You are on page 1of 59

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Evidence has it that the first offices emerged in ancient Rome as spaces where official

work was carried out, and that such spaces have existed throughout the centuries in

some form. Nevertheless, it wasn't until the 18th century that the construction of

dedicated office buildings began (Collyer, 2019). The first office building was built in

London in 1726 and became known as The Old Admiralty Office, with the British

Empire growing and engaged in an increasing level of trade with other parts of the

empire (and world). It served to handle the masses of the paperwork generated by the

Royal Navy and included meeting spaces and the Admiralty Board Room, which is

still used today (Collyer, 2019).

This was followed quickly in 1729 by the building of East India House on London's

Leadenhall Road, which served as the headquarters for East India Trading Company

and its staff legions. By now, the advent of a centralized, concentrated space to

administer increasing amounts of paperwork has gained recognition, with the

emergence of new offices throughout London (Collyer, 2019).

It is argued that the earliest industrial offices were exceptional for their scientific

approach, stressing productivity and following a static, regimented office layout that

culminated in staff sitting in endless rows of desks with managers in the nearby

offices where they could observe (Jacqueline and Mariam, 2015). Such early, open-

plan offices, which gained popularity throughout the early 20th century, adopted'

1
Taylorism' concepts, a philosophy developed by mechanical engineer Frank Taylor,

who aimed to improve industrial output. Taylor's strategy has been widely criticized,

as it failed to take human and social aspects into account and focused exclusively on

ensuring workers achieve maximum productivity from their employees. Therefore, it

was the birth of the lift and steel frame construction that marked the beginning of a

radically new way of working, therefore heralding the development of office design as

a discipline, and thus the history of office design entered a new age (Amir and

Sahibzada, 2018).

Nevertheless, scholars concluded that it is believed that better results and increased

productivity are the result of a better workplace environment. Better physical office

environment will boost the employees and ultimately enhance their productivity.

Different research on the study of multiple offices and office buildings suggested that

factors such as frustration, cluttered environments and the physical environment play a

major role in the loss of productivity of the workers (Clements-Croome, 2010;

Hameed & Amjad, 2009; Wyon, 2014). According to Mendis (2016), the overall

performance of a company is influenced by the workers ' job performance. Layout of

workplace, motivation, work life balance, job satisfaction, and leadership style are

some factors that affect job performance. Workplace architecture plays an important

role in influencing the workers ' job performance.

Effective ergonomics application can strike a balance between the task and demands

of workers. This will increase the efficiency of the employer, provide worker safety,

physical and mental well-being, and job satisfaction, thus improving the

organizational performance (Garbie, 2014). Therefore, as an aspect of the work

2
environment, the physical environment has directly affected the human sense and

gradually altered interpersonal relationships and therefore efficiency. This is so

because the characteristics of a space or meeting place for a company have effects on

efficiency and level of satisfaction. In today's business climate, the workplace

environment is the most important factor in keeping an employee happy

(Chandraseker 2019).

Overall, numerous studies have shown the positive effects on both the morale of the

worker and the efficiency of the occupied workplace where environmental

environments, such as lighting, temperature and sound levels, as well as furniture

comfort, aesthetics and architectural details, are properly controlled for the tasks being

performed (McCoy and Evans 2015; Vischer, 2017). More studies have shown that

lighting, ventilation rates, access to natural light and the acoustic environment are

significantly related to workers’ satisfaction and productivity (Humphreys 2015;

Veitch et al. 2014). In addition, workers’ attitudes and behaviors are affected by

ambient conditions, such as indoor air quality, illumination, temperature, and views

(Larsen et al. 2018; Veitch and Gifford 2016). Natural elements, such as views of

nature and indoor plants, have a positive influence on mental fatigue and a restorative

value (Kaplan 2015).

Experience has shown that workers are directly influenced by kind of workplace

environment they find themselves or where their competence will achieve nothing in

terms of productivity if the environment is not conducive. This is in respect of

workers in manufacturing industry in Enugu State and issue of unproductive nature of

workers is compounded with the poor nature of the workplace design (Duru and

3
Shimawua, 2017). However, Jacqueline and Mariam (2015) suggest that to support

employees in executing their responsibilities and to maximize their contribution to the

overall organization performance, the office must also be efficient, functional and

flexible. Meeting these objectives requires that an organization plan strategically and

design facilities to meet the needs of organization both now and in the future.

Nonetheless, studies have shown that workplace design has both positive and negative

effects on the psychological and welfare of employees. The work environment can be

described as the environment in which people are working it is wide and incorporates

the physical scenery (e.g. noise, equipment, heat), fundamentals of the job itself (e.g.

workload, task, complexity) extensive business features (e.g. culture, history) and

even extra business background (e.g. industry setting, workers relation). However all

the aspects of work environment are correspondingly significant and also affects the

overall performance of the organisation (Jain & Kaur, 2014). Therefore, this study

aimed to examine effect of work place design and performance of manufacturing

firms in Enugu.

1.2 Statement of Problem

An attractive physical workplace that responds to the requirement of creative

knowledge workers plays a crucial role in increasing employees’ productivity and

improving their performance. This contributes majorly to the overall performance of

the organisation. Hence, when people are working in situations that suit their physical

and mental abilities, the correct fit between the person and work task is accomplished.

4
However, in the manufacturing industry in Nigeria there seems to have absence of

important of work material as a result of non availability of some necessary office

facilities like air condition, rugs or tiles, good ventilation in some of the department in

the company is a common feature. Some offices or departments look depressing and

unstimulating. Some of them have no louvers, light and some with uncompleted roofs,

poorly designed workstations, unsuitable furniture, inappropriate lighting, excessive

noise, insufficient safety measures in fire emergencies and lack of personal protective

equipment.

The implication is that people working in such environments are prone to occupational

disease and it impacts on employee’s performance and overall organisational

performance. Thus productivity is decreased due to the workplace environment. Thus,

it is a wide industrial area where the employees are facing a serious problem in their

work place like environmental and physical factors. So it is difficult to provide

facilities to increase their performance level. Hence, to provide solutions to these

problems, this study aimed to examine effect of work place design and performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The broad objective of this study is to examine the effect of work place design and

performance of manufacturing firms in Enugu. However, the specific objectives of the

study are to:

i. ascertain the effect of workplace-layout on employee goal attainment of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

5
ii. examine how conducive ventilation contributes to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

iii. assess the effect of lighting on employee job performance of manufacturing

firms in Enugu.

1.4 Research Questions

In line with the objectives of the study, the following research questions were put

forward:

i. What effect does workplace-layout have on employee goal attainment of

manufacturing firms in Enugu?

ii. How does conducive ventilation contribute to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu?

iii. To what extent does lighting affect employee job performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu?

1.5 Research Hypotheses

In line with the objectives and research questions, the following hypotheses were put

forward for test:

Ho1: Workplace layout has significant effect on employee goal attainment of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Ho2: Conducive ventilation has significantly contributes to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu

6
Ho3: Lighting has significant effect on employee job performance of manufacturing

firms in Enugu.

1.6 Significance of the Study

This study is highly significant in the sense that it will serve as a useful tool to

different group of persons within and outside an organization.

Top Executives in the Manufacturing Sector: First, the study will be useful to top

managers in the Nigerian organization especially those in the Manufacturing Sector,

so as to broaden their knowledge on how to incorporate conducive workplace design,

which will help to boost the performance of the employees and that of organisation

performance.

Government: The findings and recommendations of this study will be enormously

beneficial to the government and society at large when practically applied. Through

this research the government will be able to map out measures and strategies needed

to map policies that will help to ensure favourably workplace design.

Academia: This study can serve as lecturing material in management courses as it

helps to give comprehensive evaluation of the effect of workplace design and

performance of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Prospective researcher: The study will be of immense help to other people and

students who might wish to carry out other researches in the field.

7
1.7 Scope of the Study

This study is set to study the effect of work place design and performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu. This study covered Nigeria Brewery Plc, Ama 9 th Mile

Corner Enugu from where the data for the analysis were obtained. This study was

restricted to following variables; workplace layout, ventilation and lighting. However,

the study covers the period of 2019 – 2020

1.8 Operational Definition of Terms

Design: This is the means by which we order our surroundings, re-shaping natural

materials to suit our needs and purposes.

Environment: Business environment is the sum total of all external and internal

factors that influence a business.

External Environment: An external environment is composed of all the outside

factors or influences that impact the operation of business.

Internal Environment: This is defined as the conditions, entities, events, and factors

within an organization that influence its activities and Choices, particularly the

behavior of the Employees.

Office design: This is the arrangement of workspace so that work can be performed in

the most efficient way.

Organisational Growth: Organisational growth is a necessity to meet the demands of

an increasingly complex and dynamic environment.

8
Organisational performance: Refers to the sum of accomplishments achieved by all

businesses/departments.

Productivity: The rate at which workers in a company produce goods and the

quantity produce, compared with how much time, work and money is needed to

produce them.

Worker Performance: This refers to what an employee does or does not do. This is

commonly looking at quantity of output, quality of output, timeliness of output,

presence at work and cooperativeness.

Workplace: This is a place where work is produced.

1.9 Profile of Nigerian Breweries Plc.

Nigerian Breweries Plc, is the pioneer and largest brewing company in Nigeria. It

serves the Nigerian market and exports to other parts of West Africa. The Nigerian

Breweries was incorporated in 1946. Its first bottle of beer, Star Lager, rolled off the

bottling lines of its Lagos brewery in June 1949. The brewery commissioned other

breweries including Aba Brewery in 1957, Kaduna Brewery in 1963, and Ibadan

Brewery in 1982. In September 1993, the company acquired its fifth brewery in

Enugu, and in October 2003, its sixth brewery, sited at Ameke in Enugu. Ama

Brewery began brewing on the 22 March 2003 and at 3 million hectoliters is the

largest brewery in Nigeria.

Nigerian Breweries Plc, Enugu State Branch (Ama Brewery) is located as

AmaekeNgwo near 9th Mile Corner in Enugu State. It is the sixth branch of Nigerian

9
Brewery Plc in Nigeria and it was commissioned in the year 2003. The site covers a

total area of approximately 100 hectares. Ama Brewery is designed with the best

cutting-edge technology and world class standard processes. The company has a

production capacity of 3 million of hectoliters per annum.

Nigerian Breweries Plc and Heineken International jointly owe the company. It is a

beverage company designed for the production of three brands of beer lagers namely;

Star, Gulder and Heineken, and two brands of soft drinks namely; Amstel Malta and

Maltina which are successfully in production. The company is made up of several

departments which are controlled by heads of departments (HODs) who in turn are

summarily headed by a brewery manager. He oversees the general activities of the

company. The departments are as follows: support and development department,

finance department, logistics department, quality assurance unit, production

department/Brew house and packaging and engineering department.

10
REFERENCES

Amir, F. & Sahibzada, S. (2008), Measuring the impact of office environment on


performance level of employees in the private sector of Pakistan. Pakistan,
Islamabad : Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology

Chandrasekar, K. (2019). Workplace Environment And Its Impact On Organisational


Performance In Public Sector Organisations

Clements-Croome, D., Kaluarachchi, Y. (2010) An Assessment of the Influence of the In-


door Environment on the Productivity of Occupants in Offices Design,
Construction and Operation of Healthy Buildings: 67-81.

Collyer, A. (2019). Future workspaces, design. Retrieved from:


https://www.rhinooffice.co.uk/blog/a-brief-history-of-workplace-design. accesssed
on 30 Januray, 2020

Duru, DE. and Shimawua, D (2017). The effect of work environment on employee
productivity: A Case Study of Edo city transport services Benin City, Edo State
NIGERIA. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, Vol.5, No.5,
pp.23-39

Garbie, I. H. (2014). An Experimental Study on Assembly Workstation Considering


Ergonomically Issues. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on
Computers & Industrial Engineering

Gitahi, N.S., Maina, W. and Koima, J.(2015). Effect of Workplace Environment on the
Performance of Commercial Banks Employees in Nakuru Town. International
Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), Vol,3(12): PP 76-89

Hameed, A., & Amjad, S. (2019). Impact of office design on employees productivity: a
case study of banking organizations of Abbottabad, Pakistan

Jacqueline, C. V. and Mariam, W. (2015). The effect of workplace design on quality of


life at work. Published in: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of
Life Research (2015) Eds: Ghozlane Fleury-‐Bahi, Enric Pol, Oscar Navarro.
London: Springer.

Kaplan, S. (2015). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework.


Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.

11
Mccoy, J.M. and Evans, G,W.(2015). Physical work environment. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publication. 2005; 219:245.

Wyon, D. P. (2014). The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity.
Indoor air, 14(s7), 92-101.

Vischer, J.C. (2017). The effects of the physical environment on job performance:
Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health.
2007;175:184.

Veitch, C. R., & Clout, M. N. (2012). Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive
species: Proceedings of the International Conference on Eradication of Island
Invasives (No. 27). IUCN.

Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan


offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research and
Technology, 32(4), 199-212.

12
CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Conceptual

2.1.1 Workplace Design

Workplace is made up of various elements of an organization. In a simple form, it is a

place where work is produced. Work is a purposeful productive activity and may

involve making material goods, creating or transforming information, and/or offering

a service. Differing from the meaning of space, the connotation of place is being

specific that one place is not the same as another (Alexander, Atkin, Brochner, &

Haugen, 2014). The concept of workplace in the 21st century is the place that is

designed and arranged with the aim to create a productive environment for people

who perform activities in an organization (Riratanaphong, 2019)

Meanwhile, office design is defined by BNet Business Dictionary (2018) as “the

arrangement of workspace so that work can be performed in the most efficient way”.

Office design incorporates both ergonomics and work flow, which examine the way in

which work is performed in order to optimize layout (Hameed, 2019).

However, different organizational goals require different arrangements of the

workspace. If the future function of work continues to require the combination of both

collaboration and individual concentration at work, then the new form will have to

combine private workspace with collaboration workspace. If this does not happen,

organizations will be both less effective and less efficient (Amir & Sahibzada, 2018)

13
Office environment can be divided between the two components; physical and

behavioral. The physical environment consists of elements that relate to the office

occupiers‟ ability to physically connect with their office environment. The behavioral

environment consists of components that relate to how well the office occupiers

connect with each other, and the impact the office environment can have on the

behavior of the individual. the physical environment with the productivity of its

occupants falls into two main categories office layout (open-plan verses cellular

offices) and office comfort (lighting, temperature, air quality, interior design and

noise), and the behavioral environment represents the two main components namely

interaction and distraction (Amir& Sahibzada, 2018)

Offices are built for people to enjoy living and working together. So everything should

be orientated towards people. That’s why the main objective of good office

architecture is to put people, functions, rooms and equipment in the right relationship

with one another, bringing them into a shared context. It is particularly important to

harmonize potentially polarizing elements. On the one hand, there are the rational

considerations: people as performers, who have to carry out functions efficiently. On

the other hand is the emotional factor: people with all their senses, emotions, fears and

pleasures. It is here that interior architecture and interior design can make an

important contribution. If we get the emotional side right, this will have a direct,

positive effect on the rational factors (Elgner, 2016).

Interior design was defined as items in which the design was simple of good

proportions and without dust collecting features with stress in good construction.

14
Interior designers are mainly responsible for selecting suitable textiles, floor and wall

covering, furniture, lighting and colure schemes (Rao, 2009)

2.1.2 Interior design elements

The interior design elements must integrate successfully to create a design solution for

high quality work environments. These solutions must respond to functional and

aesthetic program requirements as well as challenges presented by an increasingly

complex workplace. These elements and interior furnishing are: Furniture, ceiling,

flooring, walls, doors &window treatment, colures and decorative items. (Fabbrizzi,

2012)

2.1.2.1 Furniture

Furniture for the office environment is typically selected based on two sets of criteria.

As a functional component, furniture is chosen for performance characteristics and

cost. As a primary aesthetic element, furniture is chosen for it design and style. In

addition to meeting the criteria identified above, other key issues which are normally

considered in selecting furniture are: required maintenance, durability, inventory

management and flexibility of use (Rayfield , 2017).

Office furniture can be categorized as either a furniture system or general use

furniture. A furniture system is a generic term which refers to collection of

components such as desks, bookshelves, and storage units that are meant to be used as

an integrated group. General use furniture refers to individual (Rayfield, 2017).

However, the furniture systems were introduced to the open plan environment to

achieve greater planning flexibility and efficiency as well as increased communication

15
among personnel. Initially, these systems were referred to as modular, that is, they

were floor- standing components that could be assembled to create larger planning

units such as ADP furniture, designed to accommodate computer equipment. separate

free- standing panels and interior landscaping ( plants) were used to enclose clusters

of modular or free standing furniture to provide some visual and acoustical privacy .

(Fabbrizzi, 2012)

Panel hung systems, commonly called systems furniture were the next evolution in

furniture systems. In a panel hung systems, most of the components including

horizontal work surfaces, storage, and file elements, are hung from the panel. The use

of Panel hung systems increased the flexibility to tailor workstations to meet the needs

of the individual and it also increased the capability to accommodate the task in a

smaller amount of space. (Myerson & Ross, 2016)

2.1.3 Lighting

Lighting is a functional component of the office environment because it is necessary

for vision. Yet it is also a design element, creating a sense of volume, form and shape.

It is an art form, with the potential to create drama and response: to excite, to

motivate, and to please. It affects office aesthetics and employee motivation and

creates substantial energy demands. For these reasons, the effective design and

installation of high quality, energy efficient lighting systems are a priority in the office

environment today (Rayfield, 2017)

16
2.1.3.1 Methods of lighting

Lighting in the office environment is achieved through a combination of methods and

each of these methods has a specific purpose and is achieved through a variety of

sources and fixtures. These methods are:

i. Ambient lighting: is the general light in the space, it is categorized as

direct or indirect.

ii. Accent lighting: is a focused light, directed to illuminate specific objects or

small areas.

iii. Task lighting: illuminates a task area and is located relatively close to the

task surface. A desk lamp is an example of a task light.

iv. Task and ambient lighting: was developed as an energy efficient method

of creating both task and ambient light utilizing only one light source.

(Rayfield, 2017)

2.1.4 Organizational Performance

Performance is the end result of activities; it includes the actual outcomes of the

strategic management process (Al-Hasan and James, 2013). Bhagwatti (2004) posits

that the organizational performance is represented by the success in achieving its

goals. Organizational performance constitutes all behaviors related to organizational

objectives depending on the contribution levels of individuals to the organization

(Delery and Doty, 2016). However, the organizational performance is the mirror that

reflects the organization’s ability in achieving high productivity provided it is

combined with the customers satisfaction and having a well market share that can

17
provide a suitable financial refund and do social and ethic responsibilities towards the

environment where the organization works and the society (Al-Shammari and

Hussein, 2008).

Similarly, scholars considered organizational performance as the achieved results of

the interaction between the activities of communication and information technology

sector and its resources or the difference between the financial goals and the non-

financial ones in a specific period of time (Rajneesh and Kaur, 2014). Furthermore,

Venkatraman and Vasudevan (2009) note that measurement for the organizational

performance relies on the fields of performance in the business organizations vary and

differ according to their different businesses , nature of activities and the degree of

focus on the fields that is believed to achieve goals are considered a priority for the

organization (Giovanni, 2012). Although scholars have different attitudes towards

identifying fields of performance and ways of measuring them, hence some of them

pay attention to the shareholders‟ goals as major fields of performance that the

organization should rely on measuring the performance.

Darroch (2015) conclude that the financial performance will remain the field that

determines the extent of the organization’s success and its inability to achieve the

basic level of the financial performance. However, its existence will be in danger, only

if the performance includes non financial scales, the background image of the

performance will show up the thing which the financial indications fail to do (Zainol

and Ayadurai, 2011). In consistent with this, Sink and Tuttle (2009) realize that

performance should not be treated only as a financial concept. Thus, it is suggested

18
that particularly in the service sector, such as university institution non-financial

performance should receive serious consideration.

However, Nofal, Hollenbeck, Gerhart and Wright (2014) argue that relying only on

the financial ratios in evaluating the performance gives incomplete image about the

organization. Therefore, this method in evaluation should be enhanced and supported

by operational performance’s scales to build measurement system for effective

performance in the organization such as market share, customer retain. To this end,

Noruzy, Lau-Chung and Foley (2013) argued that if the manger cares of the total

performance of the organization, he will be able to create a balance between the

operational and the financial interests.

Traditionally, firm performance has been viewed and measured in accounting terms.

An additional issue should be raised here; due to confidentiality concerns, it is often

challenging to obtain actual accounting data from organizations unless they are

publicly quoted companies (Coulter and Robbins, 2016).

Although organizational performance encompasses many specific areas of firm

outcomes (i.e. dimensions) (Richard and Johnson, 2009; Thang, Tessema, and Soeters,

2008; Morgan and Strong, 2003; Nwokah, 2008), we focused only on three key

dimensions to measure organizational performance which growth, competitive

advantage and level of its innovations.

19
2.1.5 Physical Factors of the Workplace Environment

A physical work environment can result a person to fit or misfit to the environment of

the workplace and it is also known as an ergonomic workplace. There are some

factors of physical work environment which help employees to perform their job more

effectively and which leads to enhance their job satisfaction, such as lightings, the

floor configuration, office layout and also the furniture layout (Brill et al, 209).

The ability of the physical workplace environment to influence behaviours and to

create an image is particularly apparent for service businesses such as banks. The

physical environment includes components of the tangible workplace environment

that comprise spatial layout and functionality of the surroundings (Kohun, 2012).

Spatial layout refers to the ways in which machinery, equipment, and furnishings are

arranged, the size and shape of those items, and the spatial relationships among them.

The spatial layout of furniture was found to influence the amount and nature of

conversation between individuals (Becker, 2012). Functionality refers to the ability of

the same items to facilitate performance and the accomplishment of goals. How

performance is achieved will be affected by how well people fit with their physical

workspace and physical work environment (Srivastava, 2008).

In a broader perspective, the physical workplace environment; include but not limited

to the comfort level, ventilation, heating, natural lighting and artificial lighting.

According to Temessek, (2009) the above features assist on the functional and

aesthetic side, the décor, and design of the workplace environment that ultimately

helps improve the employees experience and necessitate better performance. He

20
emphasises that banking services “must insist on the utility and the role of

environmental information, facilitating employees’ engagement with better space

management, and the automation of certain tasks”. Similarly, if the tasks to be

performed are very complex, efficiency of layout and functionality will be more

important than when the tasks are mundane or simple.

Office layout and design impressions suggest that certain dimension serves a symbolic

function by connoting meanings and images about organizations and further how their

employees are to be engaged (Challenger, 2010). Based on these affordances, it is

suggested that employees will tend to identify more with these features which enhance

performance. Informal seating arrangements, such as chairs placed at a right angle

facilitate social interaction, where as formal seating arrangements, such as chairs

placed back-to-back discourage social interaction (Doman, 2018). This also helps

explain how style of furnishings and other physical symbols may come to serve a

symbolic function.

2.1.6 The impact of workplace design on employees’ performance

One way organizations increase their competitive advantage is through innovative

strategies that improve human performance and can be enhanced or constrained by

situational factors that are introduced into the organization’s workspace. The findings

of Nickell (2017) demonstrate that the more satisfied workers are with their jobs the

better the company is likely to perform in terms of subsequent profitability and

particularly productivity(Amir & Sahibzada, 2018)

21
(Figure 2.1: Delineates the broader picture of tangible and intangible factors impacting
productivity. Source: Doman, 2018)

The interior designing of offices nowadays play a crucial role as companies are being

forced to raise their productivity with minimum amount of costs. By using modern

office design which has given adequate consideration to an efficient and smooth

workflow and improved employees satisfaction and performance, firms are able to

increase their productivity (Amir and Sahibzada, 2008). Meanwhile, the 21 st century

office acknowledges that the office environment is highly valued as a place for ideas,

discussion, information, collaboration, teamwork and motivation. The industrial

revolution created by the internet has changed everything about business. With

companies doing automated sales around the clock and across time zones, office

environment is the physical workplace (Jacqueline and Mariam, 2015).

Open environments lead to information being freely shared and thus remove the need

for many targeted administrative transactions, the volume of information shared is

increased, the increased frequency of interaction improves feedback/response time and

22
work can continue unencumbered. Shared conversations can lead to faster recognition

and resolution of issues. However, there is a fine balance between socializing and

distraction, employees should have some privacy. Mid-height barriers are a good

compromise between an open-plan office and cubicles, and soundproofing is

imperative (Jacqueline and Mariam, 2015).

Tacit learning is more effective than formal instruction and therefore better for

employees’ performance and Management can more easily monitor work in progress

(Mendis, 2016). Ergonomics have a crucial contribution in guaranteeing that the

workforce is efficient by maintaining employee’s physical well-being (Amir and

Sahibzada, 2018). Ergonomics is defined as "The science that seeks to adapt work or

working conditions to suit the worker; the study of the problems of people adjusting to

their environment.” Ergonomics is a key component when planning any office

nowadays to support employees well being (Office Design/layout, 2009)

Well-being reflects a healthy mind and body overall contentment with the

surroundings. And some degree of control of the surroundings is thermal comfort, air

quality, light and acoustics. There are three indicators to evaluate well-being:

a. Pleasure to displeasure;

b. Comfort to anxiety;

c. Enthusiasm to depression. (Doman, 2008)

However, Croome (2016) claims that well-being is only one aspect of mental health;

other aspects include personal feelings about one's competence, aspirations and degree

of personal control. Task performance is best when mind and body are at an optimum

23
stimulation level with a high degree of satisfaction. Motivation stems from satisfaction

and sums up physical and non-physical factors that have a low or high magnitude and

a positive and negative direction.

2.2 Theoretical Framework

Many theories have been advanced to explain the link between workplace design and

organisational performance. The study is grounded on two theories i.e. The Two

Factor Theory and The Affective Events Theory.

2.2.1 Herzberg Two Factor Theory

The Two Factor Theory was advanced by Frederick Herzberg in 1959. This study is

grounded on this theory that has been explored by various scholars to explain the

relation between workplace environment and employee performance. Herzberg

defined two sets of factors in deciding employees’ working attitudes and levels of

performance, named motivation and hygiene factors (Robbins and Judge, 2007). He

stated that motivation factors are intrinsic factors that will increase employees’ job

satisfaction; wile hygiene factors are extrinsic factors to prevent any employees’

dissatisfaction. The theory pointed out that improving the environment in which the

job is performed motivates employees to perform better.

Herzberg’s theory concentrates on the importance of internal job factors as motivating

forces for employees. He wanted to create the opportunity for employees to take part

in planning, performing and evaluating their work (Schultz et al., 2010). The content

of the theory has been widely accepted as relevant in motivating employees to give

their best in organizations. Further research has proved that the employee is more

24
motivated by intrinsic factors as captured by Herzberg’s motivator needs than

anything else.

There are however other schools of thought that share a different opinion from

Herzberg’s. One such scholar is King (2005) who sought to eradicate and evaluate

five distinct versions of the Two Factor theory. He concluded that two versions are

invalid as they are not supported by any empirical studies. However, the two factor

theory can be said to be a truly outstanding specimen for it to last a long period of

time without disapproval. It has been a great influence on the body knowledge about

workplace motivation and performance. It has generated a great amount of further

research by many scholars. It draws its thought from Maslow’s famous hierarchy of

needs theory and human behaviour. However due to changes in organizational

environment and the advancement in technology, it is necessary to develop new

methods of analysis. This will provide new ways of conducting research and

revaluating the results of existing findings.

2.2.2 Affective Events Theory

The theory was advanced by Howard M. Weiss and Russel Cropanzano in 1996

(Phua, 2012). The Affective Events Theory explains the link between employees’

internal influences and their reactions to incidents that occur in their work

environment that affect their performance, organizational commitment and job

satisfaction. It proposes that positive-inducing as well as negative emotional incidents

at work have significant psychological impact on employees’ job satisfaction. The

25
impact results into lasting reactions exhibited through job satisfaction, organizational

commitment and job performance.

According to Ashton-James and Ashkanasy (2015) research to date has supported the

central tenets of AET that workplace events trigger affective responses in employees

and that these affective responses influence workplace cognition and behavior. They

assert that AET is both empirically and theoretically, restricted to events that are

internal to the organization. The theory also considers how specific events at work

other than job characteristics lead to specific emotional and behavioral responses

(Briner, 2000). He posits that these events or things that actually happen at work affect

the well-being of employees thus affecting their performance.

2.3 Empirical Review

Mendis (2016) examined the relationship between workplace design and job

performance. Operational level employees in a leading garment manufacturing

organization of Sri Lanka were investigated by using a sample of 90 employees.

Simple random sampling method is used to select the representative sample. A self-

administrated structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Correlation analysis

and multiple regression analysis were used to test the research hypotheses. Study

confirmed that workplace design is significantly correlated with employee job

performance. Findings of the study indicate that there is a strong positive relationship

between workplace design and job performance of operational level employees.

Gitahi, Maina and Koima (2015) investigated the effect of workplace environment on

the performance of Bank employees in Nakuru Town. More specifically, the study

26
sought to establish the extent to which physical workplace factors, psychosocial

factors and the work life balance factors affect performance of Bank employees in

Nakuru Town. The population of the study was 736 non-managerial staff from which

a sample of 173 respondents were drawn from employees’ using stratified random

sampling with probabilities proportional to the size of the firm was used to allocate

samples within the Banks. To achieve the objectives of the study, a survey design was

employed. A sample of 173 employees participated in the study as respondents.

Descriptive statistics and multiple regression models were used to analyze the data.

The study findings showed that the physical aspects were did not have a significant

effect on employee performance while the psychosocial and work life balance factors

were significant. The results therefore indicated that psychosocial aspects exhibited

the strongest association with employee performance while physical aspects and

psychosocial aspects were moderate. It is recommended that attention be given to the

other influences of workplace life environments consisting the physical and work life

balance aspects.

Lankeshwara (2010) investigated the impact of workplace environment on the

employee’s performance. The study has utilized primary data and a sample of size 85

has chosen in accordance the Morgan approach of sample selection including both

managerial and non-managerial employees from Brandix Intimate Apparel-

Awissawella through the proportionate sampling technique, using already developed

questionnaire. Multiple Regression Model has been utilized as the main data analyzing

technique. The survey results revealed that the job aids, supervisory support and

physical work environment as positively influential for the employee’s performance

27
and job aid as the most critical predictor. Implications of the findings and

recommendations are offered.

Duru and Shimawua (2017) investigated the effect of work environment on employee

productivity using Edo City Transport Service whether inadequacy of the various

conditional factors can affect productivity of employee. The objective of this study

therefore geared towards ascertaining whether the nature of work environment lead to

low productivity, absenteeism and lateness among employees. With the objective of

the study in mind, this research project work focused on examining the effect of work

environment. To achieve the study objectives and for the purpose of this seminar

paper, secondary data were collected and analyzed as well. From the research

findings, if good office environment is provided for employees, it will go a long way

to enhance their morale and performance. Also, if office is neat, noiseless, properly

arranged well lighted and ventilated, employees will feel a sense of belonging and this

will make them to work efficiently and effectively. Good physical working

environment inspires workers to spend more time in their various offices, employees

responded emotionally better towards the provision of good office environment by not

absenting themselves unnecessarily from work, lateness to work and other negative

attitude will be drastically reduced. Good working environment increase individual

output therefore leading to growth of the organization

Hester (2012) examined the effects of workplace design on knowledge worker’s

perceived productivity in Dutch Universities of Applied Science. The study used

multiple case study based on literature review (6 cases); a survey (n=188). The

findings show that directors, professors and researchers do not have a shared vision on

28
the role of research in their institution. Knowledge workers share two basic needs:

time for working in isolation (internalization of knowledge); time for interaction with

others (externalization of knowledge); activities that require different spatial concepts.

None of the work environments involved in the study adequately support all of the

phases in the knowledge development process. Survey results show a difference

between the direct effect of the work environment on the perceived personal

productivity and the productivity of the collective (team and organization). The

physical and social dimensions combined explain approx. 50% of the variance of the

perceived productivity.

Malik, Ahmad, Gomez and Ali (2011) investigated the work environment and

employee performance in Pakistan. It aims to test a model based on five dimensions of

work environment and their effect on the performance of employees. The data were

collected from 115 employees of Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited

(PTCL) and processed through Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) to apply

statistical tests, that is, descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and regression

analysis, to investigate the relationship of the selected variables. The results of the

study reveal that most of the employees are males working at the supervisory level.

The Pearson’s correlation results show that all the independent variables have strong

and significant relationship with employee performance, especially physical working

conditions which reflect the strongest positive and significant relationship. Whereas

the results of regression analysis reveal that performance of employees mostly

depends on physical working conditions, training and development and

communication practices. It was concluded that the entire hypotheses were upheld.

29
The work environment has an impact on an individual’s ability to work safely,

competently and in compliance with operational performance targets. It is necessary to

train the employees to efficiently and effectively handle the work overload.

30
REFERENCES

Alexander, K., Atkin, B., Brochner, J., & Haugen, T. (2014). Facilities management:
Innovation and performance. London: Spon Press

Al-Ahmadi. H, (2009). Factors affecting performance of hospital nurses in Riyadh


Region, Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,
22(1): 40 – 54

Al-Hasan, S., & James, P. (2013). Cultural control and multinationals: The case of
privatized Jordanian companies. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 14(7): 1284-1295.

Amir, F. & Sahibzada, S. (2018), Measuring the impact of office environment on


performance level of employees in the private sector of Pakistan. Pakistan,
Islamabad : Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology

Aston-James, C.E., & Ashkanasy, N.M (2015). What Lies Beneath? A Process of
Analysis of Affective Events Theory, The Effect of Affect in Organizational
Settings Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol.1 pp. 23-46

Becker, F. (2012). Improving organisational performance by exploiting workplace


flexibility. Journal of Faculty Management, 1(2), 154-162.

Bhagwatti, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization, N.Y, Oxford Univ. Press

Brill M, Margulis, S. and Konar, E. (2009). Using office design to increase productivity.
Buffalo, NY: Westinghouse. 1985

Briner, R.B. (2000).Relationships Between Work Environments, Psychological


Environments & Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Occupational Medicine,
Vol. 50 No. 5 pp. 299-303

Challenger, J.A. (2000). 24 Trends reshaping the workplace. The Futurist, 35-41.

Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace Environment And Its Impact On Organisational


Performance In Public Sector Organisations

Clements-Croome, D., Kaluarachchi, Y. (2010) An Assessment of the Influence of the In-


door Environment on the Productivity of Occupants in Offices Design,
Construction and Operation of Healthy Buildings: 67-81.

Collyer, A. (2019). Future workspaces, design. Retrieved from:


https://www.rhinooffice.co.uk/blog/a-brief-history-of-workplace-design. accesssed
on 30 Januray, 2020

Darroch, J.T (2015). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions
of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.

31
Delery, J. E. & Doty, D.H. (2016). Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource
Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational
Performance Predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-835.

Doman, U. (2018). The impact of the indoor environment on the performance of


employee. Journal on Finance and Banking 33(1) 22-33.

Duru, DE. and Shimawua, D (2017). The effect of work environment on employee
productivity: A Case Study of Edo city transport services Benin City, Edo State
Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, Vol.5, No.5,
pp.23-39

Elgner, Helga (2016). New interior design trends, Design aspects – colours and
materials , accessed on april 2006

Fabbrizzi, F. (2012). office design. TeNeues, 2002

Garbie, I. H. (2014). An Experimental Study on Assembly Workstation Considering


Ergonomically Issues. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on
Computers & Industrial Engineering

Gitahi, N.S., Maina, W. and Koima, J.(2015). Effect of Workplace Environment on the
Performance of Commercial Banks Employees in Nakuru Town. International
Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), Vol,3(12): PP 76-89

Hameed, A., & Amjad, S. (2019). Impact of office design on employees productivity: a
case study of banking organizations of Abbottabad, Pakistan

Hester, V.S. (2012). The effects of workplace design on knowledge worker’s perceived
productivity in Dutch Universities of Applied Science.. 11th EuroFM Research
Symposium EFMC

Jacqueline, C. V. and Mariam, W. (2015). The effect of workplace design on quality of


life at work. Published in: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of
Life Research (2015) Eds: Ghozlane Fleury-‐Bahi, Enric Pol, Oscar Navarro.
London: Springer.

Kaplan, S. (2015). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework.


Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.

Kohun, R.(2012). Workplace Environment and its impact on organizational performance


in Public sector organizations, International Journal of Enterprise Computing and
Business System International Systems, Vol. 1 Issue 1 January 2011

Lankeshwara, P. (2010) A study on the impact of workplace environment on employee’s


performance: with reference to the Brandix Intimate Apparel - Awissawella.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS), 3(1): 47-57

32
Mccoy, J.M. and Evans, G,W. (2015). Physical work environment. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publication; 219:245.

Mendis, M.V.S. (2016). Workplace Design and Job Performance: A Study of Operational
Level Employees in the Apparel Industry of Sri Lanka. International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 12, December 2016

Malik, M.I. Ahmad, A., Gomez, S.F. and Ali, M. (2011). A study of work environment
and employees’ performance in Pakistan. African Journal of Business
Management Vol. 5(34), pp. 13227-13232,

Myerson, J. & Ross, P. (2016), Space to work. Laurence King bublishing

Nofal, J.J, Hollenbeck, B., Gerhart & P. Wright. (2014). Human resources management:
Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noruzy, T. Lau-Chung, M. & Foley, S. (2013). Strategic Human Resource Management,


Firm Performance, and Employee relations climate in China, Human resource
Management, 47(1): 73-90

Rao, M. P. (2009) ,Interior design: Principles and practice. (3rd, Edition), delhi: standard
publishing

Rayfield, Julie (2017). office interior design guide: an introduction for facilities managers
and designers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York: Library of congress
cataloging.

Riratanaphong, C. (2019). Innovative Workplace Design: A Case Study of the Faculty of


Architecture, Delft University of Technology. Journal of Architectural/Planning
Research and Studies Volume 6(3)

Robbins, S. P. and Judge, C. R. (2007). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical


perspective for social work. Pearson Higher Ed. Robson, C., Real World Research.
Second Edition, Blackwell publishing

Schultz, Duane P.; Schultz, Sydney Ellen (2010). Psychology and Work Today: An
Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology (10th Ed.). New York
City: Prentice Hall.

Sink, K. & Tuttle, O. (2009). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies: New


perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.

Srivastava, A. K. (2008). Effect of perceived work environment on employees‟ job


behaviour and organizational effectiveness, Journal of Applied Psychology
Banarashindu, University, Varanasi.

33
Temessek, (2009) Expanding the Psychosocial Work Environment: Workplace Norms
and Work–Family Conflict as Correlates of Stress and Health 3(1) 71 -88.

Wyon, D. P. (2014). The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity.
Indoor air, 14(s7), 92-101.

Vischer, JC. (2017). The effects of the physical environment on job performance:
Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health.;175:184.

Veitch, C. R., & Clout, M. N. (2012). Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive
species: Proceedings of the International Conference on Eradication of Island
Invasives (No. 27). IUCN.

Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan


offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research and
Technology, 32(4), 199-212.

Zainol, T. and Ayadurai, H. (2011). The Future of Human Resources Management.


Virginia: John Wiley and Sons Incorporated.

34
CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design

The study used survey research design method. What informs the researcher’s use of

the survey method was that the study gathers both factual information and the opinion

of respondents, hence the relationships among given variables were determined.

3.2 Area of the Study


Geographically, the researcher through survey research covers the activities of Nigeria

Brewery Plc, Ninth Mile, Enugu state

3.3 Sources of Data


The researcher used both primary and secondary sources of data collection in the

course of this research.

3.3.1 Primary Sources of Data


The primary sources are copies of questionnaire distributed to the staff of the Nigeria

brewery in ninth mile corner, Enugu state. Questionnaire was also used to collect data

from the respondents. The questionnaires was structured using open-ended

dichotomous and multiple choice question. The questionnaire was structured in 5

likert scale method.

3.3.2 Secondary Sources of Data


The following secondary source of data were used by the researcher to gather

information especially under the literature review part of this work: journals and

periodic articles, textbook, encyclopedias and dictionaries, academic research works

35
unpublished. The National Library Enugu and the Internet played great roles towards

gathering the secondary data for this research work.

3.4 Population of the Study

The population of the study is made up of the entire staff of Nigeria Brewery Plc,

Ninth Mile Enugu. According to the data disclosed to the researcher by the personnel

management of Nigeria Brewery Plc, Ninth Mile Enugu, the organisation has a total

number of 920 workers. Hence, the total population of the study is 920.

3.5 Sample Size Determination

In determining the sample size, the researcher used Taro Yamane formula (1967) of

sample size determination as follows:

Formula:

N
n=
1+ N (e)2

920
= 2
1+ 920(0.05)

920
=
1+ 920 ( 0.0025 )

920
=
1+ 2.3

920
= = 278.8
3.3
Approximately, the sample size is 279

36
3.6 Sampling Techniques

The researcher used random sampling technique, which gave every staff of Nigeria

Brewery Plc, Ninth Mile Enugu equal chance of being selected.

3.7 Validity of Research Instrument

In this study, face validity was adopted. In other to establish the face validity of the

instrument, a copy of the original draft of the questionnaire was presented to the

project supervisor. The idea was to make sure that the questionnaire covered what it

was supposed to cover in relation with the objective of the study. The supervisor went

through the questionnaire and made some corrections, and later validated the

questionnaire. Hence, the instrument is valid based on the validation of the supervisor.

3.7 Reliability of Research Instrument

The researcher used pilot testing method because it was expected that some items or

questions would have several possible answers. The researcher established the

reliability of the questionnaires by computing the alpha coefficient of the items

(questions) in the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha of 0.7 and above indicates a high

level of internal consistency in the questionnaire.

3.8 Data Analysis Techniques

The data collected in the course of the field work was presented in a tabular form. The

data was analysed based on simple percentages, round up to 2 decimal places.

However, for the purpose of testing the hypotheses the Liner Regression analysis was

used.

37
The questionnaire was designed with the five point likert scales s follows:

Strongly Agree (SA) = 5

Agree (A) = 4

Neutral (N) = 3

Disagree (D) = 2

Strongly Disagree (SD) = 1

Decision Rule

If mean < 2.5, the respondents agree

If mean ≥ 2.5, the respondents disagree

38
CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSES

4.1 Presentation of Data

The presentation of data collected means arranging the different forms of data

obtained through various data collecting techniques to enable the researcher perform

analysis and exact new meaning from it. The researcher distributes the copies of

questionnaire with the help of two research assistant and the data collected were

presented as follows:

Table 4.1.1: Questionnaire Distribution and Return


Questionnaire Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Returned 240 86.1
Not returned 39 13.9
Total distributed 279 100
Source: Field Survey, 2020

Table 4.1.1 above shows the distribution and returns of the questionnaire. The copies

of questionnaire administered were 279 representing (100%) from which 240 (86.1%)

were returned, while 39 representing (13.9%) were not returned. The 240 copies of

questionnaire that were returned were considered adequate enough for making valid

deductions and conclusions. Hence, the research analysis was based on the returned

copies of questionnaire.

Table 4.1.2: Sex Distribution of Respondents


Option Frequency Percentage (%)
Male 148 61.7
Female 92 38.3
Total 240 100
Source: Field Survey, 2020

39
The table 4.1.2 shows the responses of staff sex distribution. In the table, 148

respondents representing 61.7% of the respondents stated that they are males while the

remaining 92 respondents representing 38.3% stated that they are females. Therefore

this table reveals that majority of the respondents are males.

Table 4.1.3: Distribution of respondents’ marital status


Option Frequency Percentage (%)
Married 103 42.9
Single 137 57.1
Total 240 100
Source: field survey, 2020

The table 4.1.3 shows the responses of respondents on marital status. Out of 103

respondents representing 42.9% of the entire respondents are married, while 137

respondents representing 57.1% indicated single. Hence, it is crystal clear that single

respondents are more.

Table 4.1.4: Age Distribution of Respondents


Option Frequency Percentage (%)
21-29 105 43.7
30-39 95 39.6
40-49 34 14.2
50 and above 6 2.5
Total 240 100%
Source: Field Survey 2020

The table 4.1.4 shows the age distribution of respondents. In the table, 105

respondents representing 43.7% out of the entire respondents are within the age of 21-

29 years, 95 respondents representing 43.7% are within the age bracket of 30-39

years, 34 respondents representing 14.2% are within the age bracket 40-49 years,

40
while the remaining 6 respondents representing 2.5% indicated 50 and above. Hence,

the majority of the respondents fall within 21-29 years.

Table 4.1.5: Distribution on length of career service


OPTIONS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE %
0- 10 years 88 36.6
11-20 years 124 51.6
21 years and Above 28 11.6
TOTAL 240 100
Source: Field Study, 2020

The above table presents the research respondents on length of career service of the

staff. In the table, 88 respondents representing 36.6% of the respondents indicated that

they have worked between 0 – 10 years, 124 respondents representing 51.6% of the

respondents indicated that they have worked for 11-20 years while remaining 28

respondents representing 11.6% indicated that they have worked for above 21 years

and above. Thus, base on the evidence on the table the majority of the respondent falls

within above 11 - 20 years of work experience.

Table 4.1.6: Mean rating of responses of respondents on the effect of workplace-


layout on employee goal attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu
S/N ITEMS SA A U D SD N FX X Decision
1 The working space area is sufficient and 116 95 1 12 16 240 1003 4.2 Accepted
roomy enough
2 The room or office I operate from is well 101 80 9 5 45 240 907 3.8 Accepted
illuminated it enhances my resolve towards
achieving goals
3 The temperatures in the room or office I 119 83 1 9 28 240 976 4.1 Accepted
operate from is appropriate
4 My furniture is comfortable enough to 126 82 - 10 22 240 1000 4.2 Accepted
enable me perform my jobs without getting
tired
5 My office is sufficiently equipped for my 134 89 1 2 14 240 1047 4.4 Accepted
job performance
Total Mean 4.1 Accepted
Source: Field Survey, 2020.

41
Table 4.1.6 above shows the mean mark calculated from the response of the

respondents on the effect of workplace-layout on employee goal attainment of

manufacturing firms in Enugu. Based on the decision rule, that if x is below 2.5 it is

considered rejected and if x is 2.5 and above it is considered accepted. However, all

the items in the table were accepted because they score the mean score of 2.5 and the

overall mean is 4.1 it therefore proves that workplace-layout affect employee goal

attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Table 4.1.7: Mean rating of responses of respondents on how conducive


ventilation contributes to the productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu
S/N ITEMS SA A U D SD N FX X Decision

6 My office temperature affects my normal level of 118 78 3 2 39 240 952 3.9 Accepted
performance positively
7 Windows in my office provide me the fresh air 87 90 2 29 32 240 891 3.7 Accepted
which energies me to work effectively
8 I am able to control temperature and airflow in my 110 69 1 50 10 240 939 3.9 Accepted
office
9 The overall temperature in my office is pleasant 113 74 2 40 10 240 957 3.9 Accepted
10 The overall layout of the offices and workspaces 101 80 9 5 45 240 907 3.8 Accepted
here are good
Total Mean 3.8 Accepted
Source: Field Survey, 2020.

Table 4.1.7 above shows the mean mark calculated from the response of the

respondents on the effect of corporate social responsibility on business environment

(internal and external environment). Based on the decision rule, that if x is below 2.5

it is considered rejected and if x is 2.5 and above it is considered accepted. However,

all the items in the table were accepted because they score the mean score of 2.5 and

the overall mean is 3.8 it therefore proves that conducive ventilation contributes to the

productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

42
2.2 Test of Hypotheses

Test of Hypothesis One

Ho : Workplace layout has no significant effect on employee goal attainment of


manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Hi : Workplace layout has significant effect on employee goal attainment of


manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Table 4.2.1a Model Summary


R Adjusted Std. Error of
Model R Square R Square the Estimate
1 .663a .440 .431 .37617
a Predictors: (Constant), Workplace layout

Table 4.2.1a above revealed that there is a strong significance at R = .663 between

workplace layout and the level of effect on goal attainment of manufacturing firms in

Enugu. An examination of the table shows that R square = .440 which implies that

workplace layout accounts for 44% of variations having a significant effect on goal

attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Table 4.2.1b ANOVA


Sum of Mean
Model Squares Df Square F Sig.
Regression 20.123 3 6.708 47.403 .000b
1 Residual 25.612 236 .142
Total 45.735 239
a. Predictors: (Constant), Workplace layout
b. Dependent Variable: Goal attainment

Table 4.2.1b shows that the F-value is the Mean Square Regression (6.708) divided by

the Mean Square Residual (0.142), yielding F=47.403. From the results, the model in

this table is statistically significant (Sig =.000). Therefore, workplace layout is a

significant predictor on goal attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu at F (3,184)

= 47.403.

43
Table 4.2.1c: Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) .782 .236 3.309 .001
1 WL .230 .054 .663 4.272 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Goal attainment

The table above revealed the degree of the effect of workplace layout and its level of

significance. The statistical results is given as; (workplace layout; β=.230; t=4.272;

p<0.01). The statistical result implies that workplace layout is a statistically significant

predictor of goal attainment.

Linear Regression Model is given as Y = a + βX

Where Y = goal attainment

a = constant

βx = Coefficient of X

Therefore goal attainment = .782 + 0.230WL

Based on the results in the Anova table above, the significance level for all items are

less than 0.01 therefore we accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null

hypothesis. That is, workplace layout has significant effect on employee goal

attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

44
Test of Hypothesis Two

Ho: Conducive ventilation has significantly contributes to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Hi: Conducive ventilation has no significantly contributes to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Table 4.2.2a: Model Summary


R R Adjusted Std. Error
Model Square R Square of the Estimate

1 .250a .063 .047 .45468


a Predictors: (Constant), Conducive ventilation

Table 4.2.2a above revealed that there is a significance effect at R = .250 between

conducive ventilation and productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu. An

examination of the table shows that the R square = .063 which implies that conducive

ventilation accounts for only 6.3% of variations having a significant effect on

productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Table 4.2.2b ANOVA


Sum of Mean
Model Squares Df Square F Sig.
Regression 2.503 3 .834 4.035 .008b
1 Residual 37.418 236 .207
Total 39.921 239
a. Predictors: (Constant), Conducive ventilation
b. Dependent Variable: Productivity of manufacturing

Table 4.2.2b shows that the F-value is the Mean Square Regression (0.834) divided by

the Mean Square Residual (0.207), yielding F=4.035. The model in this table shows

that conducive ventilation is statistically significant at (Sig =.008) and is a significant

predictor of productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu at F (3,184) = 4.035.

45
Table 4.2.2c: Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Standardized T Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 3.638 .286 12.735 .000
1 CV .229 .093 .250 2.459 .015
a. Dependent Variable: Productivity

The table above revealed the degree of effect of conducive ventilation on productivity

of manufacturing firms in Enugu and its level of significance. The statistical results is

given as; (conducive ventilation β =.019; t=.171; p>0.05). The statistical result implies

that conducive ventilation is a statistically significant predictor of productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Linear Regression Model is given as Y = a + βX

Where Y = Productivity

a = constant

βx = Coefficient of X

Therefore productivity = 3.638 + 0.019CV

Based on the results in the Anova table above, the significance level for conducive

ventilation is less than 0.01 therefore we accept the alternative hypothesis and reject

the null hypothesis. That is conducive ventilation has significantly contributes to the

productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

46
Test of Hypothesis Three
Ho : Lighting has no significant effect on employee job performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

Hi : Lighting has significant effect on employee job performance of manufacturing

firms in Enugu.

Table 4.2.3a:Model Summary


R Adjusted Std. Error of
Model R Square R Square the Estimate
1 .125(a) .016 .008 1.25837
a Predictors: (Constant), Lighting

The model summary (Table 4.2.3a) describes the proportion (or percentage) of the

(sample) variation in the dependent variable that can be ascribed to the independent

variable(s). Further explanation is given under the Table 4.2.3b below.

Table 4.2.3b: ANOVA


Sum of Mean
Model Squares Df Square F Sig.
1 Regression 3.367 1 3.367 2.126 .147(a)
Residual 210.603 238 1.583
Total 213.970 239
a Predictors: (Constant), Lighting
b Dependent Variable: Employee job performance

In this study 1.6% variation in industrial solid waste. The third hypothesis which

stated that “lighting has no significant effect on employee job performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu” was rejected at R=0.125, R2=0.016, F (1, 349)

=2.126; p<.05. The null hypothesis is therefore rejected. This implies that lighting has

significant effect on employee job performance of manufacturing firms in Enugu.

47
Table 4.2.3c: Coefficients(a)
Mode Unstandardized Standardized
l Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 3.255 .090 -2.826 .005
L 1.034 .021 .125 49.856 .000
a Dependent Variable: Employee job performance

The table above revealed the degree of effect of lighting had on employee job

performance and its level of significance. The statistical results is given as; (Lighting;

β =.1.034; t=49.856; p<0.05). The statistical result implies that lighting is a

statistically significant effect on employee job performance of manufacturing firms in

Enugu.

Linear Regression Model is given as Y = a + βX

Where Y = Employee job performance

a = constant

βx = Coefficient of X

Therefore employee job performance = 3.255 + 1.034L

Based on the results in the Anova table above, the significant levels for lighting is less

than 0.01 therefore we accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis.

That is, lighting has significant effect on employee job performance of manufacturing

firms in Enugu.

48
4.3 Discussion of Findings

The finding of the study revealed that workplace layout has significant effect on

employee goal attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu. This finding is in

agreement with the study of Mendis (2016) which revealed that there is a strong

positive relationship between workplace design and job performance of operational

level employees. The study of Gitahi, Maina and Koima (2015) showed that physical

aspects were did not have a significant effect on employee performance while the

psychosocial and work life balance factors were significant. The results therefore

indicated that psychosocial aspects exhibited the strongest association with employee

performance while physical aspects and psychosocial aspects were moderate.

The finding showed that conducive ventilation has significantly contributes to the

productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu. This finding is consistent with the

finding of Lankeshwara (2010) which showed that hat the job aids, supervisory

support and physical work environment as positively influential for the employee’s

performance and job aid as the most critical predictor. Implications of the findings and

recommendations are offered. In agreement Malik, Ahmad, Gomez and Ali (2011)

revealed that performance of employees mostly depends on physical working

conditions, training and development and communication practices.

The finding revealed that lighting has significant effect on employee job performance

of manufacturing firms in Enugu. This finding is in agreement with Duru and

Shimawua (2017) which revealed that e if office is neat, noiseless, properly arranged

well lighted and ventilated, employees will feel a sense of belonging and this will

49
make them to work efficiently and effectively. Good physical working environment

inspires workers to spend more time in their various offices, employees responded

emotionally better towards the provision of good office environment by not absenting

themselves unnecessarily from work, lateness to work and other negative attitude will

be drastically reduced. The study of Hester (2012) supported the results by revealing

that the physical and social dimensions combined explain approx. 50% of the variance

of the perceived productivity.

50
CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of Findings

The study made the following findings:

i. Workplace layout had significant effect on employee goal attainment of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

ii. Conducive ventilation had significantly contributes to the productivity of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

iii. Lighting had significant effect on employee job performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu.

5.2 Conclusion

This research investigates the effect of work place design and performance of

manufacturing firms in Enugu. Three factors of workplace design (workplace layout,

conducive ventilation and lighting) are considered to represent the impact of

workplace design on employees performance which affects the overall organisational

performance. Hence, the work place design affects employees performance, where it

affects employees satisfaction, motivation and retention, and affects the efficient and

smooth of workflow, team working, collaboration, sharing information, feedback and

response time, socializing and relationships between employees, it affects employees

privacy , distraction , absenteeism and their commitment of work times.

51
5.3 Recommendation

Based on the findings made in the course of this study, the following

recommendations are hereby suggested:

i. Management should ensure that there open spaces within the workplace as it

will help to provide natural lighting and fresh air that enhances employee

performance.

ii. In lighting of the workplace, management should provide proper and adequate

controlled artificial as well as natural light to improve the office design for

better performance.

iii. Air ventilation and temperature should be suitable and controlled.

52
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alexander, K., Atkin, B., Brochner, J., & Haugen, T. (2014). Facilities management:
Innovation and performance. London: Spon Press

Al-Ahmadi. H, (2009). Factors affecting performance of hospital nurses in Riyadh


Region, Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,
22(1): 40 – 54

Al-Hasan, S., & James, P. (2013). Cultural control and multinationals: The case of
privatized Jordanian companies. International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 14(7): 1284-1295.

Amir, F. & Sahibzada, S. (2018), Measuring the impact of office environment on


performance level of employees in the private sector of Pakistan. Pakistan,
Islamabad : Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology

Aston-James, C.E., & Ashkanasy, N.M (2015). What Lies Beneath? A Process of
Analysis of Affective Events Theory, The Effect of Affect in Organizational
Settings Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol.1 pp. 23-46

Becker, F. (2012). Improving organisational performance by exploiting workplace


flexibility. Journal of Faculty Management, 1(2), 154-162.

Bhagwatti, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization, N.Y, Oxford Univ. Press

Brill M, Margulis, S. and Konar, E. (2009). Using office design to increase productivity.
Buffalo, NY: Westinghouse. 1985

Briner, R.B. (2000).Relationships Between Work Environments, Psychological


Environments & Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Occupational Medicine,
Vol. 50 No. 5 pp. 299-303

Challenger, J.A. (2000). 24 Trends reshaping the workplace. The Futurist, 35-41.

Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace Environment And Its Impact On Organisational


Performance In Public Sector Organisations

Clements-Croome, D., Kaluarachchi, Y. (2010) An Assessment of the Influence of the In-


door Environment on the Productivity of Occupants in Offices Design,
Construction and Operation of Healthy Buildings: 67-81.

Collyer, A. (2019). Future workspaces, design. Retrieved from:


https://www.rhinooffice.co.uk/blog/a-brief-history-of-workplace-design. accesssed
on 30 Januray, 2020

53
Darroch, J.T (2015). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions
of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.

Delery, J. E. & Doty, D.H. (2016). Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource
Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational
Performance Predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-835.

Doman, U. (2018). The impact of the indoor environment on the performance of


employee. Journal on Finance and Banking 33(1) 22-33.

Duru, DE. and Shimawua, D (2017). The effect of work environment on employee
productivity: A Case Study of Edo city transport services Benin City, Edo State
Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, Vol.5, No.5,
pp.23-39

Elgner, Helga (2016). New interior design trends, Design aspects – colours and
materials , accessed on april 2006

Fabbrizzi, F. (2012). office design. TeNeues, 2002

Garbie, I. H. (2014). An Experimental Study on Assembly Workstation Considering


Ergonomically Issues. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on
Computers & Industrial Engineering

Gitahi, N.S., Maina, W. and Koima, J.(2015). Effect of Workplace Environment on the
Performance of Commercial Banks Employees in Nakuru Town. International
Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), Vol,3(12): PP 76-89

Hameed, A., & Amjad, S. (2019). Impact of office design on employees productivity: a
case study of banking organizations of Abbottabad, Pakistan

Hester, V.S. (2012). The effects of workplace design on knowledge worker’s perceived
productivity in Dutch Universities of Applied Science.. 11th EuroFM Research
Symposium EFMC

Jacqueline, C. V. and Mariam, W. (2015). The effect of workplace design on quality of


life at work. Published in: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of
Life Research (2015) Eds: Ghozlane Fleury-‐Bahi, Enric Pol, Oscar Navarro.
London: Springer.

Kaplan, S. (2015). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework.


Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.

Kohun, R.(2012). Workplace Environment and its impact on organizational performance


in Public sector organizations, International Journal of Enterprise Computing and
Business System International Systems, Vol. 1 Issue 1 January 2011

54
Lankeshwara, P. (2010) A study on the impact of workplace environment on employee’s
performance: with reference to the Brandix Intimate Apparel - Awissawella.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS), 3(1): 47-57

Mccoy, J.M. and Evans, G,W. (2015). Physical work environment. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publication; 219:245.

Mendis, M.V.S. (2016). Workplace Design and Job Performance: A Study of Operational
Level Employees in the Apparel Industry of Sri Lanka. International Journal of
Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 12, December 2016

Malik, M.I. Ahmad, A., Gomez, S.F. and Ali, M. (2011). A study of work environment
and employees’ performance in Pakistan. African Journal of Business
Management Vol. 5(34), pp. 13227-13232,

Myerson, J. & Ross, P. (2016), Space to work. Laurence King bublishing

Nofal, J.J, Hollenbeck, B., Gerhart & P. Wright. (2014). Human resources management:
Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Noruzy, T. Lau-Chung, M. & Foley, S. (2013). Strategic Human Resource Management,


Firm Performance, and Employee relations climate in China, Human resource
Management, 47(1): 73-90

Rao, M. P. (2009) ,Interior design: Principles and practice. (3rd, Edition), delhi: standard
publishing

Rayfield, Julie (2017). office interior design guide: an introduction for facilities managers
and designers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York: Library of congress
cataloging.

Riratanaphong, C. (2019). Innovative Workplace Design: A Case Study of the Faculty of


Architecture, Delft University of Technology. Journal of Architectural/Planning
Research and Studies Volume 6(3)

Robbins, S. P. and Judge, C. R. (2007). Contemporary human behavior theory: A critical


perspective for social work. Pearson Higher Ed. Robson, C., Real World Research.
Second Edition, Blackwell publishing

Schultz, Duane P.; Schultz, Sydney Ellen (2010). Psychology and Work Today: An
Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology (10th Ed.). New York
City: Prentice Hall.

Sink, K. & Tuttle, O. (2009). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies: New


perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.

55
Srivastava, A. K. (2008). Effect of perceived work environment on employees‟ job
behaviour and organizational effectiveness, Journal of Applied Psychology
Banarashindu, University, Varanasi.

Temessek, (2009) Expanding the Psychosocial Work Environment: Workplace Norms


and Work–Family Conflict as Correlates of Stress and Health 3(1) 71 -88.

Wyon, D. P. (2014). The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity.
Indoor air, 14(s7), 92-101.

Vischer, JC. (2017). The effects of the physical environment on job performance:
Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health.;175:184.

Veitch, C. R., & Clout, M. N. (2012). Turning the tide: The eradication of invasive
species: Proceedings of the International Conference on Eradication of Island
Invasives (No. 27). IUCN.

Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan


offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research and
Technology, 32(4), 199-212.

Zainol, T. and Ayadurai, H. (2011). The Future of Human Resources Management.


Virginia: John Wiley and Sons Incorporated.

56
APPENDIX

University of Nigeria Enugu Campus,


Faculty of Business Administration
Department of Management
13th August, 2020

Dear Respondent,

REQUEST FOR THE COMPLETION OF QUESTIONNAIRE

I am a student of the above named institution and Department, undertaking a research on


“effect of work place design and performance of manufacturing firms in Enugu”. Here are a
set of questions for your kind completion and return. The questionnaire is in partial
fulfillment for the award of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Management of the University of
Nigeria.
I therefore, solicit your assistance in providing answers to the questions contained in this
questionnaire. All information provided by you would be treated with strict confidentiality
and will be used duly for academic purpose.
Thanks in anticipation of a positive response

Yours faithfully

UGWOKE AMARACHI MABEL

57
Section A
INSTRUCTION: Please tick (√) in your preferred option

1. Gender : (a) Male[ ] (b) Female[ ]

2. Marital Status : (a) Single[ ] (b) Married[ ]

3. Age : (a) 21-29 years[ ] (b) 30-39 years[ ] (c)40-49 [ ] (d) 50 and above[ ]

4. How long have you work with Nigeria Breweries Enugu


a. 0 - 10 years [ ]
b. 11 - 20 years [ ]
c. 21 and above [ ]

SECTION B

Please tick (√) in the appropriate column that represents your opinion in each statement.
Key words are shown below:
SA - Strongly Agree
A – Agree
U - Undecided
D - Disagree
SD – Strongly Disagree

SECTION (B1)

The following statements are meant to elicit responses from the respondents on the effect of
workplace-layout on employee goal attainment of manufacturing firms in Enugu
S/N ITEMS Response Keys
SA A U D SD
5 4 3 2 1
1 The working space area is sufficient and roomy enough
2 The room or office I operate from is well illuminated it enhances
my resolve towards achieving goals
3 The temperatures in the room or office I operate from is
appropriate
4 My furniture is comfortable enough to enable me perform my jobs
without getting tired
5 My office is sufficiently equipped for my job performance

58
SECTION (B2)
The following statements are meant to elicit responses from the respondents on how
conducive ventilation contributes to the productivity of manufacturing firms in Enugu
S/N ITEMS Response Keys
SA A U D SD
5 4 3 2 1
6 My office temperature affects my normal level of performance
positively
7 Windows in my office provide me the fresh air which energies
me to work effectively
8 I am able to control temperature and airflow in my office
9 The overall temperature in my office is pleasant
10 The overall layout of the offices and workspaces here are good

SECTION (B3)
The following statements are meant to elicit responses from the respondents on the effect of
lighting on employee job performance of manufacturing firms in Enugu
S/N ITEMS Response Keys
SA A U D SD
5 4 3 2 1
11 My workspace is provided with efficient lighting so I can work
easily without strain on my eyes or visual confusion
12 Ample amount of natural lighting comes into my office
13 My office lighting support the function and desired atmosphere
influences my job performance
14 We don’t face any problems of lighting in my office like silhouette,
sparkle or glare
15 The office lighting support my overall productivity and morale

59

You might also like