You are on page 1of 2

Name: John Arnel E.

Alvar

Section: 2D-MLS

The data corresponded to an experiment in which systolic pressure is studied. The Patients are advised
to do 30-minute brisk walking exercise every morning. They have been evaluated at two different times.
(0: pre-test and 1: after 6 months) the variable to be compared is the systolic blood pressure (SBP) The
data corresponded to an experiment in which systolic pressure is studied. The Patients are advised to do
30-minute brisk walking exercise every morning. They have been evaluated at two different times. (0:
pre-test and 1: after 6 months) the variable to be compared is the systolic blood pressure. The
researcher found out that the distribution of data is non-normal. Is there a significant progress in the
patient’s SBP from pre-test and after intervention? (Assume that the data is normally distributed)

Participant Pre test After 6 months

1 130 120

2 120 118

3 117 120

4 140 121

5 157 130

6 128 118

7 135 120

8 118 120

9 140 123
Results
Paired Samples T-Test
Paired Samples T-Test
Measure
Measure 2 t df p
1
0.01
Pre test - After 6 months 3.131 8
4
Note.  Student's t-test.

Descriptives
Descriptives
N Mean SD SE Coefficient of variation
Pre test 9 131.667 12.971 4.324 0.099
After 6
9 121.111 3.655 1.218 0.030
months

Interpretation:

The results show a significant change between the pre-test and six months
afterwards. Depending on the patient's systolic blood pressure for six months, a 30-
minute strenuous walking workout each morning (p-0.014). Additionally, the 30-minute
brisk walking exercise resulted in a reduction in the patient's systolic blood pressure as
seen by the mean and standard deviation decline between the pretest and after the 6-
month intervention.

You might also like