The ethical position known as "biocentrism" emphasizes the existence of

living things in the environment and contends that all living things are
equally valuable, regardless of how they are used by humans. When
making moral and ethical decisions, biocentric ethics advocates giving all
living things equal weight rather than emphasizing the welfare of humans.
Human lives are frequently given priority in ethical decisions.

All environmental ethics that extend the status of moral object from
humans to all other living things in nature are referred to as biocentrism. In
a limited sense, it emphasizes the worth and rights of organic individuals,
contending that the survival of unique living things should be given moral
precedence.

According to (Markowitz and Shariff, 2012) Understanding how moral

intuitions can be developed to resonate with goals associated to
protecting the natural world is vital for promoting environmentalism.
Therefore, investigating the psychological underpinnings of biocentrism
holds the potential to enlighten on a way to a more sustainable future. To
accomplish this, the concept of biocentrism must be dismantled and
operationalized in ways that have done to enhance.

Throughout history, there have been many instances of the application of

biocentric principles, particularly in cultures where people have a close
connection to nature. For instance, numerous Native American traditions
place a strong emphasis on the sacredness of nature. Religions also
contain biocentric ethical principles.

In conclusion, there are at least two distinct moral issues that can justify
biocentrism. Protecting sentient and humanized entities is the primary
goal of biocentrism when it is aimed at preventing harm, and this
propensity to romanticise nature is probably balanced by individual
differences. In contrast, biocentrism acts primarily at a more systemic
level when it is concerned with maintaining the purity of the environment
as opposed to concentrating on the protection of distinct, individuated
beings.

Additionally, a purity-based biocentrism is likely moderated by individual

differences in spirituality and in tendencies to treat certain objects as
possessing inherent value. The psychological profiles underlying
biocentric environmentalist attitudes due to harm concerns and due to
purity concerns are therefore very different, although they might
sometimes co-occur. Recognizing this distinction carries substantial
implications for the efficacy of particular forms of environmentalist
discourse (Rottman J. et al.)

(Miranda Schouten, 03 23, 2022) https://study.com/academy/lesson/

biocentrism-in-environmental-ethics.html

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00905/full

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00905/full

ecocentrism

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
315580893_Why_ecocentrism_is_the_key_pathway_to_sustainability