Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In this chapter shows all the data collected from the previous chapters
and make references to the earlier studies which is presented in the literature
review. The discussion will inspect the perception from the findings and will try
Social Sciences who take the Modular Distance Learning and Face-to-face
Classes. The purpose of this study was to know the Academic Performance of
Face-to-face Classes into one questionnaire for the survey. The researchers
1
evaluated and find out the following: (1) Determined the Modular Learning and
Face-to-face Classes Students differ by the students grade. (2) Find out the
Results of the Data Analysis revealed that; The first area analyzed in
this study was the survey conducted to the respondents. Based on the results,
the obtained General Average by the students in both type of Learning during
the First and Second Semester was low in correlation. The mean of the
survey results of the section Diophantus under Modular Learning was 87.32,
then the mean gained from the Face-to-face Classes results of the survey
was 86.96. Majority of the students in both type of learning gained almost the
same General Average. So, this results shows that the students involved in
The second area analyzed was the Section Thales. The mean gained
from the Modular Learning was 87.76, while the Face-to-face Classes gained
87.8. The mean difference from the survey conducted in the two types of
learning was 1. Proven further by the xy value of 192951 lower than the level
Third is the Section Euler, the mean gained from the Modular Learning
was 86.68, while the Face-to-face Classes gained 87.32. The mean difference
from the survey conducted in the two types of learning was 16. Proven further
2
by the xy value of 189435 lower than the level of significance of 1.03 showing
Fourth is the Section Euclid, the mean gained from the Modular
Learning was 89.12, while the Face-to-face Classes gained 89.08. The mean
difference from the survey conducted in this two types of learning was 1.
Proven further by the xy value of 198645 lower than the level of significance
CONCLUSION
face Classes.
3
4. There was a 72 General Average gap on the Humanities and