Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clinker A B c D E
anhydrite was used blended with a small pro- The limestone was used in grinds with clinker A
portion of the natural gypsum, giving 20% of and the natural gypsum. Although the target
the SO3 present as the dihydrate. Chemical ana- SSAs are given as 350 and 450 m2/kg these
lyses are given in Table 2. grinds were actually designed to give a similar
clinker fineness to that in the equivalent grind
Limestone without limestone, as indicated by the 45 pm
residue. The actual SSAs were therefore higher,
Table 2 includes data on the limestone used in particularly for the 15% limestone grinds.
some grinds. The limestone meets the require-
ments in BS 7583 and ENV 197-1 for the METHODS
production of Portland Limestone Cements.
Mortars (3:1:0*5 sand:cement:water) were pre-
Grinds pared as described in EN 196-1. The standard
silica sand used was German ‘Normensand’ sup-
The cements were ground in a 450 mm diam- plied in pre-weighed bags. 16 x 16 x 160 mm
eter laboratory mill. The grinding was carried prisms were cast with stainless steel studs in
out cold and the cements then heat treated at their end faces. Up to four moulds, each con-
105°C for 4 h to produce a similar degree of taining three prisms, were used for each mortar
gypsum dehydration to that found in production mix. The prisms were cast in a single layer and
cements. The grinds carried out are summarised compacted with 60 jolts. After striking off
in Table 3. For most combinations of clinker excess mortar a top-plate in each prism com-
and sulfate, cements with targets of 350 and 450 partment provided essentially sealed curing
m2/kg SSA and 4% and 5% SO3 were ground. conditions. Each mould was further sealed in a
Gypsum 250 4 0 - - - - - -
5 0 - - - - - -
350 4 0 0 0 0 l 0 0
5 0 0 0 l 0 0 0
450 54 l 0 0 0 l l a
0 0 0 l 0 0 0
Anhydrite 250 $ l - - - - - -
0 - - - - - -
350 4 l 0 0 0 - -
0 0 0 : 0 - -
450 : 0 0 l l - - -
4 OK OK lKH 0 - -
5 OH 0 OH : l - -
FGD 350 4 0 a - - - - -
5 l l - - - - -
450 4 l l - - - - -
5 l l - - - - -
0 200 400
~~~._
600
7 7-----
800 1000
the mixing water to raise the SO3 and/or Na,O AgeMwsl
eq. levels. The cements used are also indicated Fig. 1. Typical expansion data. (Clinker A, anhydrite,
in Table 3. 4.3% S03, 456 m’/kg.)
174 S. IWham
Effect of fineness
The results for cements based on clinker E are
Figure 2 shows the dependence of the ultimate not included. The cements giving low expan-
expansion on the cement surface area for mor- sions at -4% SO3 are -350 m2ikg grinds
tars cured at 90°C. The lines connect data for based on clinker D. The vertical lines on the
cements with the same combination of clinker, plot indicate results from repeated tests and
sulfate type and sulfate content, thus differing show good reproducibility.
only in their finenesses. It can be seen that in
all cases where expansion takes place an Effect of clinker and SO3 sources
increase in surface area gives an increase in
expansion. The results for cements based on The most obvious dependence of expansion on
clinker E are not included. The cements with clinker type is the absence of any expansion in
low expansions at -450 m2/kg are based on all the cements containing clinker E, the sulfate
clinkers B and D and have SO3 contents > 5%. resisting clinker. Of the other clinkers, A and C
tend to give higher expansions than B and D.
Effect of cement SO3 The small differences between the grinds with
different sulfate sources are not considered sig-
In Fig. 3 the lines connect points for cements nificant. They can be related to differences in
with different SO3 contents but constant values the actual SO3 contents and finenesses. Figure 4
for other variables. The expansions pass shows the variations in expansion for a single
through a maximum at sulfate contents near set of grind parameters.
4%. Only clinker C gives expansion at 3% SO+
Gypsum
Anhydrite
j [9 F=D
B C D
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Clinker
SSA [m2/kg] Fig. 4. Effects of clinker and sulfate source on expan-
Fig. 2. Effect of cement fineness on expansion after cur- sion after curing at 90°C. (Grinds -4% S03, -450
ing at 90°C. m2/kg.)
Delayed ettringiteformation 175
DISCUSSION
Previous investigations
A B C
The early work on expansion of heat treated
Clinker mortars by Ghorab et a1.l suggested that cement
Fig. 5. Effect of adding K2S04 on expansion after curing type had a large effect of on the behaviour. A
at 90°C. (Grinds anhydrite, -450 m’kg.) low C3A sulfate resisting cement gave no expan-
22.: A 15
1.5 ;:z 5.1 0.58
0.58 0.65 O-58
1.23 0.77
2.10
A4.3S A 1.5 2.8 0.8 5.1 0.58 0.62 1.20 2.16
C4.2 t: 1.6 2.6 4.2 0.38 0.38 0.82
C4.2 1.6 2.6 4.2 0.38 0.2 0.56 0.95
C4.2 C 1.6 2.6 4.2 0.38 0.4 0.78 1.51
C4.2 : 1.6 2.6 4.2 0.38 0.8 1.18 1.40
c5.3 1.6 0.38 0.38 0.21
c5.3 : 1.6 ;:; 2:; 0.38 0.8 1.18 1.30
C4.2S 1.6 2.6 1.1 5.3 0.38 0.85 1.23 1.75
176 S. Kelham
give increasing expansion with increasing S03. between expansive and non-expansive cements.
The position of the maximum does not seem to Increasing early strengths is, of course, the
be related to the C3A content. Expansion is reason for using high temperature curing in pre-
clearly influenced by cement alkali content, as cast production. It is not clear whether
indicated in Lawrence’s work.‘,” The present obtaining a target strength with a high early
results also indicate a link between the SOS and strength cement cured at a given temperature is
alkali contents, with the pessimum value of SO3 safer or not than using a standard cement cured
increasing with the alkali content. Wieker and at a higher temperature. High early strength
Herr,” Damidot and Glasser13 and Brown and cements will also give higher temperature rises
Bathe” have shown that alkali content has a in large pours, increasing the risk of damage.
large effect on ettringite stability at high tem-
peratures. Prediction of expansions
Glasser et al. I5 considered the stable phases
at different temperatures and calculated Figures 2 and 6 suggest that expansion increases
changes in solid volumes. The volume change linearly with SSA and NazO eq. and the shape
on cooling from 85°C to 25°C was found to of Fig. 3 can he modelled with an expression
increase sharply at a cement SO, content of 4% using the ‘absolute value’ function for the dif-
and decrease at high SO3 (-9%) with an alkali ference between the cement SO3 and a constant
content of 0.8% NazO eq. and an A1203 content (-4). Using this as a basis an expression has
of 4%. An expansion potential diagram is only been derived to predict the ultimate expansion
given for these values but it would appear that following curing at 90°C for 12 h from the com-
the SO3 content for maximum expansion poten- position and fineness of the cement. In order to
tial increases slowly with increasing alkali obtain a good fit with the present data and data
content and is approximately proportional to for a range of other cements tested in the same
the A1203 content. This would seem to support manner, terms involving C3A, C3S and MgO,
the use of S03/A1203 as a key parameter but had to be included, giving the expression
the potential increase in solid volume is only
one factor in determining actual expansion. Exp(9O”C) = 0.00474*SSA+O.O768*MgO
+0.217*C3A+0.0942*C,S
Expansion and early strength
+ 1*267*Na,Oeq.
The main factors which have been identified as
increasing expansions - SSA, alkali, SO3 (up to - 0.737*ABS[SO, - 3.7
-4%) and C3A - will be recognised as factors
which increase early strengths. Figure 7 shows - 1*02*NazOeq.] - 10.1 (1)
the expansion data plotted against 2 day mortar Figure 8 compares predicted and measured
strength (EN 196-1, 20°C). While there is a expansions. Obviously, negative predicted
clear correlation, there is no clear boundary
1.2 -~ -~- .
. . 9O'Cdata
1r . X 80°C data
. - Model
.
n. I 1-
I n’ .
:
.
n . .
8
0 I m m-1
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
2 day strength [MPa] Predicted expansion [%I
Fig. 7. Expansion after curing at 90°C plotted against Fig. 8. Comparison of predicted and measured expan-
EN 196-1 mortar strength at 2 days. sions.
178 S. Kelham
the factors are also linked with high early Research and Development Bulletin RDlO8T, Portland
Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 1992.
strength. 7. Day, R. L., The potential for secondary ettringite for-
mation in precast concrete, BIBM 93, Washington
DC, Papers published for discussion, National Precast
Concrete Association, 1993.
REFERENCES 8. Lawrence, C. D., Laboratory studies of concrete
expansion arising from delayed ettringite formation,
1. Ghorab, H. Y., Heinz, D., Ludwig, U., Meskendahl, Publication C/16, British Cement Association, Crow-
T. & Wolter, A., On the stability of calcium aluminate thorne, Berks, UK, 1993, 147 pp.
sulphate hydrates in pure systems and in cements. In 9. Taylor, H. F. W., Delayed ettringite formation. In
7th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Advances in Cement and Concrete (Proceedings of an
Paris, 1980, Vol. 4, Editions Septima, Paris, 1981, pp. Engineering Foundation conference; edited by M. W.
496-503. Grutzeck and S. L. Sarkar), pp. 122-131. American
2. Heinz, D. & Ludwig, U., Mechanism of secondary Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1994.
ettringite formation in mortars and concretes subjec- 10. Odler, I. and Chen, Y., Effect of cement composition
ted to heat treatment. In Concrete Durability. on the expansion of heat-cured cement pastes. Cem.
Katherine and Bryant Mather International Conference, Concr. Res., 25 (1995) 853-862.
SP-100. Vol. 2, edited by J.M. Scanlon. American 11. Lawrence, C. D., Mortar expansions due to delayed
Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1987, pp. 2059-2071. ettringite formation. Effects of curing period and tem-
3. Heinz, D., Ludwig, U. & Riidiger, L., Delayed ettrin- perature. Cem. Concr Res., 25 (1995) 903-914.
gite formation in heat treated mortars and concretes. 12. Wieker, W. & Herr, R., Some problems concerning
Concrete Precasting, Plant and Technology, 11 (1989) the chemistry of Portland cement, Zeitschrift fir
56-61. Chemie, 29 (1989) 321-327.
4. Mtiller, A., Stiirmer, S. & Stark, J., Influence of C3A 13. Damidot, D. & Glasser, F. P., Thermodynamic inves-
content on the durability of cement mortars. Zement- tigation of the CaO-Al,03-CaSO,--HZ0 system at
Kalk-Gips, 4 (1991) 190-3. 25°C and the influence of Na,O, Cem. Concr Res., 23
5. Hempel, G., Bohmer, A. & Otte, M., Investigation of (1993) 221-238.
the influence of material-technological parameters on 14. Brown, P. W. and Bothe, J. V., The stability of ettrin-
the durability of heat treated concretes. Concrete Pre- gite. Adv. Cem. Res., 5 (1993) 47-63.
casting. Plant and Technology, 5 (1992) 75-79. 15. Glasser, F. P., Damidot, D. & Atkins, M., Phase
6. Day, R. L., The effect of secondary ettringite forma- development in cement in relation to the secondary
tion on the durability of concrete: a literature review. ettringite problem. Adv. Cem. Res., 7 (1995) 57-68.