Professional Documents
Culture Documents
do i h
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is i
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i h
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is i
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i h
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is i
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i h
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is i
THE UNCONSCIOUS
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i h
ORIGINS OF THE WILL
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is i
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i h
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free
Group will?
2 or is i
Ramsha Bukhari
do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it Taimoor
an illusion?do
Yousaf ih
Fatima Kamran
or is it an illusion?do i have free will? or is it an illusion?do i have free
Faaiz will? or is i
Bin Usman
This is a deductive argument since it follows from strict logical necessity test.
Moreover, it is a valid argument because if we assume that the premises are true, the
conclusion must also be true as well. The premises (24,25) are linked together and
P
R
E
M 25-Free will exists if 38-Self-generated events do not
53-This process of conscious
deliberation offers no
S
E
S
MAIN DIAGRAM
Main Premise 1
The fact that someone else could report what you
were about to think and do would expose this
feeling for what it is: an illusion
Argument 2
deductive
strict necessity test
invalid
Main Premise 2
The unconscious operations of a soul would
grant you no more
freedom than the
unconscious physiology of your brain does.
Argument 3
deductive
strict necessity test
valid
linked
Main Premise 3
Compatibilists’ claim is deliberately obtuse
Argument 8
21. there is no freedom when one of these mutually conflicting desire triumphs over its rival
22.Your claim that you're responsible for everything that goes inside you bears absolutely no relationship to the
feelings of agency and moral responsibility that have made the idea of free will an enduring problem for
philosophy.
23.Compatibilism solve the problem of “free will” by ignoring it. (From 21, 22)
18. the “free will” that compatibilists defend is not the free will that most people feel they have. (From 11-13,17)
20. Compatibilism amounts to the assertion that you are only free if you are fond of your conditions. (from
argument 4)
so, 24. Compatibilists’ claim is deliberately obtuse(from 18,20,23)
21 22
deductive
23 strict necessity test
valid
18 20
24
Main Premise 4
Compatibilism is the only respectable way to
endorse free will
Argument 9
24 25
deductive
26
strict necessity test
valid
linked
follows Modes Tollens
Main Premise 5
Self-generated events do not prove free will
Argument 11
34. Quantum effects are unlikely to be biologically salient whether your brain is a quantum computer or not.
Therefore, (35) quantum indeterminacy does nothing to make the concept of free will scientifically intelligible.
(From 34)
36. Therefore, (36) The indeterminacy specific to quantum mechanics offers no foothold for free will (From 35)
37. Law of cause and effect is subject to this indeterminacy
33. “Self-generated” in the biological sense means only that certain events originate in the brain. (from 29, 32- 34
refer to argument 8)
So. 38 Self-generated events do not prove free will (33-36-37)
35
deductive
strict necessity test 37 36 33
valid
linked & convergent
38
Main Premise 6
This process of conscious deliberation offers
no foundation for freedom of will
Argument 13
47 48 49
45. you cannot know why you were finally able to adhere to this discipline when all your previous attempts
failed
46.a person’s “choices” merely appear in his mind as though sprung from the void.
So, 47. emergence of choices, efforts, and intentions is a fundamentally mysterious process.
48.You have not built your mind.
49. in moments in which you seem to build it the only tools at your disposal are those that you have inherited
from moments past. 51
50.you, as a conscious agent, are only part of your mind, living at the mercy of other parts
51. So, You are not in control of your mind (47-48, 49)
So, 52. actual explanation for our behavior is hidden from us
So, 53. This process of conscious deliberation offers no foundation for freedom of will. (39-44-52)
So, free will does not exist
39 44 52
deductive
strict necessity test 53
valid
linked & convergent
54
Fallacy: False Dilemma
The fallacy of false dilemma, which is a fallacy of Insufficient Evidence occurs when one
uses a premise that unjustifiably reduces the number of alternatives to be considered.
Haris commits a False Dilemma fallacy when he states that the only respectable refute to
his argument is compatibilism. Here he overlooks other philosophies in favour of free will
such as existentialism and libertarianism
CONCLUSION