Chapter 4

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Table4.1

GENDER

GENDER

Gender discrimination existed in indian society india society determined by

particular system but how a days women also come forward to do all the works .

S.NO PARTICULARS NO. OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1. male 15 30

2. female 35 70

TOTAL 50 100

In the above table shows that (50) employee gender wise disscarification that is 35
respondents are female in the organization which considered 70% 15 respondents
are male in the organization which constituted 30% .
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
 TABLE 4.2
AGE
INTRODUCTION:
Age is an important factor for the study age have very important orgin in the
department of an individual .

Through age we are getting more knowledge and experience .

AGE:
S.NO PARTICULAS NO. OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
1. 20-25 31 62
2. 26-30 8 16

3. 31-45 7 14
4. Above 45 4 8
TOTAL 50 10
0

In the above table shows the (50) employee age classification that is 31
respondents are respond 20 -25 age in the organization which constituted 62% 8
respondents are respond 26 -30 age in the organization which constituted 16% 7
respondents is are respond 31-45 age in the organization which constituted 14% 4
respondents are respond above 45% age in the organization constituted 8% .

AGE:

60

50

40
 NO.OF .RESPONDENTS
30 PERCENTAGE
Column1

20

10

0
10 PASS 12 PASSDIPLOMADEGREE TOTAL

Table 4.3
Qualification and Education

S.No Particulars No Of Percentage

Respondent
1 10 Pass 2 4%
2 12 Pass 10 20%
3 Diploma 14 28%
4 Degree 24 48%
Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
In the above table shows that educational qualification classification that is
degree 24 respondents are degree qualified in organization which considered 48 %
14 respondents are diploma qualified in the organization which considered 28%
considered respondents are 12th qualified in the organization which considered
20% 2 respondents are below 10 qualified in organization which censed 4%.

6%

20%
35%

35%

SSLM HSC IT DEGREE

 Table 4.4

DEPARTMENT

Introduction:

A department is one of the sections in an organization such as government

business universal a department is also one of the section in large shop.

S. No Particulars No Of Percentage
Respondent
1 HR department 8 16%
2 Finance department 16 38%
3 Sales department 14 28%
 4 Operation department 12 24%
TOTAL 50 100

Interprations
In the above table show about department classification that is 16
respondents are finance department the organization which constituted 32 % 14
respondents are sales department in the organ which constituted 28 % 12
respondents are operation departments in the organization which constituted 24 %
8 respondents are Hr department in the organization which considered 16%.

Department:

100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60

PERCENTAGE
Column1
55Column1
50PERCENTAGE
DEPARTMENT
 Table 4.5

According to your job profile

It allows a company to articulate its labour needs in detail in contrast a job profile
is a brief outline The job description provides a comprehensive list of the
background skills experience education and duties required for the position
whereas the profile is a synopsis .

S.NO Particulars No of Respondents Percentages %

1 Yes 29 58%
2 Yes 21 48%
Totals 50 100 %

In the above table Shows that are about company Profile classifications
that is 29 respondents are degree yes statement in the organization which
considered 58 % 21 respondents are says No in the organization which
considered 42 %.
 According to your job profile

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
PERCENTAGE
10%
JOB PROFIT
0%

YES
NO
TOTAL
 Table 4.6

Respondent by their career development

Career development refers the process an individual may undergo to evolve

their occupational state.

S. No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT %
1 agree 9 18%
2 moderately 29 58%
agree
3 disagree 12 24%
Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
 In the above table shows that career development wise classification of 29
respondents says moderately agree constituted with 58% and 12 respondents says
disagree constituted with 24%.
Respondent by their career development

18%
24%

58%

AGREE MODERATELY AGREE DISAGREE

 Table 4.7

Respondent by their fair pay structure

Fair pay means equal pay for equal work.

S. No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 agree 7 14%
2 moderately 33 66%
agree
3 disagree 10 20%
Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
In the above table shows that fair pay structure wise classification of 33
respondents moderately agree constituted with 66% and 7 respondents are agree
with 14%.
Respondent by their fair pay structure

20% 14%

66%

AGREE MODERATELY AGREE DISAGREE

 Table 4.8

Respondent by their job satisfaction level

A feeling of fulfilment or enjoyment that a person device from their job.

S.No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 agree 12 24%
2 moderately 30 60%
agree
3 disagree 8 16%
Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
The above (8) shows that satisfied with job satisfaction level. According to it
30 respondents says moderately agree constituted with 60% and respondents 8
respondents disagree constituted with 16%.
Respondent by their job satisfaction level

24%

60%

140%

AGREE MODERATELYNAGREE DISAGREE

 Table 4.9

Satisfaction level of your work load and work time

The amount of work or of working time expected or assigned. Employees

with a heavy workload. The amount of work performance or capable of being
performed usually within a specific period.

S.No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 Highly 6 12%
satisfied
2 Satisfied 4 8%
3 Moderately 31 62%
satisfied
4 Unsatisfied 4 8%
5 Highly 5 10%
unsatisfied
6 Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
The above (9) table shows that satisfied with moderately satisfied with work load
and work time. According to its majority 31 of the employee in 50 . Respondents
are workload and work time with moderately rewards constituted 62%.
Satisfaction level of your work load and work time

8% 12%

8%

62%

HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED MODERATELY

UNSATISFIED HIGHLY UNSATISFIED
 Table 4.10

Satisfaction level of your performance appraisal policy

A performance appraisal also referred to as a performance review, performance

evaluation.

S.No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 Highly 2 4%
satisfied
2 Satisfied 26 52%
3 Moderately 18 36%
satisfied
4 Unsatisfied 3 6%
5 Highly 1 1%
unsatisfied
6 Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
The above (10) table shows that satisfied with performance appraisal policy.
According to it majority 26 of the employees in 50 respondents are satisfied with
performance appraisal constituted 52%.
Satisfaction level of your performance appraisal policy

6% 4%

36%

52%

HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED MODERATELY SATISFIED

UNSATISFIED HIGHLY UNSATISFIED
 Table 4.11

Satisfaction level of recruitment plan process

A recruitment plan is a predetermined strategy for recruiters and hiring teams to

implement during the hiring process. Having a recruitment plan in place from the

beginning streamlines processes and also gives everyone a timeline to work with.

S.No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 Highly 4 8%
satisfied
2 Satisfied 24 48%
3 Moderately 12 24%
satisfied
4 Unsatisfied 4 8%
5 Highly 6 12%
unsatisfied
6 Total 50 100%

Interpretation:
The above(11) table shows that satisfied with recruitment plan. According to it
majority 24 of the employees are in respondents are satisfaction with recruitment
plan 48%.
Satisfaction level of recruitment plan process

8% 8%

24%

48%

HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED MODERATLTY

UNSATISFIED HIGHLY UNSATISFIED
 Table 4.12

Satisfaction level reward and recognition

Reward and Recognition is a system where people are acknowledged for their
performance in intrinsic .

S.No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 Highly 8 16%
satisfied
2 Satisfied 19 38%
3 Moderately 11 22%
satisfied
4 Unsatisfied 9 %
5 Highly 6 12%
unsatisfied
6 Total 50 100%
Satisfaction level reward and recognition

18% 16%

HIOGHLY SATISFIED
SATISFIED
MODERTELY SATISFIED
UNSATISFIED
HIOGHLY UNSATISFIED
22%

38%
 Table 4.13

Respondent by their autonomy work place

The ability to make your own decisions without being controlled by anyone else

S. No PARTICULARS NO.OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENT
1 agree 31 62
2 moderately 10 20
agree
3 disagree 9 18
Total 50 100

Interpretation
The above table shows satisfied with autonomy in work place according to it 31
respondents says agree constituted with 62% and 9 respondent disagree constituted
with 18%.

Respondent by their autonomy work place

 18%

20%

62%

AGREE MONDERATELY AGREE DIS AGREE