You are on page 1of 5

Assignment One(1)

Mr. John Brown, after his retirement as a civil servant, decided to purchase land from Bruce
who is aged 17 years old. He paid him Ksh 2 million. Six months later, Brown discovers that
the material facts presented to him during negotiations were false as the land flooded during
the rainy season. He has come to you for legal advice

1. Discuss the applicable law in this case

2. Explain the various legal issues in the case

3. Remedies the court can issue should he choose to go to court

1.

In this case, the applicable law would be contract law, which governs the formation and

enforcement of contracts. The terms of the contract between Brown and Bruce must be

examined to determine if there was a breach of contract, misrepresentation, or fraud. The age

of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults in

contract law.

Contract law is the branch of law that governs the formation and enforcement of contracts

between parties. It sets out the terms of the agreement between the parties, including the

obligations of each party and the remedies available if one party breaches the contract.

In this case, it is important to examine the terms of the contract between Brown and Bruce to

determine if there was a breach of contract, misrepresentation, or fraud. If the contract was

formed without a valid consideration, or if there was a misrepresentation of material facts, the

contract may be found to be invalid.

The age of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults

in contract law. In many jurisdictions, minors are not legally capable of forming a legally

binding contract, and thus any contract made with a minor may be considered voidable.

Furthermore, if Bruce misrepresented his age to Brown, this may also be considered fraud

and may invalidate the contract


2.

The various legal issues in this case include:

1. Breach of contract:

If the material facts presented to Brown during negotiations were false, it may be considered

a breach of contract, as the contract was formed on the basis of false information.

2. Misrepresentation:

Misrepresentation occurs when one party makes a false statement of fact to another party,

which induces the other party to enter into a contract. If Bruce misrepresented material facts

to Brown, this may be considered a misrepresentation and may invalidate the contract.

3. Fraud:

Fraud occurs when one party deliberately misrepresents material facts in order to induce

another party to enter into a contract. If Bruce has misrepresented his age to Brown, this may

be considered fraud and may invalidate the co1.

In this case, the applicable law would be contract law, which governs the formation and

enforcement of contracts. The terms of the contract between Brown and Bruce must be

examined to determine if there was a breach of contract, misrepresentation, or fraud. The age

of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults in

contract law.

Contract law is the branch of law that governs the formation and enforcement of contracts

between parties. It sets out the terms of the agreement between the parties, including the

obligations of each party and the remedies available if one party breaches the contract.

In this case, it is important to examine the terms of the contract between Brown and Bruce to

determine if there was a breach of contract, misrepresentation, or fraud. If the contract was

formed without a valid consideration, or if there was a misrepresentation of material facts, the

contract may be found to be invalid.


The age of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults

in contract law. In many jurisdictions, minors are not legally capable of forming a legally

binding contract, and thus any contract made with a minor may be considered voidable.

Furthermore, if Bruce misrepresented his age to Brown, this may also be considered fraud

and may invalidate the contract.

2.The various legal issues in this case include:

1. Breach of contract:

If the material facts presented to Brown during negotiations were false, it may be considered

a breach of contract, as the contract was formed on the basis of false information.

2. Misrepresentation:

Misrepresentation occurs when one party makes a false statement of fact to another party,

which induces the other party to enter into a contract. If Bruce misrepresented material facts

to Brown, this may be considered a misrepresentation and may invalidate the contract.

3. Fraud:

Fraud occurs when one party deliberately misrepresents material facts in order to induce

another party to enter into a contract. If Bruce has misrepresented his age to Brown, this may

be considered fraud and may invalidate the contract.

4. Age of Bruce:

The age of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults

in contract law. In many jurisdictions, minors are not legally capable of forming a legally

binding contract, and thus any contract made with a minor may be considered voidable.

Furthermore, if Bruce misrepresented his age to Brown, this may also be considered fraud

and may invalidate the contract.

Step-by-step explanation

Damages:
Damages are a monetary award that is paid to a party who has been wronged by another

party's breach of contract. The amount of damages awarded is intended to compensate the

injured party for any losses, damages, or costs incurred as a result of the breach of contract.

Rescission:

Rescission is a remedy that is used to terminate a contract. It means that the contract is no

longer in effect and both parties are released from their obligations. In some cases, the court

may also order that any consideration paid by one party be returned to them.

Specific Performance:

Specific performance is a remedy that orders a party to perform the duties outlined in the

contract. This may be appropriate when the breach of contract cannot be adequately

compensated with damages alone.

Injunction:

An injunction is a court order that orders a party to stop any activity that is contrary to the

contract. This may be appropriate when the breach of contract cannot be adequately

compensated with damages alone.

Declaratory Relief

Declaratory relief is a remedy that makes a declaration that the contract is legally valid and

enforceable. This may be useful if one party is disputing the validity of the contract or if one

party wishes to ensure that the contract is valid and enforceable.

4. Age of Bruce:

The age of Bruce may also be relevant, as minors are not held to the same standards as adults

in contract law. In many jurisdictions, minors are not legally capable of forming a legally

binding contract, and thus any contract made with a minor may be considered voidable.

Furthermore, if Bruce misrepresented his age to Brown, this may also be considered fraud

and may invalidate the contract.


Step-by-step explanation

Damages:

Damages are a monetary award that is paid to a party who has been wronged by another

party's breach of contract. The amount of damages awarded is intended to compensate the

injured party for any losses, damages, or costs incurred as a result of the breach of contract.

Rescission

Rescission is a remedy that is used to terminate a contract. It means that the contract is no

longer in effect and both parties are released from their obligations. In some cases, the court

may also order that any consideration paid by one party be returned to them.

Specific Performance:

Specific performance is a remedy that orders a party to perform the duties outlined in the

contract. This may be appropriate when the breach of contract cannot be adequately

compensated with damages alone

Injunction:

An injunction is a court order that orders a party to stop any activity that is contrary to the

contract. This may be appropriate when the breach of contract cannot be adequately

compensated with damages alone.

Declaratory Relief:

Declaratory relief is a remedy that makes a declaration that the contract is legally valid and

enforceable. This may be useful if one party is disputing the validity of the contract or if one

party wishes to ensure that the contract is valid and enforceable.

You might also like