Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Digest Instruction
Case Digest Instruction
INSTRUCTIONS
1. GENERAL COMMENTS
Always use the active voice.
o Active Voice: The forest fire destroyed the whole suburb.
vs. Passive Voice: The whole suburb was destroyed by the forest fire.
Do not just copy and paste, especially the facts. Be direct and concise. Include only the facts relevant to the issue on
the case. Make sure that all facts necessary to answer the issue are included in the “FACTS” portion of the digest, and
not cited in the “RULING” portion for the first time.
Identify the “ISSUE” based on the questions submitted by the parties to the court for decision. Determine the “ISSUE”
by appreciating the entirety of the text, and not only the piecemeal portion thereof.
STRICTLY 1 PAGE ONLY, UNLESS THERE ARE MORE THAN 1 ISSUES
TICKLER
This refers to the topic or the doctrine of the case.
Use phrases only, not sentences.
Be specific and utilize the particular circumstances of the case in the development of the doctrine.
FORMAT: BOLD, ALL CAPS
CASE DOCTRINE
The case doctrine should contain the most important ruling set by the court in the particular case
Limit the sentences to 3-5 only.
Avoid offhandedly rephrasing the ruling of the court. The doctrine might be substantially changed should you do so.
At the end of the doctrine the following must be cited: case title, case number; date must be cited
Example:
APPEAL IS NOT A NATURAL RIGHT BUT IS MERELY A STATUTORY PRIVILEGE
Although appeal is an essential part of our judicial process, it has been held, time and again, that the right thereto is
not a natural right or a part of due process but is merely a statutory privilege. Thus, the perfection of an appeal in the
manner and within the period prescribed by law is not only mandatory but also jurisdictional and failure of a party to
conform to the rules regarding appeal will render the judgment final and executor (Land Bank of the Philippines vs.
Court of Appeals and Heirs of Manuel Bolanos, G.R. No. 221636; July 11, 2016).
FACTS
FIRST PARAGRAPH: “STATEMENT OF THE CASE” + STATEMENT OF THE PARTIES
Statement of the case
o Answers the question: What stage in the proceedings is the case in? Indicate its current level. Do not start
with the first court which took cognizance of the case.
o Is it an original action, appeal, petition for certiorari, or motion for reconsideration? Etc.
o Take note that a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 is completely different from a Petition for
Certiorari under Rule 65.
o Indicate the initial ruling of the first court that took cognizance of the case in a very short sentence.
o No need to spell out the names of the courts (e.g. Regional Trial Court), if they are already of public
knowledge.
o Write this in two or three SHORT sentences ONLY.
Statement of the parties
o Full names of the parties with the proper designation as petitioner, complainant, accused, etc.
o If corporation’s or entity’s name will later on be abbreviated, name should be followed with the abbreviation
enclosed in parentheses.
o After introduction, parties may subsequently be referred to with the last name, abbreviation or designation.
o Please indicate only those personal circumstances relevant to the issue.
In a petition under Rule 65 before the SC, petitioner AbelardoAbundo Sr. (Abundo) challenges the decisions of the
COMELEC and the RTC finding him ineligible to serve as mayor of Viga, Catanduanes because of the three-term
limit rule.
This is a petition for certiorari under Rule 45 which seeks to reverse the decision of CA affirming the ruling of Manila
RTC finding Juan Dela Cruz guilty of statutory rape.
ISSUE/S
Use close-ended questions which can be answered by a Yes or No.
Issue should be clear, concise and specific.
If there is only one issue, AVOID GENERAL QUESTIONS.
If there are several issues related to your subject capable of being represented as one issue, a general question is
permissible. Aim to simplify the issues into one question. At the same time, make sure that in the ruling, the several
issues are accordingly threshed out.
Make sure that the issue is not just an obiter dictum. If it is, state so.
Example:
Civil Law × Is the contract of sale Was the property bought by respondent
void? lawyer from his client the subject of litigation
at the time of purchase?
RULING
FIRST PART: YES OR NO ANSWER
Quick answer restating the question asked: “Yes, the differentiation was germane…”
This is just ONE SENTENCE.
UPLOAD @ https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/141tO493GSqrf-627-3uDEQIkl3WmhAli?usp=sharing
x-------x
x—————x
TICKLER
Case Title
G.R. No., Date
Ponente, J.
FACTS:
Start here
ISSUE:
Start here
HELD:
Start here