Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6:35 QUORUM
Present at quorum call: Otis Landerholm, Salena Copeland, Carlos Villarreal, Michael
Flynn, Matthew Rinaldi, Tim Phillips, Sharon Adams, Raul Aguilar, Rai Sue Sussman,
Laura Horton, and Anne Befu
Arriving later: Francisco Ugarte, Ming Wong, John O’Grady, Karen Jo Koonan, Matt
Ross, Bobby Shukla, Matt Nelson, Nina Farnia, Aliya Karmali, Megan Hamlin, Rachel
Lederman, and Terry Koch.
Not present: Marilyn Waller, Michael Siegel, Daljit Dhami, Kiran Prasad, and all law
school reps
Staff report
Carlos/Raul
Facilitator: Mike
Carlos suggests we change the March board meeting because so many meetings in March
and want to make sure we do not have multiple meetings in same week with Board work.
Tim Phillips introduces ideas relating to facilitation for board consideration in this
meeting. EC has already approved and would like to try at this meeting. They are as
follows: 1) decide on time per speaker and use that limitation, 2) additional person to
track time, and 3) manage stack better by letting people speak to issues
Student report
Laura/Megan
Facilitator: Mike
Laura Horton gave update from student activities and their goal to attend events at each
others’ schools.
1
One point of clarification needed that people will need to say whether it’s National,
Foundation, or local chapter when they give.
Carlos Villarreal FRIENDLY AMENDMENT to not choose name yet
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
John O’Grady FRIENDLY AMENDMENT to clarify that it’s estate planning, not
planned giving.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
VOTE:
16 YES
0 NO
1 ABSTAIN
NLG's work to stop the FBI raids, repression, and Grand Jury abuses
Presenter: Nina Farnia
Facilitator: Carlos Villarreal
Report back on people who’ve been subpoenaed to go before Grand Jury relating to
activist activity.
Rachel Lederman MOTION to extend time by 2 minutes
Matthew Rinaldi SECOND
No opposition
Nina Farnia MOTION to extend time by 1 minute
Aliya Karmali SECOND
No opposition
2
Michael Flynn MOTION to adopt policy as sent via email to full board and included in
our Board Packet. Reproduced here:
Programmatic committees and projects of the NLG SF Bay Area often do legal
representation work, and/or deal with confidential and sensitive information. Thus,
cooperation and trust within programmatic groups is integral to their functioning and
ability to do their work. Any programmatic committee and project may, in its sole
discretion, limit the participation of an NLG member in that project or committee so long
as the limitation is not inconsistent with the NLG Constitution's Preamble, Objectives and
Purposes (Article 1), or the Constitution's principles of non-discrimination (Article 2).
Should an NLG member have a concern about his/her participation or the participation of
another member that cannot be resolved amongst the parties, the NLG member may
request the Chapter office and/or the Chapter's Executive Committee to review the
situation. The review, if any, shall be conducted by the reviewing body as it deems
reasonable.