Accreditors in evaluating Instruction, Extension, Research, Linkages

and Faculty Development.

Area Rating:
(1-Poor; 2-Fair; 3-Satisfcatory;
4-Very Satisfactory; 5-Excellent

Criteria Recommendations

For compliance For compliance

Before the award after the award

1. Well-defined objectives _

2. Adequate and relevant

projects/activities to
achieve objectives

3. Systematic and effective

procedures, (teaching
methods, curriculum
development, testing, etc.

4. Reasonable budget

5. Provision of materials
and other Resources

6. Participation of significant
number of faculty/staff/
Students/community in
major projects/activities

7.
Well-documented

8. Distinctions, Achievements
and Grants of this Program.

9. Best Practices.

 Compliance Report
 Performance rating in Licensure Examination

Year Year Year

Criteria (20 ) (20 ) (20 ) Recommendations
1. SUC Graduates
Passing
Average
2. National 
Passing Compliance Report
Average

Evaluating Library and Other Resources

Criteria Recommendations

for compliance before for compliance after

the award the award

1. Administration

2. Staff/Personnel
3. Collection development,
organization and
presentation
4. Services and Utilization

5. Physical set-up and facilities

6. Financial support

7. Linkages

8. Other learning resources

9. Library development program

10. Awards of Distinction and

Achievement and Grants Best
Practices

 Compliance Report
 ACCREDITORS' REPORT
(LEVEL Ill-EVALUATION)

Program: Date
assessed:

SUC: _ Address:

Areas
Rating
(1 =Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Satisfactory,
4=very Satisfactory, 5=Excellent

Mandatory
1. Instruction
2. Extension (Undergraduate)
Research (Graduate)

Chosen Areas:
3.
4.
Grand Mean

ACCREDITOR/S’ OBSERVATIONS, COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

Mandatory (to be complied with Enhancement (maybe complied with

before award of Level lll after the Of Level Ill):

RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION:

Award Level Ill

Comply with recommendations before the

Award of Level Ill

Accreditors:
 CONDUCT FORLEVEL IV EVALUATION

Final Report.

Program: Date:

SUC: Address:

Areas Rating
1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Satisfactory,
4=Very Satisfactory, 5 = Excellent
1.Research

2.Performance of Graduates

3. Community Service

4.International Linkages and

Consortia
5.Planning

Grand Mean

Accreditors Observation, Comments and Recommendations

Mandatory (to be complied with Enhancement (may be complied with

before the awards of Level IV after award of Level IV

Recommended Board Action