Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alvar
Section: 2D-MLS
Contingency Tables
Lecture Category
Going to Drinking Fountain A B Total
Count 1.000 2.000 3.000
No
Expected count 1.615 1.385 3.000
Count 6.000 4.000 10.000
Yes
Expected count 5.385 4.615 10.000
Count 7.000 6.000 13.000
Total
Expected count 7.000 6.000 13.000
Chi-Squared Tests
Value df p
Χ² 0.660 1 0.416
N 13
Interpretation:
There is no significant relationship between the lecture type and the proportion of
students who use the drinking fountain on a frequent basis (p=0.416, p>0.05). This explains
why the lecture has no connection or relationship with the amount of students walking to
the drinking fountain. Furthermore, in both Lectures A and B, the proportion of students
going to the water fountain following stats class is asymmetric.