Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • A (18-20 Points) Exemplary B (16-17 Points) Competent C (14-15 Points) Developing D/R Dimensions: Overall Understanding Argument

    Uploaded by

    Joey Laroza
    6 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates oral exam responses on a scale of A through D/R based on dimensions of understanding, argument, evidence, implications, structure, and need for prompting. An A response shows a deep understanding, fully developed argument with relevant and sufficient evidence, discussion of major implications, logical progression of ideas, and no need for prompting. A B response shows a more limited or incomplete understanding, argument, and evidence, with adequate discussion of some implications and minimal prompting needed. A C response shows a superficial understanding and underdeveloped argument with some inaccurate or irrelevant evidence, discussion of minor implications, disjointed ideas, and need for more prompting. A D/R response shows no understanding, argument, or sufficient evidence, no discussion of

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Untitled

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This rubric evaluates oral exam responses on a scale of A through D/R based on dimensions of understanding, argument, evidence, implications, structure, and need for prompting. An A response shows a deep understanding, fully developed argument with relevant and sufficient evidence, discussion of major implications, logical progression of ideas, and no need for prompting. A B response shows a more limited or incomplete understanding, argument, and evidence, with adequate discussion of some implications and minimal prompting needed. A C response shows a superficial understanding and underdeveloped argument with some inaccurate or irrelevant evidence, discussion of minor implications, disjointed ideas, and need for more prompting. A D/R response shows no understanding, argument, or sufficient evidence, no discussion of

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    A (18-20 Points) Exemplary B (16-17 Points) Competent C (14-15 Points) Developing D/R Dimensions: Overall Understanding Argument

    Uploaded by

    Joey Laroza
    This rubric evaluates oral exam responses on a scale of A through D/R based on dimensions of understanding, argument, evidence, implications, structure, and need for prompting. An A response shows a deep understanding, fully developed argument with relevant and sufficient evidence, discussion of major implications, logical progression of ideas, and no need for prompting. A B response shows a more limited or incomplete understanding, argument, and evidence, with adequate discussion of some implications and minimal prompting needed. A C response shows a superficial understanding and underdeveloped argument with some inaccurate or irrelevant evidence, discussion of minor implications, disjointed ideas, and need for more prompting. A D/R response shows no understanding, argument, or sufficient evidence, no discussion of

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    A (18-20 points) B (16-17 points) C (14-15 points) D/R

    Exemplary Competent Developing


    Dimensions:
    Shows a deep/robust Shows a limited understanding Shows a superficial Shows no understanding of
    understanding of the topic of the topic, not quite a fully understanding of the topic, the topic and no argument
    Overall with a fully developed developed argument per the argument not developed enough per the categories below
    Understanding argument per the categories below per the categories below
    categories below
    Clearly articulates a Articulates a position or Articulates a position or argument Does not articulate a
    Argument position or argument argument that is incomplete or that is unfocused or ambiguous position or argument
    limited in scope
    Presents evidence that is Presents evidence that is mostly Presents evidence that is Presents a lot of inaccurate
    relevant and accurate relevant and/or mostly accurate somewhat inaccurate and/or and/or irrelevant evidence
    irrelevant, but corrects when
    Evidence Presents sufficient amount Presents limited evidence to prompted Doesn’t present enough
    of evidence to support support argument evidence to support
    argument Does not present enough evidence argument, even when
    to support argument, but prompted repeatedly
    augments when prompted
    Fully discusses the major Adequately discusses some of Discusses minor implications Doesn’t discuss the
    implications of the the major implications of the (missing the major ones) OR does implications of the
    Implications argument or position position not discuss major implications argument or position
    adequately
    There is logic in the There are a few areas of Ideas are somewhat disjointed Ideas are disjointed and/or
    progression of ideas disjointedness or intermittent and/or do not always flow do not flow logically, hence
    Structure lack of logical progression of logically, making it a bit difficult argument is very difficult to
    ideas to follow follow
    Did not have to prompt Prompted minimally (one or two Prompted a lot (a series of
    Prompting with probing questions at probing questions) probing questions)
    all

    GRADING RUBRIC FOR ORAL EXAM

    Eberly Center for


    Teaching Excellence, Carnegie Mellon University

    You might also like