Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isabella Ramos
23 March 2023
Even though gender fluidity and LGBTQ issues have been legalized in the western world,
they still appear to face many controversies concerning how they are accepted in society.
Different authors, through different researchers, have developed various hypotheses to show
varied perspectives on LGBTQ acceptance and diversity. Currently, there appear to be complex
conversations concerning how gender, religion, and heteronormativity tend to deal with LGBTQ
issues. In this case, most religious organizations tend to approve heteronormativity which has
deferred to us the idea that believes heterosexuality is the norm and that any other intention
should remain unconventional. As a result, religion has remained skeptical and continues to be
the source of conflict, particularly in the discussion of gender fluidity and LGBTQ rights.
According to Battle & Ashley (2013), heteronormativity is a powerful force frequently utilized to
marginalize LGBTQ identities and gender fluidity. It is an instrument of oppression that limits
people's ability to discover their gender identities. On a similar note, Schnabel, Abdelhadi,
Zaslavsky, Ho, & Torres-Beltran, (2022) try to show that when arguing for LGBTQ rights and
discussing gender fluidity, religion can be a source of contention. In the long run it has been
hypothesized that religion has been used to restrict people's freedom to explore their gender
According to Rosati et al. (2020) it becomes evident that most people identifying with the
LGBTQ plus community tend to remain silent about their sexuality for fear of being bashed.
Religion has, in most cases, sanitized heteronormativity, leaving no room for other people to
identify with their sexual orientation, particularly those across the LGBTQ community. Most
religious people tend to discriminate against the LGBTQ community, making the social lifestyles
of those who openly identify with these communities very difficult. On a similar note, Ewing et
al. (2020) use the article to support this ideology by claiming that heteronormativity and religion
have exceptionally made it hard for LGBTQ-identifying individuals to come out. As per the
ideas of Ewing et al. (2020), heteronormativity and religion impact LGBT rights and gender
Male and heterosexual cisgender people reported higher levels of heteronormativity than females
and people who were classified as sexual and gender minorities, according to Giacomazzi et al.'s
(2020) research. This shows that heteronormativity contributes to marginalizing people who
identify as sexual or gender minorities from society. Spirituality is positively correlated with both
heteronormative attitudes and negative identity, according to Wright and Stern's (2016) theories.
This shows that internalized homophobia, a predictor of psychological suffering, may be directly
linked to traditional and affirming spiritual connections. This article sheds light on the
connection between spirituality and sexual minorities and draws attention to the problems with
the notion that spirituality serves as a barrier for such minorities. These articles prove that gender
fluidity and LGBTQ people are significantly impacted by heteronormativity and religion.
This essay highlights that various authors have developed different argumentative perspectives
concerning the impact of religion and heteronormativity on sexual minorities like the LGBTQ
community. Most of the highlighted sources claim that religion and heteronormativity have had a
Ramos 3
grossly negative impact on the well-being of the members of the LGBTQ community. Most
religions and heteronormative ideologies rely on traditional ideas that only approve of two
sexualities in society. However, with continued research and civilization, more people, including
References
Battle, J., & Ashley, C. (2013). Intersectionality, Heteronormativity, and Black Lesbian, Gay,
doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.158
Evenson, F. (2018). Heteronormativity and Its Impacts on the Identities and Life Experiences of
Ewing, D., Brown, A., Mkhize, N., & Msibi, T. (2020). Sexual and gender identities: Violating
Pollitt, A. M., Mernitz, S. E., Russell, S. T., Curran, M. A., & Toomey, R. B. (2019).
Heteronormativity in the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer young people. Journal
Rosati, F., Pistella, J., Nappa, M. R., & Baiocco, R. (2020). The coming-out process in family,
social, and religious contexts among young, middle, and older Italian LGBQ+ adults.
Scandurra, C., Monaco, S., Dolce, P., & Nothdurfter, U. (2020). Heteronormativity in Italy:
doi:10.1007/s13178-020-00487-1
Schnabel, L., Abdelhadi, E., Zaslavsky, K. A., Ho, J., & Torres-Beltran, A. (2022). Gender,
sexuality, and religion: A critical integrative review and agenda for future research.
doi:10.31235/osf.io/gn8sp
van der Toorn, J., Pliskin, R., & Morgenroth, T. (2020). Not quite over the rainbow: The
Vincent, W., Parrott, D. J., & Peterson, J. L. (2011). Effects of traditional gender role norms and
aggression toward gay men and lesbians. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(4),
383-400. doi:10.1037/a0023807
Wright, A. J., & Stern, S. (2016). The role of spirituality in sexual minority identity. Psychology