My Courses

10/5/22, 10:13 AM Assignment 2 - The Hub Oil LI - Graded: Attempt review
Dashboard / My courses / ENGG 404 (LEC 501 550 SEM 601 602 651 652 Winter 2022) / Assignment 2 - The Hub Oil LI
/ Assignment 2 - The Hub Oil LI - Graded
Started on Saturday, 12 March 2022, 6:52 PM

State Finished
Completed on Saturday, 12 March 2022, 7:07 PM
Time taken 15 mins 27 secs
Marks 47.14/55.00
Grade 85.71 out of 100.00
https://eclass.srv.ualberta.ca/mod/quiz/review.php?attempt=10153332&cmid=5830141 1/20
Question 1
Complete
Not graded
Imagine if you will, a refinery had a small fire, but not catastrophic like those that make the global headlines. A root cause analysis was done on
this fire, of which one root from the "loss incident" through to the latent cause. You have been assigned to match the actual cause from the root
to the category and sub-category as illustrated in this graphic:
(Note: The "match" choices in the question for the intermediate causes are denoted as "First Intermediate", "Second Intermediate", and "Third
Intermediate" only to aid in your selection and scoring. There is no significance to the "First", "Second", or "Third" except as it relates to the
automatic scoring function on eClass quizzes.)

Petroleum fire Incident description
Petrol released from pump casing Immediate Cause: Sub-standard condition
Pump casing corroded (failed) First Intermediate
Casing material was incompatible Basic Cause: Design – inadequate technical design
Improper material was used Second Intermediate
Pump design was incorrect Third Intermediate
The engineering work process / program to

Latent Cause - Inadequate Program: relates to RMSE#7 Design, Construction, and Startup
design pumps at this refinery was inadequate
Your answer is partially correct.
The correct answer is: Petroleum fire → Incident description, Petrol released from pump casing → First Intermediate, Pump casing corroded
(failed) → Immediate Cause: Sub-standard condition, Casing material was incompatible → Second Intermediate, Improper material was used →
Third Intermediate, Pump design was incorrect → Basic Cause: Design – inadequate technical design, The engineering work process / program
to design pumps at this refinery was inadequate → Latent Cause - Inadequate Program: relates to RMSE#7 Design, Construction, and Startup
Question 2
Correct
Mark 5.00 out of 5.00
Please recall the PEAP model of losses (People, Environment, Assets, Production). Match the following with the correct PEAP category for the
losses at The Hub Oil Loss Incident:
People - Workers Two (2) fatalities, and six (6) people struck by shrapnel at the Hub Oil Plant

Environment Large noxious plume of black smoke over several days; volume of hydrocarbons released through surface run-off.

Assets Entire facility destroyed; loss of personal and company vehicles.


Production Facility permanently shut down - can no longer receive used oil for recycling.

People - General Wide residential areas were evacuated, with exposure to potentially harmful emissions.
Public

Your answer is correct.

People - Workers: Two (2) fatalities, and six (6) people struck by shrapnel at the Hub Oil Plant
People - General Public: Wide residential areas were evacuated, with exposure to potentially harmful emissions.
Environment: Large noxious plume of black smoke over several days; volume of hydrocarbons released through surface run-off.
Assets: Entire facility destroyed; loss of personal and company vehicles.
Production: Facility permanently shut down - can no longer receive used oil for recycling.
Distractor: The light-rail commuter line running just north of the plant was temporarily shut-down as a precautionary measure.
The correct answer is: People - Workers → Two (2) fatalities, and six (6) people struck by shrapnel at the Hub Oil Plant, Environment → Large
noxious plume of black smoke over several days; volume of hydrocarbons released through surface run-off., Assets → Entire facility destroyed;
loss of personal and company vehicles., Production → Facility permanently shut down - can no longer receive used oil for recycling., People -
General Public → Wide residential areas were evacuated, with exposure to potentially harmful emissions.
Question 3
Partially correct
Match the immediate cause category and sub-category with the appropriate immediate cause
Safety
devices were
made Still #2, a reclaimed pressure vessel, was not rated for the operating pressures and temperatures at the time of the loss incident
inoperable

(SP) -
Not
following
proper
maintenance The water for cleaning the feed pipes to/from Still #2 was not drained and cleared from feed pipes
procedures

or methods
(SP) -
Inadequate
protective
The over-pressure relief valve was removed from Still #2
equipment
(SC) -


Fire and
explosion The contents of Still #2 were held above auto-ignition temperature
hazard (SC) -


Not
following
proper
operating Controlling and monitoring the pressure in Still #2 system was not done following standard operating procedure
procedures

or methods
(SP) -
You have correctly selected 3.

The correct answer is:
Safety devices were made inoperable (SP) - → The over-pressure relief valve was removed from Still #2,
Not following proper maintenance procedures or methods (SP) - → The water for cleaning the feed pipes to/from Still #2 was not drained and
cleared from feed pipes,
Inadequate protective equipment (SC) - → Still #2, a reclaimed pressure vessel, was not rated for the operating pressures and temperatures at
the time of the loss incident,
Fire and explosion hazard (SC) - → The contents of Still #2 were held above auto-ignition temperature,
Not following proper operating procedures or methods (SP) - → Controlling and monitoring the pressure in Still #2 system was not done
following standard operating procedure
Question 4
Partially correct
Match the basic cause category and sub-category with the most appropriate basic cause description
Inadequate job
The skills for cleaning / lancing of pipes were not properly and completely acquired from the original contractor
procedures (Job factor) -
Inadequate training (Job

No qualification or refresher training for employees at Hub Oil
factor) -
Inadequate maintenance
of equipment (Job factor) Pressure gauges on Still #2 System were not maintained nor serviced
-
Lack of knowledge or skill

Standard Operating Procedures were locked away in manager’s office
(Personal factor) -
Inadequate engineering
standards, specifications,
or design criteria (E&D Reclaimed pressure vessel not registered with ABSA and did not meet ABSA regulations
factor) -


Improper motivation
Reclaimed pressure vessel was readily available and "would do the job"
(Personal factor) -
Inadequate assessment
Potential PEAP impacts were not identified in any aspect of the operation
of loss exposures (E&D
factor) -


Inadequate job procedures (Job factor) - Standard Operating Procedures were locked away in manager's office
Inadequate training (Job factor) - No qualification or refresher training for employees at Hub Oil
Inadequate maintenance (Job factor) - Pressure gauges were not maintained nor serviced
Lack of knowledge or skill (Personal factor) - The skills for cleaning / lancing of pipes were not properly and completely acquired from the
original contractor
Inadequate engineering standards, specifications, or design criteria (E&D factor) - Reclaimed pressure vessel not registered with ABSA and did
not meet ABSA regulations
Improper motivation (Personal factor) - Reclaimed pressure vessel was readily available and "would do the job without detailed engineering"
Inadequate assessment of loss exposures / risk assessment / hazard identification (E&D factor) - Potential PEAP impacts were not identified in
any aspect of the operation
The correct answer is:
Inadequate job procedures (Job factor) - → Standard Operating Procedures were locked away in manager’s office,
Inadequate training (Job factor) - → No qualification or refresher training for employees at Hub Oil,
Inadequate maintenance of equipment (Job factor) - → Pressure gauges on Still #2 System were not maintained nor serviced,
Lack of knowledge or skill (Personal factor) - → The skills for cleaning / lancing of pipes were not properly and completely acquired from the
original contractor,
Inadequate engineering standards, specifications, or design criteria (E&D

factor) - → Reclaimed pressure vessel not registered with ABSA and did
not meet ABSA regulations,
Improper motivation (Personal factor) - → Reclaimed pressure vessel was readily available and "would do the job", Inadequate assessment of
loss exposures (E&D factor) - → Potential PEAP impacts were not identified in any aspect of the operation
Question 5
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #1 Management Leadership, Commitment and Accountability?
Select one:
Scale of possible worse case scenario incidents were neither cross out
conceived nor planned for.
Safety performance objectives and targets were not established.

cross out
There was a cross Correct - "There was a complete absence of a risk management program at Hub Oil.". There is a difference
out
complete between a "risk management program", (the overall "umbrella" as discussed in Topic #15 Chapter 3.1 The Risk
absence of a Management Program, Chapter 3.2 The Risk Management Work Process, and Chapter 3.3 The Risk
risk Management System and Elements), and RM Element #2 Risk Assessment and Management of Risks, which is
management but one of 11 elements of the risk management program. The scope of Element #2 includes Hazard
program at Identification (FLRA, SQRA, JSA, Checklists, Reporting & Correcting Substandard Conditions & Practices,
Hub Oil.
Planned Inspections, etc.) and the control measures necessary to eliminate the risks, or reduce and control
risks to an acceptable level. Management would need to commit to the development and implementation of a
risk management program, and would need to lead its people and organization in the effective implementation
of that risk management program.
Maintenance was done on an "as needed” basis, and "if it ain't broke, cross out
don't fix it”.

The correct response is "There was a complete absence of a risk management program at Hub Oil." There is a difference between a "risk
management program", (the overall "umbrella" as discussed in Topic #15 Chapter 3.1 The Risk Management Program, Chapter 3.2 The Risk
Management Work Process, and Chapter 3.3 The Risk Management System and Elements), and RM Element #2 Risk Assessment and
Management of Risks, which is but one of 11 elements of the risk management program. The scope of Element #2 includes Hazard
Identification (FLRA, SQRA, JSA, Checklists, Reporting & Correcting Substandard Conditions & Practices, Planned Inspections, etc.) and the
control measures necessary to eliminate the risks, or reduce and control risks to an acceptable level. Management would need to commit to the
development and implementation of a risk management program, and would need to lead its people and organization in the effective
implementation of that risk management program.
Other RME's:
Scale of possible worse case scenario incidents were neither conceived nor planned for. - Incorrect. Worse case scenario planning would best be
aligned with either RM Element #2 Risk Assessment and Management of Risks, or RME #3 Community Awareness and Emergency
Preparedness. In many cases, the scenario is identified in RME #3 as well as the program and plans for community awareness and emergency
preparedness. The plans and program for identifying risks and control measures for those scenarios fall under RME #2.
Safety performance objectives and targets were not established. - Partially correct. Although this statement does align, it is only one of many
things that management would need to do in order to lead its people and organization in the effective implementation of that risk management
program. Part marks awarded.
Maintenance was done on an "as needed” basis, and "if it ain't broke, don't fix it”. - Incorrect. This statement - which was the de-facto
maintenance program at Hub Oil - would best align with RME# 8 Operations and Maintenance.
The correct answer is: There was a complete absence of a risk management program at Hub Oil.
Question 6
Correct
For the latent cause given below for RME #1, to which characterization of a latent cause does it most strongly belong?
Latent Cause: There was a complete absence of a risk management program at Hub Oil.
Reminder, alignment is defined as
"P” = Inadequate Program,
"S” = Inadequate Program Standards,
"C” = Inadequate Compliance with Standards
Select one:
P cross out
S cross out
C cross out

Latent Cause: There was a complete absence of a risk management program at Hub Oil.
The correct response is P:

Explanation: Management neither held nor had stated a set of safety values, and had minimal, if any, concept of engineering safety and risk
management. Hub Oil had not created a set of corporate safety values, lacked a comprehensive Risk Management Program, and their leadership
lacked knowledge to understand engineering safety and risk management, and to commit resources to develop an acceptable safety culture and
risk management program. Other objectives, such as production, costs, marketing, and employee welfare and satisfaction were managed
instead of safety.
The correct answer is: P
Question 7
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #2 Risk Management and Management of Risks?
Select one:
Community was in close in proximity and not aware of plant cross out
operations
The risk assessment program did not include formal risk cross out
assessments for critical plant operations.
Safety performance objectives and targets were not established.

cross out
No qualification process for selecting contractor companies or cross out

contractor employees
The correct answer is: The risk assessment program did not include formal risk assessments for critical plant operations.
Question 8
Incorrect
Latent Cause: The risk assessment program did not include formal risk assessments for critical plant operations.

Select one:
P cross out 
S cross out
C cross out
Your answer is incorrect.

Latent Cause: The risk assessment program did not include formal risk assessments for critical plant operations.
The correct response is S:
Explanation: The risk assessment program did not include process safety reviews, ABSA pressure vessel data / specification sheets, processes
for ensuring compliance with ABSA regulations, and OH&S legal requirements. Although Hub Oil had a very basic risk management program
that addressed the most simple of hazards (hot surfaces, ignition sources, and the like), the program completely overlooked all regulatory
requirements (ABSA Reg'ns and OH&S Code), and the hazards and risks associated with refining and recycling spent oils (process safety).
Employees had minimal understanding of occupational safety hazards, and requirements of the Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act,
Regulations, and Code.
The correct answer is: S
Question 9
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #4 Management of Change?
Select one:
There was no MOC program to effectively ensure plant operations cross out
did not degrade over time
No monitoring of safety performance

cross out
There was a complete absence of a risk management program at cross out

Hub Oil.
No process for effectively learning contractor skills.

cross out

The correct answer is: There was no MOC program to effectively ensure plant operations did not degrade over time
Question 10
Correct
Latent Cause: There was no MOC program to effectively ensure plant operations did not degrade over time


Select one:
P cross out
S cross out
C cross out

Latent Cause: There was no MOC program to effectively ensure plant operations did not degrade over time
The correct response is P:
Explanation: There was no program, process, procedure, or any documented administrative control to manage changes relating to the process
unit operations at Hub Oil. Management did not consider that changes in operations or equipment needed to be closely managed and
documented; management assumed that these changes would be managed by the workers. Management did not implement an MOC Program
and MOC Work Process.
The correct answer is: P
Question 11
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #7 Design Construction and Start-up
Select one:
No real emergency preparedness or emergency planning internal to cross out
the company nor with local authorities.
Safety not a value. Other objectives such as production, costs, cross out
employee satisfaction were managed instead of safety
The engineering and design program did not abide by rigorous cross out
standards for specifying, procuring, fabricating, or modifying the
process equipment and pressure vessels in the plant. Plant was
built based on trial and error of legacy knowledge, and not properly
designed or engineered.
Complete lack of understanding of process safety hazards.

cross out

The correct answer is: The engineering and design program did not abide by rigorous standards for specifying, procuring, fabricating, or
modifying the process equipment and pressure vessels in the plant. Plant was built based on trial and error of legacy knowledge, and not
properly designed or engineered.
Question 12
Correct
Latent Cause: The engineering and design program did not abide by rigorous standards for specifying, procuring, fabricating, or modifying the
process equipment and pressure vessels in the plant.


Select one:
P cross out
S cross out
C cross out

Latent Cause: The engineering and design program did not abide by rigorous standards for specifying, procuring, fabricating, or modifying the
process equipment and pressure vessels in the plant.
The correct response is C
Explanation: "At the very least, the professional engineers and operating engineers at Hub Oil should have known to access the ABSA
Regulations and comply with those regulations." Anyone doing any kind of design work at Hub Oil was not aware that they needed to comply
with the ABSA Regulations (legal requirements). The plant was built based on trial and error of legacy knowledge, and not properly designed or
engineered. ABSA Regulations for pressure vessels, pressure safety relief valves, and other plant safety systems were not followed or tracked
as they should have been. In other words, the ABSA regulations ARE the engineering and design program complete with standards for pressure
vessels for ALL facilities operating pressure vessels in Alberta; thus the "C" and not "P" or "S".
The correct answer is: C
Question 13
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #8 Operations and Maintenance?
Select one:
ABSA Regulations for pressure vessels, pressure safety relief valves, cross out
and other plant safety systems were not considered,
not tracked, not
followed.
Employees had minimal understanding of occupational safety cross out

hazards and requirement of Alberta Occupational Health and Safety
Act,
Regulations, and Code; ABSA requirements.
Latent Cause: The Maintenance Program was not planned, cross out
scheduled, nor coordinated in any sustainable manner; it was
executed on an "as needed" basis.
Management did not fully value the contractor's knowledge and cross out
expertise. Management marginalized the contractors i.e.
"they can do
the dirty work”.
The correct answer is: Latent Cause: The Maintenance Program was not planned, scheduled, nor coordinated in any sustainable manner; it was
executed on an "as needed" basis.
Question 14
Correct
Latent Cause: The Maintenance Program was not planned, scheduled, nor coordinated in any sustainable manner; it was executed on an "as
needed" basis.


Select one:
P
cross out
S
cross out
C
cross out

Latent Cause: The Maintenance Program was not planned, scheduled, nor coordinated in any sustainable manner; it was executed on an "as
needed" basis.
The correct response is S.
Explanation: Equipment maintenance was based on a series of "must do's” that gradually eroded with time, without adequate fundamental
understanding of the operating process. Hub Oil had deficient maintenance procedures, hence maintenance of critical equipment was only done
on an as-needed basis when non-functional. The Maintenance Program was extremely basic "If it ain't broke, don't fix it", and did not include a
comprehensive set of maintenance and repair procedures / manuals, nor a routine preventative maintenance schedule.

Question 15
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #9 Employee Competency and Training?
Select one:
a. Minimal understanding of occupational safety hazards and cross out
requirement of Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act,
Regulations, and Code; ABSA requirements; and other Alberta
Codes.
b. There was no cross out Knowledge was passed from worker to worker based on "word-of-mouth” and "on-the-job
formal program training" without effective checks to confirm that all critical knowledge was being learned
to train, qualify / accurately. There was no formal program to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the
certify, and workers were competent on the process unit operations.
confirm that the
workers were
competent on
the process unit
operations.
c. No monitoring of safety performance

cross out
d. Plant was built based on trial and error of legacy knowledge, and cross out
not properly designed or engineered.
The correct answer is: There was no formal program to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit
operations.
Question 16
Correct
Latent Cause: There was no formal program to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit
operations; it lacked in standards to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit operations.

Select one:
P
cross out
S
cross out
C
cross out

Latent Cause: There was no formal program to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit
operations; it lacked in standards to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit operations.
The correct response is S.
Explanation:
The employee competency and training program was defined and managed as hiring graduates from SAIT with a diploma in operating
engineering and hiring experienced "ticketed operating engineers". The training program was based on "word-of-mouth" and on-the-job" training;
it lacked in standards to train, qualify / certify, and confirm that the workers were competent on the process unit operations. Knowledge, skills,
and expertise in operating the plant were passed from worker to worker based on "word-of-mouth” and "on-the-job training" without effective
checks to confirm that all critical knowledge was being learned accurately and being retained. There were no documented training materials nor
a means to test and certify / qualify that employees were skilled and competent in their roles to operate the plant within critical operating
limits. As time progressed and with changes in personnel, this resulted in major gaps in process unit operations / maintenance expertise which
resulted in the gradual deviation from critical operating limits.

Question 17
Correct
Which of the following latent causes most strongly relates to RME #11 Operations and Facilities Information and Documentation?
Select one:
Latent Cause: The D&I Program restricted access to the operations cross out
standards and maintenance standards, which prevented employees
from following and complying with those standards.
Maintenance was done on an "as needed” basis, and "if it ain't broke, cross out
don't fix it”.
Although changes were made and acknowledged as changes, the cross out
changes were not effectively and formally managed.
There was a complete absence of a risk management program at cross out

Hub Oil.
The correct answer is: Latent Cause: The D&I Program restricted access to the operations standards and maintenance standards, which
prevented employees from following and complying with those standards.
Question 18
Correct
Latent Cause: The D&I Program restricted access to the operations standards and maintenance standards, which prevented employees from
following and complying with those standards.

Select one:
P
cross out
S
cross out
C
cross out

Latent Cause: The D&I Program restricted access to the operations standards and maintenance standards, which prevented employees from
following and complying with those standards.
The correct response is C.
Explanation: The detailed operating procedures (administrative controls) existed but employees were not able to follow and comply with them.
Employees did not have access to instructions and documentation for critical operating conditions, unit operations, and maintaining safe
operation of the plant. Even though one of the plant engineers had written a set of training documents and standard operating procedures for
plant operations, these were "locked away" and the employees had no access to these standardized administrative controls.
The correct answer is: C
Question 19
Partially correct
Referring back to the previous set of questions on the latent causes, match each RMS Element with an appropriate recommendation to improve
safety and risk management at this and other similar facilities in the future.
RME#7:
Design, Implement a program that incorporates pressure vessel safety systems into similar facilities in the future using current design crit
Construction, 
and Start Up
RME# 11:
Operations and
Facilities Implement a program for employees to gain access to all critical plant operation information, not only as part of their training, but
Information

and
Documentation
RME#9:
Employee Implement a program on all aspects of plant operations with requirements for initial qualification and certification, and periodic re
Competency 
and Training
RME#1:
Management
Leadership, Implement a program for management to create a set of safety values, communicate the value of safety within the organization, a
Commitment,

and
Accountability
RME#4:
Management Implement a program to include management approval prior to employees undertaking tasks and executing procedures that are o
of Change

RME#2: Risk
Assessment
and Implement a program with a comprehensive set of maintenance and repair procedures / manuals.
Management 
of Risk
RME#8:
Implement a program with a comprehensive set of maintenance and repair procedures / manuals.
Operations and
Maintenance 

Latent causes should be exclusive to or pertain to only one risk management system element.
A latent cause can and should only be related to one risk management system element. Consider the following latent cause statement from the
selections in this question, "Implement a program for management to create a set of safety values, communicate the values of safety within the
organization, and commit resources to developing and implementing a comprehensive risk management program." The key phrase is commit
resources which pertains to RME #1 MLCA.
So, the latent cause statement should be correctly stated to include the element name e.g. "Implement a leadership and commitment program
for management to create a set of safety values, communicate the values of safety within the organization, and commit resources to developing
and implementing a comprehensive risk management program".
It does not relate to #2 Risk Assessment and Management of Risks; a latent cause statement would start with or relate to "the risk assessment
program". Also recall that a synonymous phrase for this element is "#2 Risk Assessment and Control of Risks".
RME #1 MLCA: "Implement a leadership and commitment program for management to create a set of safety values, and communicate the
values of safety within the organization."
RME #2: "Develop and implement a comprehensive risk assessment program for the recycle oil refining process systems."

The correct answer is: RME#7: Design, Construction, and Start Up → Implement a program that incorporates pressure vessel safety systems into
similar facilities in the future using current design criteria, regulations and standards, and appropriate engineering expertise i.e. ABSA
Regulations., RME# 11: Operations and Facilities Information and Documentation → Implement a program for employees to gain access to all
critical plant operation information, not only as part of their training, but also as an ongoing part of their daily activities., RME#9: Employee
Competency and Training → Implement a program on all aspects of plant operations with requirements for initial qualification and certification,
and periodic refresher training in order to maintain the skill set at the highest and most effective level., RME#1: Management Leadership,
Commitment, and Accountability → Implement a program for management to create a set of safety values, communicate the value of safety
within the organization, and commit resources to developing and implementing a comprehensive risk management program., RME#4:
Management of Change → Implement a program to include management approval prior to employees undertaking tasks and executing
procedures that are outside of normal operating parameters., RME#2: Risk Assessment and Management of Risk → Implement a program to
include process safety reviews., RME#8: Operations and Maintenance → Implement a program with a comprehensive set of maintenance and
repair procedures / manuals.
Question 20
Partially correct
Chapter 4: Incident Investigation, Analysis, Causation, and Action

A Risk Management Program consists of different components as depicted by the slices in the Swiss Cheese Model. The
model as shown in this graphic depicts a Risk Management Program with successful outcomes. Match the most appropriate
description for each of the slices for the graphic shown: (4 marks total; 1 mark for each correct response; no penalty for
incorrect response or no response)
Slice A: Action that reflects "the culture of the organization” is depicted at this slice. 
Slice B:
Documentation of the organization as managed within the program is depicted at this slice. 
Slice C:
Ineffective implementation at this slice sets the latency for causing loss incidents. 
Slice D:
Effective implementation at this slice sustainably prevents loss incidents. 

The correct answer is: Slice A: → Action that reflects "the culture of the organization” is depicted at this slice., Slice B: → Documentation of the
organization as managed within the program is depicted at this slice., Slice C: → Installed equipment and software as managed within the
program are depicted at this slice., Slice D: → Effective implementation at this slice sustainably prevents loss incidents.
◄ Assignment 1 - RCA Exercise - Graded
Jump to...
Before Attempting Assignment #3, Read These Instructions to Learn About Assignment #3 ►

My Courses

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

My Courses

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

10/5/22, 10:13 AM Assignment 2 - The Hub Oil LI - Graded: Attempt review

Started on Saturday, 12 March 2022, 6:52 PM

Petroleum fire Incident description

Petrol released from pump casing Immediate Cause: Sub-standard condition

Pump casing corroded (failed) First Intermediate

Improper material was used Second Intermediate

Pump design was incorrect Third Intermediate

The engineering work process / program to

Your answer is partially correct.

Mark 5.00 out of 5.00

Assets Entire facility destroyed; loss of personal and company vehicles.

Your answer is correct.

Assets: Entire facility destroyed; loss of personal and company vehicles.

Mark 3.00 out of 5.00

Your answer is partially correct.

You have correctly selected 3.

Mark 5.00 out of 7.00

Inadequate training (Job

Lack of knowledge or skill

Your answer is partially correct.

You have correctly selected 5.

The correct answer is:

Inadequate engineering standards, specifications, or design criteria (E&D

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

Safety performance objectives and targets were not established.

Your answer is correct.

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

Your answer is correct.

The correct response is P:

The correct answer is: P

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

Safety performance objectives and targets were not established.

No qualification process for selecting contractor companies or cross out

Your answer is correct.

Mark 0.00 out of 2.00

"P” = Inadequate Program,

Your answer is incorrect.

The correct answer is: S

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

No monitoring of safety performance

There was a complete absence of a risk management program at cross out

No process for effectively learning contractor skills.

Your answer is correct.

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

"P” = Inadequate Program,

Your answer is correct.

The correct answer is: P

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

Complete lack of understanding of process safety hazards.

Your answer is correct.

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

"P” = Inadequate Program,

Your answer is correct.

The correct answer is: C

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

Employees had minimal understanding of occupational safety cross out

Your answer is correct.

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

"P” = Inadequate Program,

Your answer is correct.

The correct answer is: S

Mark 2.00 out of 2.00

c. No monitoring of safety performance