Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Century
Author(s): Rafael Varon Gabai and Auke Pieter Jacobs
Source: The Hispanic American Historical Review , Nov., 1987, Vol. 67, No. 4 (Nov.,
1987), pp. 657-695
Published by: Duke University Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Duke University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The Hispanic American Historical Review
* This article started as a joint venture. Auke Pieter Jacobs joined me and wrote a first
draft of the second part of the paper and its tables. Both text and tables were revised for
the final version, for which I accept full responsibility. Maria Rostworowski de Diez Canseco
pointed out the existence of the Pizarro legajos in the Archivo General de Indias; John
Lynch, Franklin Pease, Luis Millones, Juan and Judith Villamarin, and fellow researchers in
Seville provided help and encouragement at various stages of the work. Hazel Aitken aided
in translation of the article. The University of London Central Research Fund and the British
Council financed part of my stays in Seville and London, respectively. Finally, Margarita
Sudrez shared my historical and other problems. To all of them mv sincerest thanks. (R. V. G.)
I wish to add my own particular thanks to John Lynch, for his remarks on the original
Spanish text, as well as to acknowledge a grant of the Dutch-Spanish Cultural Exchange
Treaty and of the Unger van Braro Foundation that financed my stays in Seville inl 1985 and
1987. (A.P.J.)
1. Guillermo Lohmann Villena, Les Espinosa: Unefamille d'homlmnes d'affaires en Es-
pagne et aux Indes a l'Npoque de la colonisation (Paris, 1968). Some relevant articles have
been published by Enrique Otte, "Mercaderes vascos en tierra firime a raiz del descubri-
miento del Per6," Mercurio Peruano, 111:443-444 (Mar.-Apr. 1964), 81-89 and "Los mer-
caderes vascos y los Pizarro. Cartas ineditas de Gonzalo y Hernando Pizarro y su mlayordonmlo
Diego Martin," Bulletin de la Facult6 des Lettres de Strasbourg, 44 (May-June 1966), 777-
tion of the resources available in the conquered country and what became
of the fortune accumulated by the first conquerors are two issues that have
remained unsolved. This article will attempt to show both the process of
formation of the patrimony of the Pizarro family in Peru and how those
Peruvian earnings were invested in Spain, from the beginning of the con-
quest until the 1570s. The Pizarros, acting as a unified group, directed
much of their earnings to their homeland in Trujillo and neighboring
areas, buying urban property, agricultural fields, and pasture lands, as
well as lending money to peasants and urban dwellers. As a result of the
Pizarros' permanent link to their homeland, much of the money generated
in the conquest and initial exploitation of Peru was introduced into the
Spanish economy and society.
Pizarro, in addition to carrying out military operations in Peru, ac-
cumulated wealth and properties for himself and his relatives. It is very
difficult at this point to evaluate accurately the fortune of the Pizarros
in Peru. The diversity of transactions carried out via a complex web of
administrators awaits further research, while most of the documents pub-
lished on this subject are fragmentary and without archival references. In
addition to these problems, one has to consider the loss and destruction
of documents by the affected parties at the time of the Gonzalo Pizarro
uprising and the later dispersion and looting of archives, especially those
of the early sixteenth century.2
However, several indications provide an initial impression of the extent
of the Pizarros' fortune in Peru. During the first stages of the conquest
the Europeans, and the Pizarros in particular, were as busy in lending
money as they were in military affairs, selling various products and per-
forming a wide variety of mercantile activities within their expedition. As
early as May 8, 1533, a few days after Hernando Pizarro's return from
Pachacamac to Cajamarca, and more than two months before the execu-
tion of Inca Atahuallpa, he was engaged in planning the organization of
his encomiendas. On that date he issued before a notary a poder to his
mayordomo Crisostomo de Hontiveros, entrusting Indians and properties
794. Luis Vazquez, "Los Pizarros, la Merced, el convento de Trujillo (Caceres) y Tirso," in
Homnenaje a Guillermo Vdzquez N6uez (1884-1984) (Madrid, 1984), 202-427 provides some
interesting information on the Pizarros' religious donations in Trnjillo.
2. Licenciado Ramirez de Cartagena is very clear when he writes to the king from
Los Reyes oln Nov. 20, 1572: "Anse hurtado unas cuentas que soIn de donlde pendia toda la
claridad . . . [del pleito] que agora tratan ante V. M. Fernando Pizarro y su mujer....
Entiendo que el danio de esto debi6 hacerlo Gonzalo Pizarro en su tiempo . . . y parece que
el que las hurt debi6 saber el dafio que hacia . . . pues habia otros papeles alli mas antiguos
y no faltaron...." This appears in Roberto Levillier, ed., Gobernantes del Perii. Cartas
y papeles. Siglo XVI. Documnentos del Archivo de Indias, 14 vols. (Madrid, 1921-26), VII,
133-134. No comments are needed about more recent looting of archives.
into his care, and authorizing him to buy and sell on his behalf as well
as to represent him legally whenever necessary.3 A few months later, the
then Comendador, Adelantado and Capitan General Francisco Pizarro was
getting ready to receive merchandise fiom abroad. In Jauja, on October
26, 1533, in the middle of the war with the Inca state, Pizarro issued a
poder to Juan de Valdivieso and Pedro Navarro to receive merchandise
from Panama, collect debts, and settle accounts.4 These initial activities
soon gave way to others which were both more profitable and more deeply
rooted in the new lands.
The highest reward for the personal and financial risks taken by the
first conquerors was, without a doubt, the possession of an encomienda
of Indians. An encomienda gave the possibility of fulfilling the seigneurial
expectations which few Spaniards could achieve, and it gave access to
Indian tribute, labor, and even land.5 Moreover, the encomienda gave
political power through military force, since the encomenderos could and
did use Indian mnen and women extensively in the wars of conquest as well
as in the bloody civil wars among Spaniards that followed. Given that it
was Francisco Pizarro who granted most of the first encomiendas in Peru,
it is not surprising that he and his family took the best and richest ones
for themselves. This practice not only justified the complaints of their
contemporaries but also leads to our understanding of the relationship
between the Pizarros and Peru.6
Francisco had been the captain of the enterprise, had received the
royal grants necessary to ensure a leading position, and was understand-
ably eager to collect the returns on his large investments. Moreover, by
arranging the presence of four of his brothers in the invasion of Peru,
Francisco had managed to consolidate the Pizarro leadership. The larger
Extremaduran group came next in the pyramid of power, and its mem-
bers were accordingly widely rewarded when the country's population
was divided into encomiendas. For example, out of 168 Europeans present
in Cajamarca, 36 came from Extremadura, the native province of the
Pizarros. Of those, 17 came from Trujillo and its surroundings and 4 from
nearby CQceres.7 The Extremadurans were the largest regional contin-
gent, and it is not surprising that their closeness to the leaders resulted in
their permanent settlement in the conquered country. Conversely, those
who were from other regions were more inclined either to return to Spain
with the initial booty or to embark on more promising expeditions of "dis-
covery and conquest," thus furthering the borders of the Spanish presence
in America.8 No one illustrates this situation better than Diego de Alma-
gro who, in his expedition to Chile, was seeking the space for himself that
had been seized by the Pizarros in Peru. As may be expected, the fate of
the leaders determined to a large extent that of their committed followers.
The Pizarros had planned a long-term enterprise for Peru. The looting
of temples, cemeteries, and treasures of the Andean people was a first
stage of the Pizarros' accumulation of wealth, obviously not to be under-
valued but soon to give way to a more thorough exploitation of the indige-
nous population and the country's resources. This second stage, though
brief in the time span of the Pizarros, was the real origin of the family's
wealth. Given its scope and intensity, it seems strange that a few decades
later the Pizarros and their wealth were almost forgotten in Peru. With
regard to the supposed poverty that Francisco Pizarro suffered at the time
of his death, Viceroy Francisco de Toledo, a most capable colonial official,
said that "it was not known that he left anything else than an old cloth
on top of his grave in the city of Lima."9 As will be seen, that assessment
lacked all traces of truth.
In the radiant years of the Pizarros--i.e., until 1541 when the Mar-
quis Francisco Pizarro was killed, and possibly even until 1548 when
Gonzalo's rebellion and life ended-the encomiendas of Francisco Pizarro
were located all over Peru in the districts of Los Reyes (Lima), Cuzco,
Huainuco, La Plata, and Guayaquil. Many of those encomiendas included
within their boundaries gold and silver mines which had been worked in
pre-Hispanic times for the benefit of the Inca state. Pizarro also owned
houses and solares in Lima, Cuzco, and Quito and at least four chacras
that had previously produced coca leaves for the Cuzco elite, that is, the
best quality coca in Peru. These chacras were located in the vicinity of
7. Lockhart, The Men of Cajamarca. A Social and Biographical Study of the First
Conquerors of Peru (Austin, 1972), 28-29 (tables 3-4). This is the most complete and usefu
book on the Europeans who were present at the capture of Inca Atahuallpa. The information
it contains was used extensively in this article as a starting point to identify and follow the
careers of the Pizarros, their friends, and their enemies.
8. Ibid., 86 (table 23) and passim.
9. Viceroy Francisco de Toledo to His Majesty, Cuzco, Mar. 1, 1572, in Levillier,
Gobernantes del Perti, IV, 328.
Yucay, whose main valley had been taken over as an encomienda by the
Pizarro brothers Francisco, Hernando, and Gonzalo.
The case of the valley of Yucay is especially interesting, for it had
been one of the most productive in the Andes and reserved for the per-
sonal use of the Inca rulers.'0 Not long before the arrival of the Spaniards,
Huayna Calpac had turned Yucay into his private estate. Buildings, or
agricultural terraces, and irrigation canals were constructed using some
3,500 mitimaes, colonists transplanted from other parts of the state. Ad-
ditionally, yanaconas and camayoc ("servants of the Inca") were made to
settle there. According to some versions, when this ruler died, his mum-
mified body was taken to Yucay and worshipped by his panaca until the
late sixteenth century." At the time of the distribution of encomiendas,
Pizarro took a large portion of the valley for his family. This encomienda
was so rich and significant that Viceroy Marquis of Cafiete granted it some
years later in perpetuity and mayorazgo to Sairi Tuipac Inca as a reward
and compensation for leaving his refuge in Vilcabamba and going to live
in CuzCo.'2
Hernando and Gonzalo Pizarro held some of their encomiendas in
the nearby valley of Tampu (or Tambo), and Gonzalo's were precisely on
the "lands named Colcabamba . . ., ancient patrimony of the Inca."' 3
Finally, lands in the area had been allocated to dofia Angelina Yupanqui,
Pizarro's second woman and mother of his two younger children; she was
later given in marriage to the well-known Quechuist Juan de Betanzos by
Gonzalo Pizarro.'4 Dofia Angelina was a member of the Cuzco nobility
and probably the daughter of Huayna Capac. As such she belonged to
the ethnic group that ruled the Andes until the arrival of the Europeans.
Some time after the Spanish invasion, during the time spent with Pizarro,
she was again close to the rulers of the country. Finally, when she married
in. Garcilaso de la Vega explained that Viracocha Inca "mand6 hacer grandes y sun-
tuosos edificios por todo su Imperio, particularmente en el valle de Yucay, y mdis abajo en
Tampu. Aquel valle se aventaja en excelencias a todos los que hav en el Pert'i, por lo cual
todos los reyes Incas, desde Manco Capac, que fue el primero, hasta el ultimo, lo tuvieron
por jardin y lugar de sus deleites y recreaci6n...." (Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Cowmentarios
reales de los incas, 2 vols. [Buenos Aires, 19431, I, 283.)
11. Horacio Villanueva Urteaga, "Documentos sobre Yucay en el siglo XVI," Revista del
Archivo Hist6rico del Cuzco, 13 (1970), 2-4, 94.
12. Ibid., 94-95.
13. "Indice de la secci6n Derecho Indigena y Encomiendas del Archivo Nacional del
Perui. Legajo XXIII, Cuaderno 614," Revista del Archivo Nacional del Per6, 12:1 (1939),
112
14. An official survey of the valley of Yucay stated that "[p]or bajo esta arboleda qu
se dice Cozca esta una chacara que se llama Moyobamba, que era de Hachache, un sobrino
de T6pac Inca Yupanqui. Dicen que tiene ocho topos de sembradura y que la siembra dofia
Angelina, mujer de Juan de Betanzos. (Villanueva, "Documentos sobre Yucay," 52-53.)
15. Archivo General de Indias, Seville (hereafter AGI), Contrataci6n, leg. 5760, lib. 2,
ff 9-10, quoted by Otte, "Los mercaderes vascos y los Pizarro," 780.
i6. Guillermo Lohmann Villena, "indice del cartulario de Pedro de Castafieda," Revista
del Archivo Nacional del Peru, 27:1 (1963), 27-87 and 28:1, 2 (1964), 59-132. See also U.S.
Library of Congress, The Harkness Collection, II, 48-5o and 54-56.
17. Jose Varallanos, Historia de Hudnuco. Introduction para el estudio de la vida social
de una region del Per6. Desde la epoca prehist6rica a nuestros dias (Buenos Aires, 1959),
2i8 (n. 9). Also Juan Pizarro, the remaining brother, enjoyed similar privileges, but his early
death and lack of male descendants channeled his possessions initially to Gonzalo and later
to Hernando Pizarro. His biography is in Lockhart, The Men of Cajamarca, 168-175.
i8. Pedro de Cieza de Le6n, Descubrinmiento y conquista del Peru [third part of the
Cr6nica del Peru], in Pedro de Cieza de Le6n e il "descubrimiento y conquista del Peru,"
Francesca Cantui, ed. (Rome, 1979), 280.
19. Ibid., 28i. Agustin de Zdrate says that when Hernando left Peru the smelting and
assaying had not yet been made, and it was not known for sure "what could belong to His
Majesty from the pile," as quoted by Luis J. Ramos G6mez, "El primer grand secuestro
de metales, procedentes del Peru, a cambio de juros, para costear la empresa de T6nez,"
An-uario de Estudios Americanos, 32 (1975), 220.
20. Colecci6n de documentos ineditos relatives al descubrimiento, conquista y organi-
zaci6n de las antiguas posesiones espauolas de Ultrainar, segunda serie, 25 vols. (Madrid,
1885-1932), XIV, 221. Figures vary slightly in other versions.
21. Cieza de Le6n, Descubrimiento y con quista del Perli, 281 and Antonio de Herrera,
Historia general de los hechos de los castellanos en las islas y tierrafirme del mar oceano, 17
vols. (Madrid, 1934-57), XI, 8o.
22. Francisco de Jerez, Verdadera relaci6n de la con quista del Peru y provincia del
Cuzco (Madrid, 1906), 346. As converted by the chronicler himself this resulted in a total
of 318,861,000 maravedis in gold and 108,307,680 maravedis in silver. Herrera gives very
similar figures, as pointed out by Prescott, History of the Conquest of Peru, II, ]go.
23. Jerez, Verdadera relaci6n de la con quista, 345-346.
24. Ibid., as pointed out by Ramos G6mez, "El primer gran secuestro de metales," 223.
The official list drawn up by the authorities of the Casa de la Contratacion gave a total value
of 150,070 pesos, 2 tomines, and 3 grains for the gold and 5,036 marks, 7 ounces for the
silver. "Relaci6n del oro del Perl que recibimos de Hernando Pizarro . .. para Su Majestad
[en febrero de 15341 . . ." and "Relaci6n de la plata del Per6 . . . ," AGI, Contrataci6n, leg.
4675, as published by Jos6 Toribio Medina, La imprenta en Limna 1584-1824, facsimile ed.
in 4 vols. (Amsterdam, 1965), I, 163-170. Hernando Pizarro himself gave a similar value for
the royal treasure in a letter he wrote to Charles V announcing his arrival. AGI, Patronato
192, no. 1, ramo 2. Published with transcription errors in Colecci6n de docurnentos ineditos
relatives al descubrimiento, conquista y organizaci6n de las posesiones espaiiolas de America
y Oceania, 42 vols. (Madrid, 1864-84), XLII, 96-97.
25. Charles V to the Royal Officials in Seville, Madrid, Jan. 30, 1535, as published by
Medina, La imprenta en Lima, I, 170.
26. The biography of Juan Cort6s is in Lockhart, The Men of Cajamarca, 295-296, that
of Martin Alonso, ibid., 288-289 and in Jose Antonio del Busto Duthurburu, Diccionario
hist6rico biogrdfico de los conquistadores del Per6t. Tomo I. (Letra A) (Lima, 1973), 131.
27. Cieza de Le6n, Descubrimiento y conquista, 281.
28. Fernandez de Oviedo said that the conquerors remaining in Peru "trabajaron de
le embiar rico [a Hernando Pizarro] por quitarle de entre ellos, y porque yendo muy rico
como fue no tuviese voluntad de tornar a aquellas partes." (Gonzalo Fernandez de Oviedo,
as quoted by Prescott, History of the Conquest of Peru, II, 182.)
29. John Lynch, Spain under the Habsbnrgs, 2d ed., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1981), I, 119. See
also David E. Vassberg, Land and Society in Golden Age Castile (Cambridge, 1984), 147.
34. As usual, the register is not extremely trustworthy, both because of the high level
of contraband and the "disappearance" of cargo and passengers before reaching their desti-
nation.
35. Dofia Francisca arrived in Spain in 1551 with her brother don Francisco Pizarro.
Juan Pizarro's daughter, dofia Isabel, and Gonzalo's children, dofia In6s and don Francisco,
were sent to Trujillo in Spain in 1549. Levillier, Gobernzanites del Pert6, I, 162-164.
36. See letter cited in n. 24.
[AIll that might come for me or anyone else without register should
be entrusted to the ship's master, who is an honest man. A receipt
should remain there and a duplicate should come within the dis-
patches of Francisco de Zavala, and even my letters should come
inside his dispatches. . . . If you receive an order from me to give
something to someone, do not do so unless it is in my handwriting
and carries my, signature, and . . . for additional safety it [my mes-
sage] will be signed and marked by a notary public and sealed by
my seal.38
There can be little doubt that the illegal shipments of precious metals
belonging to the Pizarros and other individuals continued throughout the
following decades. This flow of illegal money proved to be of significant
value even after the Gonzalo Pizarro administration, in spite of the fact
that his execution strengthened the crown while it impaired the power of
the first conquerors.
37. AGI, Justicia, leg. io66, no. 4. This expediente is unfortunately incomplete, but it
includes Hernando's rejection of charges and the Council of the Indies' acceptance to hear
the case.
38. AGI, Justicia, leg. 833, no. 5, pieza 3. Published by Otte, "Los imercaderes vascos
y los Pizarro," 784-785.
39. Vassberg, Land and Society, 51 and 56.
t- t t r -: t S S o ~~~~~~~~-z
e o O OO O 4 N :4
bf bf bI bi bic , 'L5 a; (1 1 L
4> ts~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
-s ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ct V )
_ sd N N 5 ,= 5 > a : N N It
X ~~~ N
?~~~~~ m
V.) V.)e
n n Le n %M
rv ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
Nz
M~~~~~~~~~~~~ M
r.1
It 0 0 =
,, z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J
c,,,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c ._ _ 1
,0 S E 2~~~~~~~~~.
_) C,) 4 ,, X X
,,/?) V V V V V @_~~~~~~~~C L
?_ = = >
It O l OItO O
ClC'
C.Cl)VV
C. .b. .
_ ;, ;_ _ ; e~~~* 7
Ss;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r -'T m . tx 1
44. The rollo of the legal process is in AGI, Escribania de nimara, leg. 1007, no. 17. An
accurate summary, from which this information was taken, may be found in Ernst Schaefer,
"El proceso de Hernando Pizarro por la muerte del Adelantado Almagro," Investigaci6n y
Progreso, 5 (1931), 43-46.
45. Ibid.
the prison bars were not an obstacle for his servants and mayordomos;
nor for merchants and lawyers to come see him to receive instructions on
the running of his American and European enterprises during those years;
nor for his female companions to leave for town when the need arose.46
I would like to know about the health of senior Gonzalo Pizarro and
about your trip [to Panama] and about my possessions and about
the [movements of the] senior viceroy with our things and those
of my nephews. . . . What you say about the properties in Cuzco
being lost does not surprise me, with all the disturbances that have
occurred in the land.
46. Autos of the jtez de comisi6n in Hernando Pizarro's prison, La Mota of Medina del
Campo, July 28, 1548, AGI, Justicia, leg. 833, no. 5, pieza i. The social status of Isabel de
Mercado is not clear; in som-ie documents she was named "dofia" while in others she was
not. After Hernando's marriage she entered a convent in Trujillo according to Vdzquez, "Los
Pizarros," 221.
47. Don Francisco died in 1557, after a brief and childless marriage with his cousin
dofia Ines, a daughter of Gonzalo Pizarro. Miguel Mufioz de San Pedro, "La total extinguida
descendencia de Francisco Pizarro," Revista de Estudios Extrenmeriios, 20 (1964), 469 and
472; also Lockhart, The Men of Cajamarca, 154.
He closed the letter with another cryptic paragraph, in which the Peruvian
situation was combined with international politics, his trial, and once again
La Zarza's utopia.
Father Diego Martin, the addressee of this letter, was Hernando's princi-
pal and most trustworthy manager, second in command only to Gonzalo
Pizarro. Through this loyal priest Hernando directed the web of mayordo-
mos, who in turn managed specific properties and followed his legal cases.
Father Martin also had Hernando's authority to hire or dismiss agents, to
go through accounts, and to solve all kinds of problems about his estate in
Peru.
Among all of Hernando's enterprises it was probably the mines of Porco
that brought the highest returns, through his large investments in tools
and slaves there. In another letter to Diego Martin, Hernando said, "I
have had made a very good tool for the silver mines, and I am sending
to Lisbon for black craftsmen.... I will also send stallions and jennies.
. . . Be diligent in the mines, because what could be extracted this year
should not wait until the next....9 Just how much diligence was applied
is difficult to know, but Hernando continued to receive silver from Peru,
evading all the controls and continuous seizures of the crown.
According to Pedro de Soria, Hernando's administrator in the Porco
mines, the enterprise was doing fairly well in 1547, a year before the
48. Autos of the juez de coinisi6o, Medina del Camnpo, JUlV 28, 1548, AGI, Justicia, leg.
833, no. 5, pieza s. In the same document the fiscal accused Hernando of sending messages
between the lines, i.e., that the end of the war with France meant availability of soldiers.
49. Hernando Pizarro to Diego Martin, La Mota of Medina del Campo, Mar. 8, 1545,
AGI, Justicia, leg. 833, no. 5, pieza 3, in Otte, "Los mnercaderes vascos v los Pizarro,"
786-788.
end of Gonzalo Pizarro's rebellion. But Soria was having trouble with
Father Diego Martin, his immediate superior, and may have simply been
trying to please the master. In a letter addressed to In6s Rodriguez, but
obviously intended to be delivered to her brother Hernando Pizarro, Soria
sharply said
I only want to say that had it not been for the property under my
care, memory of the Pizarros would no longer remain. . . . The
properties of Hernando Pizarro, my master . . . are now worth four
times as much as before, because this year I will produce 100,000
castellanos of maize and coca and chufio to help the governor [Gon-
zalo Pizarro] my lord in his expenses. I let your grace know all
this so you will know that with the mines and properties that the
governor, my lord, has, he can serve His Majesty more than any of
his other vassals in the world, and if Hernando Pizarro, my lord,
comes, he can go settle other lands rather than this one which is
already discovered....50
There was a message between the lines from Soria to Hernando, sug-
gesting that Governor Gonzalo Pizarro was taking advantage of the good
mining production to Hernando's disadvantage. In a previous paragraph
Soria had already complained about the difficulties given him by Father
Martin when he sought to send silver directly from Porco to Spain, subtly
accusing the priest of disloyalty or complicity with Gonzalo, but it is more
interesting to learn of the feasibility of sending silver from the Porco
mines to Spain, along an unknown route, during the time Gonzalo Pizarro
governed Peru. Hernando, however, trusted Father Martin and Gonzalo
above anyone else, and they inevitably favored the Pizarro enterprise
during Gonzalo's administration between 1544 and 1548. The informa-
tion available for this period confirms, once again, the soundness of the
Pizarros' family ties, that expressed themselves in the economic field in
a marked idea of a common patrimony. In a letter written by Hernando
from prison on December 2, 1544, he answered Gonzalo's letter written in
Chincha on July 17 the previous year: "Diego Martin is taking my poder
to your grace to do and undo in my enterprises as you would in your
own.... Later, he added
Do not feel sorrow, your grace, for what was spent or lost [in the
expedition to La Canela, royal confiscations, etc.], our father left
us nothing. We will go on with what we may have, please God,
and as good brothers the wealthier one will help the other....
50. Pedro de Soria to In6s Rodriguez, Porco, Apr. 23, 1547, in Juan P6rez de Tudela
Bueso, ed., Documentos relatives a don Pedro de la Gasca y a Gonzalo Pizarro, 2 VOlS.
(Madrid, 1964), I, 209-212.
51. Hernando Pizarro to Gonzalo Pizarro, La Mota of Medina del Campo, Dec. 2,
1544, ibid., I, 166-170.
52. AGI, Justicia, leg. 833, no. 5, pieza 3, in Otte, "Los mercaderes vascos y los
Pizarro," 791-794.
53. Pedro de la Gasca to the officials of the Casa de la Contrataci6n, Los Reyes, Jaln. 5,
i-o, in Levillier, Gobernantes del Perti, I, 245.
54. Viceroy Francisco de Toledo to His Majesty, Cuzco, Mar. 1, 1572, ibid., IV, 184.
The large amount of precious metal that the Pizarros took to Spain,
beginning with Hernando's arrival in January 1534, was soon invested.
Part of the money arriving from Peru was delivered to the Pizarros' agents
in Seville, once the royal officials had finished with the slow paperwork.
Another part was kept by the crown and exchanged for royal juros. The
interest on these juros was usually payable from the regular income of
the Casa de la Contrataci6n or the alcabalas of Seville, even though the
transfer to other sources of royal income in a different place was frequently
accepted.
It becomes clear in the case of the Pizarros that they tried to concen-
trate their property in Extr-emadura and particularly in Trujillo and its
environs. They acquired land and rents mainly in Trujillo, Medellin, and
other places within their jurisdiction (see map). Similarly, a large number
of the juros they received were made payable from the royal alcabalas of
Trujillo or turned into a local rent that could also bring prestige and power,
such as the tenure of Trujillo's fortress or the city's alferago mayor, which
gave the Pizarros one vote in the city council.56 These acquisitions of the
Pizarros, or more precisely of Hernando and dofia Francisca, can be seen
through the information available in the two main judicial proceedings
that the crown filed against them. The first one, against Hernando, was
caused by Almagro's execution, while the other, against dofia Francisca
as her father's only surviving heir, resulted from Francisco Pizarro's sup-
posed debts to the royal treasury in Peru.
Licenciado Cisneros, the judge in dofia Francisca's lawsuit, had re-
quested the royal collector of rents and alcabalas of Jaraicejo, Cafiamero,
La Cumbre, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Logrosdn, and Garciaz to obtain from
the local notaries a list of the juros and estates that Hernando and dofia
Francisca had in those places, and then to put an embargo on them to
cover dofia Francisca's inherited debts to the crown. The alcabala collector
obliged and prepared the required list which was signed by Hernando and
dofia Francisca in April i566. This list was divided in two sections. The
first detailed dofia Francisca's personal property, which had originated
55. Adequately named "el 6ltimo Pizarro de la Conquista" by Mufioz de San Pedro.
56. Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las 6ltimas disposiciones," Part II, BRAH, 127 (Julv-Sept.
1950), 224.
Caceres Trujillo
C~ceres* 5 * *2 4
7 6* La Conquista
,Mrida 8
0 ~~9
Badajoz 10
from her Peruvian income and her father's and brother's inheritances, and
included some properties in Lima, censos in Trujillo, Medellin, and their
jurisdictions, and juros payable from royal income in Seville and Trujillo.
The other section of the list gave an itemized account of all those proper-
ties that she held as common property with her husband Hernando and
included land and houses that had been acquired in Trujillo, Medellin,
and their jurisdictions, and in La Zarza, in addition to juros and censos
payable in Trujillo. Hernando had already left prison at the time of signing
this document and was staying in his mansion of La Zarza, enjoying the
company of his wife and some of the servants that had been with them
since the Peruvian days.
The especially interesting characteristic of these lists is that they in-
cluded copies of all the notarial records issued at the time of buying the
properties and a large proportion of the census. Most of the acquisitions
had originally been made by Hernando's agents-such as Luis de Ca-
margo, who had been acting on behalf of the Pizarros in Spain at least
since 1534. As Hernando did not want to risk losing his properties in case
of unfavorable sentences in his lawsuits, they remained for many years
under the name of those agents. However, when Hernando was allowed
out of prison in 1561, many of his properties were transferred, always
through a notary public, to his own name as the true owner, with a note
specifying that they had been bought for him, from the beginning, with
his money and following his instructions. As an additional guarantee, the
original purchase contract was also copied with each transference docu-
ment. By 1566, Hernando's lawsuit was not finished, but it was clear that
it would not bring about any surprises. Another case in which a transfer
of ownership was made had occurred previously, soon after the Pizarros'
wedding, when dofia Francisca's lawsuit had reached a stage where con-
fiscations were threatened both in Spain and in Peru. On January i8, 1554
and August 14, 1555, several of the properties that she acquired before
marrying were transferred to her husband's name.
In the long run, more important than the immediate risk faced in court
was the Pizarros' wish to establish a long-lasting estate, as was the way of
the nobility, and to strengthen it through a mayorazgo.58 It is indeed dif-
ficult to imagine the Castilian nobility receiving Hernando Pizarro as one
of their peers, given that it was an accepted principle that the riches of the
nobles had to be inherited and, therefore, free from the memory of greed
present at the time of obtaining them.59 Yet, it was still possible to leave
57. Judge to royal collector of rents and alcabala. Order to embargo doila Francisca
Pizar-ro'sjuros, Trujillo, Apr. 9, 1566, followed by list of juros and other properties. Several
copies, some incomplete and in poor condition, in AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-A, ff 592-604v,
732-798, 830-952v, 953-998v (this copy bears the original signatures of Hernando and doila
Francisca), and leg. 496-B, if. 150-526 and 925-931.
58. Aln example may be found in Helen Nader, "Noble Income in Sixteenth-Century
Castile: The Case of the Marquises of Mondejar, 1480-1580," Ecotomonic History Review,
Second Series, 30:3 (Aug. 1977), 411-428. See also Charles Jago, "The Influence of Debt oln
the Relations between Crown and Aristocracy in Seventeenth-Century Castile," Ecotnomiiic
History Review, Second Series, 26:2 (May 1973), 218-236 and "The 'Crisis of the Aristocracv'
in Seventeenth-Century Castile," Past and Presenit, 84 (Aug. 1979), 60-go.
59. Pierre Chauinu, La Espaha de Carlos V, 2 vols. (Barcelona, 1976), I, Las estrticturas
de una crisis, 242-245.
the foundations ready for the Pizarros' heirs to enjoy the corresponding
privileges, as in fact occurred.
A mayorazgo could incorporate all the properties of the grantee, mak-
ing them indivisible, but Hernando and dofia Francisca opted for incor-
porating "the third part plus the fifth part" of their properties, all of which
would be taken up by a previously named heir on their death. Dofia Fran-
cisca received royal sanction for establishing a mayorazgo on November
26, 1571, while Hernando received his on May 27, 1577. Together, on
June 6, 1578, they had the documents that formalized this mayorazgo
issued in the name of their second son, don Juan Pizarro, and included a
long list of the entailed properties.60 Moreover, between July and August
1578 facing Hernando's imminent death he was then blind and so weak
that he could not get up from bed or even sign his name-they issued sev-
eral documents. These documents, which included his last will, codicils,
and additions to the original mayorazgo, are especially relevant because
of the information they provide not only about the entailed properties but
also about properties that remained free and bound for other ends.6'
It may seem surprising that there are many more properties mentioned
in the mayorazgo documents than in those of 1566, but that was to be
expected. Between 1566 and 1578, the Pizarros must have bought lands
with their Spanish and Peruvian income; these times were better and more
peaceful for them, and despite his years Hernando could act personally
in his business deals. In 1566, Hernando and dofia Francisca had lacked
all motivation to ease the judge's job of finding out what their properties
were in order to place an embargo on them. In 1578, however, it was
definitely necessary to include all the properties of the dying Pizarro in
the documents in order to assure succession, strength of the mayorazgo,
and the preservation of the family's patrimony.
If the list of urban and rural estates, census, juros, and other wealth
such as jewelry, clothes, and silverware is more complete in the may-
orazgo, last will, and related documents, what interest may the 1566 list
have? It proves crucial for two reasons: First, even though it is incomplete
6o. This don Juan Pizarro died childless soon after, therefore unable to enjoy the may-
orazgo. Following Hernando's detailed instructions, the mavorazgo was granted to his eldest
son, don Francisco Pizarro, who for unknown reasons had initially been substituted by the
second son. Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las 6ltimas disposiciones," Part I, 392-393, based on
Hernando's last will, points out that the eldest son apparently did not submit to his father's
wishes. The mayorazgo of the conqueror Juan Pizarro had initially been given to don Fran-
cisco, a legacy of his uncle killed in the attack on Cuzco in 1536 by the Inca forces. He
additionally received several unentailed properties.
6i. These documents are published at large in Munioz de San Pedro, "Las 6ltimlas
disposiciones,' Part II, 203-252, and Part III, BRAH, 127 (Oct.-Dec. 1950), 527-560. Some
of them are also published in Luisa Cuesta, "Una docurmentaci6n interesante sobre la famnilia
del conquistador del Peri-," Revista de Indias (hereafter RI), 8 (Oct.-Dec. 1947), 865-892.
62. As discussed above, manv documents account for the transference of propel-ties
bought for Hernando or his nephew don Francisco since 1536, Tables were assembled ac-
cording to the original date of purchase.
63. For example, the mayorazgo of the conqueror Juan Pizarro ended uip in Hernando's
hands but was kept as a separate estate. The properties comprising this estate, and their
management, could be studied from documents available in the Archivo de la Casa y Estados
de los Duques de Abrantes (Jerez de la Frontera), especially legs. 43, 72, 83, and 84. (I thank
Teodoro Hampe Martinez for referring me to this archive and to the Excelentisimlo senior
Duque de Abrantes who kindly allowed me to use it. [R. V. G])
64. In his last will, dated in 1536, Juan Pizarro mentions jturos he had in Spain. Cuesta,
"Una documentaci6n interesante," 878.
Date
Unknown* 500,000 29,849,535 540,000 30,889,535
1536 952,500 175,000 1,127,500
1537 862,500
1,340,500 478,000
1538 177,000 216,000 393,000
1539 30,000 30,000
1540
1541 65,500 65,500
1542
1543
1544
1545 250,0001 250,000
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552 286,501 404,950 24,179 715,630
1553 7,050 7,050
1554 82,500 2,448 84,948
1555 170,500 4,875 175,375
1556 150,000 150,000 48,044.52 348,044.5
1557 33,398 33,398
1558 2,720 2,720
1559
1560
1561 8,500 8,500
1562 23,395.5 23,395.5
Medellin, and La Zarza, remaining relatively steady until the end of the
period, with the exception of 1559 and 1560.65
The most interesting investments of the Pizarros fall under the two
categories of land and censos. The geographical location of the investments
may be explained by the natural security the Pizarro family felt in their
ancestral territory. Their purchases were mainly houses, cereal lands or
65. These investments must be searched for in notarial and other archives.
ct~~~~~~~~~~- M1o
= m: n b n 51 m? N b 1> .O <^'I
v < Ln Y *o n~~~~~~~~~~~4-
l:~~~~~~~- g =X E
t a) r = r O Y-
4 Ono oooo
co Cb 10 E o t)C ) )C
X rU rU U rU Y;o ao \Y
O = = = = r E =: Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1-
.. uz uz uz uz uz uz uz uz uz oz a) c) o~~~~~~4-
Trujillo
Land 6 1,398,000
Houses 2 872,500
Pasture rent 1 30,000
Censos 5 482,501
Sub-total 2,783,001
Medellin
Pasture rent 13 1,676,9501
Censos 1 500,0002
Sub-total 2,176,950
La Zarza
Cereal land 13 76,3243
Pasture land 5 17,790
Land (unspecified) 1 1,496
Vineyards 13 30,695.5
House with two vineyards 1 13,875
Houses 3 14,429.5
Sub-total 154,610.0
Royal Treasury
Juros 23,849,535
Fortress of Trujillo 6,000,000
Sub-total 29,849,535
Destination unknown
Censos 4 540,000
Sub-total 540,000
Total 35,504,096
Trujillo
66. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-A, if 781-784 and 785-794; Mulioz de San Pedro, "Las
6ltimas disposiciones," Part II, 224. The purchase price of 1,6oo gold ducats is equivalent
to 6oo,ooo mnaravedis. A documented monograph of the building may be found in Pilar
Mogoll6n Caflo Cortes and Antonio Navarreilo Mateos, "Palacio del Marques de la Con-
quista, en Trujillo," Memorias de la Real Academia de Extrenmaduhra de las Lett-as y las Artes
(Trujillo), 1 (1983), 259-291.
67. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, ff 357v-361.
68. Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las 6ltimas disposiciones," Part II, 22o and AGI, Escribania,
leg. 496-B, ff 353-354V.
69. See for example Ida L. Altman, "Emigrants, Returnees and Society in Sixteenth-
Century Caceres" (Ph.D. diss., The Johns Hopkins University, 1981), 325-381.
70. Don Diego de Almagro included one Crist6bal Pizarro as an ally of the Pizarros in
the charges relating to his father's assassination in 1540. Later, there was a Crist6bal Pizarro
de Orellana, from Trujillo, who took part in Gonzalo Pizarro's rebellion and was sentenced to
"perpetual banishment to Spain and loss of his property," but ran away with other prisoners
before leaving Peru. Colecci6n de docurmentos ineditos para la historia de Espaia, 113 vols.
(Madrid, 1842-1895), XX, 268-269 and 521, and Levillier, Gobernantes del Perfi, I, 123.
Ernesto Schafer, Indice de la Colecci6n de documents inelitos de Indias, 2 vols. (Madrid,
1946), I, 403, points out that both names refer to the same person.
71. Diego de Trujillo, in turn, sold the same piece of land two years later to Juan Cortes,
Hernando's servant. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, ff 414-429V and Crist6bal Rarnirez Plata,
ed., Catdlogo de pasajeros a Indias durante los siglos XVI, XVII y XVIII, 3 vols. (Seville,
1940-46), II, 141. As to Diego de Trujillo, he had sailed to Peru with the Pizarros in 1529,
always remaining loyal to Hernando. He left Peru in 1534, and soon settled in Trujillo, but
later returned to Peru during Gonzalo's rebel administration, receiving an encomienda in
Cuzco and slowly working his way up from his popular origins. His biography is in Lockhart,
The Men of Cajanarca, 362-365. He may have acted as Hernando's agent for some time,
but there is not any additional evidence.
It can be seen that much of the investment in Trujillo went into cen-
sos (see Table V). Consequently, the Pizarros participated in the return
of this credit option, a form of loan similar to a mortgage, which usually
allowed agricultural land, and in lesser measure houses, to be used as a
guarantee for loans in cash. The variety used in most of the cases studied
was called census al guitar, which provided for an end of the periodic
payment when the principal was paid off by the borrower, as opposed to
a perpetual censo. In practice, however, the principal was never paid and
interest on the loan continued to be collected for centuries. The demo-
graphic pressure of the early sixteenth century, as well as the increase in
overall economic activity, had generated a higher demand for agricultural
products. This, in turn, encouraged bringing back into cultivation long-
abandoned fields, that became once again profitable.72 It can be assumed
that at least part of the Pizarros' censos went to agriculture, as in the
case of the village of La Haba in Medellin, although specific mention of
the purpose of the loan was not made. Some other census were granted
in Trujillo over the guarantee of urban property, as in the case of some
shoemakers, the most important guild in Trujillo around the middle of
the century. In any case, the Pizarros, and with them Peruvian treasure,
acted as a source of credit in Trujillo, both in the urban and rural areas.
Medellin
Y A) ~~o 4 SC - )
Ct)~~~~~~L LOtC
> Y O O LO ) LO O) C) O) O) 0
=~~~r -- , CC -
O n r n r r c,) ;: 5,1~~~~~~~r
sH Y Y Y Y Y . | .: Q b~~~~~~C
Ct O C) C) C) C) C) ~~~~~C.) C. ) C.) C
= . . *O *O *O *O*O *O Q Q e Q W
X t t < Y Y Y Y Y < Y ; = A Y~~~~~~~~~I
= L LL L LL L >L L ;B c
4 ~ Y Y Y Y Y< Y Y X OQC
O 1:12 : 1 1t : 1 1:12 1 =-Oco
O O O O O O O OOO O
O a~~~~~a~~~a~~~a~~a: ,nns~~cl
Ranchal of an extension of 29.25 "vacas" had belonged to dofia Catalina Pizarro, mother of
Hernando Cortes. Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las uiltirnas disposiciones," Part II, 219.
75. Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las uiltimas disposiciones," Part II, 214-219. The "vaca" of
pasture rent, hereafter to be referred to as "vaca," is an area unit which is related to the
livestock's consumption of pasture, in particular those travelling to winter in the region. A
nineteenth-century copy of the Pizarro mayorazgo documents equalled the area of a "vaca"
to that of a fanega. Archivo de la Casa y Estados de los Duques de Abrantes, leg. 43.
76. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-A, ff 777-780v and leg. 496-B, if. 453-459v. This de-
hesa is still known by the same name, and is now in the jurisdiction of Guarefia (Badajoz),
according to Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las uiltirnas disposiciones," Part I, 395.
77. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, if. 361-362v and 462-465, and Mufioz de San Pedro,
"Las uiltimas disposiciones," Part II, 215.
La Zarza
78. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, ff 329-337v and Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las filtimas
disposiciones," Part II, 218. This dehesa has also kept its name and is located in the ju-
risdiction of Villar de Rena (Badajoz), according to Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las iltimas
disposiciones," Part I, 395.
79. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, ff 339-341, 400-402, and 475-485. The Duke of
Albuquerque held one of the Spanish sehorios in the sixteenth century, having anl income
of 25,000 ducats in 1530, 46,ooo ducats in 1577, and 50,000 ducats in 1595. Nader, "Noble
Income," 426.
8o. Captain Gonzalo Pizarro's last will, Pamplona, Sept. 14, 1522. Published by Luisa
Cuesta, "Una documentaci6n interesante," 869.
above, it is almost certain that at least since the 1540S Hernando had
every intention of spending the rest of his life here. Moreover, the 36
transactions for properties in La Zarza that are available from the notarial
records for the period 1552-62 do not reflect the totality of the purchases.
Other documents show that the Pizarros bought more properties here,
but probably before and after those years. Unfortunately, the situation
in this case becomes more difficult to investigate than in the previous
ones, considering that the mayorazgo documents do not detail individual
properties in La Zarza but include them as one unit, except "the large
vineyard ... , the house in the woods, and the house of the oxen works,"
all of which Hernando shortly before dying assigned to his eldest son, don
Francisco Pizarro.8 In any case, the explanation for this contrast between
La Zarza and the other places may be that the purchases made by the
Pizarros' agents during the first few years (1536-52) were not copied by
the scribe of 1566, or perhaps the properties in La Zarza were bought
directly in the name of the Pizarros from the very beginning, and it was
unnecessary to copy those documents at the time of Licenciado Cisneros's
request.
The second contrasting characteristic is that Hernando did not invest
in censos in La Zarza. This is an important difference, considering that
in other places a high proportion of his investments went to this cate-
gory. Hernando's strategy appears to have been an eminently lucid one.
While in Trujillo and Medellin he received a good income from census,
in La Zarza he was in practice forcing the small land owners to sell their
lands by not giving loans to normally credit-thirsty peasants. The scarcity
of money in the rural areas directly corresponded to the agricultural cy-
cle, and this situation was reflected in Hernando's land-purchasing cycle.
Thus, all the purchases of cereal lands, except one, were made between
May and September, while the vineyards, again with one exception, were
purchased between November and April.82
The investments of the Pizarros in La Zarza between 1552 and 1562
were only 154,6io maravedis, according to the notarial records (see Table
IV). Clearly, this amount is not tremendously high, but La Zarza was a
small place where this money, however little, would be noticed, and for
that reason the effect of the Pizarrist presence was stronger than in Trujillo
8i. Codicil, Trujillo, Aug. 8, 1578. Published by Mufioz de San Pedro, "Las iltimas
disposiciones," Part III, 555.
82. A similar situation was found in sixteenth-century Cdceres, where slightly over 40
percent of vineyards were purchased between December and March, that is in the winter
months, after the harvest and vintage, according to Jose L. Pereira Iglesias, "La explotaci6n
del vifiedo en la tierra de Cdceres durante el siglo XVI," Alchntara (Revista del Semlinario
de Estudios Cacerefios), Tercera 6poca, 4 (Jan.-Apr. 1985), 17-26, quote from p. 24.
83. An idea of the going prices in the region may be given by those in El Casar, jurisdic-
tion of CQceres. In 1567, the fanega of wheat for plowing was sold for 310 maravedis, barley
for 187 maravedis, and rye for 200 maravedis. In the following decade, a cow was bought
for 5,113 maravedis, a donkey for 2,250 maravedis, and a pig for 1,500 maravedis. Jos6 L.
Pereira Iglesias and Miguel Rodriguez Cancho, La 'riqueza campesina' en la Extremadura
del antiguo regimen (Cdceres, 1984), 85 and 96.
84. Averiguaci6n de La Zarza.
85. Ibid.
86. The Averiguaci6n de La Zarza does not include livestock, which was taken from
Hernando's and dofia Francisca's list of common properties of 1566. As discussed above, this
list tended to lower their properties. AGI, Escribania, leg. 496-B, ff 193-214.
Conclusions