1. What is a research problem?

The aim of the research is to prove the hypothesis that possible to claim that the
screen-printing technique is mostly based on both the print-maker’s and spectator’s
physical and emotional experience while producing and perceiving it.

2. What are the Statistical Tools used for the Research Analysis?
The comparative approach was chosen to add more value to the research analysis. P.
Bazeley mentioned that the comparison approach may reveal unexpected contexts. In
our case, the screen printing technique was compared to other analogue revivals such
as analogue cinema, analogue music, etc which are not interconnected with art
techniques, but its philosophy appears to be relevant and comparable to the topic.

3. What alternative tools can be applied for analysis?

Brain storming is an alternative tool that can be used for selecting the candidates
according to their knowledge of screen printing.

4. What are the independent and dependent variables?

I. Independent variable
i. What are 3 general reasons for choosing screen printing?
ii. Do you prefer screen printing to digital printing?
iii. What are your insights about screen-printing - what do you think are the cons and
pros of screen printing?
iv. Do you have advice for a screen printer who just started?
v. What are your favorite contemporary and classical screen printers/artists?
vi. What do you think will happen to screen printing in the digital technology future?
II. Dependent variable
i. How did you learn about screen-printing? Did you study Screen Printing at any
school or are you self-taught artist?
ii. For how long are you screen printing?
iii. What are you printing? (Posters, flyers, books, other)
iv. For which genre are you creating most? (Music industry, art printing, design,
advertising, etc.)

5. What are study results?

Screen-printing is an affordable, but in the meantime artistic reproduction medium has
important role in Contemporary Visual Culture which is easily distinguishable
because of its “materic” appearance, vivid colors and versatility.

6. How generalizable are the results?

In case of Walter Benjamin and Josh Mcphee the results are quite generalizable,
where's in case of Naomi Klein the result is senseless.

7. What limitations do the authors note?

toxic solvents used in process which is harmful for human.

8. How do you analyze data in a literature review?

Two approaches of Analysis where chosen Interpretative method and Comparison
Method. The collected data is hardly statistically measurable, the results will be based
on the major genre.