You are on page 1of 86

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Production Engineering


Institute for Organization of Production Systems

OPERATIONS AND
PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT

TOC
MSc. Małgorzata Zalewska-Traczyk

OPMAN
exercises ©M.Zalewska-Traczyk
Theory of Constraints

1
Disclaimer and Approved use
 Disclaimer
◦ The files in the Superfactory Excellence Program by Superfactory Ventures LLC (“Superfactory”)
are intended for use in training individuals within an organization. The handouts, tools, and
presentations may be customized for each application.
◦ THE FILES AND PRESENTATIONS ARE DISTRIBUTED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS WITHOUT
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.

 Copyright
◦ All files in the Superfactory Excellence Program have been created by Superfactory and there
are no known copyright issues. Please contact Superfactory immediately if copyright issues
become apparent.

 Approved Use
◦ Each copy of the Superfactory Excellence Program can be used throughout a single Customer
location, such as a manufacturing plant. Multiple copies may reside on computers within that
location, or on the intranet for that location. Contact Superfactory for authorization to use the
Superfactory Excellence Program at multiple locations.
◦ The presentations and files may be customized to satisfy the customer’s application.
◦ The presentations and files, or portions or modifications thereof, may not be re-sold or re-
distributed without express written permission from Superfactory.

 Current contact information can be found at: www.superfactory.com

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


2 Reserved.
Outline
1. Introduction to Constraints
2. Five Steps Of Theory of Constraints
3. Drum Buffer Rope
4. Evaporating Cloud Method
5. The Batch Size Problem
6. Chain Analogy
7. Issues with TOC
8. Measurements & Financial Issues

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


3 Reserved.
Constraints
Any system can produce only as much as its critically constrained resource

Constraint

60 units 70 units 40 units 60 units


Per day Per day Per day Per day

Maximum Throughput = 40 units per day


© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
4 Reserved.
Significance of Bottlenecks
 Maximum speed of the process is the
speed of the slowest operation
 Any improvements will be wasted
unless the bottleneck is relieved

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


5 Reserved.
Theory of Constraints
 Purpose is to identify constraints and
exploit them to the extent possible
◦ Identification of constraints allows
management to take action to alleviate
the constraint in the future

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


6 Reserved.
Theory of Constraints
 Assumes current constraints cannot
be changed in the short-run
◦ What should be produced now, with
current resources, to maximize profits?
 Question cannot be answered by traditional
accounting methods

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


7 Reserved.
Theory of Constraints
 Based on the concepts of drum, buffer
and ropes
◦ Drum
 Output of the constraint is the drumbeat
 Sets the tempo for other operations
 Tells upstream operations what to produce
 Tells downstream operations what to expect

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


8 Reserved.
Theory of Constraints
◦ Buffer
 Stockpile of work in process in front of
constraint
 Precaution to keep constraint running if upstream operations are
interrupted

◦ Ropes
 Limitations placed on production in upstream
operations
 Necessary to prevent flooding the constraint

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


9 Reserved.
Do we really want or need another new theory?

“The significant problems we face today


can not be resolved at the same level
of thinking we were at when we
created them.”
- Einstein

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


10 Reserved.
What is the Theory of Constraints?

“The core idea in the Theory of


Constrains
is that every real system such as a
profit-making enterprise must have at
least one constraint”.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


11 Reserved.
What is TOC? (continued)

“There really is no choice in the matter.


Either you manage constrains or they
manage you. The constraints will
determine the output of the system
whether they are acknowledged and
managed or not”

Noreen, Smith, and Mackey, The Theory of Constraints and its Implecations for Management Accounting (North River Press, 1995)

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


12 Reserved.
How does TOC help
companies?
1. Focusing improvement efforts
where they will have the greatest
immediate impact on the bottom line.

2. Providing a reliable process that


insures Follow Through!

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


13 Reserved.
Five Steps Of TOC
1. Identifying the constraint

2. Decide how to exploit the constraint

3. Subordinate everything else to the


decision in step 2

4. Elevate the constraint

5. Go back to step 1, but avoid inertia

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


14 Reserved.
Theory of Constraints

2. Identify the 3. Use bottlenecks


bottlenecks properly

1. Identify the 4. Synchronize all


appropriate other processes to
measures of value the bottlenecks

6. Avoid inertia and 5. Increase the


return to Step #1 bottleneck’s capacity
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
15 Reserved.
Steps in the TOC Process
Identify the system constraints

 Internal
 External
◦ Process constraints
◦ Material constraints
 Machine time, etc.
 Insufficient materials
◦ Policy constraints
◦ Market constraints
 No overtime, etc.
 Insufficient demand

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


16 Reserved.
Steps in the TOC Process
 Decide how to exploit the constraint
◦ Want it working at 100%
◦ How much of a buffer?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


17 Reserved.
Steps in the TOC Process
 Subordinate everything else to the
preceding decision
◦ Plan production to keep constraint
working at 100%
◦ May need to change performance
measures to “rope” upstream activities

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


18 Reserved.
Steps in the TOC Process
 Elevate the constraint
◦ Determine how to increase its capacity

 Repeat the process


◦ Always a new constraint

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


19 Reserved.
Drum Buffer Rope
 Drum-Buffer-Rope for Shop Floor Control
◦ Drum: The Pace Setting Resource - constraint
◦ Buffer: The amount of protection in front of the resource
◦ Rope:The scheduled staggered release of material to be in line with the Drum’s
schedule.

A Pull System

Buffer

60 70 40 60

Rope Constraint
(Drum)
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
20 Reserved.
Lean: How DBR Supports it
Fundamentally, Don’t Build Until Needed

 Overproduction avoided because DBR is “pull” system

 Inventory minimized because only buffer at constraint

 Transportation reduced because “unbuilt material” doesn’t move

 Processing waste minimized because “unbuilt material”

 Unnecessary Motion decreased because don’t build unneeded

 Waiting is eliminated at the constraint –only place that counts

 Defects avoided because of “small lot”, non conformance, and corrective action

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


21 Reserved.
Evaporating Cloud Method
 Implementing step 2:
Decide how to exploit the system‘s
constraints

 Idea:
Find the minimum number of changes
that are needed to create an eviroment
where the core problem (big black cloud)
cannot exist. You don‘t try to solve the
problem, but instead cause the problem
not to exist.
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
23 Reserved.
Evaporating Cloud Method
 „as long as we think we already know,
we don´t bother to rethink the
situation“
◦ Problem of „accepted“ solutions (compromise)

 „You can‘t have your cake and eat it


too“
◦ Existence of compromising solutions

 „God does not limit us, we are


limiting ourselves“
◦ Whenever we face a solution that requires a compromise, there is always a simple solution
that does not require a compromise

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


24 Reserved.
Evaporating Cloud Method
Define a problem precisely

 Declaration of the desired objective


 Define the requirements that must be
fulfilled
 Define shared prerequisite

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


25 Reserved.
Evaporating Cloud Method
Define a problem precisely

 Declaration of the desired objective


 Define the requirements that must be
fulfilled
Verbalize the hidden assumptions
 Define shared prerequisite
Find invalid assumptions

Check the local objective versus the global goal

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


26 Reserved.
The Batch Size Problem

Cost per unit

Carrying cost/unit

Setup cost/unit

Batch size
Best optimum size

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


27 Reserved.
The Batch Size Problem
 Hidden assumptions:

• Setup costs cannot be reduced

Just-in-time

• Does setup really cost us money?

Distortion of the definition of cost

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


28 Reserved.
The Batch Size Problem
 Hidden assumptions:

• Large batch is the opposite of small batch

improper use of terminology

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


29 Reserved.
The Batch Size Problem

local objective “less costs” global objective “more money”

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


30 Reserved.
Chain Analogy

A company can be compared to a


chain. The activities businesses
perform is really a “chain” of
dependent events. That is to say that
we don’t ship parts until they are
packaged, and we don’t package parts
until they are manufactured, etc.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


31 Reserved.
Chain Analogy

Marketing Bidding Purchasing Production Finishing Shipping

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


32 Reserved.
Chain Analogy

Conventional Wisdom believes that…


•Improvement of any link is an improvement to the chain.
•Global improvement is the sum of the local improvements.
•Primary Measurement: Link Weight
Result: Every link wants/needs more resources all the time

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


33 Reserved.
Chain Analogy

“Take actions that will maximize any/all local operations.” (i.e. Fight
constantly for scarce resources.)
MAXIMIZE

Marketing Shipping

Bidding
Finishing
Purchasing Production
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
34 Reserved.
Chain Analogy

Throughput World Approach believes


that…
 Most improvement of most links do not
improve the the chain.
 Global improvement is NOT the sum of
the local improvements.
 Primary Measurement: Chain Strength
Result: Resources are channeled to the
weakest link (aka: Herbie, the
constraint, “CCR”).
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
35 Reserved.
Chain Analogy
“Think Globally. Take only those local actions that will strengthen the
chain.” (i.e. Focus scarce resources on the constraint.)

Management & Resources

Marketing Bidding Purchasing Production Finishing Shipping

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


36 Reserved.
Common Sense Throughput
A Lean Approach to Managing the Shop Floor

Constraint- Throughput
Based Management
Scheduling

Central
Database

DBR
Shop Floor

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


37 Reserved.
Shop Floor Control Techniques
Product Line Strategy

Engineer Make to Assemble Make to


To Order Order To Order Stock

Job Low Volume,


Production Process Layout

High Variety
Shop

Batch
Flow TOC/DBR
Medium Volume,
Med. Variety

Mixed-
High Volume,
Model Fixed Variety
Repetitive

Dedicated
Repetitive JIT/KANBAN High Volume,
Standard
Product

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


39 Reserved.
Issues with TOC
 Constraining resource must be
maximized
◦ All other operations must be geared
toward this goal
 May require suboptimization in other areas

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


40 Reserved.
Issues with TOC
◦ Upstream operations must provide only
what the constraint can handle
◦ Downstream operations will only receive
what the constraint can put out
◦ Constraint must be kept operating at its
full capacity
 If not, the entire process slows further

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


41 Reserved.
Issues with TOC

 Advantages
◦ Improves capacity decisions in the short-run
◦ Avoids build up of inventory
◦ Aids in process understanding
◦ Avoids local optimization
◦ Improves communication between
departments
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
42 Reserved.
Issues with TOC
 Disadvantages
◦ Negative impact on non-constrained
areas
 Diverts attention from other areas that may be
the next constraint
 Temptation to reduce capacity

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


43 Reserved.
Issues with TOC

 Ignores long-run considerations


◦ Introduction of new products
◦ Continuous improvement in non-
constrained areas
 May lead organization away from
strategy
 Not a substitute for other accounting
methods
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
44 Reserved.
Financial Issues: Finding the Goal

Before a company can properly focus,


one necessary condition is that they
answer the following question:

◦ What is the Goal of a for profit enterprise?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


45 Reserved.
The Goal?

 To make more money now and in the


future!

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


46 Reserved.
The Goal
Some would argue that the goal of
their company is to…

 To satisfy customers now and in the


future!
Or to..
 Provide satisfying jobs now and in the
future!

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


47 Reserved.
The Goal

TOC recognizes that only the “owners” of a company can choose THE
goal. However, once chosen, the other 2 become conditions necessary
to achieving the goal.

Make money now


and in the Future

Satisfy customers Satisfy employees


now and in the future. now and in the future

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


48 Reserved.
The Goal
That is…
 If your goal is to satisfy customers, it is
absolutely necessary that you make
money and that you satisfy
employees…
 Likewise, if your goal is to satisfy
employees, you also have to make
money and satisfy your customers…
…or you won’t be in business in the
future! 49
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
Reserved.
The Goal

The choice is yours, choose any of


the three as the goal of your
organization.

For the duration of this presentation,


we will assume that the goal is:
 To make more money now and in the
future! © 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
50 Reserved.
Measuring Progress

Once the Goal is identified, one


necessary condition to success in
achieving the goal is to identify which
measurements will be used to judge
progress.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


51 Reserved.
Measurements
Conventional Wisdom
 Net profit?
 Efficiency?
 Utilization?
 Return on Investment?
 Cash Flow?

“Are you using the right measurements?”


Jonah in The Goal

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


52 Reserved.
Measurements

TOC Wisdom
 Throughput
 Inventory
 Operating Expense

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


53 Reserved.
Throughput (“T”)
The rate at which the system generates
money through sales. (Or, the
money coming into the organization.)
 Building inventory is not throughput
 Only $ generated by the system get
counted; e.g., raw materials and
purchased parts are not throughput.
 T = Selling Price - Materials

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


54 Reserved.
Inventory (“I”)
All the money the system has
invested in purchasing things which it
intends to sell.

 Inventory is a liability (not an asset)


 Raw materials, work in process,
finished goods and scrap are “I”

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


55 Reserved.
Operating Expense (“OE”)
All the money the system spends in
order to turn inventory into throughput.
(Or, the money coming into the
organization.)
 All employee time is “OE” (direct,
indirect, operating, etc.)
 Depreciation of a machine is “OE”
 Operating supplies are “OE”

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


56 Reserved.
Financial Links
“Wait a minute” someone exclaims. “If
I monitor Throughput, Inventory, and
Operating Expense in the short term,
how can I be sure that I will have a
Profit, with a reasonable Return On
Investment in the long term, and
maintain a positive Cash Flow?”

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


57 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)

Question 1: If we can increase “T”


while maintaining level “I” and level
“OE, what will the impact be on Net
Profit, ROI and Cash Flow?
If…
T I OE
Then...
NP ROI CF
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
58 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)

Question 2: If we can decrease “I” while


maintaining level “T” and level “OE”,
what will the impact be on Net Profit,
ROI, and Cash Flow?
If…
T I OE
Then...
NP ROI CF
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
59 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)

Question 3: If we can decrease “OE”


while maintaining level “T” and level “I”,
what will the impact be on Net Profit,
ROI, and Cash Flow?
If…
T I OE
Then...
NP ROI CF
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
60 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)

 So the answers to these 3 questions


show unquestionable that by
determining the impact that an action
will have now on Throughput,
Inventory, and Operating Expense we
will know the future impact on Net
Profit, ROI, and Cash Flow.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


61 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)
Question 4: What about Inventory?
Because it has no direct impact on Net
Profit, it would seem to be less
powerful at impacting the bottom line.
Even though when…

I
There is no Direct impact on...

NP
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
62 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)
However, reducing Inventory levels
does also reduce some operating
expenses.

If… Carrying
Then...
I Costs

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


63 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)

And…

Carrying
If…
Costs
Then...
NP ROI CF
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
64 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)
Therefore, there is an indirect link…
If… Then…

And since we already saw that a


reduction in inventory causes a direct
increase in ROI and Cash Flow, we
I NP
can see that reducing inventory has a
significant financial impact.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


65 Reserved.
Financial Links (continued)
 Throughput, Inventory, and Operating
Expense are valuable operational
measures that can be used to guide
our decisions.

 The next question must be: Which of


these 3 is the most important -- or do
they all have equal weight?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


66 Reserved.
Where should we focus?

Increasing Throughput

Decreasing Inventory, or

Decreasing Operating Expense?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


67 Reserved.
Traditional vs JIT, TQM and
TOC
Traditional Ranking JIT, TQM and TOC

 Operating expense  Throughput

 Throughput  Inventory or Assets

 Inventory or Assets  Operating expense

All Three methods attack the underlying assumption that crated a problem related to
inventory levels. They ask:
WHY DO WE NEED INVENTORY TO PROTECT THROUGHPUT ?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


68 Reserved.
Why do we need inventory to protect throughput ?

We need inventory to protect throughput, because


there are statistic fluctuations ( variations ) and dependent
resources

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


69 Reserved.
TOC, TQM and JIT
 All 3 methods attempt to reduce variation and
recognize the interdependencies.

 Statistical process control is emphasized in the


quality area to help identify ways to reduce
variations.

 Cells are used to reduce the dependencies „..U


cell configurations , where one worker is moving
with the processed piece from one machine to
another“

 Predetermined schedules, in TOC, reduce both


statistical fluctuation and dependent resources.
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
70 Reserved.
The “Cost World”
 Decreasing “OE” is definitely #1
because we have relatively high control
of our expenses.
 Increasing “T” is always important, but
it ranks #2 because we are at the
mercy of the marketplace and have
less control over sales.
 Inventory tends to fall into a “grey area”
that we don’t know exactly what to do
about; it is a “necessary evil” that must
be lived with to protect sales.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


71 Reserved.
The “Throughput World”
 Increasing “T” is unquestionably #1
because it has the greatest potential
impact on the bottom line.
 Decreasing “I” is #2 because excess
WIP and finished goods jeopardize
future throughput.
 Decreasing “OE” is #3 because
significant reductions (workforce
reductions) usually jeopardize future
throughput.
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
72 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 TOC is a management tool, not a
financial tool
 Not used to determine inventory
values
 Not used to allocate overhead to
inventory
 Does not comply with GAAP
 Does indicate how to use available
resources most effectively
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
73 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Standard costing promotes
undesirable behavior
◦ Work to keep people busy
 Local optimization
 Inventory is produced regardless of need

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


74 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Does indicate what it should cost to
produce a product
 Does not indicate which products will
maximize profits given the constraints
◦ Doesn’t take constraints into account
◦ Standard cost does not consider the
demands each item places on limited
resources

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


75 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Traditional absorption costing
promotes undesirable behavior
◦ Production costs are assets until sold
 Accumulation of inventory keeps costs off the
income statement
 Illusion of profitability

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


76 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Does indicate what it costs to produce
a product
 Doesn’t indicate which products will
maximize profits given the constraints
◦ Doesn’t take constraints into account
◦ Absorption cost does not consider the
demands each item places on limited
resources

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


77 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Variable (direct) costing identifies the
incremental costs of producing a
product
◦ Identifies product that provides the greatest contribution margin, or
contribution margin per unit of constrained resource

 Cannot deal with more than one constraining


resource at a time

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


78 Reserved.
Financial Issues
 Traditional definition of variable cost
doesn’t hold in the short-run
◦ Labor, variable overhead aren’t really variable on a day-to-day
basis

 Some costs are truly variable in the


short-run
◦ Material, commissions, delivery costs, out-of-pocket selling costs

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


79 Reserved.
Profit
 Profit is defined in terms of throughput
◦ Sales – totally variable costs
◦ All other costs treated as fixed operational expenses

 Cannot vary much in the short-run

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


80 Reserved.
TOC Question...

How do you manage a company in a


world where increasing Throughput is
the #1 priority, reducing Inventory is
#2, and reducing Operating Expense
is a tactic only after serious efforts at
#1 and #2?

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


81 Reserved.
TOC Summary

The theory of Constraints is about 2


things
 Focus
 Follow Through

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


82 Reserved.
TOC Summary: Focus

 A company must first know its Goal


 Then it must identify the thing(s), the
constraint(s), that are limiting the level
of achievement of that goal.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


83 Reserved.
TOC Summary: Follow
Through
The Process Of On Going Improvement
1. Identify the constraint
2. Exploit it
3. Subordinate all other operations to
the necessity to exploit the
constraint.
4. If after #2 and #3 more capacity is
needed to meet market demand,
Elevate the constraint.
5. Go back to #1, but don’t let inertia
become the system.s constraint.
© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights
84 Reserved.
Conclusion
 Viewing an organisation from the operation expense
world perspective causes one to believe that almost
everything is important – that the organization is
composed of independent variables.

 But viewing the organization from throughput world


perspective forces the realization that the organization
is a collection of dependent variables and that the
artificial barriers between these variables, or functions,
must be eliminated.

 Managing the parts of an organization as if they were


isolated kingdoms is not the dominated measurement.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


85 Reserved.
Conclusion

 In the throughput world, constraints


become the main tools of
management and the previous tool,
product cost, can be discarded.

© 2004 Superfactory™. All Rights


86 Reserved.
Thank you!

OPMAN
exercises ©M.Zalewska-Traczyk

You might also like