You are on page 1of 11

Identification and Characterization of Pressure

Seals through the Use of Wireline Logs:


A Multivariate Statistical Approach
Gerilynn R. Moline: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Jean M. Bahr: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Peter A. Drzewiecki: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Lisa D. Shepherd: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Abstract: A study is currently investigating the occur- associated with abnormal pressures is critical to under-
rence of abnormal pressures and the associated low-perme- standing the genesis of pressure seals.
ability seals within the St. Peter Sandstone in the Michigan At the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a study is
Basin. These seals are commonly identified by examining currently underway to investigate the origin and occur-
vertical-pressure profiles and noting the depths at which a rence of pressure compartments within the St. Peter Sand-
major change in the pressure gradient occurs. Additionally,
stone in the Michigan Basin. This formation is a mature
zones of very low permeability which may act as fluid seals
may also be identified on the basis of core analyses and well quartz sandstone of Middle Ordovician age, with burial
tests. Often, however, there are an insufficient number of depths ranging from less than 7,000 ft (2 km) to more
direct pressure or permeability measurements to adequately than 1 1,000ft (3.5 km) within the region of interest. Along
identify the depth and lateral extent of these seals. An alter- with the overlying Glenwood Formation, the St. Peter
native method for identifying and characterizing pressure Sandstone has been the focus of intense gas exploration
seals is through the use of wireline logs. Multivariate statis- for the past decade.
tical techniques can be used to segment the logs and group In the Michigan Basin, anomalously high pressures have
the segments into electrofaciestypes. Application of this tech- been identified within the St. Peter Sandstone and the
nique to four wells within the St. Peter Sandstone suggests Glenwood Formation from vertical-pressure profiles and
that the electrofacies characterization reflects both the hy- hydraulic-head distributions (Bahr, 1989). The locations
draulic and diagenetic characteristics of the formation. In
of the low-permeability seals associated with these pres-
particular, an electrofacies type has been identified which has
characteristics similar to those found within seals in other sure anomalies are not presently known, however. This
basins. region of high hydraulic heads occurs near Saginaw Bay
and extends into the northeast portion of the basin (Figure
INTRODUCTION 1). Saginaw Bay is a regional discharge area for topo-
The phenomenon of abnormal pressures has received graphically driven flow, yet the hydraulic gradients in-
considerable attention because of the problems inherent dicate downward flow in these formations in this area,
in drilling into abnormal pressures and the question of suggesting that low-permeability zones have prevented
whether economically producible hydrocarbons exist in equilibration with the present-day regional flow system.
overpressured reservoirs. In the past two decades, much Precise identification of zones of very low permeability
of the attention has been focused on understanding the in the Michigan Basin is complicated by the lack of avail-
mechanisms contributing to pressure generation (Barker, able core samples and direct pressure and permeability
1972; Bradley, 1975; Magara, 1975; Fertl, 1976; Law and measurements. However, borehole geophysical logs are
Dickinson, 1985; Mudford and Best, 1989), and on meth- available for all of the deep Michigan wells, providing
ods for detecting anomalous pressures (Fertl, 1976).More both continuous vertical measurements and a wide dis-
recently, the focus has turned to understanding the genesis tribution of data. While the wireline logs do not directly
and characteristics of pressure seals themselves (Hunt, measure permeability, the log responses are a function of
1990; Powley, 1990; Tigert and Al-Shaieb, 1990). Low- the lithology, pore-fluid composition, and porosity (As-
permeability seals associated with abnormal pressures are quith and Gibson, 1982). Because permeability is also a
of particular interest because of the suggestion that, in function of lithology and porosity (Ahmed et al., 1989),
many instances, seal genesis may be linked to depth- a correlation between composite log response and per-
dependent diagenetic processes (Powley, 1990) and could meability should exist. This correlation can be used to
provide a type of hydrocarbon trap not normally incor- estimate permeability in wells for which direct perme-
porated into exploration strategies. An ability to map the ability measurements are not available.
vertical and lateral extent of very-low-permeability zones In this study, an electrofaciesapproach is used to char-

362 The Log Analyst July-AuguSt, 1992


Pressure Seals Identification Using Wireline Logs

Wolverine Patrick & St. Norwich 2-28


A. Wireline Logs Principal Component Log

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


--
Wolverine
Patrick & St. Norwich

Michigan Wolverine Patrick & St. Norwich 2-28

a’
B. Wireline Logs Principal Component Log

Figure 1: Map of Michigan showing the location of the wells


included in this study. Contours indicate hydraulic heads greater
than 1,100 ft (CI = 300 ft).
B
acterize the multivariate log response and to group the
core measurements. An electrofacies is a set of wireline-
log responses which characterizesa part of the formation,
permitting it to be distinguished from its surroundings
(Serra and Abbott, 1982; Serra, 1986). The name origi-
nates from the use of the term “electric logs” to refer to
the entire suite of wireline logs. It should be remembered
that electrofacies reflect not only the electrical properties
of the subsurface, but the acoustic and nuclear properties
as well. Figure 2: A, Principal-component analysis is applied to the
ELECTROFACIES CLASSIFICATION four logs in the left two tracks, resulting in the construction of
a first principal component (PC) log, shown on the right. The
Three steps are involved in the electrofacies classifi- PC log represents the sum of the variance of the four logs along
cation process: reduction of the multivariate problem the first principal component axis. Logs included in the analysis
down to a single variable, log segmentation,and clustering are the sonic (DT), microresistivity (MSFL), density (RHOB),
of the log segments into electrofacies types. The statistical and neutron porosity (NPHI). B, The PC log is segmented by
techniques used in these steps are not new to log analysis, maximum-liklelihood estimation, and the segment boundaries
only the method of application. are then transferred to the original logs. Segmentation is shown
Numerous algorithms for log segmentation can be found here superimposed on the original log trace.
in the literature (Testerman, 1962; Kulinkovich et al.,
1966; Gill, 1970; Webster, 1973; Hawkins and Merriam, In order to honor the contributions from the entire suite
1974). The majority of these techniques are applicable of logs, the multivariate problem is collapsed into a single
only to a single trace. Hawkins (1976) presents an algo- variable through the use of principal component analysis.
rithm for multivariate segmentation, but the size of the Geometrically, principal components define the axes of
data set is severely restricted. a hyper-ellipsoid formed by the variance-covariance

July-August, 1992 The Log Analyst 363


Moline et al.

Electrofacies Classification
by Cluster Analysis

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Electrofacies Group

Figure 3: This dendrogram is a composite of all of the log segments from the four Michigan wells constructed by cluster analysis.
The plot graphically presents a hierarchical distance structure constructed from the multivariate means of the log segments. Six
clusters or electrofacies types have been created by cutting the dendrogram at the location of the dashed line.

structure of data points plotted in multidimensional space by maximizing the likelihood function for the log data,
(cf. Davis, 1986, p. 527). This multivariate statistical assuming a constant signal within segments and super-
technique has been successfully applied to problems of position of random noise. The program is interactive and
zonation and well-to-well correlation (Elek, 1988) and is the user supplies the length of the window for filtering,
particularly useful in cases where the input logs are highly the length of the window for computing local variance,
correlated, resulting in a concentration of the variance and the segmentation threshold. The last parameter con-
along the first-principal-component (PC) axis. For the trols the coarseness of the segmentation. In practice, the
wells included in this study, greater than 80% of the vari- parameters are varied within a narrow range, and the
ance is accounted for by the first principal component. segmented log is compared to the original PC log and to
In addition, examination of eigenvectors indicates that the core values to arrive at a subjective determination of
the contributions from the four logs are nearly equally the adequacy of the segmentation.
weighted. The results of segmentation of the PC log are shown
Figure 2A shows the PC log construction for one of the in Figure 2B, superimposed on the original log trace. The
four wells included in this study, the Wolverine Patrick output of the segmentation algorithm has been edited to
& St. Norwich 2-28 well. Four input logs were used in remove segments that are less than 3-ft thick for consis-
this study based on their strong correlation to core per- tency with the resolution of the logging tools. Once the
meability: neutron porosity (NPHI), density (RHOB), segmentation is completed, the segment boundaries are
sonic (DT), and a transform of the microspherically fo- applied to the original log traces and log values are then
cused resistivity (MSFL). The PC log was constructed by averaged within the segments. In this manner, a multi-
projecting standardized principal component scores onto variate mean is assigned to each segment.
the PC axis. Standardization removes the effects of dif- The final step in the classification process is to group
fering units of the input logs. For this well, 86% of the similar log segments into electrofacies types through the
variance occurs along the first principal component. The use of cluster analysis. The clustering algorithm estab-
problem is now simplified, and a univariate segmentation lishes a hierarchy of distances in multivariate space on
algorithm can be applied to the PC log. the basis of the log averages assigned to each segment.
In the second step of the electrofacies classification pro- This hierarchy is shown graphically by the dendrogram
cess, the PC log is segmented using a maximum-likeli- in Figure 3. Each data point represents a single log seg-
hood estimation algorithm (Mehta et al., 1990). The al- ment.
gorithm solves for the locations of segment boundaries Cluster analysis establishes a distance structure only.

364 The Log Analyst July-AuguSt, 1992


Pressure Seals Identification Using Wireline Logs

ANOVA for Different Grouping Schemes any point with a horizontal line. For this application, the
criterion is one that will optimize the separation of the
distributions of core porosities and permeabilities asso-

11
ciated with the log segments, because these are the pa-
rameters we are interested in estimating. To do this, the
core data are also segmented using the same segment
130 boundaries that were applied to the logs. The dendrogram
is cut into successively larger numbers of groups until the
best separation of permeabilities and porosities is
150
v) achieved. The “goodness” of this separation is achieved
110 when the F-scores from an analysis of variance for the
8
v)
permeability and porosity distributions are maximized.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


u. This maximization occurs at five groups for the perme-
ability distributions and at six groups for the porosity
distributions (Figure 4). The six-group scheme was chosen
because it incorporated optimal separation of both pa-
rameters, in spite of some redundancy in permeability.
For the four wells included in this study, six electro-
facies types were identified, as indicated in Figure 3. The
distributions of core values associated with the electro-
4 5 6 7 facies are shown graphically by box plots in Figure 5.
Number of Groups Note that, while the permeabilities in types I and I1 over-
Figure 4: Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) show that
lap, the porosities are significantly different. Similarly,
the F-scores are maximized at five groups and six groups for the porosities in types I1 and IV overlap although the
permeability and porosity, respectively. A maximum F-score permeabilities are different. This indicates that the elec-
reflects the optimal grouping scheme. trofacies groupings are reflecting the non-linearity be-
tween the porosity and permeability. Two electrofacies
Choice of the appropriate number of groups depends on with similar storage properties may have very different
the application of outside criteria. Any number of groups flow characteristics and vice versa, an important point
between one and the total number of input data points when applying this technique to reservoir characteriza-
can be chosen simply by cutting the dendrogram along tion.

Permeability and Porosity Within


Electrofacies Groups Box Plots

maximum-

minimurn-
* -outliei

b
T

’ I II 111 IV v VI I II 111 IV
I
v
i1
VI

Figure 5: Box plots show the distributions of porosity and permeability within each of the six electrofacies groups determined
by clustering the log characteristics (Figure 3).

July-August, 1992 The Log Analyst 365


Moline et al.

Wolverine Patrick & St. Norwich 2-28


Wireline Logs Core Analysis

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Figure 6: Electrofacies distribution in the Wolverine Patrick and St. Nonvich 2-28 well. The wireline logs are shown in the left
two tracks and the results from core-plug analysis are shown on the right. Log segments are indicated by horizontal lines through
the log traces and electrofacies types are indicated by shading.

APPLICATION TO THE MICHIGAN BASIN WELLS The cored interval is from the upper St. Peter just below
the Glenwood contact.
The electrofacies method described above was applied The cored interval in the Patrick Glide 1-27 (Figure 7)
to four wells distributed across the basin (Figure 1). Two is also from the upper St. Peter and contains high-, in-
of the wells, the Wolverine Patrick & St. Nonvich 2-28 teremediate-, and low-permeability electrofacies, types 11,
and the Patrick Gilde 1-27, were located outside of the 111, and V, respectively. Note the depth of burial to the
pressure anomaly. The Hunt Martin 1-15 is located at top of the interval is now at 10,550 ft (3.2 km) but there
the edge of the pressure anomaly near Saginaw Bay and is still an absence of the lowest-permeability electrofacies
the Mobil St. Foster 1- 12 is located in the region of high type VI.
hydraulic head in the northeast part of the basin. The deepest of the four wells, the Hunt Martin 1-15
The 13 segments in the Patrick & St. Nonvich 2-28 (Figure 8) contains the widest range of porosity and per-
well have been clustered into four electrofacies types (Fig- meability. The top of the cored interval is at a depth of
ure 6). Electrofacies type I is present only in this well, the 11,306 ft (3.4 km), and the interval contains 200 ft (60.9
shallowest of the four wells with a depth of 7,920 ft (2.4 m) of core, again at the top of the St. Peter just below the
km) at the top of the interval shown. The highest poros- Glenwood contact. Note that the permeabilities decrease
ities in the St. Peter Sandstode within the Michigan Basin with depth, with the lowest-permeability electrofacies type
occur in the region where this well is located. Two inter- VI present in the lower half of the interval.
mediate-permeability electrofacies, types I11 and IV, and Type VI is also present in the Mobil St. Foster 1-12
the low-permeability type V are also present in this well. well (Figure 9). The depth to the top of the cored interval

366 The Log Analyst July-August, 1992


Pressure Seals Identification Using Wireline Logs

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Figure 7: Electrofacies distribution in the Patrick Glide 1-27 well. Clustering has regrouped some of the adjacent log segments
into the same electrofacies. Types 11, 111, and V appear in this well.

is at just above 11,260 ft (3.4 km), but this is now the tion of subs6ntially more data. However, the consistency
lowermost portion of the St. Peter just above the Prarie of characteriktics within electrofacies types between wells
du Chien contact. Note the similarity in the interval depths separated by large distances is an indication of the po-
and the electrofacies types between this well and the lower tential effectiveness of the method for determining the
half of the Hunt Martin 1- 15 well. spatial distribution of these characteristics at the basin
scale.
RELATIONSHIP TO PRESSURE SEALS While the lithologic characteristics of each of the six
The four wells chosen for this study represent a subset electrofacies are recognizable in core examination, those
of the available wells for which core permeability and of type VI are of greatest interest to our research because
porosity have been measured. This subset, composed of of the focus on identification and characterization of low-
427 core measurements, was chosen to reflect a wide permeability seals within the St. Peter Sandstone. The
geographical and vertical distribution. It was hoped that lithologic characteristics associated with some seals have
by sampling in this manner, the data set would be rep- been documented. Hunt (1990) observed that the top seal
resentative of spatial variations within the St. Peter Sand- in many sandstones is layered with multiple horizontal
stone but would still allow a small set to be used as a test bands of carbonate cement. In the sandstones of the Simp-
of the methodology. In the final analysis, data from an son Group in the Anadarko Basin, Tigert and Al-Shaieb
additional 2 1 wells comprising more than 1,500 core (1990) observed alternating carbonate-cemented, silica-
measurements will be incorporated into the electrofacies cemented, and high-porosity intervals within a seal zone.
classification. It is anticipated that the geophysical- and A model that incorporates mechanical and chemical pro-
hydraulic-parameter distributions associated with the cesses has been developed by Dewers and Ortoleva (1990)
electrofacies types will change somewhat with the addi- to explain the formation of banded quartz cementation

July-A~gust,1992 The Log Analyst 367


Moline et al.

Hunt Martin 1-15


Wireline Logs Core Analysis

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Figure 8: A 200-ft cored section from the Hunt Martin 1-1 5 well contains four electrofacies types, including the lowest per-
meability type VI. Permeability decreases with depth as reflected in the electrofacies distribution. (Note: a slightly different set of
logs is shown here. However, the electrofacies were determined using the same set of logs as in the other wells.)

in sandstones. Thus, we might expect to see diagenetic average of 0.1 md (1 x cmz). These values are
banding in the form ofalternating cements and alternating measured from core plugs at surface conditions and reflect
high and low porosity within sandstone intervals, which horizontal permeability to air. It should be noted that the
act as pressure seals. permeabilities will be one or more orders of magnitude
The lithologic characteristics of the type VI electrofa- lower under in-situ conditions (Ahmed et al., 1989). In
cies within the Hunt Martin 1- 15 and the Mobil St. Foster fact, core data provided by Shell Western demonstrate a
1- 12 wells include diagenetic banding of both cement and decrease of 3-4 orders of magnitude when horizontal per-
porosity types, moderate to abundant stylolitization, and meability was measured with brines under 5,000 psi (3.4
a predominance of quartz-overgrowth cement, often to x lo7 Pa) confining pressure.
the total occlusion of porosity. In Figure 10, a segment The wide range of variability of these parameters is a
of core from the Mobil St. Foster 1- 12 well within a type result of the banding described above. In Figure 11, po-
VI zone exhibits mm-scale alternating bands of dolomite rosity measurements from continuous thin sections
cement (D), quartz cement (Q), and high-porosity bands through an 1 1-ft (3.3-m) section of the Mobil St. Foster
(P). Also evident are stylolites (sty), concentrated pre- 1- 12 core demonstrate these porosity variations and their
dominantly along the boundaries of the bands. correlation with the diagenetic bands. This observation
Hydrologic characteristics within the type VI zones in- makes it clear that the permeability is significantly an-
clude porosities that range from <1% to 7%, with an isotropic within these type VI zones. A simple arithmetic
average of 3%, and permeabilities ranging from <0.05 or geometric averaging of the values will severely over-
md (5 x lO-I3 cm2) to 0.8 md (8 x cmz), with an estimate the vertical permeability because flow paths must

368 The Log Analyst July-August, 1992


Pressure Seals Identification Using Wireline Logs

Mobil St. Foster 1-12


Wireline Logs Core Analysis

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


Figure 9: Three electrofacies types appear in the cored interval of the Mobil St. Foster 1-12 well. Note that these electrofacies
types are the same as those that appear in the lower half of the Hunt Martin 1-15, shown in the previous figure. The depths in
these two wells are roughly correlative.

cross the low-porosity bands. As a result, average vertical CONCLUSIONS


permeability under in-situ conditions within these type
VI zones is estimated in the nanodarcy range. A multivariate statistical method for relating geophys-
Geophysical log characteristics of the type VI electro- ical log data with lithologic and hydrologic properties has
facies include low sonic traveltime, low neutron porosity, been applied to a test set of data from the St. Peter Sand-
high density, and high resistivity. Average values are 57 stone in the Michigan Basin. Analysis of data from four
ps, 0.005 porosity units (limestone), 2.62 g/cc, and 15 wells has resulted in the identification of six electrofacies
ohm-meters, respectively. Resistivity values ranged from types. While the electrofacies classification was based
2-1,000 ohm-meters, reflecting the heterogeneity within solely on the log responses, it was done in such a way as
the rocks of this electrofacies type. to optimize the separation of distributions of porosity
The presence of type VI electrofacies within only the and permeability associated with each electrofacies type.
deepest two of the four logged intervals is consistent with It is expected that this separation will be enhanced by
the Powley (1990) pressure-compartment model, which enlargement of the data set.
suggests that the top seals occur at depths of roughly An examination of cores from each of the four wells
10,000 ft (3,000 m). In addition, these two wells occur demonstrated that electrofacies types reflect not only the
within the region of anomalously high hydraulic heads. hydraulic characteristics, but the lithologic characteristics
These observations do not prove that the type VI zones as well. In particular, an electrofacies type has been iden-
are, in fact, acting as low-permeability seals. However, tified that is associated with formation characteristics
their occurrence at these depths and locations is consis- consistent with those observed in pressure seal zones in
tent with the theories and observations referenced above. other basins. These Characteristics include low perme-

July-August, 1992 The Log Analyst 369


Moline et al.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023

Figure 10: A section of core from a type VI zone in the Mobil St. Foster 1-12 showing diagenetic banding. Bands of dolomite
(D) and quartz (Q) cement alternate with high porosity (P) bands which have formed as a result of intergranular pressure solution.
Stylolites (sty) are frequent within the type VI electrofacies.

The Log Analyst July-August, 1992


370
Pressure Seals Identification Using Wireline Logs

Mobil St. Foster 1-12 surements associated with each electrofacies type will be
used to estimate values for these parameters where core
Depth Core Description Porosity (%) Quartz Cement (%) is not available. This technique is applicable to problems
(ft) 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 where determining the spatial distribution of hydraulic
I ,&,-I
characteristics is critical but where direct measurements
of those properties are insufficient.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
11276 The authors would like to thank Mobil Exploration and Pro-
ducing, Inc., Amoco Production, Shell Western E. & P., and
Western Michigan University for providing core analyses and
samples and digital logs. John Doveton and an anonymous

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


reviewer provided helpful discussion and comments. This re-
11278 search was funded by the Gas Research Institute.

REFERENCES
Ahmed, U., Crary, S. F., and Coates, G. R., 1989, Permeability
11280 estimation: the various sources and their interrelationship,
SPE-19604, in J. F. Tomich, ed., Formation evaluation and
reservoir geology: Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME,
V. 64, p. 649-662.
Asquith, G. B., and Gibson, C. R., 1982, Basic well log analysis
11282
for geologists:American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
Tulsa, OK, 216 p.
Bahr, J. M., 1989, Evaluation of pressure distribution in the St.
Peter Sandstone, Michigan Basin (abs.): EOS, Transactions
of the American Geophysical Union,v. 70, no. 43, p. 1097.
11284
Barker, C., 1972, Aquathermal pressuring-role of temperature
in development of abnormal-pressure zones: American As-
sociation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 56, p. 2068-
KEY Quartz-cemented Band
207 1.
Porous Band Bradley, J., 1975, Abnormal formation pressure: American As-
Stylolite sociation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 59, no. 6, p.
957-973.
Figure 11: Porosity measurements from image analysis of con- Davis, J. C., 1986, Statistics and data analysis in geology, 2nd
tinuous thin sections in an 11-ft section of the Mobil St. Foster ed.: John Wiley & Sons, New York. 646 p.
1- 12 core within a type VI zone. Porosity is highly variable and Dewers, T., and Ortoleva, P., 1990, A coupled reactionltrans-
is controlled by varying concentrations of quartz overgrowth port/mechanical model for intergranular pressure solution,
cement occurring in a complex pattern of horizontal bands in- stylolites,and differentialcompaction and cementation in clean
dicated by the stippled regions on the left of the figure. Note sandstones: Geochimicaet CosmochimicaActa, v. 54, p. 1609-
that this section is highly stylolitized. 1626.
Elek, I., 1988, Some applications of principal component anal-
ysis; well-to-well correlation, zonation: Geobyte, v. 3, no. 2,
ability, diagenetic banding, abundant quartz-overgrowth p. 46-55.
cementation, and moderate to abundant stylolitization. Fertl, W., 1976, Abnormal formation pressures: Elsevier, Am-
The occurrence of type VI electrofacies within only the sterdam. 382 p.
deepest two of the four logged intervals and in association Gill, D., 1970, Application of a statistical zonation method to
with regions of high hydraulic head indicates consistency reservoir evaluation and digitized-log analysis: American As-
with theories about seal genesis and with the location of sociation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 54, no. 5, p.
potential pressure compartments within the St. Peter 7 19-729.
Hawkins, D. M., 1976, FORTRAN IV program to segment
Sandstone in the Michigan Basin.
multivariate sequences of data: Computers and Geosciences,
In the future, additional wells for which core analyses V. 1, p. 339-35 1.
are available will be added to the data base, and char- Hawkins, D. M., and Merriam, D. F., 1974, Zonation of mul-
acterization of the log responses for each electrofaciestype tivariate sequences of digitized geologic data: Journal of the
will then be used to assign class membership to log seg- International Association of Mathematical Geology, v. 6, no.
ments in wells that have no core data available. The sta- 3, p. 263-269.
tistical distributions of porosity and permeability mea- Hunt, J. M., 1990, Generation and migration of petroleum from

July-August, 1992 The Log Analyst 371


Moline et al.

abnormally pressured fluid compartments: American Asso- of low sedimentation rate: American Association of Petroleum
ciation of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, vol. 74, no. 1, p. 1- Geologists Bulletin, v. 73, no. 11, p. 1383-1396.
12. Powley, D. E., 1990, Pressures and hydrogeology in petroleum
Kulinkovich, A. Y . , Sokhranov, N. N., and Churinova, I. M., basins: Earth Science Reviews, v. 29, p. 2 15-226.
1966, Utilization of digital computers to distinguish bound- Serra, O., 1986, Fundamentals of well-log interpretation, vol. 2,
aries of beds and identify sandstones from electric log data: The interpretation of logging data: Elsevier, Amsterdam. De-
International Geology Reviews, v. 8, p. 4 16-420. velopments in Petroleum Science, 15B, 684 p.
Law, B., and Dickinson, W., 1985, Conceptual model for origin Serra, O., and Abbott, H. T., 1982, The contribution of logging
of abnormally pressured gas accumulations in low-perme- data to sedimentology and stratigraphy: Society of Petroleum
ability reservoirs: American Association of Petroleum Geol- Engineers Journal, v. 22, no. 1, p. 117-1 3 1.
ogists Bulletin, v. 69, no. 8, p. 1295-1304. Testerman, J. D., 1962, A statistical reservoir-zonation tech-
Magara, K., 1975, Reevaluation of montmorillonite dehydra- nique: Journal of Petroleum Technology, Aug. 1962, p. 889-
893.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2196939/spwla-1992-v33n4a2.pdf by University of Regina user on 13 January 2023


tion as a cause of abnormal pressure and hydrocarbon mi-
gration: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bul- Tigert, V., and Al-Shaieb, Z . , 1990, Pressure seals; their dia-
letin, v. 59, p. 292-302. genetic banding patterns: Earth Science Reviews, v. 29, p.
Mehta, C. H., Radhakrishnan, S., and Srikanth, G., 1990, Seg- 227-240.
mentation of well logs by maximum-likelihood estimation: Webster, R., 1973, Automatic soil boundary location from tran-
Mathematical Geology, v. 22, no. 7, p. 853-869. sect data: Journal of the International Association of Math-
Mudford, B. S., and Best, M. E., 1989, Venture Gas Field, ematical Geology, v. 5, p. 27-37.
offshore Nova Scotia; case study of overpressuring in region

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Gerilynn R. Moline received a B.A. in geology from the Uni- Peter A. Drzewiecki received a B.S. in geology in 1989 from
versity of Southern Maine in 1986 and an M.S. in geophysics the University of Notre Dame and an M.S. in geology at the
from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1989. She is pres- University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1992. His Masters re-
ently a doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin-Mad- search focused on the diagenesis and geochemistry of the St.
ison, majoring in geology with a concentration in hydrogeology. Peter Sandstone in the Michigan Basin, and their implications
Her current research interests are parameter estimation in het- on the formation of abnormally pressured compartments. In
erogeneous systems and basin-scale flow modeling. She is a 199 1 Peter won an SEPM Promising Young Geoscientist award.
member of AGU, GSA, AWRA, and AAPG. He is currently working toward a Ph.D. in carbonate sedimen-
tology at the University of Wisconsin.
Lisa D. Shepherd received a B.A. in geology in 1987 from
Jean M. Bahr is an assistant professor in the Department of Carleton College in Northfield, MN. After completing her un-
Geology and Geophysics at the University of Wisconsin-Mad- dergraduate degree she was employed at the USGS in Menlo
ison. She received a B.A. in geology from Yale University in Park, CA. Her projects included a geothermal study in the Or-
1976, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Applied Earth Sciences from egon Cascades and a subsidence study in the Sacramento-San
Stanford University in 1985 and 1987. During her graduate Joaquin Delta. She is currently completing requirements for an
work, she was also employed as a hydrologist with the USGS. M.S. in geology with a concentration in hydrogeology at the
She has consulting experience in water resources development University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her current research in-
and aquifer restoration. Her research interests include fluid flow volves the study of small-scale porosity and textural variations
in sedimentary basins, chemical evolution of groundwater, and in the St. Peter Sandstone in the Michigan Basin in order to
contaminant hydrogeology. characterize the heterogeneity of low-permeability seals.

372 The Log Analyst July-AuguSt, 1992

You might also like