Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reductionism is the belief that any complex phenomenon can be broken down
into its basic constituent parts and explained. Parfit explains how a reductionist would
explain personal identity in his book "Reasons and Persons." By conceptually isolating
specific characteristics of a person, the idea is that we can identify the essential
characteristic upon which the concept of a person is based. He asserts that a person's
simplify the ambiguous nature of what makes a person themselves, he also emphasized
connection between one's experiences with information and facts. Personal identity can
be reduced to this psychological continuity because Parfit believed that this is where a
person gets their personality or identity. Parfit's theory of persistence is supported in this
regard because both the psychological criterion and the physical criterion are based on
the idea of continuity within a functioning brain. This indicates that one may endure over
or the passage of time. As a result, the concept of continuity implies that a person 50
years ago is still the same person, despite the fact that they may have appeared
JMJ Marist Brothers
NOTRE DAME OF MARBEL UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Alunan Ave., City of Koronadal, South Cotabato 9506
connectedness.
and in opposition to what most people normally think a person is like. As a consequence
of this, Parfit states, "even if we are not aware of this, the majority of us are non-
Reductionists." As a result, the majority of us have erroneous notions about our nature
and our identity over time. A non-reductionist view of personal identity, such as the
Cartesian view, states that a person is a mental substance rather than a brain and a
body. From a Cartesian point of view, the existence of a mental, nonphysical ego that
keeps each person unique is what matters. Parfit rejects the non-reductionist viewpoint
The experiment's theoretical nature means that it is not very convincing and
relies on empirical assumptions, which may suggest that the findings were influenced by
a biased interpretation. Parfit makes the presumption that one could split a brain in half
and expect the same level of functioning because split brain patients can function
normally with only one half of their brain. It is difficult to accept this as support for Parfit's
ideas until Parfit's example has been falsified through legitimate experiment rather than
JMJ Marist Brothers
NOTRE DAME OF MARBEL UNIVERSITY
College of Arts and Sciences
Alunan Ave., City of Koronadal, South Cotabato 9506
conjecture. A functional plasticity of one's brain may enable it to take over various
functions of an area of the brain that has been damaged. As a direct consequence of