Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-Preventing the creation of waste is the best option we have in general. Unrecyclable waste is almost
always formed, so preventing it completely is a great advance, because it would all be much easier to
manage if there were much less waste from minute one, which In itself, waste is not generated when an
experiment is carried out.
-This is another detail that we no longer try to reduce the impact of toxic waste, but in this case we are
already trying to prevent it completely and thus stop producing it unnecessarily. The prevention of toxic
waste is one of the most important issues that must be addressed. try if we want to stop and minimize the
damage of global warming.
3. Atom Economy: Synthetic methods should be designed to maximize the
incorporation of all materials used in the process into the final product.
-This also talks about preventing unnecessary expenses but already at an atomic level, and making sure that
everything is used at a moderately adequate level, being called green chemistry is based to a large extent
on controlling waste.
Looking for a graph to be able to give an example at this point I realized something that is sad, before I had
seen a graph that did show that we had lowered the tons of CO2, but it was only in Spain. Everything in the
world continues to rise And this occurs thanks to the fact that most of the factories that are the ones that
largely produce CO2 (which is a greenhouse gas and the main cause of climate change) are in Asian
countries.
8. Reduce Derivatives: Unnecessary derivatization (use of blocking groups,
protection/ deprotection, temporary modification of physical/chemical
processes) should be minimized or avoided if possible because such steps
require additional reagents and can generate waste.
12. Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention: Substances and the
form of a substance used
MY CONCLUSION
This work has made me reflect on the number of measures and the concern in the world about
climate change. The truth is that people are concerned about the health of the planet and that is
something that deep down makes me feel good. Knowing that people are Being worried about a
common threat is something very nice, but we are not in a fairy tale, and here the problem is not the
simple citizen who is constantly bombarded with news that they have to recycle or the world will heat
up and it will be all your guilt for not having recycled. It seems silly to me knowing that 90% of
pollution is caused by companies or businesses. I believe that the average citizen is being used as
the main culprit for not throwing things in the correct trash and for not recycling the batteries and then
there are millions of tons of contaminated water thrown away by large farms and they wash their
hands knowing that the people will continue to believe that we are to blame. Now I am not saying no
Let's stop recycling or stop taking care of the planet as it deserves. But what I am saying is that you
have to have a lot of guts to put the citizens as guilty of all the shit that multinationals and companies
create. Because That is something else here are the Zara stores but here almost nothing is
produced. In fact, here I am going to leave you a list of the stores that Inditex has associated (which
is the company behind Zara and many well-known stores that in Spain).
In summary, as a consumer we find ourselves in an ethical dilemma in which we should stop buying clothes in
these places where we do not know where they come from, the problem is that the industry has grown so
much that it is almost impossible to buy clothes that are beautiful and at a reasonable price. price that is not
exaggerated. I believe that this is more of the person, you decide to worry a little about the clothes you wear
and the story behind it, and therefore support solidarity initiatives to help those large companies stop
contaminate or focus on other problems such as green chemesty and the issue is to help, no matter how
much.
Now if I go with green chemistry, I think that it should not be the number one priority right now. I consider that it
is not very useful and that it has a great risk, reducing the rate of future research, and that can not be I think
that if it gets along it would be perfect because it will be another extra help against climate change. But if it
doesn't get along knowing that it can delay future discoveries and even spoil super useful projects. Look, I
agree to put certain measures in the production of clothing, or reduce the consumption of meat and make the
animals that are there in the farms have better living conditions. But start to put norms and rules to something
as necessary as the investigation. It does not seem absurd to me It is something that is too useful to invest in
making it more sustainable. It seems to me that more should be invested in research and not in how to make it
more sustainable. It is as if we set standards to breathe and make it only You can breathe once every 5
seconds because you also produce CO2. Of course, everything is done with good intentions, but I think there
are more important problems like the one I mentioned before and not in making chemistry more sustainable.
WEBGRAFÍA
GreenChemesty:https://www.products.pcc.eu/es/blog/que-nos-ensenan-los-12-principios-de-
la-quimica-verde/
Grafica barcos:¿Cuánto contamina cada tipo de barco? - Mapas de El Orden Mundial - EOM
Medio
Ambiente:https://www.euroinnova.edu.es/blog/factores-que-influyen-en-el-medio-ambiente#factores-que-inf
luyen-en-el-medio-ambiente