Paper 8679

ISSN (Online) 2581-9429
IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT)
Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Impact Factor: 7.301
Microporous Materials for Separation Membranes

for Chromatography
Mr. Sham Gajanan Ghuge1, Mr. Vaibhav R. Thakare2, Dr. Nitin B. Kohale3,
Ms. Kusum R. Rajbhar4, Mr. Shubham H. Kale5
Students1, Principal3 and Assistant Professor2,4,5
Vardhman College of Pharmacy, Koli, Karanja (Lad), Washim, Maharashtra, India
Affiliated To Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere, Maharashtra, India
shamghuge870@gmail.com
Abstract: Chromatography is a crucial biophysical method that makes it possible to separate, identify, and
purify mixture's constituent parts for qualitative and quantitative study. Based on characteristics like size
and shape, total charge, the presence of hydrophobic groups on the surface, and capacity to attach to
stationary phases, proteins can be purified. Ion exchange, surface adsorption, partition, and size exclusion
mechanisms are used in four different separation approaches based on the molecular characteristics and
types of interactions. Other chromatographic methods, like column, thin-layer, and paper chromatography,
are based on fixed beds. One of the most popular techniques for purifying proteins is column
chromatography. Membrane chromatography is largely employed in wastewater treatment applications as
well as downstream processes for the separation and purification of proteins and biopolymers. Using a
membrane chromatography.
Keywords: chromatography, microporous materials, types of membranes, membrane chromatography ,

membrane ligament.
I. INTRODUCTION
In general, solid frameworks containing pores and/or voids are porous material. Practically any solid material can
provide a porous medium. The chemical properties of porous solids are therefore very rich and cover all the important
Materialgroup: inorganic and organic crystals, carbon, polymers, glasses, pottery and metal. International Union of Pure
and Applied Chemistry(IUPAC) classifies porous materials according to pore size.(i) microporous; Pores less than 2.0
nm. (ii) mesoporous with pores from 2.0 to 50 nm; When(iii) microporous [12] with pores between 50 and 1000 nm;
pore size Trolls accessibility to pore volume, but capacity Relationship between skeleton and empty space. series of
porous organicsThe sizing is the high specific surface area (SSA) of the porous material. Varies from hundreds to
thousands of square meters per gram of solid. Another important feature that determines the properties of porous
materials isIt is a more structured organization than Based on this last criterion, solids are porous Broadly speaking, he
can be divided into two groups, crystalline and amorphous. It's important-Note that the properties of porous materials
depend on their chemistry.Nature. combination of pore properties, structural organization, Chemical composition
determines the overall properties of porous materialsand its applicable fields.
Carbonaceous Materials Porous and nanostructured carbonaceous materials are very promising materials for numerous
applications because of their unique pore structures, low cost, lightweight, and the abundance of natural raw materials
used in their syntheses. Several classes of carbonaceous materials are discussed as follows (Figure 1) Membrane
technology is widely recognized as an important process and is used in a wide range of applications including chemical
and biological processes. Membrane separation is one of the most important applications of membrane science and
technology. Membrane separations are performed with feed streams ranging from small gases to large colloids. An
important property utilized in gas separation is the membrane's ability to allow certain gas species in the gas mixture to
freely permeate through the membrane while preventing other species from permeating. The goal of liquid separation is
to control the transport velocity of colloidal particles while retaining other particles in a reserve.
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 171

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MEMBRANES
Membrane science and technology has a long history, and its research It dates back to the 18th century [1].
Development of membrane technology ology can be divided into two periods: early membrane and modern memory.
The concept of Brane membrane permeation was proposed in the 1740s. words Osmosis was coined by Abe Nolle to
explain water osmosis Diaphragm in 1748. In the 19th century, the theory started in the laboratory. Describe the
physical/chemical behavior of the membrane. for 887, Van't Hoff's law of limit values was developed through the
measurement of: Osmotic pressure of solution due to grape and pepper membranes. law I need to explain the behavior
of an ideally diluted solution, how it works It also led directly to the van't Hoff equation. Almost simultaneously, the
con-The concept of a fully selective semipermeable membrane was used by Maxwell, Others in the development of gas
dynamics theory. Early membranes were experimented with different types of biological membranes. such as animal
bladders and fish intestines. Then a nitrocellulose membrane. We checked the reproducibility. 1907 BegholdA
technique for preparing nitrocellulose membranes with graded pore sizes [2]. When Extensive work by other
researchers such as Elford [3], Zsigmondy, Bach -According to mann [4] and Ferry, Bechhold's technique [5] has been
greatly improved in the preliminary stages. A significant event was witnessed by scientific researchers and engineers
Timely supply of research and development funds, etc. The U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Saline Solutions
(OSW) brought this about. Commercialization of RO membranes. Parallel to industrial applications Potential of
Membranes for Environmental Processes, Medicine Recognized Separation process. We have had success with
artificial kidneys, etc. Kolf and Berk [7] demonstrated the world's first successful artificial kidney.Holland 1945. Use of
membranes in artificial organs since the 1960sImprovements in technology over the years have made it an important
life-saving procedure. Sales of these devices comfortably dominated the membrane market.Far beyond that of all
industrial membrane separations. another representative Defiant use of membranes as blood oxygenators and controlled
substances delivery system. Alza (Inc.) Alex Zaffaroni) and his colleagues are widely used in pharmacy.Improve the
efficiency and safety of drug delivery. film The technology matured during his next decade (1970s) and many
experience it.Technological innovation happened during this time. Organized by OSW, etc.Includes membrane
fabrication technology based on Loeb-Sourirajan interfacial polymerization and casting and coating of multilayer
composites, Introduced for the production of high performance membranes. EngineeringMembrane with a very thin
selective layer of 0.1 μm or less Implemented by several companies. Membrane packaging methodlarge area, spiral
wound, hollow fiber, Capillary and plate-and-frame modules have also been developed. improvement etc.Progress has
been made in improving membrane stability. the fruit of The OSW program entered the commercial membrane unit
market in the late 1970s.Modern membrane technology began in his early 1980s.
III. MICROPOROUS MATERIALS

In general, solid frameworks containing pores and/or voids are porous material. Practically any solid material can
provide a porous medium.The chemical properties of porous solids are therefore very rich and cover all the
importantMaterial group: inorganic and organic crystals, carbon, polymers, glasses,pottery and metal. International
Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry(IUPAC) classifies porous materials according to pore size.(i) microporous;Pores
less than 2.0 nm. (ii) mesoporous with pores from 2.0 to 50 nm; When(iii) macroporous [12] with pores between 50 and
1000 nm; pore size Trolls accessibility to pore volume, but capacity Relationship between skeleton and empty space.
series of porous organics The sizing is the high specific surface area (SSA) of the porous material.Varies from hundreds
to thousands of square meters per gram of solid. Another important feature that determines the properties of porous
materials isIt is a more structured organization than Based on this last criterion, solids are porous Broadly speaking, he
can be divided into two groups, crystalline and amorphous. It's important-Note that the properties of porous materials
depend on their chemistry. Nature. combination of pore properties, structural organization, Chemical composition
determines the overall properties of porous material sand its applicable fields.
3.1 Carbonaceous Materials

Porous and nanostructured carbonaceous materials are very promising materials for numerous applications because of
their unique pore structures, low cost, lightweight, and the abundance of natural raw materials used in their syntheses.
Several classes of carbonaceous materials are discussed as follows (Figure 1)

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

Figure 1. Representative classes of carbonaceous materials.

3.2 Microporous Silica
Microporous silica is an inorganic material with an amorphous structure. It has a wide temperature range and can be
fired in a dry atmosphere. Temperature around 400-700 . Microporous silica contains high porosity,Very small pores
with molecular sieve properties. there issol-gel,template approach and his CVD. Among these methods is sol-gel
processing excellent workability, Control of pore size and pore structure and easy scaling in industry[88]. The sol-gel
synthesis process can be divided mainly into three methods:(1)polymer method and slip casting (2) colloidal sol and hot
coating method, (3) Surfactant-assisted method. There are two main types of colloid sand a distinguishable polymeric
sol–gel pathway. in the middle of the colloid The basic entity is a solid nanoparticle dispersed as a stable sol in a liquid.
Sol stability is related to electrostatic and steric repulsive interactions [89].Hydrolysis and condensation reactions are
fast by the colloidal route, Fully hydrolyzed oxide. This rapid condensation process creates particulate matter Growth or
formation of precipitates [90]. Rapid precipitation, as a rule, Silica phase that is too dense. It is the polymer route
compared to the colloidal route The most convenient way to prepare microporous silica from solution of molecular
precursors such as alkoxidesPorePore formation when forming pores in silica compounds. Usually by the
macromolecular route, First, an elemental unit is used, usually the silicon alkoxide Si(OR)4.as a molecular precursor.
One of the most common precursors is tetramethylOrthosilicate (Si(OCH3)4) (TMOS) and Tetraethylorthosilicate
(Si(OC2H5)4)(TEOS) is dissolved in the relevant alcohol. Good handling of microporous silica on silanolHydrolysis or
polysilicate condensation is very important. for example, Acidic catalyst system of polymer solpas, hydrolysis reaction
is maintained This is usually accomplished by adding a small amount of water.Formation of partially hydrolyzed
alkoxide and linear inorganic polymers.A subsequent gelation process causes the polymer sol to form a gel network. By
controlling the raw material concentration and synthesis conditions, You can change the sol-gel form. This is achieved
by controlling the rate Hydrolysis and condensation by varying the amount of water or catalyst used. or The structure of
the resulting polymer can vary from linear to slightly branched polymer. Short-branched linear polymers are most
preferred for formation of microporous silica membranes [91]. Properties derived from sol-gel Silica is controlled by
various sol-gel process parameters. change solution pH, reaction temperature, The ratio of water to silica can
dramatically affect the microstructure of the resulting material silica [92]. Therefore, the influence of these parameters
is important. It is well understood that makes the sol-gel process a reliable and practical technology Membrane
production [93]. In addition to the great advantage of controlling pore size Based on the size of the starting precursor
and silica sol, sol-gel processing is also possible. For low temperature synthesiserof hybrid silica compounds. B. Mixed
oxideB. Mixing metal ions into a silica matrix [94]. Insertion of metal cations post-synthesis processing or By mixing
the appropriate precursors in situ in the first reacting system. Using the template approach, silica. The first strategy is to
use a template molecule (built intogelling medium) is inert to the chemical processes leading to it Inorganic network. A
second approach is to use modified alkoxides.Here, a molecular group acting as a template is covalently bonded to the
Si atom. Synthesis conditions are chosen to directly attribute to porosity of the final material by thermal removal of the
template species. There are two main types of templates that have been used to trim pores. Structures, namely H.
Surfactant molecules and organic ligands/polymers. surfactant Molecules embedded in a matrix can arrange matrix
molecules around them through non-covalent interactions. of heat removal The template leaves residual pores in the
silica. so the form control Pore size can be easily achieved with this method.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

3.3 Zeolites
According to the classical definition, a zeolite is a crystalline and microporous aluminosilicate mineral [101]. The
primary framework of a zeolite is constructed of adja- cent silicon and aluminum tetrahedron forming channels/pores
ofmicroporous dimensions, wherein alkali or alkali-earth cations (e.g. Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) and water molecules are
situated (Figure 1.4). These advantageous ions are instead loosely held and may without difficulty be exchanged for
others in a touch solution. The method of natrolite, an instance of zeolite, is Na2Al2Si3O10⋅2H2O. The time period
zeolite turned into firstly coined in 1756 with the aid l zeo-of using Swedish mineralogist Axel Fredrik Cronstedt, who
determined the primary zeolite mineral [102]. Natura lites shape wherein volcanic rocks and ash layers react with
alkaline groundwater. Zeolites additionally crystallize in post depositional environments over durations ranging from
heaps to tens of thousands and thousands of years in shallow marine basins. Naturally occurring zeolites are hardly
ever natural and are infected to various ranges with the aid of using other minerals, metals, quartz, or other zeolites.
Figure 2. The formation process of some representative zeolites

First colostomy, late 1862Logs of natural zeolites have been obtained [103]. Initial development was The Mid-20th
Century and the Heyday of Zeolite Science and Practice Started in the early 1960's. Applications of these materials
began after their discovery Benefit from a highly reactive starting system under relatively mild conditions hydrothermal
conditions. Extensive work in industrial and academic laboratories led to the production of synthetic counterparts of
zeolite minerals and newA kind of framework that did not exist in nature. Furthermore, the organic cation that makes it
possible is Raise the Si/Al ratio of the zeolite framework and synthesize a new framework Topology has been used to
crystallize zeolites. A paper on the first silica-rich zeolite called Beta [104]. sorption, catalyst and The ion-exchange
properties of various types of zeolites have been systematically studied. Namely. Most of these developments were
made by R.M. Barrer and D.W. breakFounder, of modern zeolite science [105]. This period is Application of zeolites in
fluid catalytic cracking. Amorphous replacement Aluminosilicate catalyst with zeolite Y that revolutionized catalytic
cracking On conversion and selectivity]. In the 1970s, a great many Organic molecules have been tested as structure
directing agents in the crystallization of zeolites. Developments that have led to the synthesis and preparation of many
new structural types. Distribution of high-silica zeolites and all-silica zeolites . the most important discovery inIn the
1980s, a new family of non-silica His zeolite-like materials was developed. That’s why. Aluminophosphate analog first
synthesized by Union Carbide researchers Expanded to include counterparts containing silicon and metalTi, Sn, Zn, etc.
.Number of zeolite-type microporous structures It is increasing every year due to advances in synthesis. 232 as of
September 2016Unique zeolite frameworks have been identified, with over 40 occurring naturally.Zeolitic frameworks
are known .. Synthetic advances have also made this possible The zeolite framework composition can be extended well
beyond the observed limits in nature. Well-defined microporous materials portfolio today The chemical composition
different from the periodic structure is large.
3.4 Metal–Organic Frameworks

MOFs are compounds composed of organically coordinated metal ions or clusters Ligands that form 1D, 2D, or 3D
structures (Figure 3). they are subclasses of Coordination polymers with potential cavity specificity. in part In some
cases, the pore may be stable during the removal of guest molecules (often solvent). The metal ions are typically
divalent, trivalent, or tetravalent transition metals, Ligands are typically organic carboxylic acids with multiple carboxyl

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

groups serve as struts to connect metal ions or clusters, for example 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC).Describe
and organize the structure of the MOF, nomenclature it was developed. MOF subunits, so-called secondary building
blocks(SBU) can be described by a topology common to several structures. Everyone Topologies, also called networks,
are assigned a symbol consisting of three lowercase letters. Bold letters. For example, MOF-5 has hisPCU network. In
addition to topology The chemical structure of a MOF can be described by three descriptors: Metal sites, organic
ligands, and available pores. metal selection and The linker determines the MOF's structure and thus its properties. for
example, Metal coordination preferences influence pore size and shape Determines the number and orientation of
ligands that can bind to the metal.Furthermore, the coordination mode between the metal ion and the linker allows
Available Groups of Ligands for Unsaturated Metal Sites and Further Functionality Nationalization. Spaces within the
MOF framework offer great opportunities For host-guest chemistry such as composite Nano pores Dating a large set of
gases or liquids and providing molecular pathways diffusion.
Figure 3. A scheme for the self-assembly of metal–organic frameworks by metal ions or clusters with organic linkers.
The synthesis of MOFs evolved from that of zeolites. MOF is a proIt is induced almost exclusively by hydrothermal or
solvothermal techniques.Crystals grow slowly from hot solutions. Unlike zeolites, MOFs areBuilt from bridging
organic ligands that remain intact during synthesis Paper . Templates are often used in zeolite synthesis. the template is
an ion Influences the structure of the growing inorganic framework. typical template The ions are quaternary
ammonium cations that are later removed by calcination. Ion. In MOFs, the framework is templated by SBUs and
organic ligands ..Post-synthetic modification of MOFs opens up possibilities that may not existachieved by
conventional synthesis .possibly related to carbon ide Capture is a MOF with an amino group. One such group was
generated by Post-synthetic grafting to bridging ligands . Solvent-free synthesis of Many crystalline MOFs have been
reported .Usually metal acetate and an organic ligand are mixed and pulverized in a ball mill. for example,Cu3(BTC)2
(named HKUST-1) can be rapidly synthesized in large quantities by this method.
3.5 Highly Porous Polymers

A major class of high free volume glassy polymers includes substituted Polyacetylene, per fluoropolymer,
poly(norbornene), polyimide (PI),Thermally rearranged (TR) polymers. chemical structure and molecular modelA
typical example is shown in Figure 1.6. For polymers containing Isolated double bonds in the main chain, poly(1,3-
diene) and polynorbornene known ..The maximum molecular weight of natural rubber is about 1 million,Cis 1,4-
polyisoprene structure, except for the top two or three trans 1,4 units Start chain end. Polynorbornene can be
transformed by ring-opening medication’cis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornene (NBE).
Polymerization of acetylene and its analogues, yielding polymers with conjugated carbon-carbon double bonds,
extensively researched. Presence of alternating carbon-carbon doubles Bonding of substituted polyacetylene and
poly(norbornene) backbones. Gives unique properties such as conductivity, nonlinear opticsproperties, magnetic
properties, gas permeability, photoluminescence, etc. electroluminescence properties, etc. The best known features of A
gas separation membrane that combines polyacetylene and poly(norbornene). in the In particular, poly[(1-
trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne][poly(11)] is famous.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

Figure 4. Molecular models of representative porous polymers.

Because it exhibits the highest gas permeability among existing polymers, Its gas permeability has been extensively
studied . addition formulaPoly(trimethylsilylnorbornene) catalyzed by nickel naphthenate and methylaluminoxane as a
catalyst showed high free volumes and high values. Permeability . Per fluoropolymers are fluorocarbon-based polymers
that Multiple carbon-fluorine bonds. Characterized by high resistance Solvents, acids and bases. This unique class of
polymers is widespread In membrane technology for excellent chemical and thermal stability, High mechanical strength
and versatile workability. Main use MF, UF, and fluororesin membrane areas centering on batteries Separator .
However, recently the field of application has expanded New innovative applications such as MBR,membrane
distillation (MD) and membranescrystallization (MCr) and PV. Some soluble perfluoropolymers are also possible
Forms amorphous glass membranes in certain applications of gas separation. or The most studied are the copolymers
Teflon AF2400 and Teflon AF1600.from 2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene The
dioxole mole fractions are 0.87 and 0.65, respectively .
IV. FUNDAMENTALS OF MEMBRANE SEPARATION

4.1 Membrane Definition
A membrane can essentially be defined as a barrier that separates two phases. And selectively restricts the transport of
various chemicals Membranes can be homogeneous or heterogeneous, symmetrical or asymmetrical A structure, or
solid or liquid, that can or can carry a positive or negative charge neutral or bipolar. Transport across membranes can be
affected by convection or by electric field- or concentration-induced single-molecule diffusion ions, pressure or
temperature gradients. Film thickness may vary Small from a few nanometers to a few millimeters. A membrane
separation system separates the upstream feed into two effluents.This is known as permeation and concentration.
Penetration rate is of liquid that has passed through a semipermeable membrane The concentrate stream contains film.
Membrane separation processes enjoy numerous industrial applications It has the following advantages: Remarkable
Energy Savings; Ecologically Benign; clean technology, easy to operate; possibility to replace it Conventional
processes such as filtration, distillation, ion exchange, chemicals treatment system; ability to produce quality products;
large Flexibility in system design. The correct choice of membrane is Determined by specific application goals.
Particulate or dissolved solids removal, hardness reduction or ultrapure water generation, specific removal
Gases/Chemicals etc. The end use may also dictate the choice of membrane. Industries such as drinking water,
wastewater treatment, desalination and water Supplies for electronics or pharmaceutical manufacturing.
4.2 Transport Theory

Theories of membrane transport phenomena for both gas and liquid separations have been described.
A. Membrane Transport for Gas Systems

Solution diffusion mechanism is a commonly used physical model We describe gas transport through dense
membranes. Pattern diagram For clarity, it is shown in Figure 5. Adsorption of gas molecules Dissolves and diffuses
into the membrane material on one side of the membrane It passes through the membrane and is desorbed on the other

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

side of the membrane. If Diffusion through membranes takes place in the form of ion sand electrons(ie proton exchange
transport) or as atoms (eg hydrogen transport).through dense metals), the molecules must be split after adsorption,
Recombines after diffusing across the membrane.[2]. As shown in Figure 5., three types of transport mechanisms are
pro-For porous membrane separation: Knudsendiffusion, Surface diffusion and molecular sieving. Molecules in some
cases It can cross membranes by multiple mechanisms. Knudsen Diffusion gives relatively low separation selectivity
compared to surface diffusion. Molecular sieves can give higher selectivity to shape selectivity Separation. The
separation factors for these mechanisms are pore dependent. Interactions between size distribution, temperature,
pressure and gases Separated and membrane surface. Knudsen (or free molecule)Diffusion occurs when the Knudsen
number (Kn) is large. It is defined as the ratio of the mean free paths of the gas molecules (mean distance between
collisions) and typical physical length scales(eg pore radius). When using pore radius as a physical representative On
length scales, the length of the mean free path is significantly longer than for pores A radius with Kn> 10 allows lighter
molecules to penetrate. pores. In this case the selectivity is bounded and can be calculated as Square root of the ratio of
the molar masses of the gases involved. or The smaller the Knudsen number, the larger the pores (mean free path of the
molecule), which reduces selectivity. Kn< 1.0 The dominant transport mechanism is viscous flow. Not selective.
Surface diffusion can occur in parallel with Knudsen diffusion. gas molecule Adsorbs to membrane pore walls and
migrates along the surface face. Surface diffusion increases the permeability of adsorbed components Heavy on
membrane pores.
Figure 5. Gas transport mechanisms in membranes.
B. Membrane Transport for Liquid Systems

In membrane filtration, the separation process is Differential forcing potential across membranes with selective
permeability. For example, the differential driving potential used to transport solvents membranes are hydrostatic. UF is
commonly used for cutting Suspended solids, colloids and macromolecules from water. This will localize The
concentration of the solute usually leads to the precipitation of a gel of the solute film. UF throughput therefore depends
on the physical properties of the UF.Membranes such as permeability, thickness, and process/system variables B. Feed
Concentration, System Pressure, Velocity, and Temperature. two models The effects of gel polarization and resistance
by different approaches are described below.
V. MEMBRANE CONFIGURATIONS
Membrane materials, including suitable chemicals, as described above; Mechanical and permeation properties are
important for high performance storage BrainIn addition, this technology contributes significantly to the success of
production. This material is made into a tough, thin, defect-free membrane and packaged. Makes the membrane an
efficient and economical module with a large surface area. this The chapters are membrane structures, preparation
techniques, techniques, and modules.
5.1 Membrane Structures

The membrane structure is arranged as shown in Figure 6..Membranes that are microporous, homogeneous,
asymmetric, charged, and liquid films. 1. Membrane that is microporous and acts like a fiber filter Screening device that

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

separates by particle and pore size. Such membranes are made of both organic and inorganic materials. Membrane
pores are available in sizes from 0.3 nm to 100 µm. 2. Homogeneous membrane: This dense membrane transports
molecules by voltage drop, concentration, or pressure. At widely different concentrations, these membranes can be used
to effectively separate species of similar size and solubility. It was a pity. 3. Asymmetric membrane: An asymmetric
membrane is a very thin (0.1–1.0 m) skin layer on top of a thick, highly porous substructure (50–500 m).
Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of the commonly used membranes.

Thin skin acts as a selective membrane. Its emission characteristics are Determined by membrane material type or pore
size and mass The transportspeed is mainly determined by the thickness of the skin. Function of the porous sublayer As
a support for thin and fragile skin, it has little effect on exfoliationfeature.4. Charged Membrane: These are necessarily
ion exchangeA brain consisting of a heavily swollen gel with fixed positives or negatives commission. They are mainly
used in ED.5. Liquid film: Liquid membranes are selectively Transport components such as metal ions to the store at
relatively high speed brain interface.
5.2 Preparation Techniques

A. Solution Casting
Solution casting is often used to produce small membrane samples for membranefabrication Laboratory
characterization experiments. fair movie Pour the suspension onto a flat plate and spread it out with a knife. oral cast
knife consists of a steel blade on her two runners in place. Precise gap between platen and blade on which film is place
din water. After pouring, the solution remains and the solvent evaporates Leaves a thin, uniform film .Appropriate
solution viscosity and Solvent types are required to produce high quality membranes and films. or The solution used for
solution casting should be sufficiently viscous. Typical concentrations are 15-20% range by weight. Preferred solvents
are B. Acetone, ethyl acetate and cyclohexane. Films are cast from these solutions Dries in a few hours. Once the
solvent has completely evaporated, The dry film can be lifted off the glass plate.
B. Melt Extrusion
many polymers or inorganic polymer hybrids, including polyethylene, Polypropylene, nylon and silica gel are not
soluble in suitable solutions. Because it vents at room temperature, membranes cannot be made by solution casting. The
polymer is compressed between two heated plates. print as usual A pressure of 2000-5000 psi is applied for 1-5 minutes
at platen temperature Just below the melting point of the hybrid polymer or matrix. melted Extrusion is used on a very
large scale to produce high density packaging films Application by extrusion as a sheet from a die or as a blown film.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

C. Spin Coating
Spin coating is widely used for coating photoresists and resists in the electronics industry Photolithographic films on
silicon wafers . techniques also used in Laboratory for manufacturing composite membranes with a thickness of 0.5-10
μm. surplus of The diluted solution is applied to the substrate and the substrate is spun at high speed. Liquid is jetted
from the edge of the rotating substrate to obtain the desired film thickness. reached. By increasing the twist, the
thickness of the coating layer can be reduced. The rate or decrease in concentration in the applied solution.
D. Membrane Technology
many other industrial membrane processes such as. B. Career base Transport is under development and often uses
liquid membranes together Contains a complexing agent or carrier. Carrier reacts with compound Diffuse the mixture
on the feed side of the membrane and spread it across the membrane. Membrane for letting permeate on the product
side escape. Modified vehicle It then diffuses back to the feed side of the membrane. So career agents work Optionally
as a shuttle to transport components from the infeed to the product side of the membrane. Transport-enhanced
membranes can be used for separations gas. In this case, membrane trafficking is driven by partial differences. Pressure
across the membrane. Metal ions can also be selectively transported Across the membrane, it is driven in the opposite
direction by the flow of H+ or OH-. this The process is sometimes called combined traffic. As a career-promoting
transformer, Port processes use reactive carrier species and are highly membrane selective can be reached. Selectivity is
often far superior to what others have achieved membrane process. This has maintained interest in facilitated transport
for so many years. However, commercial deployment is not yet to be deployed due to challenges faced with respect to
(i) the physical instability of the liquid membrane and (ii) the chemical instability of the carrier agent. In recent years, a
number of potential solutions to this problem have been developed, which may make carrier-facilitated transport a
viable process. The membrane separation processes described earlier represent the bulk of the industrial membrane
separation industry. Another process, dialysis, is usedon a large scale in the field of medical application to remove toxic
metabolites from the blood in patients suffering from kidney failure. first successful art The official kidney was based
on a dialysis membrane made from cellophane (regenerated cellulose).and was developed in 1945. A lot has been
developed in the last 50 years Did it. Currently, most artificial kidneys are based on hollow fiber membranes It is
formed into a module with a membrane area of approximately 1 square meter (1.0 m2).Removes urea and other toxic
components. After artificial success Kidney-like device developed to remove and deliver carbon dioxide oxygen in
blood. These so-called artificial lungs are used in surgical procedures. The time when the patient's lungs do not work.
another great doctor The use of membranes is in controlled drug delivery. controlled drug delivery Accomplished by a
wide range of techniques, most of which involve membranes.
E. Membrane Modules
Membrane systems often require large membrane areas to run Industrial scale separation is required. Module before
separation Large membrane areas must be packed economically and efficiently. Membranes are molded as flat sheets,
tubes, and fine hollow fibers. for sub Different types of membrane modules by changing such shape and structure
Figure 7. An early plate-and-frame design for the separation of helium from natural gas. Source:
www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

Reproduced with permission from Reference ,Copyright John Wiley & Sons. including plate-and-frame, tubular, spiral
wound, and hollow fiber modules have been widely developed for industrial purposes .
VI. FEATURES OF MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES

Unlike dense membranes, microporous membranes impart porosity Nature. That is, the membrane material has a large
free volume and is open pores. Figure 8. shows the most important parameters of micropores. Materials for membrane
applications. Explanation of the characteristics of microporous membranes from the viewpoint Pore chemistry. Because
this chemistry plays a central role in membranes. Separation. Pore characteristics can be determined using the term pore
size. Composition, Dimension and Function. Description of pore composition Pore shape and connection mode.
Figure 8. Four important parameters – pore size, interconnected, pores, pore dimensionality, and surface functionality –
of microporous materials for membrane application.
on the other hand, A pore that is cut off from other pores is called a closed pore. open pores It plays a central role in
fluid dynamics and gas adsorption. from the appMaterials chemists are interested in open pores. The presence of Open
pores are a prerequisite for separation, as interconnected pores are formed. Free passage of gas or liquid. Advantage of
height The connected pore system has high permeability or flow. Many microporous materials have interconnected pore
configurations This is due to the uniform pore structure or crystalline phase. for example, The zeolites described in this
book have regular pores, and the pores areCylinders are connected straight or cross. Occurrence of open pores
inzeoliteDue to the crystalline phase in which all atoms are regularly arranged grid. In microporous membranes, the
pore size is usually 3-20 Å. Pore size imposes various restrictions on molecular diffusion pores. According to the
Lennard-Jones plot a huge potential is measured. With micropores. As a result, small molecules diffuse faster than large
molecules This is because small molecules are less likely to be inhibited. Therefore this effect Used to screen for
specific molecules of interest with good selectivity. After examining microporous materials, it was found that their
pores For example, in the 3-20 Å range, zeolites have pore sizes of 3-14 Å.MOFs have 3–20 Å pores and CNTs have
defined 5–10 Å channels. Dimensionality can also affect mass transport behavior. To For example, a single molecule
can do this in a porous membrane with a 3D pore system. Easily diffuses into pores and crosses membranes any
direction. On the other hand, it is necessary to control the pore orientation in a complex manner. Made to render
molecules along a 1D channel. effect of pores Dimensionality was studied in detail in random and b-oriented MFI
zeolites membrane. Most pores are clogged or not used for mass transport Randomly oriented membrane. However,
significant improvement in xylene flux The b-oriented MFI zeolite membrane was achieved.
VII. CONCLUSION
This chapter contains brief introductions to a wide range of topics. among them First introduced the basics of
membranes and then reviewed From original membranes to the latest membranes. constant nomenclature, types,
Carbon, silica, zeolites, MOFs, and porous organic polymer structures. this An overview helps to gain a comprehensive
understanding of microporous materials From a material point of view. In Parallel, Fundamentals of Membrane
Separation Discussed in detail including separation theory and membrane composition Distribution, Membrane Craft,

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

Membrane Module. this discussion is helpful Understanding Separation Processes from a Membrane Perspective
engineering. Finally, we explored the properties of microporesMembranes play a central role in membrane-based
separations. I hope all the basics in this chapter provide a solid platform for our loved ones Readers may wish to more
easily digest the other chapters and provide solutions we can arm ourselves with. A wealth of knowledge.
REFERENCES
[1]. Baker, R.W. (2004). Membrane Technology and Applications, 2e. Menlo Park, CA: Membrane Technology
and Research Inc.
[2]. Bechhold, H. (1907). Z. Phys. Chem. 60: 257.
[3]. Elford, W.J. (1937). Trans. Faraday Soc. 33: 1094.
[4]. Zsigmondy, R. and Bachmann, R. (1918). Z. Anorg. Chem. 103: 119.
[5]. Ferry, J.D. (1936). Chem. Rev. 18: 373.
[6]. Loeb, S. and Sourirajan, S. Sea water demineralization by means of anosmotic membrane. In: Saline Water
Conversion-II, Advances in Chemistry Series Number, 1963, vol. 38 (ed. R.F. Gould), 117–132.
Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
[7]. Kolf, W.J. and Berk, H.T. (1944). Acta Med. Scand. 117: 121–134.
[8]. Henis, J.M.S. and Tripodi, M.K. (1980). Sep. Sci. Technol. 15: 1059–1068.
[9]. de Vos, R.M. and Verweij, H. (1998). Science 279: 1710–1711.
[10]. Freni, A., Dawoud, B., Bonaccorsi, L. et al. (2015). Characterization of Zeolite-Based Coatings for
Adsorption Heat Pumps. Springer.
[11]. Wright, P.A. and Connor, J.A. (eds.) (2007). Microporous Framework Solids, Royal Society of Chemistry.
[12]. IUPAC (1972). Pure Appl. Chem. 31: 577–638.
[13]. Romanos, J., Beckner, M., Rash, T. et al. (2012). Nanotechnology 23: 015401.
[14]. Yang, R.T. (2003). Adsorbents: Fundamentals and Applications, 208–213. Wiley.
[15]. Mendez-Linan, L., Lopez-Garzon, F.J., Domingo-Garcia, M., and Perez-Mendoza, M. (2010). Energy Fuel
24: 3394–3400.
[16]. Serp, P. and Figueiredo, J.L. (2009). Carbon Materials for Catalysis, 550. Wiley.
[17]. (a) Gómez-Serrano, V., Piriz-Almeida, F., Durán-Valle, C.J., and Pastor-Villegas, J. (1999). Carbon 37:
1517–1528.(b) Machnikowski, J., Kaczmarska, H., Gerus-Piasecka, I. et al. (2002). Carbon 40: 1937–1947.
(c) Petrov, N., Budinova, T., Razvigorova, M. et al. (2000). Carbon 38: 2069–2075. (d) Garcia, A.B.,
Martinez-Alonso, A., Leon, C.A., and Tascon, J.M.D. (1998). Fuel 77: 613–624. (e) Polovina, M., Babic, B.,
Kaluderovic, B., and Dekanski, A. (1997). Carbon 35: 1047–1052. (f ) Fanning, P.E. and Vannice, M.A.
(1993). Carbon 31: 721–730. (g) Youssef, A.M., Abdelbary, E.M., Samra, S.E., and Dowidar, A.M. (1991).
Indian J. Chem. 30: 839–843.
[18]. (a) Arriagada, R., Garcia, R., Molina-Sabio, M., and Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. (1997). Microporous Mater. 8:
123–130. (b) Molina-Sabio, M., Gonzalez, M.T., Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., and Sepulveda-Escribano, A.
(1996). Carbon 34: 505–509. (c) Bradley, R.H., Sutherland, I., and Sheng, E. (1996). J. Colloid Interface Sci.
179: 561–569.
[19]. Saha, B., Tai, M.H., and Streat, M. (2001). Process Saf. Environ. 79: 211–217. 20 (a) Sutherland, I., Sheng,
E., Braley, R.H., and Freakley, P.K. (1996). J. Mater. Sci. 31: 5651–5655. (b) Rivera-Utrilla, J. and Sanchez-
Polo, M. (2002). Car-bon 40: 2685–2691. (c) Valdés, H., Sánchez-Polo, M., Rivera-Utrilla, J., and Zaror,
C.A. (2002). Langmuir 18: 2111–2116.
[20]. (a) Pradhan, B.K. and Sandle, N.K. (1999). Carbon 37: 1323–1332. (b) Acedo-Ramos, M., Gomez-Serrano,
V., Valenzuella-Calahorro, C., and Lopez-Peinado, A.J. (1993). Spectrosc. Lett. 26: 1117–1137. (c) Gomez-
Serrano, V., Acedo-Ramos, M., Lopez-Peinado, A.J., and Valenzuela-Calahorro, C. (1991). Thermochim.
Acta 176: 129–140.
[21]. (a) Stohr, B., Boehm, H.P., and Schl ˝ ogl, R. (1991). ˝ Carbon 29: 707–720. (b) Biniak, S., Szymanski, G.,
Siedlewski, J., and ´ Swiatkowski, A. (1997). ´ Carbon 35: 1799–1810.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

[22]. (a) Boudou, J.P., Chehimi, M., Broniek, E. et al. (2003). Carbon 41: 1999–2007. (b) Radkevich, V.Z., Senko,
T.L., Wilson, K. et al. (2008). Appl. Catal. A Gen. 335: 241–251.
[23]. (a) Evans, M.J.B., Halliop, E., Liang, S., and MacDonald, J.A.F. (1998). Car-bon 36: 1677–1682. (b)
Papirer, E.N., Lacroix, R., Donnet, J.B. et al. (1995). Carbon 33: 63–72.
[24]. Papirer, E., Lacroix, R., Donnet, J.B. et al. (1994). Carbon 32: 1341–1358.
[25]. Nansé, G., Papirer, E., Fioux, P. et al. (1997). Carbon 35: 515–528.
[26]. Aldana-Pérez, A., Lartundo-Rojas, L., Gómez, R., and Niño-Gómez, M.E. (2012). Fuel 100: 128–138.
[27]. Diyuk, V.E., Zaderko, A.N., Grishchenko, L.M. et al. (2012). Catal. Commun. 27: 33–37.
[28]. Budarin, V.L., Clark, J.H., Tavener, S.J., and Wilson, K. (2004). Chem. Com-mun. 2736–2737.
[29]. EPA Alumni Association. Senior EPA officials discuss early implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act
of 1974.
[30]. Iijima, S. (1991). Nature 354: 56–58.
[31]. Lalwani, G., Kwaczala, A.T., Kanakia, S. et al. (2013). Carbon 53: 90–100.
[32]. Lalwani, G., Gopalan, A., D’Agati, M. et al. (2015). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A103: 3212–3225.
[33]. Takeuchi, K., Hayashi, T., Kim, Y.A. et al. (2014). Nanosystems: Phys. Chem. Math. 5: 15–24.
[34]. Karousis, N., Tagmatarchis, N., and Tasis, D. (2010). Chem. Rev. 110: 5366–5397.
[35]. Yu, M.F., Lourie, O., Dyer, M.J. et al. (2000). Science 287: 637–640.
[36]. Peng, B., Locascio, M., Zapol, P. et al. (2008). Nat. Nanotechnol. 3: 626–631.
[37]. Filleter, T., Bernal, R., Li, S., and Espinosa, H.D. (2011). Adv. Mater. 23: 2855–2860.
[38]. Wang, Z.K., Ci, L.J., Chen, L. et al. (2007). Nano Lett. 7: 697–702.
[39]. Lu, X. and Chen, Z. (2005). Chem. Rev. 105: 3643–3696.
[40]. Hong, S. and Myung, S. (2007). Nat. Nanotechnol. 2: 207–208.
[41]. Charlier, J.C. and Roche, S. (2007). Rev. Mod. Phys. 79: 677–732.
[42]. Haddon, R.C., Laura, P.Z., Bin, Z., and Hui, H. (2006). Nano Lett. 6: 562–567.
[43]. Reibold, M., Paufler, P., Levin, A.A. et al. (2006). Nature 444: 286.
[44]. Liu, F., Wagterveld, R.M., Gebben, B. et al. (2014). Colloid. Interface Sci. Comm. 3: 9–12.
[45]. Pyrhönen, J., Montonen, J., Lindh, P. et al. (2015). Int. Rev. Electr. Eng. 10: 12.
[46]. Cooper, D.R., D’Anjou, B., Ghattamaneni, N. et al. (2012). ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. 501686.
[47]. Geim, A. (2009). Science 324: 1530–1534.
[48]. Kusmartsev, F.V., Wu, W.M., Pierpoint, M.P., and Yung, K.C. (2014). Con-dens. Matter. Mater. Sci.
14060809.
[49]. Geim, A.K. and MacDonald, A.H. (2007). Phys. Today 60: 35–41.
[50]. Jayasena, B. and Subbiah, S. (2011). Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6: 95.
[51]. Eigler, S., Enzelberger-Heim, M., Grimm, S. et al. (2013). Adv. Mater. 25: 3583–3587.
[52]. El-Kady, M.F., Strong, V., Dubin, S., and Kaner, R.B. (2012). Science 335: 1326–1330.
[53]. Hernandez, Y., Nicolosi, V., Lotya, M. et al. (2008). Nat. Nanotechnol. 3: 563–568.
[54]. Alzari, V., Nuvoli, D., Scognamillo, S. et al. (2011). J. Mater. Chem. 21: 8727–8733.
[55]. Nuvoli, D., Valentini, L., Alzari, V. et al. (2011). J. Mater. Chem. 21: 3428–3431.
[56]. Woltornist, S.J., Oyer, A.J., Carrillo, J.M.Y. et al. (2013). ACS Nano 7: 7062–7066.
[57]. Bointon, T.H., Barnes, M.D., Russo, S., and Craciun, M.F. (2015). Adv. Mater. 27: 4200–4206.
[58]. Das, S. and Drucker, J. (2017). Nanotechnology 28: 10.
[59]. Chiu, P.L., Mastrogiovanni, D.D.T., Wei, D. et al. (2012). J. Am. Chem. Soc.134: 5850–5856.
[60]. Bonaccorso, F., Colombo, L., Yu, G. et al. (2015). Science 347: 41–52.
[61]. Avouris, P., Chen, Z., and Perebeinos, V. (2007). Nat. Nanotechnol. 2: 605–615.
[62]. (a) Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V. et al. (2005). Nature 438: 197–200. (b) Morozov, S.V.,
Novoselov, K., Katsnelson, M. et al. (2008). Phys. Rev. Lett. 100: 016602. (c) Chen, J.H., Jang, C., Xiao, S.
et al. (2008). Nat. Nanotechnol. 3: 206–209.
[63]. Akturk, A. and Goldsman, N. (2008). J. Appl. Phys. 103: 053702.
[64]. Bernardo, A.D., Millo, O., Barbone, M. et al. (2017). Nat. Commun. 8: 14024.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

[65]. Baringhaus, J., Ruan, M., Edler, F. et al. (2014). Nature 506: 349–354.
[66]. Neto, A.C., Peres, N.M.R., Novoselov, K.S., and Geim, A.K. (2009). Rev. Mod. Phys. 81: 109–162.
[67]. Chen, J.H., Jang, C., Adam, S. et al. (2008). Nat. Phys. 4: 377–381.
[68]. Schedin, F., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V. et al. (2007). Nat. Mater. 6: 652–655.
[69]. Adam, S., Hwang, E.H., Galitski, V.M., and Das, S.S. (2007). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 18392–18397.
[70]. Steinberg, H., Barak, G., Yacoby, A. et al. (2008). Nat. Phys. 4: 116–119.
[71]. Trisetyarso, A. (2012). Quantum Inf. Comput. 12: 989.
[72]. Pachos, J.K. (2009). Contemp. Phys. 50: 375–389.
[73]. Balandin, A.A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W. et al. (2008). Nano Lett. 8: 902–907.
[74]. (a) Cai, W., Moore, A.L., Zhu, Y. et al. (2010). Nano Lett. 10: 1645–1651. (b) Faugeras, C., Faugeras, B.,
Orlita, M. et al. (2010). ACS Nano 4: 1889–1892. (c) Xu, X., Pereira, L.F.C., Wang, Y. et al. (2014). Nat.
Commun. 5: 3689. (d) Lee, J.U., Yoon, D., Kim, H. et al. (2011). Phys. Rev. B 83: 081419.
[75]. Denis, P.A. and Iribarne, F. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. C 117: 19048–19055.
[76]. Yamada, Y., Murota, K., Fujita, R. et al. (2014). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136: 2232–2235.
[77]. Eftekhari, A. and Jafarkhani, P. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. C 117: 25845–25851.
[78]. Yamada, Y., Yasuda, H., Murota, K. et al. (2013). J. Mater. Sci. 48: 8171–8198.
[79]. Yamada, Y., Kim, J., Murota, K. et al. (2014). Carbon 70: 59–74.
[80]. Dissanayake, D.M.N.M., Ashraf, A., Dwyer, D. et al. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6: 21070.
[81]. Zhong, M., Xu, D., Yu, X. et al. (2016). Nano Energy 28: 12–18.
[82]. Akinwande, D., Tao, L., Yu, Q. et al. (2015). IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag. 9: 6–14.
[83]. (a) Lalwani, G., Henslee, A.M., Farshid, B. et al. (2013). Biomacromolecules 14: 900–909. (b) Rafiee, M.A.,
Rafiee, J., Wang, Z. et al. (2009). ACS Nano 3: 3884–3890.
[84]. Shehzad, K., Xu, Y., Gao, C., and Duan, X. (2016). Chem. Soc. Rev. 45: 5541–5588.
[85]. Barboiu, C., Sala, B., Bec, S. et al. (2009). J. Membr. Sci. 326: 514–525.
[86]. Ayral, A., Julbe, A., Rouessac, V. et al. (2008). Microporous silica membrane: basic principles and recent
advances. In: Membrane Science and Technology (ed. M. Reyes and M. Miguel), 33–79. Elsevier:
Amsterdam.
[87]. Tsuru, T. (2003). Porous Ceramics for Filtration, Handbook of AdvancedCeramics, 291–312. Oxford:
Academic Press.
[88]. Nair, B.N., Elferink, W.J., Keizer, K., and Verweij, H. (1996). J. Colloid Inter-face Sci. 178: 565–570.
[89]. Witoon, T., Tatan, N., Rattanavichian, P., and Chareonpanich, M. (2011). Ceram. Int. 37: 2297–2303.
[90]. Naito, M., Nakahira, K., Fukuda, Y. et al. (1997). J. Membr. Sci. 129: 263–269.
[91]. Kanezashi, M. and Tsuru, T. (2011). Gas permeation properties of helium, hydrogen, and polar molecules
through microporous silica membranes at high temperatures: correlation with silica network structure. In:
Mem- brane Science and Technology (ed. S.T. Oyama and M.S.W. Susan), 117–136. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
[92]. Lin, Y.S., Kumakiri, I., Nair, B.N., and Alsyouri, H. (2002). Sep. Purif. Rev. 31: 239–248.
[93]. Wang, X., Miao, X.R., Li, Z.M., and Deng, W.L. (2011). Appl. Surf. Sci. 257: 2481–2488.
[94]. Eswaramoorthy, M., Neeraj, S., and Rao, C.N.R. (1999). Microporous Meso-porous Mater. 28: 205–210.
[95]. Guo, L., Dong, X., Cui, X. et al. (2009). Mater. Lett. 63: 13–14.
[96]. Raman, N.K. and Brinker, C.J. (1995). J. Membr. Sci. 105: 273–279.
[97]. Labropoulos, A.I., Romanos, G.E., Karanikolos, G.N. et al. (2009). Microp-orous Mesoporous Mater. 120:
177–185.
[98]. Breck, D.W. (1974). Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use. New York: Wiley.
[99]. Cronstedt, A.F. (1993). Observations and descriptions on an unknown mineral species called zeoloites.
Proceedings of 9th International Zeolite Con-ference (ed. R. van Ballmoos, J.B. Higgins, and H.M.J.
Treacy), 3–9. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
[100]. Deville, H.d.S.C. (1862). C. R. Seances Acad. Sci. 54: 324.
[101]. Wadlinger, R.L., Kerr, G.T., and Rosinski, E.J. (1967). Catalytic composition of a crystalline zeolite. US
Patent 3308069.

www.ijarsct.co.in
IJARSCT

[102]. (a) Barrer, R.M. (1978). Zeolites and Clay Minerals as Sorbents and Molecular Sieves. London: Academic
Press. (b) Barrer, R.M. (1982). Hydrothermal Chemistry of Zeolites. London: Academic Press.

www.ijarsct.co.in

Paper 8679

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Paper 8679

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISSN (Online) 2581-9429

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Microporous Materials for Separation Membranes

Keywords: chromatography, microporous materials, types of membranes, membrane chromatography ,

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 171

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

III. MICROPOROUS MATERIALS

3.1 Carbonaceous Materials

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 172

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Figure 1. Representative classes of carbonaceous materials.

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 173

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Figure 2. The formation process of some representative zeolites

3.4 Metal–Organic Frameworks

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 174

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

3.5 Highly Porous Polymers

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 175

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Figure 4. Molecular models of representative porous polymers.

IV. FUNDAMENTALS OF MEMBRANE SEPARATION

4.2 Transport Theory

A. Membrane Transport for Gas Systems

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 176

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Figure 5. Gas transport mechanisms in membranes.

B. Membrane Transport for Liquid Systems

5.1 Membrane Structures

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 177

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of the commonly used membranes.

5.2 Preparation Techniques

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 178

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

VI. FEATURES OF MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 180

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 181

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 182

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 183

Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2023

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-8679 184

You might also like