Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract-This paper is purely a model to determine the present the system that is required for PD detection
method to advance Partial Discharge (PD) detection. The is quite extensive as many high cost equipment are
research shall involve matlab and Verilog High used to monitor real time PD events.
Development Language (VHDL) programming to
evaluate the use of Field Programming Gate Array
As for the sake of comparison, the brand VLF-0.1
(FPGA) for the detection and counting of partial
Hz system, needs outage, cable shielded sensor,
discharge signals.
and its effective range is 4 km for PD detection and
2 km for PD location. This system costs
Keyword- Partial Discharge Detection, Magnitude Field,
FPGA Technology, Peak Detector, Real Time RM600,000. The brand OWTS-200 Hz system,
Processing, Underground Cable, Portable Detector, also needs outage, cable shielded sensor, and its
VHDL Programming. effective range is 4 km for PD detection and 2 km
for PD location and this system costs RM700,000.
I. INTRODUCTION The typical 50Hz On-line system, does not need
outage, the sensor is clamped on cable earth, and its
effective range is 5 km for PD detection and 2.5 km
for PD location. However this system costs
RM220,000 for sensor and RM180,000 for the
scope. The Magnetic Probe [1] system does not
Fig. 1 Comparison between existing system need outage; the sensor is a magnetic probe, and its
effective range is unlimited for PD detection. This
A Partial Discharge (PD) is a flow of electrons and system detects from above the ground as shown in
ions which occurs in a gas over a small volume of Fig. 2 and costs RM2.40 for the sensor and less
the total insulation system. This short duration than RM50,000 for the proposed processor as will
series of events emit acoustic, optical, electrical be designed in this project. The functional approach
and electromagnetic energy. PDs can be detected of the processor will be dealth in this paper.
by measuring any of this radiation energy. Fig.1
shows the typical method for detecting and
monitoring PD.
1
"International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering" World Congress Science Engineering and
Technology (WCSET), in Penang, Malaysia, 25-27 February 2009.
FPGA
VIRTEX 5
Band Pass ADC
Gaussian Filter 3GSPS
Pulse LNA WITH FPGA
DISPLAY
Peak
Detector
LCD
i 2 and i 3
In short a PD gives rise to voltage and current where voff stands for the offset voltage, AV is the
pulses with time durations in the range of a few voltage gain, and are the second and
nanosecond (ns), travelling at velocities of
third order intercept point[4].
electromagnetic waves. Due to the high
sensitivities of magnetic probes, the shape of the The model of the LNA design is described
pulse is preserved with very high integrity. [2] comprehensively in ref [5]. It should be noted that
the input parameters plus the power consumption
II. DESIGN BLOCK OF THE PD DETECTION used for the circuit dimensioning are the same as in
equation (1).
Fig. 3 shows the functional approach of the
processing layout to count the PD signals. The
shape of the PD signal that will be fed into the
modeled system is a Gaussian pulse having a pulse
width of 1-10nsec. Each of the blocks in the figure
will be describe as follows:
There are two kinds of amplifiers included in the It is noted that the model in equation (1) can be
toolbox of matlab and they are LNA (Low Noise easily implemented by using simulink elementary
Amplifiers) and PGA (Programmable Gain library blocks as shown in Fig. 4. However, this
implementation causes the matlab interpreter to be
Amplifiers). The non-linear function is modeled by
called at each time step, drastically slowing down
4 vin2
the following equation: the simulation time.
v0 voff AV vin 1
vin
i 2 3 i3 2
(1) This problem is aggravated for more complex
2
circuit. In order to overcome this problem, the
nonlinear characteristic has been codified using C-
coded S-functions.[6]
2
"International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering" World Congress Science Engineering and
Technology (WCSET), in Penang, Malaysia, 25-27 February 2009.
2 5
Input Signal Output PD Detection
PD Source Threshold Logic 1
cheby2
<=
In1 Out1
Peak Detector Convert 5V
Gaussian Pulse
PD Source LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) BPF
Block System Band Pass Filter
In1 Out1 0
Display PD Detector
Pulse Counter
PD Detection in 1 micro second
Fig 5. Simulation Model of PD Detection Block with LNA Block, BPF Block (Chebyshev II Method), Peak Detector and
Impulse Counter using Matlab Simulink .
For this purpose, simulink provides different S- In this simulation, BPF block has an upper
function templates which can accommodate the C- bandedge frequency of 1 GHz and lower
coded computation model of different systems.[7] bandedge frequency of 125 MHz. stopband
Detail of simulation model of PD detection with attenuation is 60 dB in elliptic method, and 40 dB
LNA block, BPF block, Peak detector block, and in Chebyshev II method.
Impulse counter block is shown in Fig.5.
C. The Peak Detector / Square Law Detector:
B. Block BPF (Band Pass Filter):
The function of this peak detector is to detect peak
The function of this BPF is to filter out noise and signals from BPF. In this simulation the peak
unwanted frequencies from LNA, because when detector is designed to have a 2 V threshold
PD signal has been amplified by LNA, the noise is voltage. It means that if the input signal is more
also amplified.[8]. Simulation model of BPF Block than 2 V, the output of the peak detector is logic 1
is shown in Fig.6. or 5 V and if input signal is less than 2 V, the
output peak detector is logic 0 or 0 V. Detail of
simulation model of Peak detector is shown in
Input Signal
PD Source
Fig.7.
cheby2
In1 Out1 2
Input Signal
Gaussian Impulse Output PD Detection Threshold
LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) Analog PD Source
Block System Filter Design
ellip
Fig. 6 Band Pass Filter (BPF) Block with Chebyshev II method <=
In1 Out1
Peak Detector Output PD Detection
Gaussian Impulse
There are five methods for designing BPF in LNA (Low Noise Amplifier) BPF
matlab simulink that are Butterworth, Chebyshev I, Block System Band Pass Filter
are quite commonly used in high frequency circuits Fig. 7 Peak Detector Block with 2 V Threshold
due to their easy in implementation.
3
"International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering" World Congress Science Engineering and
Technology (WCSET), in Penang, Malaysia, 25-27 February 2009.
shown in Table 1.[10] Fig.9 Design LNA Block with Gaussian Signal
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time (ns) -9
x 10
-5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
-8
NOT x 10
Data OUTPUT
Pulse Reference in Logical Input Reference
1 micro second Operator
0.01
Fig. 8 Impulse COUNTER Block in PD Detection using
SIMULINK MATLAB 0
-0.01
In this simulation, impulse counter is designed to 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
-8
x 10
count the amount of pulses each 1µs because the
Fig. 11 Compare Input and Ouput Data of LNA Block
pulse to be measured is in the order of With AV=2.5
nanoseconds. This problem is due to the matlab
interpreter is called at each time step and hence
will drastically slow down the simulation time.
4
"International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering" World Congress Science Engineering and
Technology (WCSET), in Penang, Malaysia, 25-27 February 2009.
Data OUTPUT -3
Data INPUT
x 10
4
3
5
A/mm
0
2
-5
1
A/mm
-1 2
A/mm
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Time (ns) -9 -2
x 10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Fig.12 Ouput Data of LNA Block Time (ns)
x 10
-8
With AV=500 Fig.14 Input PD Source and Output Data of BPF Block
With Butterworth methode
B. Test of Band Pass Filter (BPF) Block
Data OUTPUT
2
-3
x 10 Data INPUT
A/mm
10
0
5
A/mm
-2
0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Time (ns) -8
x 10
-5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fig.15 Input PD Source and Output Data of BPF Block
Time (ns) -8
x 10 With Elliptic methode
Data OUTPUT
4
2
C. Test of Peak Detector Block Simulator
A/mm
0 2.5
2
-2
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Time (ns) -8
1
x 10
A/mm
0.5
Fig.13 Input PD Source and Output Data of BPF Block
0
With Chebyshev II methode
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
B.2. Butterworth Method Time (ns)
x 10
-8
4.5
3.5
shown in Fig. 14 that the stopband frequency is 3
Volt Output
extent that two pulses are seen for one pulse in the 1.5
0
in the counting circuit. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Time (ns)
2.5 3 3.5 4
-8
x 10
5
"International Conference on Electronics and Electrical Engineering" World Congress Science Engineering and
Technology (WCSET), in Penang, Malaysia, 25-27 February 2009.
The output of the BPF is fed into the peak detector [2] A. Morgado, V.J. Rivas, R. del Rio, R. Castro-Lopez,
block. Fig. 16 shows the output from the peak F. Fernandez and J.M de la Rosa, ”Behavioral
detector. The amplitude is large enough to be fed to Modeling, Simulation and Synthesis of Multi-
standard Wireless Receivers in
the FPGA block. The number of pulses is now
MATLAB/SIMULINK” VLSI Journal 2008, Vol.41.
accurately reflected in the output of the peak
detector as clear logic signals are produced [3] Bill Schwartz, Michael Carfore, and Dr. Robert Qiu,
“Ultra Wideband Transmitter & Receiver Design,” in
D. Test of Impulse Counter Block Simulator The REU Program of Tennessee Technological
University, July 27, 2005.
Data Output :
[4] Benjamin Nicolle, Mourad Zarour, William Tatinian,
Gilles Jacquemod, “System Design Oriented Low
In this simulation, the counter is set to 100 impulse Noise Amplifier Modeling” in IEEE 2007
per 1µs. Fig. 17 shows the counter will reset each
[5] S. Braun, F. Krug, and P. Russer, “A novel automatic
1µs, and the data output will be hold by a latch for digital quasi-peak 60detector for a time domain
display purpose. The data will be updated to measurement system,” in 2004 IEEE
display each 1µs in simulink. For constant impulse InternationalSymposium On Electromagnetic
Compatibility Digest, August 9–14, Santa Clara,
signal rate, there will be 108 Impulse in 1 s. USA, 2004.
1
Review,” in Proceeding of the IEEE, vol. 77, no. 7,
0.5 pp. 941–981, 1989.[4] A. V. Oppenheim and R. W.
0 Schafer, Discrete–Time Signal Processing.ISBN 0-
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Time (ns) -6
13-214107-8, Prentice-Hall, 1999.
x 10
Data Latch
5 Volt (logic 1)
1
[8] M. S. Chong, “Partial Discharge Mapping of
0.5 Medium Voltage Cables – TNB’s Experience”,
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
CIRED 2001, 18-21 June 2001, Conference
Time (ns) -6
x 10 Publication No. 482 © IEEE 2001
VII. REFERENCE