Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Objectives
General Definition of Risk
Concepts on Different Types of Investment Risk
Subjective Risks and How It Affect Investment Portfolio in Retirement Planning
Risk Profiling for Gauging the Degree of Risk Acceptable to Clients
Introduction
Risk Defined
For our purpose, we may define risk as “fluctuations or variations in investment return from
expectations with regards to an exposure”. Risk is held to be present in all investment assets.
The exception is the so called “risk-free asset” in portfolio theory.
The investment assets of a client are exposed to various types of investment risk. The major
ones are as follows:
a. Business risk
b. Financial or financing risk
c. Interest rate risk
d. Inflation risk
e. Foreign exchange risk
f. Political risk
Business Risk
- Business risk can be defined as the risk associated with a company’s failure to generate
revenue to cover operating expenses. Essentially, the profit of an organization is
determined by a simple equation where
Profit = Revenue – Expenses
- When revenue falls short of expenses, operating loss will be occurred.
- In general, companies offering essential goods and services will have low business risk
since the demand for such products and services are inelastic. In this regard, companies
providing electricity and water supply with little or no competition have very low
business risk.
- The costs of running a business may be classified into fixed costs and variable costs.
Fixed costs do not change over a given range of production. However, variable costs vary
in accordance with the level of production. A company with very high fixed costs is
deemed to be having high business risk as they require higher volume of sales to
breakeven.
- Companies operating in the IT sector are deemed to have high business risk as the
demand for their products may change vary drastically due to new invention or
substitutions.
- For clients who invest in stocks and shares for purpose of accumulation of retirement
resources, planners should suggest that they avoid counters with high business risk,
particularly when the time to retirement is short. In general, this category of shares should
be avoided unless the clients are very young and have high appetite for risk taking.
Financial of Financing Risk
- Financial risk is a form of risk associated with the usage of external funds in running
the business of a corporation. Perhaps a more appropriate name that should be used
its place is financing risk.
- Usage of external financing involves payment of fixed interest expenses at regular time
interval. An exception is the issuance of zero coupon bonds by business organizations. The
higher the external funds the higher is the fixed interest charges.
- For a company with little or no external financing, financial risk is deemed to be low.
- Companies that have plenty of room for business expansion will usually rely on external
financing. However, the reward to investors can be equally high.
- Financial planner should advise clients to be wary of the even higher risk associated with
companies with high business risk and high degree of external financing.
Uncertainty is a frame of mind filled with reservations, because of the lack of information of
what will crop up or what will not take place in the future. It is just a psychological reaction to
the lack of knowledge about the future where the probabilities are not established yet.
Is the Risk Real or Imagined?
- The risk faced by a client can be real or “real” in the mind only. Hence, risk has two
dimensions, the objective and subjective dimensions. When a person faces a risk situation,
he assesses and makes a conclusion of what the risk means to him. The real risk is the
objective risk.
- However, clients often do not view risk in its reality. Their interpretation of the risk
situation may or may not be representative of the true situation but based on their
perception of what the situation is. Because the risk is based on perception of the person,
this sort of risk is known as perceived risk. It is essentially the interpretation of people on
a risk they faced.
- People are influenced by their beliefs, past experiences and value system when they
interpret situations.
Risk Behaviours
- Everyone is unique and possesses a unique set of attitudes and hence is expected to act in
response differently to a same set of risk stimuli. Some will be more willing to accept high
level of risks in their dealings, while others will act in the opposite manner in the same set
of circumstances.
- Since it is the client’s retirement plan, his attitude towards risk is more important than the
planner’s own. It is precisely because of this, that we must understand the client’s pattern
of thinking towards risk before we finally nail down what is suitable for him. For instance,
you do not recommend risky investments to a ‘safe minded’ person no matter how high is
the yield, and vice versa.
- According to studies made, we can generally categorize people as risk seeking, risk
indifferent or risk averting. The planner must recommend investments vehicles that are
generally in alignment with the client’s type. Let us examine the three types of human risk
behaviour:
Risk seeking: Risk seekers are those people whose perspective of risk is that it is an
opportunity rather than a threat. Psychologically, they have a partiality for uncertainty to
certainty in a given state. In addition, they are also likely to underrate risk and have a
preference for variety and ambiguity. It is not unexpected that many successful business
owners possess some or all of these characteristics.
Risk indifferent: Risk indifferent clients have a “who-care-what” attitude to both the
danger and opportunity presented by a risky situation. They are neither bent towards being
attracted nor being repelled by risk.
Risk averting: These are people whose viewpoint of risk is a threat. They generally have a
preference for certainty over uncertainty and have a tendency to overrate risk. Hence, they
tend to be pessimistic; focusing on the “loss” aspects of any venture they get involved in.
According to a study made by LIMRA, most people fall under this category is behaviour.
Misjudgement
- We make judgement on a daily basis. However, there is a common tendency for people to
judge inaccurately the degree of risk in a risk situation. This happens mainly due to
overconfidence in personal judgement ability.
- The stock market is a good example of what we are talking about. A lot of losses that take
place in the stock market are due to over confidence and irrational behaviour. When
someone says or thinks he is “sure” of a particular share going up, he tends to ignore the
possibility of wrong information received and plunges in without further checking.
Successes due to pure luck strengthen this overconfidence syndrome.
Short-Run Trends
- Current trend has a greater impact on how a person reads risk.
- It is easy to be misled by results of short-run trend and view them as results signifying a
long-run trend. This leads to mistakes.
- The law of large numbers works only in long run where the sample base is large enough.
For instance, in the short run, it is possible that the stock market keeps going up and up
without any correction. In the long term, this usually does not happen.
Accessibility bias:
- What emerges in the mind as “real” is real to that person. Those events that can be readily
recalled or imagined are often viewed as more real or probable to happen, even when in
fact it does not. Similarly, those incidents that are more blur are treated as less likely to
happen.
- A useful example is the issue of insurance policy claims. Although most claims are paid
without problem, the regular reports in the media and the consumer magazines’ stress on
unpaid claims have created an impression in people’s mind that most insurance claims are
not paid out.
Intimacy bias:
- Knowledge lessens fear. Those risks that are more closely known to the client are less
dreaded. For instance, most investors have preferred counters. Usually, these are the ones
they are more familiar with and hence, the clients are more willing to invest in these than
other counters new to them.
Evidence bias:
- What a person believes in, he will have the propensity to try to establish that his beliefs are
right. As such, there is a tendency for people to seek evidence in a selective manner as a
means to support their beliefs. As such, it is natural for them to either distort or ignore
evidence that is divergent to their beliefs.
- For instance, two medical specialists have told a person that he has cancer. He does not
want to believe the specialists and decides to seek a Sin She who will confirm that he is all
right. The evidence given by doctors is ignored despite it is more reliable than that of the
Sin She.
There have been many studies done on the relationship between risk tolerance and demographic
characteristics such as age, wealth and education. In this section we will briefly explore five key
demographic characteristics of the research done on this topic and taking the local cultural
aspects into considerations.
Age: As a person grows older, he generally takes less risk. Aging seems to dampen the
spirit of taking on more risk. This observable fact exists in most cultures and races.
Sex: This is another observable happening. In most cultures, women seem more risk
adverse than their male counterpart, and this is the case across all ages.
Marital Status: Increased in responsibilities as a result of marriage seems to reduce the
urge to take risk. Those who are not married and have no dependents are generally less risk
adverse than those who are married.
Occupation: Those working in the public sector are generally more risk adverse than those
working in the private sectors. And within the private sector, those who are owners or part
owners of their respective business are inclined to take more risk.
Wealth: Wealth increases a person’s risk tolerance. This is true in both absolute and
relative terms. Absolute risk tolerance is the total amount of one’s wealth that is allocated
to risky investments. Relative risk tolerance is measured by the proportion of wealth
invested that a person allocates to risky investments.
2. Identify the sort of returns you prefer over a five-year investment period.
a) 3-5%
b) 5-10%
c) 10-15%
d) More than 15%
6. Identify the grouping that you feel is the nearest to your attitude towards investment in
general.
a) I am extremely uncomfortable with risk associated with investing
b) I am not comfortable but willing to take some risk investing
c) I am quite comfortable with investment risks
d) I am very comfortable with investment risks
7. Identify the grouping that you feel is the nearest to your attitude towards investment of
funds relating to your retirement.
a) I am panicky watching the fund’s performance fluctuations
b) I am willing to allocate 20% in risky but high return investments
c) I am willing to allocate 50% in risky but high return investments
d) I am willing to allocate 100% in risky but high return investments
8. Identify which of the following is your likely behaviour if you have won RM1,000 betting
with a friend on a football match.
a) Spend the money in a diner with friends in celebration
b) Save it in the bank
c) Invest the money in the Bursa Malaysia
d) Bet the money won in another football match
9. What would you do when the Bursa Malaysia index takes a sharp swing upwards?
a) Feel nothing
b) Feel happy you had not invested because of the fluctuation
c) Regret for not investing earlier
d) Call your investment broker immediately for advice
10. You were waiting from friends who are gambling in the Genting casino, of which you
are there for the first time. How would you pass your time?
a) Just watch around and wait
b) Play slot machines or Kino to pass time
c) Play blackjack at the RM25-minimum table
d) Play blackjack at the RM100-minimum table