Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • CO2 Capture Tecchnology Comparison

    Uploaded by

    Muchammad Adriyan
    14 views19 pages
    The first document is a research article from the Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data that evaluates the performance of monoethanolamine (MEA) for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture from coal-fired flue gas. It reports energy requirements for MEA absorption and regeneration of 4.2 and 3.8 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2, respectively. The second document is another research article that analyzes the energy consumption of different CO2 capture technologies, such as absorption with MEA or ammonia, and reports values ranging from 2.9 to 6.774 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2. The third document could not be accessed so no summary is provided.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The first document is a research article from the Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data that evaluates the performance of monoethanolamine (MEA) for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture from coal-fired flue gas. It reports energy requirements for MEA absorption and regeneration of 4.2 and 3.8 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2, respectively. The second document is another research article that analyzes the energy consumption of different CO2 capture technologies, such as absorption with MEA or ammonia, and reports values ranging from 2.9 to 6.774 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2. The third document could not be accessed so no summary is provided.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views19 pages

    CO2 Capture Tecchnology Comparison

    Uploaded by

    Muchammad Adriyan
    The first document is a research article from the Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data that evaluates the performance of monoethanolamine (MEA) for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture from coal-fired flue gas. It reports energy requirements for MEA absorption and regeneration of 4.2 and 3.8 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2, respectively. The second document is another research article that analyzes the energy consumption of different CO2 capture technologies, such as absorption with MEA or ammonia, and reports values ranging from 2.9 to 6.774 gigajoules per tonne of captured CO2. The third document could not be accessed so no summary is provided.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 19

    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.

    1021/ie049962v

    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie402185h
    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/ie070831e
    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849/full
    https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/828131/

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265682200015X
    Jenis Sub Jenis Konsumsi Energi Chapel, D.,Energi
    Ernst, Total
    J., Mariz, C., 1999. Recovery of C
    Absorption MEA Regeneration 4.2 GJ/tonne CO2 Can. Society6.774194
    of Chem.
    capture from an existing GJ/tonne
    Eng. (OctCO2
    4-6)power plant: M
    coal-fired
    (Reboiler Duty) 3.8 GJ/tonne CO2 combustion. 6.129032
    Energy Convers.
    GJ/tonne Mgm.
    CO2 44, 3073-309
    Alie, C., Backham, L., Croiset, E., Douglas, P., 2005
    4 GJ/tonne CO2 MEA scrubbing:
    6.451613
    a flow GJ/tonne
    sheet decomposition
    CO2
    Presentation of the 11th meeting of the internatio meth
    2.9 GJ/tonne CO2 Vienna, Austria.
    4.677419 GJ/tonne CO2
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610209001817

    GJ/tonne CO2
    GJ/tonne CO2
    GJ/tonne CO2
    GJ/tonne CO2
    1876610209001817
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265682200015X

    You might also like