyi Lagos.
ii. The building is still under construction with all structural members more
than 28days.
iii. The mode of construction is cast in-situ reinforced concrete where in
Vertical loads are transferred via a structural system of framed
reinforced columns, RC beams and open rib floor system.
F. DESK STUDY
Compressive Strength of Concrete at Various Ages
8 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
The strength of concrete increases with age. Table 1.0 shows the strength of
concrete at different ages in comparison with the strength at 28 days after casting.
Table
1.0 Age Strength
(Days) (%)
1 day 16%
3 days 40%
7 days 65%
14 days 90%
28 days 99%
showing the age of concrete and the required strength development
G. OBSERVATION
9 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
GROUND FLOOR COLUMNS
COLUMNS REFERENCE SCHMIDT HAMMER
LABELS NUMBER READING
(N/mm2)
C13 1098 31.0
C19 1128 36.5
C14 1138 33.5
C15 1198 17.0
C20 1208 18.0
C21 1219 14.5
C11 1229 16.5
C10 1249 15.5
C9 1279 17.5
C6 1319 16.0
C5 1319 26.0
C4 1339 18.5
C3 1349 13.5
C2 1369 13.5
10 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
Fig 6: Ground floor plan showing the compressive strength of the columns, the
strength in circles indicates columns with compressive strength below the design
strength of 25N/mm2(See Appendix A for the raw data from Proceq SChimdt
hammer)
H. DISCUSSION
I. As discussed earlier that concrete cube tests are used to determine the
compressive strength. Cube test results submitted, indicated adequacy of
results.
II. Nondestructive test (NDT’s) via Schmidt hammer also gives fair indication
of Strength of concrete but with the added advantage of better
representation of sampling test points and real time values
III. From our observations, there are variances in test results submitted from
the concrete cube tests and the NDT’s result. The cube test results have
median values between 28.2Nmm-2 – 28.5 Nmm-2 while the NDT varies
from 8.0Nmm-2 – 36.0 Nmm2
IV. There are several factors that would have caused the aforementioned.
Chief amongst is the time it takes to place concrete from the time of
11 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
hydration which sometimes exceed the initial setting time because of the
small cross-sectional area of the vertical elements like column.
V. The above factor is the reason to tend to rely much in test methods as
NDT for vertical elements like column.
VI. Though contractors always take measures to keep in check the
aforementioned. This has been known to be a big challenge in
construction.
12 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
APPENDIX A
13 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
14 |UF-A CONSULTANTS
15 |UF-A CONSULTANTS