The document discusses the need for an international strategy for improving healthcare quality beyond Turkey. It analyzes Turkey's efforts to enhance quality through evidence-based treatment, patient safety, and electronic health records. However, Turkey still faces challenges like inadequate funding and infrastructure. The US, UK, and Germany are examined for their work on quality, though each system has issues - the UK has financial and staffing problems while the US struggles with high costs. The authors argue a comprehensive strategy should create standard metrics, adopt patient-centered care, use continuous quality improvement, and involve cross-border cooperation and information sharing to effectively raise standards globally.
The document discusses the need for an international strategy for improving healthcare quality beyond Turkey. It analyzes Turkey's efforts to enhance quality through evidence-based treatment, patient safety, and electronic health records. However, Turkey still faces challenges like inadequate funding and infrastructure. The US, UK, and Germany are examined for their work on quality, though each system has issues - the UK has financial and staffing problems while the US struggles with high costs. The authors argue a comprehensive strategy should create standard metrics, adopt patient-centered care, use continuous quality improvement, and involve cross-border cooperation and information sharing to effectively raise standards globally.
The document discusses the need for an international strategy for improving healthcare quality beyond Turkey. It analyzes Turkey's efforts to enhance quality through evidence-based treatment, patient safety, and electronic health records. However, Turkey still faces challenges like inadequate funding and infrastructure. The US, UK, and Germany are examined for their work on quality, though each system has issues - the UK has financial and staffing problems while the US struggles with high costs. The authors argue a comprehensive strategy should create standard metrics, adopt patient-centered care, use continuous quality improvement, and involve cross-border cooperation and information sharing to effectively raise standards globally.
013-19-0156 Title: An International Strategy for Quality in Healthcare Beyond Turkey Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 334043066_AN_INTERNATIONAL_STRATEGY_FOR_QUALITY_IN_HEALTHCARE_BE YOND_TURKEY_THREE_COUNTRY_REVIEW Published in June 2019 Summary: In the article "An International Strategy for Quality in Healthcare Beyond Turkey: Three Country Review," the necessity of a thorough international strategy for quality improvement in healthcare systems outside of Turkey is discussed. This strategy should incorporate the ideas of patient-centered care, evidence-based medicine, and continuous quality improvement. The first section of the article looks at Turkey's healthcare system and efforts to enhance its quality, stressing current initiatives to increase the use of evidence-based treatment, improve patient safety, and integrate electronic health records. Notwithstanding these efforts, the authors argue that Turkey's healthcare system continues to confront substantial obstacles, such as insufficient funding, unequal distribution of healthcare services, and inadequate infrastructure. The healthcare systems of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany are then contrasted in terms of their efforts to increase quality. Although these nations have achieved tremendous progress in raising the standard of healthcare, the authors point out that each system has particular difficulties. For instance, while the UK's healthcare system issues financial shortfalls and personnel shortages, the American healthcare system contends with excessive healthcare expenditures. According to the authors, a comprehensive international strategy for healthcare quality should incorporate a number of crucial elements, including the creation of standardized quality metrics, the adoption of efficient patient-centered care, and the application of continuous quality improvement techniques. The authors also contend that the effectiveness of such a plan depends on cross-border cooperation and information exchange. The authors stress the significance of an extensive worldwide plan for healthcare quality that involves cross-border cooperation and information exchange and goes beyond particular country strategies. The quality of treatment given to patients throughout the world may be significantly improved, according to their argument.