Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CYN-002
B. Tech I Yr. Courses
1
2
Prof. Yadagiri
Dongari
Prof. R K Peddinti
Prof. Dheeraj
Kumar
3
Coordination Chemistry
4
5
ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
An area which bridges organic and inorganic chemistry
A branch of coordination chemistry where the complex has one or more metal-
carbon bonds
stability
6
Organometallic Compounds
Ferrocene
C always more electronegative compared to M
❑ Olefin Metathesis
Discovery 1827
Structure ~ 150 years later
W C Zeise, Danish
pharmacist, I789- I847 Potassium trichloro(ethylene)platinate(II)
(5-C5H5)2Fe (6-C6H6)2Cr
G. Wilkinson E. O. Fischer
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1973 was awarded jointly to Ernst Otto Fischer and Geoffrey Wilkinson "for their
pioneering work, performed independently, on the chemistry of the organometallic, so called sandwich compounds
10
10
11
Bridging Ligands
• In coordination chemistry, a bridging ligand is a ligand that connects two or
more atoms, usually metal ions.
• In naming a complex wherein a single atom bridges two metals, the bridging
ligand is preceded by the Greek letter mu, μ, with a subscript number denoting
the number of metals bound to the bridging ligand. μ2 is often denoted simply
as μ.
12
18 Electron Rule
When the metal achieves an outershell configurations of
ns2(n-1)d10np6, there will 18 electron in the valence orbitals
and a closed stable configuration.
This rule of thumb is called “18 electron rule”
13
Methods of counting: Neutral atom method & Oxidation state method
Ligand Neutral Oxidation state Ligand Neutral Oxidation state
atom atom
Electron Formal Electron Formal
contribution charge contributi charge
on
Carbonyl (M–CO) 2 2 0 Halogen ( M–X) 1 2 –1
Phosphine (M–PR3) 2 2 0 Alkyl (M–R) 1 2 –1
Amine (M–NR3 ) 2 2 0 Aryl (M–Ar) 1 2 –1
Amide (M–NR2 ) 1 2 –1 acyl (M–C(O)–R 1 2 –1
Hydrogen (M–H) 1 2 –1 1-cyclopentadienyl 1 2 –1
Alkene (sidewise) 2- 2 2 0 1-allyl 1 2 –1
Alkyne (sidewise) 2- 2 2 0 3-allyl 3 4 –1
2-C60 2 2 0 5-cyclopentadienyl 5 6 –1
Nitrosyl bent 1 2 –1 6-benzene 6 6 0
Nitrosyl linear 3 2 +1 7-cycloheptatrienyl 7 6 +1
Carbene (M=CR2) 2 4 –2 Carbyne (MCR) 3 6 –3
Alkoxide (M–OR) 1 2 –1 Thiolate (M–SR) 1 2 –1
-CO (M–(CO)–M) 2 2 0 -H 1 2 –1
-alkyne 4 4 0 -X (M–X–M) 3 4 –1
X = halogen
-alkyl 1 2 –1 -amido 3 4 –1
(M–(NR2)–M
-phosphido 3 4 –1 -alkoxide 3 4 –1
(M–(PR2)–M (M–(OR)–M
Thiocarbonyl (M-CS) 2 2 0 Isocyanide (M-CNR) 2 2 0
14
Neutral atom method: Metal is taken as in zero oxidation state for counting purpose
Oxidation state method: We first arrive at the oxidation state of the metal by
considering the number of anionic ligands present and overall charge of the complex
NO linear 3 electrons
17
17
18-electron Rule: Illustrative Examples
18
Q1) Consider the 18 electron rule as a guide and determine the value of n in
the following complexes.
(a) Na2Fe(CO)n
(b) MnBr(CO)n
(c) W(η6-C6H6)(CO)n
(d) Rh(η5-C5H5)(CO)n
(e) Cr(η3-C5H5)(CO)n(CH3)
(f) IrBr2(CO)n(CH3)
Q2)
Ans 2. (a) x = 2, (b) x = -3, (c) x = +1, (d) x = +1, (e) x = 0, (f) x = +1 19
Q3)
Q4)
Subtract this number from n × 18 where n is the number of metals in the complex, that is, (n
× 18) – A; say, it is B.
(a) B divided by 2 gives the total number of M–M bonds in the complex.
(b) A divided by n gives the number of electrons per metal. If the number of electrons is 18, it
indicates that there is no M–M bond; if it is 17 electrons, it indicates that there is 1 M–M
bond; if it is 16 electrons, it indicates that there are 2 M–M bonds and so on.
Molecule TVE (18 × n) – A Total M–M Bonds per metal Basic geometry of
(A) (B) bonds (B/2) metal atoms
Fe
Co
Co4(CO)12 60 72 – 60 = 12 12/2 = 6 60/4 = 15; 3
Co Co
Co
CO OC CO
Ni OC Fe Cr
CO OC CO
OC CO
CO
CO CO
O
CO OC CO C CO
OC OC
OC Mn Mn CO OC Co Co CO
OC CO OC CO
CO OC C
O
CO
OC
CO CO
OC CO Ir
OC
CO Os CO CO
OC
OC CO Ir Ir
OC CO
Os Os Ir CO
OC CO CO OC Heteroleptic Carbonyls
OC CO
CO CO
Homoleptic Carbonyls
• Carbonyl is one of the most important ligand in organometallic chemistry.
• Homoleptic Carbonyls (complexes containing only carbonyls as ligands)
• Coordination number around the metal normally remains six or lesser.
• 17 electron species such as Mn(CO)5, Co(CO)4 dimerize to gain 18 electrons.
• V(CO)6 does not dimerize. It exist as V(CO)6ˉ
• Most of the metal carbonyls have metal in very low oxidation state, sometime even zero and negative24
oxidation state.
Why study metal carbonyls ?
• Simplest of organometallic compounds where M-C bonding is well
understood. CO is one of the strongest acceptor ligands.
CO, CO H3C C I
HCo(CO)4 MeI
H2
[Rh(CO)2I2] O
R H2O
CH CH2 H3C C I H3C C OH
H HC O O
O
• Back bonding ( bonding) and variation in electronic properties of CO can
be monitored very efficiently by Infrared spectroscopy.
25
Molecular Orbital diagram of CO
*
orbitals of CO.
Bond order = ½(Nb – Nab) = ½ (8-2) = 3 2s
32.4 ev
C CO O
CO is a very good σ donor as well as a good π acceptor. 26
Orbital Overlap for and bonding in
metal carbonyls
First two electron donation of the lone pair on carbon into a vacant metal d-orbital
( donation). This electron donation makes metal more electron rich, and in order
to compensate for this increased electron density, a filled metal d orbital can
interact with empty π* orbital of the carbonyl ligand to relieve itself of the added
electron density (π back bonding).
27
Synergic Bonding in Metal Carbonyls
• The two components of this bonding are synergistic. The more sigma
donation by the carbonyl (or other sigma-donors on the metal center),
the stronger the pi-backbonding interaction.
• IR Spectroscopy (CO) and crystal structure (M-C bond length) will give
information will give idea about the structure.
29
Infrared Spectroscopy- A spectro-analytical tool in chemistry
M C O M C O
CO Higher CO Lower
More back bonding
31
✓ Co2(CO)8 has two isomers one with no bridging carbonyls
and other with two bridging carbonyl groups, both also being
18 electron species (How to differentiate?).
✓ As the C-O bond stretching frequency is quite sensitive to
small changes in the electronic environment, one can identify
these by IR spectral studies.
✓ The C-O stretching frequencies of terminal carbonyls come
in the range of 2125 - 1850 cm-1 while bridging carbonyl
stretching frequencies come in the range of approximately
1850 - 1700 cm-1.
32
Terminal versus bridging carbonyls
O
M O
C
C
C M
M M M
O
M
terminal bridging 2 bridging
3
CO 2120-1850 cm-1
1850-1700 cm-1 1730-1620 cm-1
Cp
CO Fe CO
OC CO
Cr OC Fe Cp
OC CO OC Fe
Cp
CO
Bridging CO groups can be regarded as having a double bond C=O group, as compared
to a terminal CO, which is more like a triple bond.
33
Infrared Spectroscopy- Spectra of Metal Carbonyls
CO OC CO
OC
OC Mn Mn CO
The range in which
OC CO the band appears
CO OC
decides bridging or
terminal terminal .
The number of
bands is only
related to the
symmetry of the
O
C
O
C
bridging molecule
OC CO
OC Fe Fe CO
OC C CO
O
terminal
34
Factors which affect CO stretching frequencies
Variation in CO (cm–1) of the first row transition 1.Charge on the metal
metal carbonyls 2. Effect of other ligands
free CO
2143 As the electron density on a
Ni(CO)4 d8 metal centre increases,
2057
more -backbonding to the
Co(CO)4- Co2(CO)8 CO ligand(s) takes place.
1890
d8 2044(av, ter)
This weakens the C–O bond
[Fe(CO)4]2- Fe(CO)5
1815
d8 2030
further as more electron
density is pumped into the
[Mn(CO)4]3- Mn(CO)6 + Mn2(CO)10
1600,1790 d8 2098
d4 2013 (av) empty * anti-bonding
[Cr(CO)4]4- Cr(CO)6
carbonyl orbital. This
d4 increases the M–C bond
1462,1657 2000
V(CO)6¯ V(CO)6 order and reduces the
d4
1860 1976 C-O bond order. That is, the
Ti(CO)62- resonance structure M=C=O
d4
1747 becomes more dominant.
M C O M C O
CO Higher CO Lower
35
More back bonding
Effect of other ligands trans to CO
Effect of different Co-ligands on CO (cm-1) of Mo(CO)3L3
Complex CO cm–1
(fac isomers)
Mo(CO)3(PF3)3 2090, 2055
CO
Mo(CO)3(PCl3)3 2040, 1991 More back bonding =
L CO
Mo Mo(CO)3[P(OMe)3]3 1977, 1888 More lowering of
L CO the C=O bond order =
Mo(CO)3(PPh3)3 1934, 1835
L More lower CO
Mo(CO)3(NCCH3)3 1915, 1783 stretching frequency
Mo(CO)3(dien)* 1898, 1758
Mo(CO)3(Py)3 1888, 1746
The better the donating capability of the other ligands on the metal, more electron
density given to the metal, more back bonding (electrons in the antibonding orbital of
CO) and lower the CO stretching frequency.
Based on CO IR stretching frequencies, the following ligands can be ranked from
best -acceptor to worst:
NO > CO > PF3 > RNC > PCl3 > P(OR)3 > PR3 > RCN > NH3 36
Problems
1. The V-C bond length in V(CO)6- and V(CO)6 are 1.93 and 2.00 A°respectively.
Justify the bond lengths.
2. In a carbonyl complex with linear CO-M-CO group, how will CO change when a)
one CO is replaced by Et3N b) a positive charge is put on the complex c) a
negative charge is placed on the complex.
3. Arrange the following in the decreasing order of back donation
Cr(CO)6; [Ti(CO)6]-2 ; [Mn(CO)6]+ ; [Ir(CO)6]3+; [V(CO)6]-
Cp Cp
Cl CO
Zr Zr
CO CO
Cp Cp
A B
37
Problems
Q1. Select the best choice in each of the following and briefly justify the reason for your choice
a) Complex with the shortest C-O bond
Ni(CO)4, [Co(CO)4]-, [Fe(CO)4]2-
b) Complex with the lowest C-O stretching frequency
Cr(CO)6 V(CO)6- Fe(CO)62+
Q2. Which one of the following complexes (a) and (b) will undergo ligand substitution faster with
PPh3? Why?
(a) V(CO)6 (b) [V(CO)6] ̶
Q3. The compound (ƞ5-C5H5)Co(CO)2 (A) upon UV irradiation, resulted in the evolution of a gas and
formation of a new compound, B. While the infrared spectrum of A showed absorptions around
1988 cm-1, the spectrum of B showed absorptions only at 1788 cm-1. Compounds A and B obey the
18 electron rule and both have cyclopentadienyl group in the ƞ5 mode. Draw the structure of
compounds B.
Q4. The compound Re(CO)5Br upon UV irradiation resulted in the evolution of an
equimolar amount of a colourless gas and the formation of a new stable complex X.
The infrared spectrum of compound X indicated the absence of metal-metal bond and
showed bands in the range of 2040-1965 cm-1. The starting material Re(CO)5Br also
showed bands in the same spectral range. Draw the structure of compound X.
Q5. In the given pair of complexes pick out the complex having lower energy CO stretching
frequency in its infrared spectrum. Rationalise your choice.
(a) Mo(CO)6 and Mo(CO)5PPh3 (b) Fe(CO)5 and Fe(CO)4Br2
38
Answers
1 : (a) Shortest CO bond Ni(CO)4 (b) Lowest CO stretching V(CO)6-.
2 : The mechanism of ligand substitution is different in both cases. V(CO)6 is a 17 e
system and it will prefer ligand substitution by an associative mechanism.
However [V(CO)6] ̶ is an 18 e coordinatively saturated complex and it will undergo
ligand exchange by a dissociative mechanism. Since CO is more tightly bound in
[V(CO)6] ̶ {higher back donation}, [V(CO)6] ̶ will be less reactive than V(CO)6.
3 : Infrared absorption of B indicates only
bridging carbonyls. To attain 18 electrons,
dimerization will take place with the
formation of a Co-Co double bond.
4 : The colourless gas has to be CO as bromine vapours are
coloured. Equimolar amount means one CO is released per
Re(CO)5Br; 2040-1965 cm-1, is the terminal carbonyl region.
Based on this and absence of metal-metal bonds, the structure
is one with bridging bromines
5 : (a) Mo(CO)5PPh3 will have lower CO since PPh3 is a poorer π acceptor ligand
than CO.
(b) Fe(CO)4Br2 [Fe2+ = 3d6]; Fe(CO)5 [Fe = 3d64s2]. Since the electron density on Fe0
is higher, back donation to CO will be more. Hence Fe(CO)5 will have lower CO .
39
NO > CO > PF3 > RNC > PCl3 > P(OR)3 > PR3 > RCN > NH3
40
(REDUCTIVE CARBONYLATION)
(CO itself acts as a reducing agent and get converted to CO2 in the process.
The reaction conditions are relatively more drastic for such reactions)
41
Reactions of Metal Carbonyls
V(CO)6 + Na Na[V(CO)6]
2. Oxidation : Iodocarbonyls
Mn2(CO)10 + I2 2 Mn(CO)5I
Fe(CO)5 + I2 Fe(CO)4I2
3. Photochemical substitution
h W(CO)5(PPh3) + CO
W(CO)6 + PPh3
In the presence
Fe(CO)5 + h of UV radiation
Fe(CO)3 + 2CO
a monodentate
ligand displaces
only one CO unit
42
43
PROPERTIES OF CARBONYL HYDRIDES
The term hydride is assigned based on the formal oxidation state, however, the
properties of organometallic hydrides vary from hydridic to protic in character.
Based on the nature of metal and ligands, the acidity of these complexes varies significantly.
• The acidic character of metal carbonyl hydrides decreases on descending the group in
periodic table.
• Bridging hydrides are more acidic than complexes with terminal M-H.
• The σ-donor ligands such as Cp, phosphines, etc. reduce the acidity of M-H bond,
whereas, π-acceptor ligands such as CO, NO, PF3 increases the acidity of M-H bond.
6. Nucleophilic addition to CO
R OLi R OCH3
CO
C C
OC CO OC
OC CO [Me3O]BF4 CO
W RLi W
W
OC CO OC
ether OC CO CO
OC OC
OC
Fischer Carbene
Carbenes are catalysts
for olefin metathesis
Et
Et
Al
7. Migratory insertion of CO O
Et
O CO CO
2 AlEt3
C Me C
Me
Fe Fe Fe OFe
CC
C OC
OC OC OCO O
CO
OC CO
Mn Et AlMn
OC CO high pressure Et Et
OC CO
OC
OC
45
Photochemical Substitution
Photochemical substitutions are the most common photoreactions in organometallic chemistry.
Kinetic studies have shown that the rate constant for the dissociation of one CO unit which
precceds the entrance of a new ligand is increased upon photochemical excitation by a factor of
1016. h
W(CO)6 + PPh3 W(CO)5(PPh3) + CO
Fe(CO)5 + h
Fe(CO)3 + 2CO
Photochemical excitation of a metal carbonyl with a mixed substituent coordination sphere causes dissociation
of a ligand which is most weakly bonded in the ground state as well. If ligands of comparable ligand strength
are used one can displace all the carbonyl groups
If after dissociation of a ligand no suitable free ligands are present the free coordination site generated
through photochemical dissociation of CO may get closed by dimerization. The gap may also be filled internally
by an 1 to 3 rearrangement
Br
h
2 Re(CO)5Br (CO)4Re Re(CO)4
Br
Mn(CO)5 h
- CO Mn(CO)4
46 46
Alkene and Alkynes As Ligands
Zeise’s Salt - The first transition metal organometallic compound
Discovery 1827
Structure ~ 150 years
W C Zeise, Danish later
pharmacist, I789- I847 Potassium trichloro(ethylene)platinate(II)
• Ethylene molecule occupies the 4th coordination site of square planar complex with
its C-C axis perpendicular to the platinum-ligand plane.
• Alkene can bind to metal center and act as both σ donor and π acceptor.
• Relative to the free ethylene, the C-C bond in the complex is lengthened slightly and
the hydrogens are slightly tilted back from the planar arrangement.
47
Models of Ethylene-Metal Bonding
• Two Models: Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson Model
and Metallacyclopropane Model.
• Structural studies on a large number of alkene
complexes have shown that they fall in between
M M
these two extremes depending on the M and
Dewar-Chatt cyclopropane
substituents on the alkene carbon atoms.
For Zeise’s salt, the best bonding picture is given by the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson
model. This involves the donation of the C=C electrons to an empty d sigma
orbital of the metal, accompanied by back donation from a filled metal d orbital
into an empty C=C * orbital.
C C
M M *
C C
(Zeise’s Salt)
49
Metallacyclopropane Model
In the metallacyclopropane extreme, the substituents on the
carbon are strongly folded back away from the metal and the
carbons rehybridize from sp2 to somewhat more closely to a sp3.
In this process, the metal gets oxidized and its formal oxidation
state increases by two units, the C-C bond lengths become more
of a single bond.
50
• When the back bonding from the metal atom to the alkene ligand is
small, substituents on the alkene are bent only slightly away from the
metal and the C-C bond length is lengthened marginally from the free
alkene (Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson Model).
M M
Dewar-Chatt cyclopropane
51
Examples of complexes with alkenes having electron withdrawing groups
52
Important Points
53
Effect on alkene stretching frequency ( νC=c)
Both σ donation and π back bonding weaken the C=C bond resulting in
the lower νC=c stretching frequencies compared to the free alkene in the
infrared spectra.
54
Alkynes: Modes of Bonding to Metals
• Alkynes are essentially like alkenes, only with another perpendicular pair of -
electrons. Thus they can act as neutral 2 or 4 e- donors, depending on the needs
of the metal center. They are also much better bridging ligands because of this
second set of -electrons.
• Alkynes are better donors compared to alkenes and typically coordinate far more
readily to a metal for steric (more open, less hindered) and electronic (better donor,
2 or 4e- bonding) reasons.
C C C C
M M
R R R
R R R
C C C C
C C
M M M M M M
Possible modes of binding of alkynes to metal centers
55
Synthesis of metal – alkyne complexes
R
R
C
C
Co2(CO)8 + R-C C-R
(CO)3 Co Co (CO)3
But
Cl
But
PPh3
Ph2C2, Pt
(Ph3P)2Pt(C2H4)
PPh3
But 56
Reactions of Metal Complexes of Alkenes and Alkynes
• With cobalt and palladium compounds alkynes dimerize to give cyclobutadienyl
compounds
Oxidative
coupling
Co(+1) Co(+3)
57
• The most interesting reactions of alkynes with transition metals is the
trimerization of alkynes by cobalt, nickel and palladium salts.
• Example: acetylene and substituted acetylenes trimerise to benzene or its
derivative in the presence of catalysts like CpCo(COD) or CpCo(C2H4)
58 58
Problems
Q1. Reaction of two moles of CpNa with MCl2 gave an unstable compound A with molecular
formula C10H10M (M is a first row TM). On reacting A with excess of a hydrocarbon gas B along
with K gave a stable compound C with the empirical formula C9H13M. Reaction of C with excess
diphenylacetylene gave a highly stable compound D with the molecular formula C33H25M along
with evolution of the gas B. Write the structures of compounds A to D.
Ans:
Q2. Which of the following metal alkene complexes do you think will look more like a
metallacyclopropane? Explain your answer.
(a) (CH2=CH2)Ni(PPh3)2 (b) (CH2=CH2)Fe(CO)4
Ans: (a) (CH2=CH2)Ni(PPh3)2, since it has a more electron rich metal.
Q3. Arrange the following compounds in the increasing order of ethylene C-C bond lengths
Ans: B<A<C<D
59
Q4. Predict the product(s) in the following reactions.
Q5. To which of the following structures will trifluoroethylene (F2C=CHF) bind most and least strongly?
Phosphines (PR3) are excellent soft donor ligands (which are large and
polarisable) with a variety of substituents which differ in steric and
electronic properties. Variation of three R groups can effect:
• Significant change in the steric size of the phosphine
• Change in the basicity and nucleophilicity of the phosphine
• generation of a large number of multidentate polyphosphines (bis-,
tris-, tetra-, penta-, and hexaphosphine ligands are all known) that
can adopt specific coordination geometries as well as
stereochemistry.
62
Basicity of Phosphines
• The pKa values are typically
used as a measure of σ
donor capability of a
phosphines
Grubbs’ First
Generation
Catalyst
63
Different types of Phosphines
Me
Me Me
Me Me Me PR2 PCy2
MeO OMe
Me P Me
Me P Bu R=Cy, t-Bu
Sterically hindered and electron rich tertiary phosphines
Cr(+2) – d4 Fe(+2) – d6
Pt(+4) – d6
66
N-HETEROCYCLIC CARBENES (NHCs)
Advantages of NHC:
• They are stronger donor than phosphines.
• The stronger M-C bond of the NHC complexes
favours reaction kinetics which involves less of NHC
dissociation from the metal complex
• The presence of sterically hindered groups bound to N atoms facilitate reductive
elimination of the product from the metal during catalysis.
• Their activity can be modified by introducing electronically different substituents on
the nitrogen atoms in the ring.
67
N-HETEROCYCLIC CARBENES and Olefin Metathesis Catalysts
➢ Oxidative Addition
➢ Reductive Elimination
➢ Migratory Insertion
➢ - Hydrogen Elimination
69
Oxidative addition
When addition of ligands is accompanied by oxidation of the metal, it is called an
oxidative addition reaction
LnM + XY Ln(X)(Y)M Often the first step of the mechanism
dn dn-2
Wilkinson’s Catalyst
70
Examples of Oxidative addition : Cis or trans ?
Depending on the nature of the adding group (polar, nonpolar) as well as the type of
mechanism involved (concerted, SN2, free radical and ionic) one can get either cis
addition products, a mixture of cis and trans addition products or in few cases trans
addition products.
Note:
• d0 metals cannot undergo oxidative additions So always electron count the starting
and final metal complexes to check out the overall electron-count, metal oxidation
state and d-electron count.
• Compounds with 18 electrons cannot undergo oxidative addition without the
expulsion of a ligand.
e.g Ru(CO)4(PMe3) + MeI gives Ru(CH3)(I)(CO)3(PMe3) + CO
71
Intramolecular Oxidative Addition: C-H Activation and
cyclo/ortho metallation
Agostic interaction
Oxidative Coupling
Ph2 Cl
Ph2 Cl
P
P H3C N Cr
H3C N Cr
P
P Ph2 Cl
Ph2 Cl
Cr(+5) d1
Cr(+3) d3
13e-
15e-
72
Reductive elimination
Almost the exact reverse of Oxidative Addition
CH3 Ph2
Ph2
P CH3 P CH3
reductive elimination + H3C CH3
Pt Pt
165 °C, days P CH3
P CH3
Ph2 Ph2
CH3
Pt4+ Pt2+
CH3 Ph3P O
OC OC
CO C
Mn + PPh3 Mn CH3
OC CO OC CO
OC OC
These reactions are enthalpy driven and although the reaction is entropy
prohibited the large enthalpy term dominates
74
Types of Migratory Insertion
X X
X = Anionic
M A B M A 1, 1 - migratory insertion
ligand = H, R,
B Ar, COR
X
X
A AB = Neutral
B 1, 2 - migratory insertion ligand = CO,
M
M A alkene, alkyne
B
CO O
CH2CH2R 1, 1-migratory Ph P CCH2CH2R
Ph3P insertion 3
Rh Rh
OC PPh3 OC PPh3
H
R 1, 2-migratory CH2CH2R
Ph3P
Ph3P insertion
Rh Rh
Ph3P OC PPh3
CO
75
Migration versus Insertion
Most systems studies have been shown to undergo migration and not insertions.
76
-Hydride elimination
Beta-hydride elimination is a reaction in which an alkyl group having a hydrogen, bonded
to a metal centre is converted into the corresponding metal-bonded hydride and a bonded
alkene. The alkyl must have hydrogens on the beta carbon. For instance butyl groups can
undergo this reaction but methyl groups cannot. The metal complex must have an empty (or
vacant) site cis to the alkyl group for this reaction to occur.
mechanism H H H H H
H H H
C H C C
M
M C M C C
H H H H H H
Question: Select the most unstable platinum complex from the given list. Justify
your answer
H
Ph3P C Ph3P Ph3P
SiMe3 Et3P C
Pt Pt Pt Pt
Ph3P SiMe3 Ph3P Ph3P
Et3P C
C
H
A B C D
78
Problem solving
Classify the following reactions as oxidative addition,
reductive elimination, (1,1 / 1,2)migratory insertion, - H
elimination, ligand coordination change or simple addition
Answer: (a) 1,1- Migratory insertion; (b) Oxidative addition; (c) Simple addition;
(d) 1,2- Migratory insertion 79
Question:
Answer: (a)
80
Problem solving- fill in the blanks
81
Catalysis using organometallic Catalysts
A catalyst typically increases the reaction rates by lowering the activation energy by opening
up pathways with lower Gibbs free energies of activation (G).
catalyzed
thermodynamically unfavourable cannot
be made favourable by a catalyst.
• Catalyst product complex should not be
too stable, i.e, Product should not bound
to the catalyst too strongly.
• Catalyst Poisoning: If reactants or
products make stable intermediate with
catalysts.
stable intermediate
Reactants Products
82
Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Catalysis
Catalysts are classified as homogeneous if they are soluble in the reaction medium (catalyst
and reactants in the same phase) and heterogeneous if they are insoluble.
83
Comparing different catalysts; Catalyst life and Catalyst efficiency
84
Catalytic Hydrogenation of Alkenes
• Although the reaction of hydrogen gas with ethylene is thermodynamically
favorable, [G0 = -101 kj/mol.], it does not take place at room temperature
and pressure.
Synthesis:
85
Conventional Catalytic cycle for hydrogenation with
Wilkinson’s catalyst
P P
Rh 16 e
P Cl
P P
P
The first step of this catalytic
reductive Cl Rh H2 oxidative cycle is the cleavage of a PPh3
elimination 14e P addition to generate the active form of
the catalyst followed by
RCH2CH3 oxidative addition of
dihydrogen.
R H H
CH2
P P
H2C Rh H Rh 16 e
P P
16 e Cl Cl
R
18 e
NOTE: Ethylene can’t be used because ethylene-Rh complex is very stable (Catalyst poisoning)
86
Relative reactivity of alkenes for homogenous catalytic hydrogenation
R R R R
> > > >
R
R R R R
> >
R R R R
R
O
cis- disubstituted Pd/C
O
acetone, H2(1atm), rt
O
O heterogeneous catalysts 75%
O
O
O
Wilkinson's catalyst
tetrasubstituted
benzene, H2 (1 atm), rt O
O
homogeneous catalysts 95%
(n) (iso)
• Alkane is thermodynamically
favoured product and not the
aldehyde.
• Since, aldehyde is the major
product, it shows that the
reaction is kinetically controlled.
89
Four catalytic processes for hydroformylation.
(n) (iso)
d(aldehyde)/dt = k[alkene][Co][pH2][pCO]-1
CO
RCH2CH2CHO HCo(CO)3 CH2=CHR
Alkene coordination
Reductive
16 e-
Elimination
RCH2CH2Co(CO)3
RCH2CH2CO-Co(CO)3
16 e-
16 e-
CO
Carbonyl
Migratory
Insertion RCH2CH2Co(CO)4
1,1-MI
18 e-
92
Phosphine modified Cobalt Catalysts- Co2(CO)8/PR3
Unstable Stable
Therefore we need PPh3 being good sigma donor
high pressure will increase back bonding to Co and stability of
Catalyst will increase
d(aldehyde)/dt = k[alkene][Rh][pH2]
• In this case there is no dependent on partial pressure of CO. So this system works
at pressure of 15-25 bar.
• The main drawback of the Rhodium- PPh3 catalyst was due to a practical problem
that at high temperatures required for product separation of long chain
aldehydes, the catalyst decomposes. So the application was limited to C3 and C4
alkenes.
• This problem was solved by using a water soluble phosphine in the catalyst and by
resorting to biphasic catalysis. HRh(CO)(PR3)3 ( R = m-C6H4SO3Na)
94
Catalytic Cycle for hydroformylation using Rhodium Catalyst
H
CO
Ph3P Rh
PPh3 18 e-
PPh3
-PPh3
Ph3P H CH2=CHR
RCH2CH2CHO Rh Alkene coordination
Reductive OC PPh3
Elimination
16 e-
H
H R
Ph3P H
Ph3P
18 e- Rh
O
Rh 18 e-
OC Ph3P
C
PPh3 CO
CH2CH2R
H2
O
CO
Carbonyl
Migratory CH2CH2R CO
Ph3P
Insertion Rh
OC PPh3
95
18 e-
Comparison of different hydroformylation Catalysts
96
Olefin Metathesis
Grubbs Schrock
➢ Occurs in the presence of carbene complexes- GRUBBS catalysts and
SCHROCK Catalysts.
➢ Robert H. Grubbs, Richard R. Schrock and Yves Chauvin : Nobel Prize - 2005.
PCy3
Cl N N N N
Ru Cl
Cl
Cl Ru Ru
PCy3 Cl Cl
PCy3 O
Grubb's first-generation
catalyst Grubb's second-generation Hoveyda-Grubb's
catalyst Catalyst
97
Mechanism:
C C
R R' R R'
R R'
Metallacyclobutane
• The commonly accepted mechanism for the olefin metathesis reaction was
proposed by Chauvin and involves a [2+2] cycloaddition reaction between a
transition metal alkylidene complex and the olefin to form an intermediate
metallacyclobutane. This metallacycle then breaks up in the opposite fashion
to afford a new alkylidene and new olefin. If this process is repeated enough,
eventually an equilibrium mixture of olefins will be obtained.
98
CHR
RCH=CHR
CH2
99
L
Cl R L = PCy3 (Grubbs first generation catalyst)
Ru
Cl = NHC (Grubbs second generation catalyst)
16e
PCy3
-PCy3
L
Cl R
Ru R'
Cl
R
14 e-
(R = R’ after first
cycle)
L
L R
Cl
Cl
Ru
R Cl Ru
Cl
R' R'
L
Cl R
Ru
Cl
R'