The petitioner argues that the demolition order of the paired towers constructed under the Ikaira project was arbitrary for three reasons. First, demolishing 160 homes would violate residents' right to live and earn a livelihood. Second, land is scarce in the densely populated nation so demolishing homes would burden people and disrupt order. Third, the construction of the paired towers did not violate the Resident Welfare Act or fire safety regulations. The petitioner asserts the towers were built according to necessary permissions and the minimum distance requirements for fire safety were satisfied.
The petitioner argues that the demolition order of the paired towers constructed under the Ikaira project was arbitrary for three reasons. First, demolishing 160 homes would violate residents' right to live and earn a livelihood. Second, land is scarce in the densely populated nation so demolishing homes would burden people and disrupt order. Third, the construction of the paired towers did not violate the Resident Welfare Act or fire safety regulations. The petitioner asserts the towers were built according to necessary permissions and the minimum distance requirements for fire safety were satisfied.
The petitioner argues that the demolition order of the paired towers constructed under the Ikaira project was arbitrary for three reasons. First, demolishing 160 homes would violate residents' right to live and earn a livelihood. Second, land is scarce in the densely populated nation so demolishing homes would burden people and disrupt order. Third, the construction of the paired towers did not violate the Resident Welfare Act or fire safety regulations. The petitioner asserts the towers were built according to necessary permissions and the minimum distance requirements for fire safety were satisfied.
2.WHETHER THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAIRED TOWER VIOLATES THE
RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ACT AND FIRE SAFETY REGULATION OR NOT. It is most humbly submitted before the Hon’ble court that the order of demolition of paired tower constructed under the project of Ikaira, is ultra vires in nature. Herein the arguments advanced have been dealt in threefold manners i.e., [2.1] The court’s order of demolition was arbitrary. [2.2] construction of paired tower under Ikaira doesn’t violate resident welfare act . [2.3] construction of paired tower under Ikaira doesn’t violate fire safety regulation. [2.1] The order of Hon’ble court of demolition was arbitrary. 2.1.1 Everyone has a right to live and earn livelihood as per Art. 21 of Constitution of UOL, and that cannot be taken away casually and arbitrarily. Passing the order of demolition of paired towers after 40% completion of the project is a hasty and an arbitrary decision which could further deteriorate the rights of individual. 2.1.2 as per the moot problem the republic of Mendika is one of the most densely populated nations in the world. Land is scarce and the population of nation is ever increasing in this situation demolishing as many as 160 houses will create a burden upon the people and will disturb law and order. 2.1.3 [2.2] construction of paired tower under Ikaira doesn’t violate resident welfare act. 2.2.1 the construction of the paired tower was in accordance with the laws and with the necessary permission of the Authorities responsible for that. Also, the construction doesn’t violate resident welfare act. 2.2.2 Skypar homes limited proposed construction of two new towers i.e paired tower and new plan was put up for approval from the authorities. (para graph no 3 of moot proposition). 2.2.3 The contention of Skypar was clearly an afterthought as it was contrary to the stand taken by it in its affidavit filed before the High Court, correspondence addressed to the flat purchasers and the plans/ maps prepared and sanctioned by the Authority. According to these documents, the new towers were disconnected from the existing 15 towers, with separate entries/exits, amenities and infrastructure. 2.2.4 The concept of minimum distance between the two building blocks is for the purpose of free fire tender movement (Minimum 6 meters setback as per regulation), air ventilation, sunlight etc. The minimum distance requirement is in no way connected with the structural safety of the building.1 2.2.5 The construction of paired tower was for the welfare of the nation as seeing the scarcity of land and Mendika being the most densely populated nations in the world and the population of the nation is ever increasing, Multistory building was the need of the hour and hence Skypar decided to construct 160 houses through these towers. 2.2.6 The revised plans of the construction or change in the construction plans were in the public domain and easily available, also the construction was in accordance with the permission from the authorities, hence no law is being violated and every rule and regulation that needs to be followed was being taken care of. [2.3] construction of paired tower under Ikaira doesn’t violate fire safety regulation. 2.3.1 It is stated that Ikaira Building Regulations intends to provide the distance between two adjacent building blocks to be between 6 meter to 16 meter depending upon the height of the building blocks. It does not provide any specific requirement of distance between two buildings. The concept of minimum distance required between two High Rise building of a block may not 1 Uttar Pradesh Apartment (promotion of construction, ownership and maintenance) Act, 2010 necessarily be the same as required between the two building blocks. For Example a building block may have three or four stories for the entire block area and few towers of different height and different upper stories designed at different places in the same block. 2.3.2 It is stated here that the new building under construction is having perimeter of approx. 230 meter the entire building is surrounding by enough open area i.e. more than 16 meter except at one place where the building is made a part of block of adjoining building by way off a proposed connecting bridge to provide an extra exit route for the purpose of emergency evacuation. Here also the minimum gap between old building and new building is 9 meter for 6.80 meter length with satisfies the requirements of fire safety provisions. It does not violate any provision with regards to fire safety and air circulation.”2
2 Chapter 7 Fire protection and fire safety requirements.
Building Legislation and Historic Buildings: A Guide to the Application of the Building Regulations, the Public Health Acts, the Fire Precautions Act, the Housing Act and Other Legislation Relevant to Historic Buildings
The Complete HVAC BIBLE for Beginners: The Most Practical & Updated Guide to Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems | Installation, Troubleshooting and Repair | Residential & Commercial
The Complete Guide to Alternative Home Building Materials & Methods: Including Sod, Compressed Earth, Plaster, Straw, Beer Cans, Bottles, Cordwood, and Many Other Low Cost Materials