Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Week 8

    Uploaded by

    Rito Kato
    6 views1 page
    The owner has the right to remove Brian if the agreement is broken, as they are enforcing the contract. A third party may make a decision on the performance, but both parties must be informed before it is final. Even if Chel argues otherwise, Andre still has greater rights as original owner to enforce rules and regulations between contracts, since contracts state the breaching party loses authority. Therefore, Chel as a third party does not have authority, only the direct tenants involved can make the final choice.

    Original Description:

    dwdw

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The owner has the right to remove Brian if the agreement is broken, as they are enforcing the contract. A third party may make a decision on the performance, but both parties must be informed before it is final. Even if Chel argues otherwise, Andre still has greater rights as original owner to enforce rules and regulations between contracts, since contracts state the breaching party loses authority. Therefore, Chel as a third party does not have authority, only the direct tenants involved can make the final choice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Week 8

    Uploaded by

    Rito Kato
    The owner has the right to remove Brian if the agreement is broken, as they are enforcing the contract. A third party may make a decision on the performance, but both parties must be informed before it is final. Even if Chel argues otherwise, Andre still has greater rights as original owner to enforce rules and regulations between contracts, since contracts state the breaching party loses authority. Therefore, Chel as a third party does not have authority, only the direct tenants involved can make the final choice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Week 8

    No, Chel's criticism of the circumstance will not be successful. As the transaction's

    contract enforcer, the owner has the right to have Brian removed if the agreement is broken. A

    third party may be chosen to decide on the performance in accordance with article 1309 of the

    Civil Code, but their decision won't be final until both contracting parties have been informed of

    it. Even if Andre is still the original and legal owner of the condo, he has greater rights to enforce

    the rules and regulations or terms and conditions between the contracts of the condo, despite

    Chel's arguments to the contrary. Once it pertains to the requirements of contracts regarding the

    adherence to the terms and conditions, it has consistently been stated that the party who breaches

    the commitments usually forfeits authority and jurisdiction, particularly if Andre will bring a

    case to the court. As a result, Chel is merely a third party to the transaction, and the tenants of the

    condo who are directly involved are the ones with the authority who have the power to make the

    final choice.

    You might also like