Performance Based Design Overview

Department of Civil Engineering
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN– 18MST3E3

III Semester, MTech Structural Engineering
2020
ASSIGNMENT PHASE 1
Name Prabhu Kumbar
USN 1RV19CSE12
Overview of Performance Based
Topic
Design
Date of Presentation
Date of Submission of Report 30-09-2020
Certificate
This is to certify that Mr/Ms Prabhu Kumbar of III Semester, MTech, Structural
Engineering, has successfully completed the assignment prescribed by the
institution in the course Earthquake Resistant Design-18MST3E3, for the academic
year 2020-2021.
Maximum Marks Marks Obtained
Signature of the Student Signature of the Course

Coordinator
CONTENTS
Table of contents i
List of Figures ii
List of Tables ii
Abbreviation ii
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1
Chapter 2. Requirements for Reliable P-BSD ..................................................................... 2
2.1 Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives (P-BSDO) ...................................... 2
2.2 Multilevel Seismic Design Criteria ............................................................................ 3
2.3 Need for a Probabilistic Design approach .................................................................. 3
2.4 Need for a Design Spectra for Buildings ................................................................... 3
Chapter 3. Performance Based Design of Buildings ........................................................... 4
3.1 Establishment of Design EQGMs .............................................................................. 5
3.2 Numerical Preliminary Design Procedure.................................................................. 5
3.2.1 Preliminary Analysis ........................................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Preliminary Sizing and Detailing ...................................................................... 10
3.2.3 Analysis of Preliminary Design ......................................................................... 13
3.3 Case studies .............................................................................................................. 15
Chapter 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 18
Chapter 5. References ........................................................................................................ 19
Page |i
List of Figures
Figure 1. Steps of the numerical design. .............................................................................. 4
Figure 2. Flowchart of preliminary analysis. ....................................................................... 6
Figure 3. IDI Design Spectra ............................................................................................... 9
Figure 4. DML Design spectra ............................................................................................. 9
Figure 5. Strength Design Spectra ....................................................................................... 9
Figure 6. First fundamental mode and base shear.............................................................. 11
Figure 7. Combined mechanisms for beam ....................................................................... 11
Figure 8. Design bending moments and shear for columns. .............................................. 12
Figure 9. Required and provided story stiffness. ............................................................... 12
Figure 10. Time history envelope ...................................................................................... 13
Figure 11. Push-over analysis. ........................................................................................... 14
Figure 12. IDI for push-over analysis. ............................................................................... 15
List of Tables
Table 1. Performance design objectives……………………………………………………8
Abbreviations
(P-BSE) - Performance-Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings
(P-BSD) - performancebased seismic design
P-BSDOs - Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives
PDOs - performance design objectives
EQGMs - Earthquake Ground Motions
DM - Damage Index
IDI - Interstory Drift Index
PLs - Performance Levels
LERS - Linear Elastic Response Spectra
P a g e | ii
Chapter 1. Introduction
The effects of the building after analysis and design considering earthquake forces
since 1980s, the seismic risks in urban areas are increasing and are hazardous and are far
from socio-economic levels. This led to the most effective way of design towards the
problem. The objectives of the design should be towards life and serviceability of the
structure.
The promising approach towards the above development has been proposed by the
SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee in 1995. The report for the same was “Performance-
Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings.” (P-BSE). Different methodologies have been
proposed for the application of such framework to the design. Emphasis made on such
type of design was called as “performancebased seismic design” (P-BSD).
After some time of the introduction to the method the following developments
should take place:
1. simple but reliable approaches and numerical procedures for the practical
application of P-BSD are developed.
2. simple but reliable guidelines, norms, standards and/or seismic provisions for the
practical applications of the P-BSD that are developed and implemented in the
next generation of standards and building codes which then should be strictly
enforced.
Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 1

Chapter 2. Requirements for Reliable P-BSD
2.1 Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives (P-BSDO)

the first step is the selection of P-BSDOs or performance design objectives (PDOs
or just POs). These POs are selected and expressed in terms of expected levels of damage
resulting from expected levels of earthquake ground motions (EQGM). POs will range from
code minimum requirements usually based on frequent but minor EQGMs, fully
operational under occasional but moderate EQGMs, life safety under rare but major
EQGMs and to avoid collapse under the very rare but maximum credible EQGMs.
A performance level represents a distinct band in the spectrum of damage to the

structural and non-structural components and contents, and also considers the consequences
of the damage to the occupants and functions of the facility. Four discrete performance
levels are identified in the SEAOC (1995) report. The seismic hazard at a given site is
represented as a set of earthquake ground motions and associated hazards with specified
probabilities of occurrence. For example, the term “rare earthquake” refers to a set of
potential earthquake ground motions that can produce a defined level of damage with a
specific mean annual frequency (for example, 475-year return period for standard
buildings). Performance objectives (POs) typically include multiple goals for the
performance of the constructed building: for example, that it is fully operational in the 43-
year event, it offers life safety in the 475-year event and it will not collapse in the 970-year
event. According to the adopted definition of P-BSD, the following minimum performance
levels should be considered initially:
1. Serviceability
2. Fully Operational
3. Operational
4. Life Safety
5. Near Collapse

Chapter 2 Performance Based Design
2.2 Multilevel Seismic Design Criteria

During the 1971 San Fernando earthquake, the Olive View Medical Canter in
Sylmar (California), inaugurated just a few months before, was almost completely
destroyed. The hospital was redesigned in 1976 and rebuilt using RC and steel shear walls
around the perimeter. During the 1994 Northridge earthquake new facility resisted floor
accelerations of 2.8 g without any significant structural damage. However, the hospital had
to evacuate all its patients to other facilities for several days because of breakage of both
sprinkler and chilled water lines. This suggests that choosing the EQGMs is very much
important.
The above situation can be represented in the performance curves of two typical
designs,
Design A: design has been done on the basis of the life safety performance objective, does
not satisfy the operational and fully operational performance objectives.
Design B: fully operational and life safety performance objectives.
From the above example it becomes very clear that at least two performance levels
should be considered.
2.3 Need for a Probabilistic Design approach

For the proposed design procedure, reliability for the same becomes more
important. That is, how much shall we rely on the design. So, due to the dominant
uncertainties in the demand, it is possible to develop particularly simplified reliable
assessments and probabilistic designs.
2.4 Need for a Design Spectra for Buildings

since the performance levels are keyed to limiting values of local structural response
parameters, such as local structural damage indexes (DM), story drift indexes (IDI) and
floor accelerations, design spectra of such parameters should be available for the
preliminary design.

Chapter 3. Performance Based Design of Buildings
The step by step process of the design is explained in the following headings and
the same is represented in the Figure 1. Steps of the numerical design as shown below.
Figure 1. Steps of the numerical design.
Source: Book by Bozorgnia and Bertero “Earthquake Engineering” 2006

3.1 Establishment of Design EQGMs
The first phase of the comprehensive numerical design (phase a) is the

establishment of the design EQGMs. The establishment of design EQGMs covers,
1. acquisition and
2. processing of the data needed for establishing reliable design EQGMs.
The data and the problems involved in acquiring design EQGMs can be summarized as
follows:
Given the site conditions of the building (soil profile and topography), the following
are required.
a) Return periods for different levels of possible EQGMs at the site and
b) their damage potential to the entire building system and EQGM time-histories for
all the four different performance levels that have to be considered according to the
selected P-BDO matrix.
For the above requirements Conduct a reliable analysis of the site to assess its
suitability for the construction of the desired building. This will be required to identify
all the sources of EQGMs that could affect the building; define the seismic activity at
the site due to all possible earthquake sources in the form of time histories and
recurrence periods. select for at least two sets of EQGMs corresponding to the limit
states.
If there are not enough of such records, the data can be obtained either from EQGMs
recorded at sites with similar soil profile and topography, or by using numerical
synthesis to generate several probable EQGM time histories.
3.2 Numerical Preliminary Design Procedure
As illustrated in Figure 8.1, to arrive at the desired final design it is necessary to

start with a preliminary design procedure. The main objective of this phase is to obtain a
design that is as close as possible to the desired final design. As illustrated in Fig.1, the
preliminary design procedure consists of three main steps: (1) preliminary analysis; (2)
preliminary sizing and detailing and (3) analysis of preliminary design.

3.2.1 Preliminary Analysis
The preliminary analysis can be illustrated in figure Fig. 2 Flowchart of preliminary

analysis.
Figure 2. Flowchart of preliminary analysis.

Given the, Function of building and desired performance design objectives; general
configuration, structural layout, structural system, structural materials and non-structural
components and contents. Gravity, wind, snow and other possible loads or excitations; and
displacement, strength and dissipated hysteretic energy due to ductility and damping ratio,
design spectra for different damping and ductility for frequent minor and rare major
EQGMs.
To establish the minimum lateral stiffness, minimum strength and toughness of the
building that are capable of controlling the design seismic forces, the critical load
combinations and the elastic and inelastic deformations are required.
The first part in the solution for the above requirements is,
Performance Design Objectives:
To decide about the performance design objectives, the designer should discuss
with the client the severity of the expected potential sources of seismic hazards and their
corresponding frequency (return period) as well as the number of discrete PLs that should
be considered. According to the adopted definition of P-BSD, the following minimum
performance levels should be considered initially: (a) Serviceability, (b) fully operational,
(c) operational, (d) life safety and (e) near collapse.
The designer should explain to the owner that the following are the minimum design
objectives.
a) Resist minor EQGMs, which can occur frequently, without damage (service
or fully operational limit state).
b) Resist moderate EQGMs, which can occur occasionally with controlled
structural and non-structural damage (amount of damage depends on
function of facility) (operational limit state)
c) Resist expected major EQGMs, which can occur rarely, with controlled
damage that cannot endanger the life safety of its occupants or those of
adjacent facilities (life safety limit state).
d) Resist extreme EQGMs, which can occur very rarely but are probable, with
damage up to impending collapse but without collapsing and endangering
the lives of its occupants or inducing damage to surrounding facilities
(impending collapse limit state).

Already in the SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee Report (1995), Furthermore, this
report recommended that the preliminary P-BSD be conducted considering at least two of
the DO-usually those corresponding to the following PLs: 1. serviceability and life safety,
or 2. fully operational or operational and life safety or impending collapse. The details of
the above two PLs are shown in the Table 1. Performance design objectives.
Interstory Drift Index (IDI): It is the ratio of story displacement to story height. It
also indicates Beam-Column joint rotation.
Damage index (DML): These damage indices have been formulated using response
parameters of the structure that are obtained through analytical evaluation of structural
response. The Damage Index typically normalizes the damage on a scale of 0 to 1
Recurrence EQGM Level

interval Structural Damage Non-Structural Damage
(years) Local Failure IDI Failure
damage Probability Prob.
Serviceability 10 0.00 16% 0.003 16%
Life Safety 500 0.80 16% 0.015 16%
Table 1. Performance design objectives.
IDI Design spectra, DML Design spectra and Strength Design Spectra are shown
in the figures, Figure 3. IDI Design Spectra, Figure 3. DML Design spectra and Figure 3.
Strength Design Spectra respectively.

Figure 3. IDI Design Spectra
Figure 4. DML Design spectra
Figure 5. Strength Design Spectra

From PDOs limits given in Table 1, the acceptable design zone are the rectangles
shown in Figure 3 and 4. From the above figures time period and ductility are determined.
The building structure should possess the calculated time period (lower bound) and
ductility.
3.2.2 Preliminary Sizing and Detailing
To start the process, use beams and column sizes from Gravity design forces and
architectural constraints. Also, in the start select first period, T1 inside the acceptable zone.
Using T1 and the selected first mode shape obtain the preliminary sizing for stiffness to
match the assumed. Firstly, the slabs are designed, then further calculations are made.
Minimise the dead load of the slab, so that story forces will be lesser to the building
structure.
Even the stiffness of the structure as a whole depends on the amount of rotation that
occurs at the end of the members connected at joints and supports (due to slipping of rebars
at the joints), interaction with non-structural elements and soil- structure interaction (SSI)
at the foundations, the uncertainties in the effective stiffness must be considered in the
design. In general, Ib eff = 0.5 Ibgross for beams and Ic eff = Icgross for columns (assumed to
remain under compression during the response) can be used as mean values, where Ibgross
and Icgross are the gross stiffness of beams and columns.
The complex nonlinear behaviour of the members is simplified using a bilinear

model that tries to fit the real moment-curvature diagram. The initial linear elastic stiffness
is represented by the effective values defined above. After the yielding of the main
reinforcement, the deformation hardening is approximated by a line from the yielding point
to the point corresponding to the ultimate moment and curvature of the element.
Total base shear can be estimated from the elastic response spectra and the modal
parameters. Example for the base shear for the first fundamental mode is shown in Figure
6. First fundamental mode and base shear. After the analysis conventional design can be
recommended, but the simultaneous design for service and safety limit state using plastic
design is required. Which also minimises the required volume of flexural reinforcement.
Plastic analysis is carried out and beams are designed for plastic bending moments.
The figure explaining the plastic moment calculations of the collapse mechanisms is shown

in Figure 7. Combined mechanisms for beam. Columns are designed in such a way that the
beam-column rigid joints should satisfy the IDI values.
Figure 6. First fundamental mode and base shear
Figure 7. Combined mechanisms for beam

Bending moments and shear force calculated for columns is shown in Figure 8. Design
bending moments and shear for columns.
Figure 8. Design bending moments and shear for columns.
The required and provided story stiffness comparison is represented by graph shown in the
below Figure 9. Required and provided story stiffness.
Figure 9. Required and provided story stiffness.

3.2.3 Analysis of Preliminary Design
Linear elastic Response Spectrum Analysis is done then checked with the IDI if it
were below the PL from Table 1 then the design is safe.
3-D Time history analysis is done for the reasons that,
1. To check the behaviour of the structure under a service EQGM; to check

IDI to control non-structural damage. The same is illustrated in the Figure
10. Time history envelope
2. To check the LERS modal superposition analysis.
3. To use as a reference for the nonlinear time-history analysis. Note that for
evaluation of nonlinear behaviour it is necessary to run nonlinear time-
history analysis. A linear time-history analysis is useful for evaluating the
differences between linear and nonlinear behaviour. This comparison can be
difficult if only LERS modal superposition analysis is done.
Figure 10. Time history envelope
“Push-over” analysis is done for the following objectives
1. To obtain the maximum shear strength of the structure, and the mechanism
of collapse.
2. To evaluate if the structure can achieve the collapse mechanism without
exhausting the plastic rotation capacity of the members.

3. To obtain the monotonic displacement and global ductility capacity of the

structure.
4. To estimate the concentration of damage and IDI that can be expected
during the nonlinear seismic response.
The example for the Sequence of plastic hinge formation for push-over analysis is
shown below in Figure 11. Push-over analysis. The IDI for different story and
frames is also checked and the response of the same is shown in Figure 12. IDI for
push-over analysis.
Figure 11. Push-over analysis.

Figure 12. IDI for push-over analysis.
3.3 Case studies
Following are the two case studies for performance-based design
1. case study by Ali Ruzi Özuygur, Department of Structural

Engineering, YPU Istanbul, Turkey
The structural design of a 50-story tall reinforced concrete residential building,

which was planned to be constructed in Istanbul and given up afterwards by the investor,
has been completed in accordance with the draft version of Seismic Design Code for Tall
Buildings in Istanbul that adopts performance-based seismic design as the basic approach
as Tall Buildings Initiative Guidelines do. The seismic design of the building has formed
the main part of the structural design process due to high seismicity of the proposed location
and the extremely irregular floor plan not conforming to usual tall building structures. The
building consists of two individual buildings linked through stronger link slabs at top 13
stories whereas relatively weak slabs at lower stories. The building has been designed for
design basis earthquake by elastic response spectrum analysis and its seismic performance

has been checked for maximum considered earthquake by nonlinear time history analyses
carried out using PERFORM-3D. the 3D model of the building is shown below

2. Performance Based Design: Case Study by Yernagula. Pratap, P.V S.

Neelima, M. Tech, Civil Engineering Department, Gitam University,
Andhrapradesh, INDIA:
In the present study, an attempt is made to understand the procedure and

methodology adopted in performance-based design and its implications to achieve
an earthquake resistant design. A G+4 storey commercial building, assumed to be situated
in seismic zone IV (according to IS: 1893(part1)-2002), is considered for the case study.
Static nonlinear pushover analysis is performed to estimate the capacity of the building
represented in the form of a pushover curve. Five performance levels, based on
the criteria for earthquake resistant design, are defined for the building. The hinge
mechanism obtained in each step of the pushover, is studied to obtain a desired
performance level. The plan of the building is shown in the below figure.

Chapter 4. Conclusion
1. It leads to a transparent numerical design procedure that considers and checks the
selected or desired performance objectives.
2. In spite of the great uncertainties in the quantification of some of the concepts
involved in its codification, such quantifications can be improved as new more
reliable data become available without changing the philosophy and particularly the
format of this codified methodology.
3. such formulation can be used as a basis for improving the education of architects
and engineers, as well as for the establishment of the prioritization and program of
the focused research needed to improve seismic design, and thus to attain the so
much needed reduction of the current seismic risks in our urban areas to social and
economical acceptable levels.

Chapter 5. References
[1] Y Bozorgnia and V.V. Bertero “Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology
to Performance-Based Engineering” International Code Council 2006.
[2] R. Sinha and S.R. Shiradhonkar “Seismic Damage Index for Classification of Structural
Damage – Closing Loop” IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India on 15 WCEE LISBOA 2012
[3] M.D. Trifunac and M.I. Todorovska “Earthquake Design Spectra For Performance-
Based Design” Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA on 15 WCEE
LISBOA 2012
[4] Ali Ruzi Özuygur “Performance-based Seismic Design of an Irregular Tall Building —
A Case Study” Department of Structural Engineering, YPU Istanbul, Turkey
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.10.001.
[5] Yernagula. Pratap, P.V S. Neelima “Performance Based Design: Case Study” ISSN
(ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962

Performance Based Design Overview

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Performance Based Design Overview

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of Civil Engineering

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN– 18MST3E3

Name Prabhu Kumbar

Date of Submission of Report 30-09-2020

Maximum Marks Marks Obtained

Signature of the Student Signature of the Course

Chapter 2. Requirements for Reliable P-BSD ..................................................................... 2

2.1 Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives (P-BSDO) ...................................... 2

2.2 Multilevel Seismic Design Criteria ............................................................................ 3

2.3 Need for a Probabilistic Design approach .................................................................. 3

2.4 Need for a Design Spectra for Buildings ................................................................... 3

Chapter 3. Performance Based Design of Buildings ........................................................... 4

3.1 Establishment of Design EQGMs .............................................................................. 5

3.2 Numerical Preliminary Design Procedure.................................................................. 5

3.2.1 Preliminary Analysis ........................................................................................... 6

3.2.2 Preliminary Sizing and Detailing ...................................................................... 10

3.2.3 Analysis of Preliminary Design ......................................................................... 13

3.3 Case studies .............................................................................................................. 15

Chapter 4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 18

Chapter 5. References ........................................................................................................ 19

(P-BSD) - performancebased seismic design

P-BSDOs - Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives

PDOs - performance design objectives

EQGMs - Earthquake Ground Motions

IDI - Interstory Drift Index

PLs - Performance Levels

LERS - Linear Elastic Response Spectra

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 1

2.1 Performance-Based Seismic Design Objectives (P-BSDO)

A performance level represents a distinct band in the spectrum of damage to the

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 2

2.2 Multilevel Seismic Design Criteria

Design B: fully operational and life safety performance objectives.

2.3 Need for a Probabilistic Design approach

2.4 Need for a Design Spectra for Buildings

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 3

Figure 1. Steps of the numerical design.

Source: Book by Bozorgnia and Bertero “Earthquake Engineering” 2006

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 4

3.1 Establishment of Design EQGMs

The first phase of the comprehensive numerical design (phase a) is the

3.2 Numerical Preliminary Design Procedure

As illustrated in Figure 8.1, to arrive at the desired final design it is necessary to

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 5

3.2.1 Preliminary Analysis

The preliminary analysis can be illustrated in figure Fig. 2 Flowchart of preliminary

Figure 2. Flowchart of preliminary analysis.

Source: Book by Bozorgnia and Bertero “Earthquake Engineering” 2006

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 6

Performance Design Objectives:

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 7

Recurrence EQGM Level

Source: Book by Bozorgnia and Bertero “Earthquake Engineering” 2006

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 8

Figure 3. IDI Design Spectra

Figure 4. DML Design spectra

Figure 5. Strength Design Spectra

Source: Book by Bozorgnia and Bertero “Earthquake Engineering” 2006

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 9

3.2.2 Preliminary Sizing and Detailing

The complex nonlinear behaviour of the members is simplified using a bilinear

Structural Engineering 2019-20 Page | 10

Figure 6. First fundamental mode and base shear