Link

Volume of Information
Response time in micro seconds
Precesion
Mean rank
Categories displayed
User friendly
Freshness repersenting recent content out of 5 rating
Coverage represinting data covered by a singl source out of 5 rating
Relevancy of information out of 5 rating

The above table is the Input table , where the values observed during the research are
The values observed during going through all the search engines are added in the abov
outcome.
 INPUT TABLE
Google Bing Yahoo
https://www.google.com/ https://www.bing.com/ https://ca.yahoo.com/
16600000 552000000 552000000
0.3 0.5 0.6
1 2 4
1 5 4
9 8 5
10 8 9
4 3 4
3 4 4
4 3 2

s observed during the research are added

arch engines are added in the above input table , which automatically shows the graps and final
 DuckDuckgo Ecosia Max score
https://duckduckgo.com/?va=b&t=hchttps://www.ecosia.org/?c=en
Max score
150,000,000 22,000,000 552,000,000
0.7 1 1
3 3 4
2 4 5
5 6 9
6 5 10
3 1 4
2 2 4
3 2 4

and final
 Final Result Notes Response time in micro seconds
Weightage Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia Final result shows the following outcomes: Volume of Information
Best search engine : Yahoo with 767 being the average 600000000 552000000 552000000 1.2
Volume of Information 5 0 10 10 3 0 value for all the outcomes with the parameers 1
Response time 10 7 5 4 3 0
considered. 500000000 1
1)I have categorized the Pie Chart in such a way that it shows the
Precesion 18 3 5 10 8 8 majority of the parameter which is Relevancy which I priortize the 400000000 0.8 0.7
most when I compared all the search engines and the other
Mean rank 2 8 0 2 6 2 parameter intersest are given as per the repective interest 300000000 0.6
0.6
0.5
percentage. 200000000
Categories displayed 5 10 9 6 6 7 150,000,000 0.4 0.3
2) The table shows the output of the data entered into the input 100000000
User friendly 10 10 8 9 6 5 table,sheet 1, for various parameters, rated overall out of a common 16600000 22,000,000 0.2
Freshness 15 10 8 10 8 3
value which is 10 and then incorporated with my parameter 0
weightage and giving out the final best optimized search engine. Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia 0
Coverage 10 8 10 10 5 5 Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia
3) The below line chart shows the representation of each parameter
Relevancy 25 10 8 5 8 5 with all the search engines compared .
Precision Mean rank
4.5 6
4
4
5
Total 758 714 767 628 437
5
3.5
3 3 4 4
3 4
2.5
2 3
2
SEARCH ENGINE SCORE (PER THOUSAND)
2
1000 1.5 2
1
1 1
767 1
758 0.5
750 714
628 0 0
Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia
500 437
Categories displayed User friendly
250 10 9 12
9 8 10
8 10 9
7 8
0 6 8
Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia 6 5 5
5 6
6 5
4
3 4
Weightage 2 2
1
0 0
Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia
5
Volume of Information
10
25 Response time
Freshness repersenting recent content out of 5 rating Coverage represinting data covered by a singl
Precesion 4.5 source out of 5 rating
4 4
4 5
Mean rank 3.5 3 3
18 3 4
Categories displayed 2.5 3
2
User friendly 1.5 1 2
10 1
0.5 1
Freshness
2 0 0
Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia
5 Coverage
15 Relevancy of information out of 5 rating
10 Relevancy
4.5
4
4
3.5
3 3
3
2.5
2 2
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Google Bing Yahoo DuckDuckgo Ecosia