MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION

VIVEKANAND EDUCATION SOCIETY POLYTECHNIC

MICRO PROJECT
Academic year: 2022-23

TITLE OF PROJECT
Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw UML
diagram and test cases

Program: Computer Engineering

Program code: CO-4I (B)
Course: Software Engineering (SEN)
Course code: 22413
 MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
This is to certify that Mr./Miss. Leonhard Dsouza, Aaditi Inamdar, Soham
Jagtap Roll No. 45, 46, 47 of Forth Semester of Diploma in Computer Engineering
Of Institute, V.E.S. POLYTECHNIC (Code: 0004) has Completed the Micro
Project satisfactorily in Software Engineering (22413) for the academic year 2022
- 2023 as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: Mumbai Enrollment No: 2100040261-63

Date: ……/……/2023 Exam Seat No:

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

Sangita Bhoyar

Seal of
Institution
 INDEX
Academic year: 2022-23 Name of the faculty: Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar
Program code: CO-4I Course & Course code: Software Engineering (SEN)

Roll No: 45, 46, 47 Enrollment No. 2100040261-63

Semester: 4th
Name of the Students: Leonhard Dsouza, Aaditi Inamdar, Soham Jagtap

SR.NO. CONTENT PAGE NO.

4
1 Brief Introduction
4
2 Aim of the Micro-Project
5
3 Action Plan and Resources Required
5
4 Brief Description
11
5 Implementation & Result
18
6 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project
19
7 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
 Annexure-1
Micro Project Proposal
Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw UML
diagram and test cases

1.0 Aim of Micro Project :

The Aim of this microproject is to manage risk and to increase profitability in any market
environment and to draw UML diagrams and test cases.

2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed:

CO1: Select suitable software process model for software development.
CO2: Prepare software requirement specification.
CO3: Use software modelling to create data design.
CO4: Estimate size and cost of software product.

3.0 Proposed Methodology:

 Discussion about topic with guide and among group members

 Literature Survey
 Submission of project proposal
 Information collection
 Analysis of Data
 Compilation of the content
 Representation
 Editing and revising the content
 Report Preparation
4.0 Action Plan:

Name of
Planned Planned
Sr. Responsible Team
Finish date
no. Activity performed Start date Members
1
Discussion and finalization of topic 06/02/2023 20/02/2023
2 Preparation and submission of
20/02/2023 06/03/2023
Abstract
3
Literature Review 06/03/2023 13/03/2023
4
Collection of Data 13/03/2023 27/03/2023
5 Compilation of Report And
27/03/2023 10/04/2023
Presentation
6
Actual Presentation & Final
10/04/2023 24/04/2023
submission of Micro Project

5.0 Resources required:

Name of
S. No. Specifications Qty
Resource/material
1 Chrome Free open learning source 2
Microsoft word document
2 Laptop 1
With internet facility
3 Printer Hp Laserjet 1
Group Details:

Sr.No Roll No Name of Student

1 45 Leonhard Dsouza
2 46 Aaditi Inamdar
3 47 Soham Jagtap

Name of Guide: Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar

 Annexure-II

Micro Project Report

Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw UML
diagram and test cases
1.0 Rationale:
Trading analysis software is a powerful tool that traders and investors use to analyze market
data and make informed trading decisions. In this software test case refers to the
actions required to verify a specific feature or functionality in software testing. The
test case details the steps, data, prerequisites, and postconditions necessary to
verify a feature and UML diagrams can be used as a way to visualize a project before it
takes place or as documentation for a project afterward..

2.0Aim of Micro Project :

The Aim of this microproject is to manage risk and to increase profitability in any
market environment and to draw UML diagrams and test cases.

3.0 Course Outcomes Addressed:

CO1: Select suitable software process model for software development.
CO2: Prepare software requirement specification.
CO3: Use software modelling to create data design.
CO4: Estimate size and cost of software product.
4.0 Literature Review:
The impact of algorithmic trading on market liquidity by L. Menkveld (2013): This study
analyzes the impact of algorithmic trading on market liquidity, and how it affects the ability of
traders to buy and sell securities. The author finds that algorithmic trading can improve liquidity
in some situations, but can also create negative feedback loops that exacerbate market volatility.

Class diagram is a static diagram. It represents the static view of an application. Class diagram is
not only used for visualizing, describing, and documenting different aspects of a system but also
for constructing executable code of the software application.
Class diagram describes the attributes and operations of a class and also the constraints imposed
on the system. The class diagrams are widely used in the modeling of objectoriented systems
because they are the only UML diagrams, which can be mapped directly with object-oriented
languages.
Class diagram shows a collection of classes, interfaces, associations, collaborations, and
constraints. It is also known as a structural diagram.
The purpose of the class diagram can be summarized as −
 Analysis and design of the static view of an application.
 Describe responsibilities of a system.
 Base for component and deployment diagrams.
 Forward and reverse engineering.

The test case is defined as a group of conditions under which a tester determines whether
a software application is working as per the customer's requirements or not. Test case
designing includes preconditions, case name, input conditions, and expected result. A test
case is a first level action and derived from test scenarios.

The primary purpose of writing a test case is to achieve the efficiency of the application.
 TEST CASE TEMPLATE

Overall, these studies and articles highlight the importance of trading analysis software in the
financial industry, and how it can be used to improve trading performance, risk management, and
decision-making. They also emphasize the need for careful analysis and testing of trading
strategies to ensure their effectiveness and reliability.

5.0 Actual Methodology Followed:

 Discussion about topic with guide and among group members
 Literature Survey
 Submission of project proposal
 Information collection
 Analysis of Data
 Compilation of the content
 Representation
 Editing and revising the content
 Report Preparation
6.0 Actual Resources Used:

Sr. Name of
Specifications Qty Remarks
No. Resource/material
Free open learning
1 Chrome 2
source
Microsoft word
2 Laptop document 1
With internet facility
3 Printer Hp Laserjet 1
7.0 Outputs of micro-projects
ER DIAGRAM FOR TRADING ANALYSIS SOFTWARE
8.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project
The following skills were developed-
1 Designing: Designing of micro project with minimum required resources and
at low cost.
2 Teamwork: Learned to work in a team and boost individual confidence.
3 Time Management: Timely completion of micro project as scheduled.
4 Data Analysis: Interpretation of data: drawing and analysis of graphs,
laboratory calculations, etc.
5 Problem-solving: Develop good problem-solving habits.
6 Technical writing: Preparing a report of the proposed plan and final report.
7 Presentation: Giving working model presentation of the micro project .

9.0 Applications of this Micro – Project.

 It is commonly used for technical analysis, which involves studying
historical market data to identify patterns and trends.
 It can also be used for fundamental analysis, which involves analyzing a
company's financial statements, economic indicators, and other relevant
information to determine its intrinsic value.
 It is often used for algorithmic trading, which involves using computer
programs to execute trades based on pre-defined rules and algorithms.
 This project will help all end users as a user friendly system

References:

https://youtu.be/9mSFYWMjZuo

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/121014/best-technical-
analysis-trading-software.asp

Sign of the faculty

Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar

 Annexure-III

Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

S. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent (

No. assessed ( Marks 1 - 3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) Marks 9- 10 )
Relevance to the course Relate to very few Related to some LOs Take care of at-least one Take care of more than
1 LOs CO one CO
Not more than two
sources At-least 5 relevant
Literature Survey (primary and At –least 7 relevant About 10 relevant
2 sources, at least 2
/information collection secondary), very old sources, most latest sources, most latest
latest
reference
Completion of the
Target as per project Completed less than Completed 50 to Completed more than
3 Completed 60 to 80%
proposal 50% 60% 80 %
Enough data collected
Sufficient and by sufficient and
Sample Size small, appropriate Sufficient and appropriate appropriate sample size.
data sample, enough sample, Proper
Analysis of Data and neither organized data generated but enough data generated inferences drawn by
4
representation nor presented well not organized and which is organized and organising and
not presented well. presented well but poor presenting data
No or poor inferences drawn through tables, charts
inferences drawn and graphs.
Just Well
assembled/fabricated Well assembled/fabricated
and parts are not assembled/fabricated with proper
functioning with proper functioning functioning parts. In
Quality of well. Not in proper parts. In proper shape, proper shape, within
Prototype/Model Incomplete
5 shape, dimensions within tolerance tolerance dimensions
fabrication/assembly.
beyond tolerance dimensions and good and good
limit. finish/appearance. But finish/appearance.
Appearance/finish is no creativity in design and Creativity in design
shabby. use of material and use of material
Nearly sufficient
Very short, poor and correct details
quality sketches, about methods, Very detailed, correct,
material, Detailed, correct and clear
Details about clear description of
precautions and description of
methods, methods, materials,
conclusion. but methods, materials,
6 Report Preparation material, precautions and
clarity is not there in precautions and
precaution and conclusions. Enough
presentation. Conclusions. Sufficient
conclusions tables, charts and
But not enough Graphic Description.
omitted, some details sketches
are wrong graphic description.

Major information is Includes major

not included, information but Includes major Well organized,
Presentation of Micro information is not not well organized information and well includes major
7
Project well organized . and not presented organized but not information ,well
well presented well presented
Replied to
Could not reply to considerable Replied properly to
number of Replied most of the
8 Viva considerable of considerable number of
questions but not questions properly
question. question.
very properly
 Annexure – IV
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Academic year: 2021-22 Name of the faculty: Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar
Program code: CO-4I (B) Course & Course code: Software Engineering (SEN)

Roll No: 45, 46, 47 Enrollment No: 2100040261-63

Semester: 4th Name of the Students: Leonhard Dsouza, Aaditi Inamdar, Soham Jagtap
Title of the Micro-Project: Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw UML
diagram and test cases

Course Outcomes Achieved:

CO1: Select suitable software process model for software development.

CO2: Prepare software requirement specification.

CO3: Use software modelling to create data design.

CO4: Estimate size and cost of software product.

Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project

Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent Sub Total

No. assessed Marks Marks Marks Marks 9-
1-3 4-5 6-8 10
(A)Process and product assessment Out Of 6
1 Relevance to the course
2 Literature Survey .
Information Collection
3 Completion of the Target
as per project proposal
4 Analysis of Data and
representation
5 Quality of
Prototype/Model/Content
6 Report Preparation
(B)Individual Presentation/Viva Out of 4
7 Presentation .
8 Viva
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process and Product Individual Total

Roll
Name Assessment Presentation/Viva Marks
No.
(6 marks) (4 marks) 10

Leonhard Dsouza
45

Aaditi Inamdar
46

Soham jagtap
47

Comments/Suggestions about teamwork/leadership/interpersonal communication (if any)

……………………………………………………………………………………………..

……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Name and designation of the Faculty Member: Mrs. SANGITA BHOYAR (Lecturer)

Signature________________