You are on page 1of 4

Stonehenge, a Neolithic wonder in southern England, has vexed historians and

archaeologists for centuries with its many mysteries: How was it built? What purpose did it
serve? Wheredid its towering sandstone boulders come from? That last question may finally
have an answer after a study published found that most of the giant stones -- known as
sarsens -- seemto share a common origin 25 kilometers away in West Woods, an area that
teemed with prehistoric activity.

The finding boosts the theory that the megaliths were brought to Stonehenge about the
same time: around 2,500 BCE, the monument's second phase of construction, which in turn
couldbe a sign that its builders were from a highly organized society. It also contradicts a
previoussuggestion that one large sarsen, the Heel Stone, came from the immediate vicinity
of the site and was erected before the others. The new paper appeared in the journal
Science Advances. Lead author David Nash, a professor of physical geography at the
University of Brighton, told AFP he and his team had to devise a novel technique which is
relatively new to analyse the sarsens, that stand up to nine meters tall (30 feet) and weigh
as much as 30 metric tons. They first used portable x-rays to analyze the chemical
composition of the rocks, which are 99 percent silica but contain traces of several other
elements. "That showed us that most of the stones have a common chemistry, which led us
to identify that we're looking for one main source here," said Nash. Next, they examined
two core samples from one of the stones that were obtained during restoration work in
1958 but which then went missing until resurfacing in 2018 and 2019, respectively. They
performed a more sophisticated analysis on these samples using a mass spectrometry
device, which detects a bigger range of elements at a higher precision. The resulting
signature was then compared to 20 possible source sites for these sedimentary rocks, with
West Woods, Wiltshire found to be the closest match.

Only the 17th century English natural philosopher John Aubrey had previously postulated a
link between "Overton Wood," probably a former name for West Woods, and Stonehenge.
Read also: Giant circle of shafts discovered close to Stonehenge 'Enormous endeavor'
Previous work has found that Stonehenge's smaller "bluestones" came from Wales, about
200 kilometers to the west, and the new study says that they and the sarsens were placed at
the same time. "So it must have been an enormous endeavor going on at that time as
it is quite a big event" said Nash. "Stonehenge is like a convergence of materials being
brought in from different places."

Just how the early Britons were able to transport the boulders weighing up to 30 tons a
distance of 25 kilometers remains unknown -- though the prevailing idea and central
concept is they were dragged along sleds. The site's significance also remains mysterious. "I
think you're looking at a very organized society there," added Nash. As for why they picked
West Woods, he said, it could have been a case of pragmatism as it was one of the closest
sites. But the area was also a hive of Early Neolithic activity. It is home to a huge ancient
burial site known as a barrow, a large circular earthwork, prehistoric cultivated fields that
are now woodland, and a polissoir -- a rock used to sharpen ancient stone axes. Nash said
that the technique the research team had devised could help answer further archaeological
questions, such as the route used to transport the boulders -- which can be inferred if sarsen
chippings are discovered at waypoints. He and his team also hope to use the techniques on
other ancient sarsen sites scattered around Britain.
This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "Mystery solved: Scientists
trace source of Stonehenge boulders". Click to read:
https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2020/07/30/mystery-solved-scientists-trace-source-
of-stonehenge-boulders.html.

1. According to the passage, what happened around 2.500 BCE ? a. Stonehenge had the
megaliths
b. Stonehenge was destroyed
c. The second phase of Stonehenge construction was stopped
d. The builders became organized
e. The Heel Stone was completed

2. What did David Nash tell AFP?


a. He was a professor at the University of Brighton
b. He was confused with the analysis
c. He had a sophisticated x-rays
d. He had to come up with a new method to examine the sarsens
e. He was angry with AFP

3. What can be concluded about the towering sandstone boulders?


a. They are prehistoric
b. They are materials of a study
c. They come from West Wood
d. They are admired by archaeologist
e. They are difficult to find

4. What is the main idea of the passage?


a. The theory of Stonehenge development
b. The philosopher John Aubrey
c. The Description and origin of Stonehenge
d. How Stonehenge was recognized
e. How Stonehenge was admired

5. The word “novel” could best be replaced by


a. New
b. Story
c. Sophisticated
d. Challenging
e. Easy

6. What is implied in the passage about West Woods and Wiltshire?


a. They were valuable
b. They had traces of other elements
c. They were gone in 1958
d. They were the same rocks
e. They were highly connected
7. What is can be concluded about the two core samples from one of the stones?
a. They were examined in 1958
b. They disappeared
c. They were expensive
d. They were obtained in 2018
e. They were analyzed in 2019

8. What is the tone of the passage?


a. Explanatory
b. Engaging
c. Provocative
d. Exciting
e. Inspiring

9. The next paragraph following this passage most likely discussed


a. How the techniques are registered
b. Using the techniques on other ancient sarsen sites
c. Other discoveries by Nash and his team
d. Challenges faced by Nash in his discoveries
e. How Sun was adored by men

10. The word “enormous” could best be replaced


a. big
b. small
c. tall
d. long
e. short

11. The word “prevailing” is closest in meaning to


a. questioned
b. main
c. mystery
d. initiative
e. wish

12. Which of the following is NOT TRUE about Barrow?


a. It was a large circular earthwork
b. It was a prehistoric cultivated fiel
c. It is now woodland
d. It is a burial site
e. It is a home to prehistoric animals

13. What can be concluded about a polissoir?


a. It has been missing
b. It is highly expensive
c. It is an archeological finding
d. It is a rock hidden in an archeological site
e. It is a rock functioned to make stone axes sharp

You might also like