Gwyn Irish G.

Abanador Ma’am Karen Quino

10 Einstein 09/27/13

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2
13.8571428 13.7619047
Mean 6 6
6.02857142
Variance 9 8.49047619
Observations 21 21
Pooled Variance 7.25952381
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 40
0.11453844
t Stat 5
0.45469199
P(T<=t) one-tail 6
1.68385101
t Critical one-tail 3
0.90938399
P(T<=t) two-tail 2
t Critical two-tail 2.02107539

Analyzing Result

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null hypothesis. The data showed
that -2.021 <0.1145<2.021. Therefore we cannot reject the null hypothesis. The means between the
sample means (13.86-13.76) is not enough evidence to say that the new tasted flavor and the old tasted
flavor is equal in terms of effectiveness.

Conclusion

Therefore, the new flavor that was introduced was more effective than the old flavor of beverage that
was already present in the market.
 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2
14.2380952 14.5238095
Mean 4 2
8.36190476
Variance 5.79047619 2
Observations 21 21
7.07619047
Pooled Variance 6
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 40
-
0.34803814
t Stat 7
0.36481827
P(T<=t) one-tail 2
1.68385101
t Critical one-tail 3
0.72963654
P(T<=t) two-tail 3
t Critical two-tail 2.02107539

Analyzing Result

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null hypothesis. The data showed
that -2.021 <0.345<2.021. Therefore we cannot reject the null hypothesis. The means between the
sample means (14.24-14.52) is not enough evidence to say that the new drug has a significant impact on
the driving skills of a person.

Conclusion

Therefore it is concluded that there is no significant impact on the driving skills of a person even if the
new drug was injected.