You are on page 1of 2

American Journal of Infection Control 44 (2016) 1750-1

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

American Journal of Infection Control American Journal of


Infection Control

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. a j i c j o u r n a l . o r g

Brief Report

Impact of eliminating reflex urine cultures on performed urine


cultures and antibiotic use
Jessica Dietz PharmD, BCPS a,b,*, Tze Shien Lo MD c, Kimberly Hammer PhD a,d,
Milagros Zegarra MD e
a
Fargo Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Fargo, ND
b
Pharmacy Service, Fargo Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Fargo ND
c Department of Infectious Disease, Fargo Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Fargo, ND
d
Research Service, Fargo Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Fargo ND
e
Department of Nephrology, Fargo Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Fargo, ND

Key Words: Inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is often the result of unnecessary urinalyses and
Urinary tract infection urine cultures. This study aimed to determine the impact of stopping the practice of reflex urine cul-
urine culture tures. Our study demonstrated that stopping urine reflex cultures decreased the number of urine cultures
asymptomatic bacteriuria
performed and there was a trend toward a decrease in antibiotic use.
Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and
Epidemiology, Inc.

Urinalyses are often ordered as part of a general workup re- toms. The patient’s urine sample is held in the laboratory for 3 days
gardless of symptomatology. A recent study reviewed 195 patients to allow for urine culture to be added if the provider feels this is
who underwent urinalysis: 62% of the patients had this test com- warranted. The following message was also added to the labora-
pleted without specific symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI).1 tory results for all urinalysis and urine cultures: Patients with
Another study showed that positive results from a urinalysis are non- asymptomatic bacteriuria, funguria, or pyuria without UTI symp-
specific and occur in as many at 90% of asymptomatic elderly toms usually do not require treatment with an antimicrobial agent.
patients.2 Inappropriate use of urinalysis and urine cultures in as- The purpose of this study was to determine if the change in the Fargo
ymptomatic patients often leads to overuse of antibiotics.2 Veterans Affairs Healthcare System policy regarding reflex urine cul-
At the Fargo Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, urinalysis is tures was effective in decreasing the number of inappropriate urine
commonly used as part of a general workup in the emergency de- cultures and decreasing overall use of antibiotics commonly used
partment and clinics. Starting in April 2006, the facility automatically to treat urinary tract infections.
started sending urinalyses with positive nitrite or white blood cell
counts ≥8 per high-power field for culture. The antimicrobial stew-
ardship team felt that this practice was leading to incidental findings MATERIALS AND METHODS
of bacteriuria in asymptomatic patients who were subsequently
treated with antibiotics. In an effort to decrease treatment of as- The primary end points for the study were the change in the
ymptomatic bacteriuria the laboratory policy was changed in number of urine cultures performed and the change in antibiotic
September 2014 to remove the reflex urine cultures and instead prescribing. Rates of urinalysis and urine culture performed in both
require providers to order a culture separately from the urinalysis the inpatient and outpatient settings were collected retrospec-
if deemed appropriate based on urinalysis results and patient symp- tively for the preintervention period (November 2013-August 2014)
and the postintervention period (October 2014-July 2015). All in-
patient and outpatient antibiotic use was collected for the pre- and
postintervention periods for antibiotics commonly used to treat UTIs,
* Address correspondence to Jessica Dietz, PharmD, BCPS, Fargo Veteran Affairs including ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim,
Healthcare System, 2101 N Elm St, Fargo, ND 58102. and nitrofurantoin. No antibiotic prescriptions were excluded. An-
E-mail address: jessica.dietz@va.gov (J. Dietz).
Conflicts of Interest: None to report.
tibiotic use data were collected in different units for outpatients and
Disclaimer: The contents of this manuscript do not represent the views of the inpatients because of the way the data are collected at the facility.
Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Government. Inpatient antibiotic use data were collected through the Centers for

0196-6553/Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.232
J. Dietz et al. / American Journal of Infection Control 44 (2016) 1750-1 1751

Table 1
All antibiotic use pre- and postintervention

Antibiotic Preintervention Postintervention P value


Outpatient antibiotic use (percentage of encounters)
Ciprofloxacin 0.13 0.12 .65
Levofloxacin 0.04 0.08 .0009
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim 0.07 0.09 .08
Nitrofurantoin 0.01 0.01 .42
Inpatient antibiotic use (rate of antimicrobial days/total patient days)
Ciprofloxacin 24.03 18.02 .27
Levofloxacin 9.89 31.72 .001
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim 11.88 4.00 .01
Nitrofurantoin 0.56 0.38 .34

Disease Control and Prevention’s Antimicrobial Use Option. Out- Table 2


patient antibiotic prescription data were collected from the Fargo All positive blood cultures for uropathogens

Veterans Affairs VISTA outpatient prescription database. In order to Uropathogen Preintervention Postintervention
determine the safety of this laboratory change, the rates of posi- Gram-negatives 16 15
tive blood cultures for common uropathogens were compared to Enterococcus 3 4
determine if the removal of reflex urine cultures impacted the rates Total 19 19
of severe infections. Laboratory data were collected from the Fargo
Veterans Affairs health records laboratory package. Patients were
at least 18 years of age, and all patients seen at the Fargo Veterans DISCUSSION
Affairs Healthcare System from November 2013-July 2015 were in-
cluded. Pre- versus postintervention analyses were performed using Overall, the number of urine cultures after the intervention de-
unpaired Student t tests. The study was approved by the facility’s creased. There appeared to be some decrease in the use of antibiotics,
institutional review board and research and development commit- but this was only statistically significant for sulfamethoxazole-
tee prior to data collection. trimethoprim in the inpatient setting. A major limitation to the study
was that the antibiotic use was collected as a whole for the speci-
RESULTS fied antibiotics, and this may have created measurement bias because
the antibiotics could have been used for indications other than sus-
In the preintervention period (November 2013-August 2014) pected UTI. The increase in levofloxacin use in both the outpatient
there were a total of 1,085 urine cultures completed (901 outpa- and inpatient settings is likely partially because of the facility shift
tient, 184 inpatient). The total number of urine cultures decreased in formulary preference from moxifloxacin to levofloxacin for treat-
in the postintervention period (October 2014-July 2015) to 761 (613 ment of respiratory infections. Moxifloxacin use decreased after the
outpatient, 148 inpatient). There was no significant change in the shift in formulary preference (outpatient: pre- and postintervention:
number of urinalyses completed during the pre- and postintervention 0.06% and 0.03%, respectively; P = .006; inpatient: pre- and
periods (preintervention: 837 ± 181; postintervention: 806 ± 178; postintervention: 13.7 and 6.7, respectively; P = .047). Rates of bac-
P = .90). Overall, rates of urine cultures per month were statistical- teremia related to common urine tract pathogens stayed consistent
ly decreased in the postintervention period (preintervention: after removal of the reflex urine culture practice, suggesting the in-
108.5 ± 8.36; postintervention: 76.1 ± 5.78; P = .0004). When divided tervention did not increase rates of serious infections as a result of
based on patient location, the difference in rates of urine cultures uropathogens.
was not statistically significant in the inpatient setting (18.4 ± 1.84 Based on the cost of urine culture tests, the facility would save
pre, 14.8 ± 1.53 post, P = .15), but the decrease in urine cultures approximately $6,000 per year (this savings does not include the
after the intervention was statistically significant in the outpa- technician time or other supplies required to complete the test; the
tient setting (preintervention: 90.1 ± 2.49; postintervention: cost of 1 test is $9.23). Despite cost savings there was no signifi-
61.3 ± 4.33; P < .0001). cant decrease in the use of antibiotics as hoped with the removal
Antibiotic use in the outpatient and inpatient settings were of reflex cultures. Further interventions are necessary to decrease
also compared (Table 1). There was no statistically significant antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic patients. Future research
change in outpatient antibiotic use except for levofloxacin use, should focus on the impact of removing urine cultures specifically
which increased (P = .0009). In the inpatient setting, antimicrobial on the antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic patients.
use also increased for levofloxacin (P = .0011); however, use of
sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim significantly decreased (P = .01). References
Ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin use decreased but did not reach
statistical significance. 1. Pallin DJ, Ronan C, Montazeri K, Wai K, Gold A, Parmar S, et al. Urinalysis in acute
All blood culture results performed at the facility showing gram- care of adults: pitfalls in testing and interpreting results. Open Forum Infect Dis
2014;1:ofu019.
negative organisms and enterococcus were compared, and there was 2. Yin P, Kiss A, Leis JA. Urinalysis orders among patients admitted to the general
no difference noted (Table 2). medicine service. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1711-3.

You might also like