Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract..........................................................................................................................2
1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................3
4.0 Conclusion.........................................................................................................10
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................11
Abstract
In this article, there have two variables that has been discuss which are the
first one is energy efficiency. Writing on EE practices for office building inhabitants
who are environmentally conscious is scarce in Malaysia. Hassan et al. (2015) said for
instance led an investigation of EE management strategies for green structures
generally. In Malaysia, there is no widespread EE practice for inhabitants of green
structures, as noted by Shafii (2008) and Zaid et al. (2015). Additionally, GBI only
assesses how green buildings are constructed in Malaysia, not how well they perform
(Zaid and Kiani, 2016). To realize the objective of green building in Malaysia, there is
a need for increased engagement from a human perspective. In green buildings,
energy efficiency is essential to attaining sustainability. Many businesses may
significantly improve by reducing the amount of energy used during construction.
Energy efficiency, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015), is the
practice of using less energy while maintaining a certain level of service. Sustainable
or "high performance" structures are also referred to as green buildings. Sustainable
building, also known as green building, is the development of buildings and building
structures while using practices and resources that promote environmental efficiency.
It is used in all phases of building, from pre-construction to the removal of
construction, reducing harmful or toxic effects on the building environment (Hwang
& Tan, 2012). Green buildings are sustainable and generally strive to lessen the
environmental effect of construction operations. Energy efficiency has many positive
effects on society and is crucial for achieving sustainability in environmentally
friendly structures and businesses. Energy efficiency also helps green buildings add
value and become more competitive by lowering their environmental impacts, such as
cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and rising energy prices. It is simple to demonstrate
that a building or structure is truly green by applying energy efficiency (Howe, 2010).
After that, the second variables that has been discussed in this article is
environmental efficiency. The consequences of pollution, water shortage, climate
change, and other factors are the importance of resource usage concerns will increase,
especially for emerging economies that are vulnerable to drought, floods, and other
climate limits (Sitorus, 2018). Eco-efficiency, which the World Business Council for
Sustainability Development describes as an item or administrative appreciation that is
divided with its influence on nature, is the precursor of environmental efficiency
(Verfaillie and Bidwell, 2000). The eco-efficiency was first introduced in 1992 and
has since been extensively related in many different aspects (Li et al., 2010). There
are several assessment tools available that were developed with eco-efficiency in
mind. An Eco-Impact methodology for evaluating the environmental impact of
buildings was presented by Assefa et al. in 2007, and it is helpful for both existing
structures and new construction. The Environmental Efficiency Building Assessment
System reveals how to implement environmental efficiency (BEE), which is pulled
into a wide range of structural management factors.
Results are presented using a descriptive analysis. This is a result of the way
the questions were constructed. I believe that the author might have studied the impact
of motivation on employee performance more thoroughly by performing correlation
and regression analyses. Additionally, the data' presentation has no significant policy
ramifications that might help stakeholders and policy makers. I believe that the results
are insufficient to make generalizations that are significant. Some results are
presented in a clumsy and unclear manner. Despite the authors' claims to have used
both qualitative and quantitative methods, categorical data is once again inappropriate
for this kind of quantitative study.
4.0 Conclusion
Overall, I thought the essay was intriguing, and the clear language and
appropriate verb tenses made it simple for the reader to comprehend the topic. To
provide the reader a more comprehensive understanding of the study, it would be
helpful to incorporate graphical depictions of the conceptual model in the article.
Because earlier research has only shown positive or negative associations between
factors, the author also demonstrates in the article how variables may have multiple
affects, such as how social interaction can both be a source of stress and a source of
support. In addition, the paper clearly distinguishes between the two clusters rather
than summarizing the results in a single paragraph. Being qualitative research, the
essay is clearly written from several points of view. As a critical thinker, I am pleased
with the study's overall data presentation, and the facts can support the formation of
an unbiased view. In conclusion, this study examines all sides of the argument, which
has enhanced the article's core ideas.
Sartori, S., Ensslin, L., Campos, L.M.D., Ensslin, S.R. (2014), Literature review of
environmental sustainability related to information technology.
Transinformação, 26(1), 77-89.
Zaid, S.M., Rad, A.K., Zainon, N. (2017), Are green offices better than conventional?
Measuring operational energy consumption and carbon impact of green office
in Malaysia. Facilities, 35(11/12), 622-637