Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Industry Analysis
Lawson, Inc. is a convenience store chain in Japan. The store originated in the United States in
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, but exists today as a Japanese company (subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corp)
based in Tokyo.
Lawson has massive expansion with its growth overseas: has more than 5,200 stores in China.
In 2011, Lawson opened its first Indonesian store in Jakarta, began opening stores in Thailand in
2013, first branch in Manila (Philippines) in 2015, and did exist in South Korea after the 1988
Summer Olympics (since 1995, the Lawson right had been bought by the Kolon Group and in
2000 was absorbed into the 7-Eleven franchise).
Lawson, one of the largest convenience stores in Japan with more than 10,000 shops in Japan--
has different color against its competitors, namely 7-Eleven, FamilyMart and MiniStop. 7-Eleven
implements its marketing strategy with providing pre-prepared foods and has mass production
of onigiri in Japan market. Both Lawson and 7-Eleven (and the rest competitors) have their own
bandwagon in creating campaign and improving their scale in each country..
A Porter’s Five Forces analysis (Exhibit 2) further amplified this reasoning. As could be seen on
the addendum, Lawson has proven its strong presence with rapid expansion, both local and
abroad, especially in Asia countries. Lawson is a great player when it comes to convenience
store segment, which it offers many novelty provided through products and services. Beside its
various adoption toward technology development and its consumers preferences, Lawson faces
direct amd indirect competitors. However, it embraces the challanges as opportunities to grow
wider by improving the other aspects, such as the power of buyers, suppliers, etc.
Exhibit 3 shows a portrait of Lawson's main competitors from various store formats and styles.
To compete against them, Lawson has to win their consumers' heart and wider their scope of
brand awareness, despite being rapid in expanding their store numbers.
Competitor Analysis
Based on the data shown in Exhibit 4, Lawson plays a big role in the convenience store industry
against its biggest competitors (i.e. 7-Eleven, FamilyMart, and MiniStop). Regardless, the overall
price points area on average level, since the tight competition, which they have similar target
market, store format, and their products offered are also alike. Even so, Lawson itself has
evolved by showing its unique value propostions, such as the high quality (premium) products,
more jumped into "organic" or natural products by providing Lawson Natural, and consistent in
giving the best consumers shopping experience as it could.
Competitive Positioning
Apart from the strict competitions against other players in the industry, Lawson has still hold
the good position in the market. Along with its massive expansion, Lawson also reveals how its
team maganed to be sophisticated to attenuate with current trends, adaptive to its target
market based on country culture, value, and so on. To be said, Lawson has big room to grow
with its unique selling proposition, without being a copycat of others. The depiction on the
overall addendum has been a proof of how Lawson are in safe space to compete.
Addendum
(1) Convenience Store Industry from various countries (Source: IbisWorld, ExploreResearch,
CSPDailyNews)
Direct: 7-Eleven
Indirect: major
supermarkets
Barriers to Entry depend on how well the easy to entry for new actors.
relationship are built among There are many similar
suppliers, brand exposure and industry with various scale of
its customer loyalty rate store formats and styles
MiniStop Aeon
References
Huuhka, A., Shimizu, N., & Laaksonen, M. (2010). Strategic differentiation in the Japanese
convenience store business. the example of Lawson’s format variation. European retail
research, 149-172.
Ibis World. March 26, from Convenience Stores in the US - Market Size 2005 - 2028 - IBISWorld
Tan, C. S. L. (2013). Humanizing Twitter in retail: How Lawson, a convenience store chain in
Japan fused cute culture and social media. Journal of Economics, Business and Management,
1(2), 197-200.