Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P2P QA Paper 1 Rational v03 1
P2P QA Paper 1 Rational v03 1
Rational
Instructions
1. You should attempt all 68 questions. Each question is worth one mark.
2. Mark all answers on the answer sheet provided. Use a pencil (NOT a pen).
4. This is an open book exam. You can use the Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 (2017)
for guidance.
7. You will also need the “Additional Information” in the Scenario Booklet to answer some questions.
8. Each question is separate. Do not use information from one question to answer another question.
Q9: Two trees need to be cut to make way for the football pitch A. Reasons
B. Business options
Q10: One suggestion put forward is to create a football pitch for
C. Expected benefits
community in the local park
D. Expected dis-benefits
Q11: Local members of the town park and environment organization E. Costs
may object to the football pitch which can kill the project F. Major risks
Q12: During the fifth month of the project, the project manager learns of a new issue. The electricity
prices have increased and this may have a big impact on the evening use of the football pitch, but it
will not affect the cost of the project. The project manager decides not to take any action for now and
waits until the end of the stage to update the business case and send it to the project board.
Is this an appropriate action, and why?
A. Yes, as the project manager needs to update the business case at the end of each stage.
B. Yes, as the cost increase will happen after the project, so the project manager doesn’t need
to change any plan at the moment.
C. No, because the project manager needs to consult with the executive and update the
business case based on his direction.
D. No, because when any new issues arise which have an impact on business case, the project
manager needs to review the impact of the issues and risks on the business case and check
if the expected costs go out of tolerance or not.
Help Q12: Ref 6.2.2
Continued business justification drives all decision-making by ensuring that the business
objectives and benefits being sought can be realized. The business justification must be reviewed
and verified as part of any impact assessment by the project manager. The project manager must
review the impact of issues and risks on the continued viability of the business case.
Q13: While preparing the business case during the “initiating a project” process, the executive
reminds the project manager that there is no need to include “do nothing” as an option in the business
case as the other options are considered by the project board.
Is this an appropriate action, and why?
A. Yes, because we need to tailor PRINCE2 documents to fit to project needs.
B. Yes, because the project manager has to define the business option based on requirements.
C. No, because business case always should include “do nothing” as the first business option.
D. No, because it is the executive’s responsibility to create the business case.
Help Q13: Ref: A.2
Document the business case with options for: 1) do nothing, 2) do the minimum, or 3) do
something. “Do nothing” should always be the starting option to act as the basis for quantifying
the other options.
Q17: As a result of previous lessons, this recommendation has been made: "If an executive is
appointed who does not have an understanding of PRINCE2, someone with experience of applying
PRINCE2 should undertake business project assurance." The project manager has therefore been
appointed business project assurance during the initiation stage.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, because the executive does not have the necessary skills.
B. Yes, because the project manager has the experience required to deliver the project product.
C. No, because this will be a conflict of interest for the project manager.
D. No, because the project manager can appoint project support to take care of this.
Help Q17:
The project board’s responsibilities include to assure itself that the project is being conducted
correctly. The project board members each have a specific area of focus for project assurance,
namely business assurance for the executive, user assurance for the senior user(s), and supplier
assurance for the senior supplier(s), and this must be independent of the project manager.
Q18: To ensure a successful project, the executive decides to lead from the top and advises the
project manager during the initiation stage that the project board will be run like a democracy.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, this is appropriate and important for gathering requirements.
B. Yes, as this is a PRINCE2 requirement and supports the roles and responsibilities principle.
C. No, as the senior user has more authority than the senior supplier as they represent the user
requirements which are a reason for the project.
D. No, as the executive is ultimately accountable for the project’s success.
Q22: When planning the second stage, the project manager wishes to add the producer, reviewer,
and approver for each product that will be delivered in the next stage so they can follow up on the
quality activities.
Which action should the project manager take?
A. The project manager adds this information to the quality management approach.
B. The project manager adds this information to the quality register.
C. The project manager does not need to do this as this is not a PRINCE2 requirement.
D. The project manager adds this information to the stage plan.
Q23: During the second stage, the senior user and executive have agreed to update the acceptance
responsibilities to involve both of them and not just the senior user.
Which action should the project manager take?
A. Update the responsibilities section in the project plan.
B. There is nothing to do and this can be decided at the end of the project.
C. Add a note about this in the daily log with a reminder during the closing a project process.
D. Update the project product description with this information during the stage boundary
process.
Q27: Toward the end of the initiation stage, the executive advises the project manager that the
programme should be taken into account when planning the project.
Is the executive correct in asking this, and why?
A. Yes, as the number and length of stages will be influenced by the programme plan.
B. Yes, as the executive is responsible for the project.
C. No, as this is up to the project manager on how to plan the project.
D. No, as this has already been decided in the project approach in the SU process.
Q28: When creating the stage plan, the project manager will also add the activities to the work
packages as this is helpful for the team managers and they can better estimate the amount of work
when the project manager hands out the work packages.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as this speeds up the hand over process of the work packages to the team managers.
B. Yes, as this is part of the step: defining and analyzing the products.
C. No, as activities are not added to the work packages.
D. No, the team managers add the activities to the work packages and not the project manager.
Help Q28: Ref 9.2.1.4, Ref 26.2
Work packages mainly consist of product descriptions and other information such as: people
interfaces, tolerances, constraints, reporting agreements, problem handling, and escalation. Work
packages do not contain work activities; these activities can be part of the project plan.
Q32: As each project is unique, the project manager does not align with any centrally defined risk
management policies but does use any centrally defined risk management techniques and adopts
centrally deployed tools to help them with risk management.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, this is appropriate as each project is unique.
B. Yes, as aligning with any centrally defined risk management policies is optional.
C. No, as the project manager must align with any centrally defined risk management policies.
D. No, as according to PRINCE2, the project manager must always follow organizational,
programme, or portfolio policies.
Q33: During the SB process, after the second stage, the executive recommends some changes to the
risk management procedure. The project manager documents these in the risk register.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as this is a change to the risk management procedure and must be documented.
B. Yes, as the executive is permitted to make suggestions to the risk management procedure.
C. No, the project manager should not update the risk register.
D. No, the executive is not allowed to make suggestions to the risk management procedure.
Q34: Decide if the new cheaper drainage system meets the A. Corporate, programme
requirements management, or the customer
B. Executive
Q35: Send the issue to the change authority C. Senior user
D. Project manager
Q36: Maintain the issue register and document this issue
E. Team manager
Q37: The project manager wished for the stage to stay within budget and decided to choose a lower
quality fence than what was specified in the security fence product description but that still met the
quality requirements. As this issue is in his delegation limits, the project manager decided to manage
it informally and record it in the daily log.
Is this an appropriate approach to controlling change, and why?
A. Yes, because the project manager has to record all informal issues in the daily log.
B. Yes, because this is in the delegation limits of the project manager, and they can decide how
to handle the issue.
C. No, because this is a formal issue. This is a small change to one of the requirements in a
baselined product description, and it needs to be recorded in the issue register.
D. No, because lower quality may decrease customer satisfaction, so before any action, the
project manager has to check with the senior user first.
Progress:
Here are three actions relating to controlling progress on the Football Pitch project. Which role (A-E)
should carry them out?
Choose only one role for each action. A role can be used more than once.
Q39: Ensure that progress toward the outcome remains A. Team manager
consistent from the user perspective B. Senior user
Q40: Confirm management stage and project progress against C. Project assurance
agreed tolerances D. Executive
Q41:Inform project support of completed quality activities E. Project support
Q42: Project assurance complains to the project manager that the frequency and format of the
checkpoint reports is not consistent in the project.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, the project manager must have consistent checkpoint reporting from the teams.
B. Yes, as project assurance checks if the rate of reporting is within the reporting tolerance.
C. No, as project assurance should be complaining to the team manager.
D. No, as this depends on the individual work package and cannot be defined for all work
packages.
Q43: During the third stage, the project manager sees that they are going to be 3% above the 20%
tolerance and they escalate to the project board. The project board reviews the exception report and
decides to widen this current stage time tolerance to 25%.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as this is possible for time and costs tolerances but not benefits, scope, risk, or quality.
B. Yes, the project board can decide to widen the tolerances during a stage.
C. No, this is not an option in PRINCE2, the project board must ask for an exception plan.
D. No, the project board cannot raise tolerances during a stage.
Q47: During the activity “prepare the outline business case,” the project manager decides to take the
first action in the second planning step which is “define and analyze the products.”
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the first draft of the project plan is created during this activity.
B. Yes, as the project manager uses the product based planning technique here.
C. No, this activity is focused on the outline business case.
D. No, planning the project starts in the initiation stage and in this process.
Q51: During the second delivery stage, the project board (acting as change authority) grants a
concession to an off-specification regarding the “two dugouts.”
Is it appropriate for the project board to do this, and why?
A. Yes, as they have the change authority role and this is a typical response.
B. Yes, as grant a concession or ask for an exception plan are the only available responses.
C. No, as grant a concession is a change request response and not an off-specification.
D. No, the change authority is not allowed to decide on off-specifications.
Q52: The project manager seeks lessons related to communication A. Business case
management from similar previous projects B. Organization
Q53: The project manager documents the project tolerances, the number of C. Risk
stages, and the frequency and format of communication D. Progress
Q54:A workshop is facilitated to create a product breakdown structure with E. Plans
Town Services Manager, other users, and two team managers F. Quality
Q55: During the activity “refine the business case,” the project manager adds the following information
to the business case: 1) the costs and timescale (from the project plan), 2) the benefits to be gained,
and 3) how the realization of each benefit is to be measured.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, all this information is added to the business case.
B. Yes, this is added by the project manager with support from the executive.
C. No, how the realization of each benefit is to be measured is not added to the business case.
D. No, only the costs and timescale (from the project plan) are added to the business case.
Q56: The project manager defines the tolerances for the work A. Authorize a work package
package that contains the two dugouts and pitch markings B. Review work package status
Q57: Due to a privacy issue with security cameras, the project C. Review the management
manager prepares a new work package that defines how the stage status
cameras are to be configured to solve the security issue D. Report highlights
Q58: The project board is provided with regular summary E. Escalate issues and risks
information about the status of the management stage and project F. Take corrective action
Q59: During stage three, the project manager is reviewing work package status and notices that the
two football shelters have failed the quality review as they have no side protection. The project
manager instructs the quality review person to accept them as this is not such a big deal.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as this is a way to keep the stage on track.
B. Yes, as the project manager is taking corrective action and within tolerance.
C. No, as the quality review person is independent of the project manager.
D. No, as only the team manager can give instructions to the quality reviewer.
Q61: During stage 3, when executing a fixed-price artificial surface work package of € 9,000, the
contractor team manager recorded an actual spend to date of € 9,000, with a further spend of € 2,000
required to complete this work. The team manager reported this information to the project manager
three days later in the weekly checkpoint report.
Was this an appropriate application of PRINCE2 for this project?
A. No, because the project manager is to be notified immediately of any issues.
B. No, because the team manager should notify the project manager immediately in the form of
an exception report.
C. Yes, because the team manager should inform the project manager with product status in the
checkpoint report.
D. Yes, because the project manager requires this information to update the team plan with
actuals.
Help Q61: Ref 18.4.2
While developing the products, the team manager should not exceed the work package
tolerances agreed with the project manager. And if it happens, the team manager should notify
the project manager by raising an issue. The project manager can then decide on an appropriate
course of action.
Q62: Which one of the following is NOT the building contractor’s PRINCE2 responsibility while
executing “level surface” work package?
A. Check the level surface and record completed quality management activities.
B. Advise the project manager of the status of issues and risks associated with the product.
C. Review the “level surface” work package and obtain any referenced documentation.
D. Review and approve the work package and report to the project manager.
Help Q62: Ref 18.4.1
PRINCE2 recommends the following action during “accept a work package activity”:
Review the work package:
• Obtain any referenced documentation
• Clarify with the project manager what is to be delivered
• Negotiate with the project manager the constraints within which the work is to be done
• Agree tolerances for the work package
Q64: The project manager notices that the quality information in the product description for the
artificial grass is not adequate and they decide to facilitate a workshop with users, team manager, and
quality assurance to update the product description.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, and the project manager may also invite project support.
B. Yes, but the project manager should get an independent person to facilitate the workshop.
C. No, as the quality assurance role is not required.
D. No, as this should have been documented in the initiation stage.
Help Q64:
The role quality assurance has nothing to do with the quality requirements for a product
description. The quality criteria information comes from the users.
Q65: After completing the next stage plan, the project manager decides not to update the quality
register as this should not be done until the products have been reviewed and approved.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the products need to be reviewed and approved before they are accepted.
B. Yes, as the quality register should not be updated during the stage boundary process.
C. No, as the reviewer and approver already need to plan the actual dates in their own planning
documents and synch with the quality register and stage plan.
D. No, as the project manager should add the following target information for each product to the
quality register: 1) production date, 2) reviewer date, and 3) approver date.
Q67: While creating the end project report, the project manager includes an assessment of the results
of the project against the expected benefits in the business case. The expected benefits were to book
20% of the football pitch capacity before the opening date.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as some benefits always have to be realized during a project.
B. Yes, as assessing the benefits can be done during “creating the end project report “activity.
C. No, as assessing the benefits is not done in the “closing a project” process.
D. No, as the football pitch must be fully available before bookings can take place.
Q68: At the very end of the project, the project manager refers to the project product description to
identify who needs to be made aware the project is closing.
Is this appropriate for the project manager, and why?
A. Yes, as the project description was created during the “starting up a project” process.
B. Yes, as the project manager must notify the necessary stakeholders.
C. No, they need to review the project plan for this information.
D. No, they need to review the communication management approach for this information.