Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allergy to latex
>>decreasing among health-care workers because of the availability of other types of gloves
>> allergies patches of dry, itchy irritation on the hands; delayed hypersensitivity reactions
resembling poison ivy that appear 24 to 48 hours following exposure
>>true immediate hypersensitivity reactions often characterized by facial flushing and
respiratory difficulty
>>Hand sanitizing immediately after removal of gloves and avoiding powdered gloves may aid
in preventing the development of latex allergy
>>Any signs of a latex reaction should be reported to a supervisor because a true latex allergy
can be life-threatening
LAB CONTAINERS
Primary container
>>glass, metal, or plastic must be watertight with a positive screw-on cap
>> must be wrapped with enough absorbent material to be capable of absorbing all its contents.
Multiple specimens must be wrapped individually before placing them in the leakproof
secondary container
Secondary container
>>must be placed in a sturdy outer container made of corrugated fiberboard, wood, metal, or
rigid plastic
>>An itemized list of contents in a sealed plastic bag is also placed in the outer container
>>Ice packs are placed between the secondary and the outer container
>>Additional measures must be taken when using ice and dry ice
CHEMICAL SPILLS
>>When skin or eye contact occurs, the best first aid is to immediately flush the area with water
for at least 15 minutes and then seek medical attention
>>Laboratorians must know the location of the emergency shower and eyewash station in the
laboratory, Do not try to neutralize chemicals spilled on the skin
Chemical Spills
>>SDS gives specific information for the appropriate action to be taken for a chemical spill
>>A chemical spill kit must be available in every laboratory and contains appropriate PPE
(gloves and goggles), absorbent pads, disposable bags, and waste tags. Liquids are absorbed
using a neutralizer, such as a sodium bicarbonate and sand mixture, or ground clay
>>After the liquid is absorbed, it is scooped up and placed into a waste bag and labeled
appropriately for disposal
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
>>overall process of guaranteeing quality patient care
>> is the continual monitoring of the entire test process, from test ordering and specimen
collection through reporting and interpreting results
>>Written policies and documented actions as they pertain to the patient, the laboratory,
ancillary personnel, and the health-care provider are required
>> written remedial actions mandating the steps to take when any part of the system fails are
essential to a QM program
Variable
>>defined as anything that can be changed or altered
>>Identification of variables throughout the testing process provides the basis for development
of procedures and policies within the immunology department that are located in the procedure
manual
Preexamination variables
>>occur before the actual testing of the specimen and include test request orders, patient
preparation, time of specimen collection, specimen collection, handling and transport, and
specimen storage
>>Health-care personnel outside the immunology department control many of these factors,
such as ordering tests and collecting specimens; however, communication between
departments and adequate training on the correct procedures for ordering a test, collecting a
specimen, and transporting the specimen improves the turnaround time (TAT) of results, avoids
duplication of test orders, and ensures a high-quality specimen
TAT
>>defined as the amount of time required between the point at which a test is ordered by the
health-care provider and the results are reported to the healthcare provider
>>The laboratory can monitor the TATs for both stat and routine tests to determine areas in the
process that need improvement
"The criteria for specimen rejection for both physical characteristics and labeling errors must be
present. If a specimen is rejected, the criteria for rejecting that specimen must be documented
and available to the health-care provider and nursing staff."
Examination Variables
>> reagents, instrumentation and equipment, testing procedure, QC, preventive maintenance
(PM), access to procedure manuals, review and interpretation of results, and the competency of
personnel performing the tests
Reagents
>>The name and chemical formula of each reagent used, any necessary instructions for
preparation or company source of prepared materials, storage requirements, and procedures for
reagent QC are all found in the procedure manual
>>The type of water used for preparing reagents and controls must be specified
Testing Procedures
>>Detailed and concise testing instructions are written in a step-by-step manner
>>Instructions should begin with specimen preparation, such as time and speed of
centrifugation, and include types of glassware needed, time limitations and stability of
specimens and reagents, calculation formulas and a sample calculation, health and safety
precautions, and procedures
>>Additional procedure information, including reasons for special precautions, sources of error
and interfering substances, helpful hints, clinical situations that influence the test, alternative
procedures, and acceptable TATs for stat tests are listed under the title of Procedure
>>Reference sources should be listed
>>The manufacturer’s package inserts may be included but cannot replace the written
procedure. The laboratory director must sign and date new procedures and all modifications of
procedures before they are used
External Controls
>> verify the accuracy or ability to obtain the expected result and precision ability to obtain the
same result on the same specimen of a test
>>Reliability is the ability to maintain both precision and accuracy
>>The control material is tested in the same manner as the patient samples
>>Analysis of at least two levels of control material is required
>>One of these is a high-level control and the other is a low-level control
>>The concentrations of the controls should be at medically significant levels and should be as
similar to the human specimen as possible
>> Documentation of QC includes dating and initialing the material when it is first opened and
recording the manufacturer’s lot number and the expiration date each time a control is run and a
test result is obtained
Electronic Controls
>>use a mechanical or electrical device in place of a liquid QC specimen
>>This type of QC can be an internal or an external component inserted into a point-of-care
(POC) instrument
>>Electronic controls verify the functional ability of a testing device but do not verify the integrity
of the testing supplies
>>Many test systems use a combination of external and internal controls to verify that the entire
test system is working properly
Postexamination Variables
>> processes that affect the reporting of results and correct interpretation of data
Reporting Results
>>Standardized reporting methods minimize health-care provider confusion when reporting
results
>>Electronic transmission is now the most common method for reporting results
>>The telephone is frequently used to convey results of stat tests and critical values. Personnel
on hospital units and from health-care providers’ offices often call requesting additional results
>>When telephoning results, confirm that the results are being reported to the appropriate
person. The time of the call and the name of the person receiving the results must be
documented according to the facility’s policy
>>Written procedures should be available for the reporting of critical values, which are
significantly abnormal results that are life-threatening
>>Laboratorians must be familiar with the critical values for each test and the processes for
notification of attending staff in a timely manner
Result Errors
>>Errors may be discovered in the laboratory through a QM procedure known as the delta
check that compares a patient’s test results with the previous results
>>Variation outside the established parameters alerts laboratory personnel to the possibility of
an error that occurred during the testing procedure or in patient identification
>>Automated comparison of patient results with predetermined preapproved criteria
(autoverification) is often programmed into many laboratory analyzers to expedite result delivery
>> manual must contain a written procedure for reporting, reviewing, and correcting errors.
Examination
• Sample misidentification
• Erroneous instrument calibration
• Reagent deterioration
• Poor testing technique
• Instrument malfunction
• Interfering substances present
• Misinterpretation of QC data
Postexamination
• Patient misidentification
• Poor handwriting
• Transcription error
• Poor quality of instrument printer
• Failure to send report
• Failure to call critical values
• Inability to identify interfering substances
Interpreting Results
>>The specificity and the sensitivity for each test should be included in the procedure manual
for correct interpretation of results
Nonwaived Tests
>>Moderate-complexity tests
>>Tests that require documentation of training in test principles, instrument calibration, periodic
proficiency testing, and on-site inspections
>>Automated immunoassays
>>High-complexity tests
>>Tests that require sophisticated instrumentation and a high degree of interpretation
>>Proficiency testing and on-site inspections are required
>>Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE)
Quality indicators
>>are the measurements developed by each laboratory to determine if the QSEs are being met
>>They may include such items as appropriateness of the testing, correct patient identification,
timely reporting of laboratory results, and correct proficiency testing results
Six Sigma
>>statistical modification of the original Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) method adopted by TJC as
a guideline for health-care organizations
>> focuses on minimizing variability in process outputs that lead to wasted time and resources
>> Reducing variation will potentially reduce costs, improve performance, and increase
profitability
>>The primary goal of Six Sigma is to measure, to quantify errors, and then to reduce
variables and decrease errors to a level of 3.4 defects per 1 million opportunities
>>Attaining this goal indicates that the laboratory is addressing factors critical to customer
satisfaction and quality care