Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 1
I. TOPICS:
III. DISCUSSIONS:
SEGMENT 1. Overview on Human Development
What is Behavior?
Behavior refers to the actions of an organism or system, usually in relation to its
environment, which includes the other organisms or systems around as well as the physical
environment. It is the response of the organism or system to various stimuli or inputs,
whether internal or external, conscious or subconscious, overt or covert, and voluntary or
involuntary.
Behavior can also be defined as anything that you do that can be directly observed,
measured, and repeated. Some examples of behavior are reading, crawling, singing, holding
hands and the likes.
4. Empowerment
It is the view that people who are powerless, such as women, need to be given
power.
1. Id
Id allows us to get our basic needs met. Freud believed that the id is based on the
pleasure principle i.e. it wants immediate satisfaction, with no consideration for the
reality of the situation. Id refers to the selfish, primitive, childish, pleasure-oriented
part of the personality with no ability to delay gratification. Freud called the id the
"true psychic reality" because it represents the inner world of subjective experience
and has no knowledge of objective reality.
2. Ego
As the child interacts more with the world, the ego begins to develop. The ego's job is
to meet the needs of the id, whilst taking into account the constraints of reality. The
ego (acknowledges that being impulsive or selfish can sometimes hurt us, so the id
must be constrained (reality principle). Ego is the moderator between the id and
superego which seeks compromises to pacify both. It can be viewed as our teller
"sense of time and place".
According to Freud our personality is divided into 3 elements. Id, Ego and Superego. He also
says that there is a conflict between the demands of the Id (our primitive drives) and the
Superego (our moral and social drives). Thus the function of a strong and balanced Ego is
the ability to mediate between these two drives.
This is the first psychosexual stage in which the of infant's source of id gratification is the
mouth. Infant gets pleasure from sucking and swallowing. Later when he has teeth, infant
enjoys the aggressive pleasure of biting and chewing. A child who is frustrated at this stage
may develop an adult personality that is characterized by pessimism, envy and suspicion.
The overindulged child may develop to be optimistic, gullible, and full of admiration for
others.
When parents decide to toilet train their children. during anal stage, the children learn how
much control they can exert over others with anal sphincter muscles. Children can have the
immediate pleasure of expelling feces, but that a may cause their parents to punish them.
This represents the conflict between the id, which derives pleasure from the expulsion of
bodily wastes, and the super-ego which represents external pressure to control bodily
functions. If the parents are too lenient in this conflict, quit will result in the formation of an
anal expulsive character of the child who is disorganized, reckless and defiant. Conversely,
a child may opt to retain feces, thereby spiting his parents, and may develop an anal
retentive character which is neat, stingy and obstinate.
Genitals become the primary source of pleasure. The child's erotic pleasure focuses on
masturbation, that is, on self-manipulation of the genitals. He develops sexual attraction to
the parent of the opposite sex; boys develop unconscious desires for their mother and
become rivals with their father for her affection.
This reminiscent with Little Hans' case study. So, the boys develop a fear that their father will
punish them for these feelings (castration anxiety) so decide to identify with him rather than
fight him. As a result, the boy develops masculine characteristics and represses his sexual
feelings towards his mother. This is known as:
a) Oedipus Complex - This refers to an instance where in boys build up a warm and
loving relationship with mothers (mommy's boy).
b) Electra Complex - This refers to an occasion where in girls experience an intense
emotional attachment for their fathers (daddy's girl).
Note: The Oedipus Complex is named for the king of Thebes who killed his father and
married his mother
Interest now turns to heterosexual relationships. ure The lesser fixation the child has in
earlier stages, the more chances of developing a "normal" personality, and thus aan
develops healthy meaningful relationships with those of the opposite sex (see table 1)
TABLE 1
Freud Psychosexual Theory believes that we are born with two basis instincts:
1. Eros This is named after the Greek god for love. Eros includes the sex drives and
drives such as hunger and thirst.
2. Thanatos This is named after Greek god for death. This includes not only striving for
death but also destructive motives such as hostility and aggression. These drives
highly influence the personality of a person.
Trait approach identifies where a person might lie along a continuum of various personality
characteristics. Trait theories attempt to learn and explain the traits that make up personality,
the differences between people in terms of their personal characteristics, and how they
relate to actual behavior. Trait refers to the characteristics of an individual, describing a
habitual way of behaving, thinking, and feeling.
1. Common Traits
- These are personality traits that are shared by most members of a particular
culture.
2. Individual Traits
- These are personality traits that define a person's unique individual qualities.
3. Cardinal Traits
- These are personality traits that are so basic that all person's activities relate
to it. It is a powerful and dominating behavioral predisposition that provides
the pivotal point in a person's entire life. Allport said that few people have
cardinal traits.
4. Central Traits
- These are the core traits that characterize an individual's personality.
Central traits are the major characteristics of our personalities that are quite
generalized and enduring. They form the building blocks of our personalities.
5. Secondary Traits
- These are traits that are inconsistent or relatively superficial, less
generalized and far less enduring that affects our behaviors in specific
circumstances.
Eysenck theorized that criminality and antisocial. behavior is both positively and causally
related to high levels of psychoticism, extroversion and neuroticism. The theory says that in
extroverts, and possibly also in people high on the psychoticism scale, biologically
determined low degrees of arousal and arousability lead to impulsive, risk-taking and
sensation-seeking behavior that increase the level of cortical (brain) arousal to a more
acceptable and enjoyable amount.
Eysenck did find that extroverts experience cortical under arousal, prefer higher levels of
stimulation, and are less responsive to punishment - they therefore do not learn behavioral
alternatives with the use of disciplinary action.)
What is Temperament?
Temperament refers to the fundamental groundwork of character, generally presumed to
be biologically determined and existent early in life, inclusive of traits like emotional
reactiveness, energy level, reaction tempo, and motivation to explore.
1. August Alchorn
Aichorn in his book entitled Wayward Youth (1925) said that the cause of crime and
delinquency is the faulty development of the child during the first few years of his life. The
child as a human being normally follows only his pleasure impulse instinctive. Soon he
(child) grew up and find to these pleasure impulses which he must some revise, he suffers
from faulty ego-development and become delinquent. He then concluded that many of the
control offenders with whom he had worked had underdeveloped consciences Aichorn
identified two further categories of criminal:
a) those with fully developed consciences but identified with their criminal
parents, and
b) those who had been allowed to do whatever they like by over-indulgent
parents.
The theory describes eight stages through which a healthily developing human should pass
from infancy to late adulthood. In each stage the person confronts, and hopefully masters,
new challenges. Each stage builds on the successful completion of earlier stages. The
challenges of stages not successfully completed may be expected to reappear as problems
in the future.
Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development suggests that children move through four
different stages of mental development. His theory focuses not only on understanding how
children acquire knowledge, but also on understanding the nature of intelligence (see table
2).
Piaget believed that children take an active role in the learning process, acting much like
little scientists as they perform experiments, make observations, and learn about the world.
As kids interact with the world around them, they continually add new knowledge, build upon
existing knowledge, and adapt previously held ideas to accommodate new information (24)
Vygotsky's Social Development Theory is the work of Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky.
Vygotsky's work was largely unknown to the West until it was published in 1962. Vygotsky's
theory is one of the foundations of constructivism. It asserts three major themes regarding
social interaction, the more knowledgeable other, and the zone of proximal development.
Social Interaction.
Social interaction plays a fundamental role in the process of cognitive development.
In contrast to Jean Piaget's understanding of child development (in which development
necessarily precedes learning). Vygotsky felt social learning precedes development. He
states: "Every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social
level, and later, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then
inside the child (intrapsychological)".
The ecological systems theory holds that we encounter different environments throughout
our lifespan that may influence our behavior in varying degrees. These systems include the
micro system, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macro system, and the chronosystem.
2. The Mesosystem
The mesosytem involves the relationships between the microsystems in one's life.
This means that your family experience may be related to your school experience.
For example, if a child is neglected by his parents, he may have a low chance of
developing positive attitude towards his teachers. Also, this child may feel awkward
in the presence of peers and may resort to withdrawal from a group of classmates.
3. The Exosystem
The exosystem is the setting in which there is a link between the context where in the
person does not have any active role, and the context where in is actively
participating. Suppose a child is more attached to his father than his mother. If the
father goes abroad to work for several months, there may be a conflict between the
mother and the child's social relationship, or on the other hand, this event may result
to a tighter bond between the mother and the child.
4. The Macrosystem
The macrosystem setting is the actual culture of an individual. The cultural contexts
involve the socioeconomic status of the person and/or his family, his ethnicity or race
and living in a still developing or a third world country. For example, being born to a
poor family makes a person work harder every day.
5. The Chronosystem
The chronosystem includes the transitions and shifts in one's lifespan. This may also
involve the socio-historical contexts that may influence a person (see figure 5).
One classic example of this is how divorce, as a major life transition, may affect not only the
couple's relationship but also their children's behavior. According to a majority of research,
children are negatively affected on the first year after the divorce. The next years after it
would reveal that the interaction within the family becomes more stable and agreeable.
The second level of morality involves the stages 3 and 4 of moral development.
Conventional morality includes the society and societal roles in judging the morality of an
action.
even violate the laws and rules as the person becomes attached to his own principles
of justice (figures 6 & 7).
What is Psychopathology?
The 4 Ds
A description of the four Ds when defining abnormality:
1) Deviance - This term describes the idea that specific thoughts, behaviors and
emotions are considered deviant when they are unacceptable or not common in
society. Clinicians must, however, remember that minority groups are not always
deemed deviant just because they may not have anything in common with other
groups. Therefore, we define an individual's actions as deviant or abnormal when
his or her behavior is deemed unacceptable by the culture he or she belongs to.
2) Distress - This term accounts for negative feelings by the individual with the
disorder. He or she may feel deeply troubled and affected by their illness.
Models of Abnormality
1. Behavioral
Behaviorists believe that our actions are determined largely by the experiences we have in
life, rather than by underlying pathology of unconscious forces. Abnormality is therefore seen
as the development of behavior patterns that are considered maladaptive (i.e. harmful) for
the individual. Behaviorism states that all behavior (including abnormal) is learned from the
environment (nurture) and that all behavior that has been learnt can also be 'unlearnt' (which
is how abnormal behavior is treated). The emphasis of the behavioral approach is on the
environment and how abnormal behavior is acquired, through classical conditioning, operant
conditioning and social learning.
Classical conditioning has been said to account for the development of phobias. The feared
object (e.g. spider or rat) is associated with a fear or anxiety sometime in the past. The
conditioned stimulus subsequently evokes a powerful fear response characterized by
avoidance of the feared object and the emotion of fear whenever the object is encountered.
Learning environments can reinforce (re: operant conditioning) problematic behaviors. E.g.
an individual may be rewarded for being having panic attacks by receiving attention from
family and friends - this would lead to the behavior being reinforced and increasing in later
life. Our society can also provide deviant maladaptive models that children identify with and
imitate (re: social learning theory) (Figure 8).
2. Cognitive
The cognitive approach assumes that a person's thoughts are responsible for their behavior.
The model deals with how information is processed in the brain and the impact of this on
behavior. The basic assumptions are:
In people with psychological problems these thought processes tend to be negative and
the cognitions (i.e. attributions, cognitive errors) made will be inaccurate: These cognitions
cause distortions in the way we see things; Ellis suggested it is through irrational thinking,
while Beck proposed the cognitive triad (see figure 8).
3. Medical/Biological
The medical model of psychopathology believes that disorders have an organic or
physical cause. The focus of this approach is on genetics, neurotransmitters,
neurophysiology, neuroanatomy, biochemistry etc. For example, in terms of biochemistry-the
dopamine hypothesis argues that elevated levels of dopamine are related to symptoms of
schizophrenia. The approach argues that mental disorders are related to the physical
structure and functioning of the brain. For example, differences in brain structure
(abnormalities in the frontal and pre-frontal cortex, enlarged ventricles) have been identified
in people with schizophrenia.
4. Psychodynamic
The main assumptions include Freud's belief that abnormality came from the
psychological causes rather than the physical causes that unresolved conflicts between the
id, ego and superego can all contribute to abnormality, for example:
a) Weak Ego
Well-adjusted people have a strong ego that is able to cope with the demands of both
the id and the superego by allowing each to express itself at appropriate times. If,
however, the ego is weakened, then either the id or the superego, whichever is
stronger, may dominate the personality.
b) Unchecked Id Impulses
If id impulses are unchecked they may be expressed in self-destructive and immoral
behavior. This may lead to disorders such as conduct. disorders in childhood and
psychopathic [dangerously abnormal] behavior in adulthood.
Freud also believed that early childhood experiences and unconscious motivation were
responsible for disorders.
2) Deviation from Social Norm - Every culture has certain standards for acceptable
behavior, behavior that deviates from that standard is considered to be abnormal
behavior. But those standards can change with time and vary from one society to
another.
3) Maladaptive Behavior - This third criterion is how the behavior affects the well-being
of the individual and/or social group. A man who attempts suicide or a paranoid
individual who tries to assassinate national leaders are illustrations under this
criterion. The two aspects of maladaptive behavior are: a. Maladaptive to One's self.
It refers to the inability of a person to reach goals or to adapt the demands of life. b.
Maladaptive to Society-It refers to a person's obstruction or disruption to social group
functioning.
unable to perform the behaviors necessary for day-to-day living e.g. self-care, hold
down a job, interact meaningfully with others, make themselves understood etc.
6) Deviation from Ideal Mental Health - Under this definition, rather than defining what
is abnormal, we define what normal/ideal is and anything that deviates from this is
regarded as abnormal. This requires us to decide on the characteristics we consider
necessary to mental health. The six criteria by which mental health could be
measured are as follows:
a. positive view of the self,
b. capability for growth and development,
c. autonomy and independence,
d. accurate perception of reality,
e. positive friendships and relationships, and
f. environmental mastery (able to meet the varying demands of day-to-day
situations).
According to this approach, the more of these criteria are satisfied, the healthier the
individual is.
3. Bizarre Behavior - Bizarre behavior that has no rational basis seems to indicate that
the individual is confused. The psychoses frequently result in hallucinations
(baseless sensory perceptions) or delusions (beliefs which are patently false yet held
as true by the individual).
In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-
5 as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's
cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological,
biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."
The relationship between mental disorder and crime is an issue of significant empirical
complexity. It has been subject of extensive research, using both cross-sectional and
longitudinal designs and including samples of the general population, birth cohorts,
psychiatric patients, and incarcerated offenders. Nevertheless, findings have been
equivocal.
On the one hand, the following are several results of studies that have found a relationship
between mental disorder and crime:
1) The risk of criminal behavior was significantly higher among subjects with mental
disorders, regardless of the socioeconomic status of the childhood family. In
particular, the higher risk for violent behavior was associated with alcohol-induced
psychoses and with schizophrenia with coexisting substance abuse.
2) A review on the five epidemiological investigations of post Second World War birth
cohorts, came to the conclusion that persons who develop major mental disorders
are at increased risk across the lifespan of committing crimes. However, this
increased risk may be limited to generations of persons with major mental disorders
born in the late 1940s, 1950s and 1960s, as they do not have received appropriate
mental health care.
3) After examining data from national hospital and crime registers in Sweden,
researchers found that the overall population-attributable risk fraction of patients was
5%, indicating that patients with severe mental disorder commit one in 20 violent
crimes.
4) A comparison on Swiss in-patients with the general population and came to the
conclusion that patients were more frequently registered in all crime categories,
although there were differences between the diagnostic groups: while alcoholics and
drug users of both sexes had a significantly higher criminality rate, a higher rate was
found among female, but not male, patients suffering from schizophrenia or related
disorders.
On the other hand, there are also studies that discard any relationship between mental
disorder and crime. They are as follows:
1) In a study which examined the ability of personal demographic, criminal history, and
clinical variables to predict recidivism in mentally disordered offenders in the United
Kingdom, researchers found that reconviction in mentally disordered offenders can
be predicted using the same criminogenic variables that are predictive in offenders
without mental disorders.
alone with no history of alcohol or drug abuse was associated with a considerably
lower risk of violence. Overall, the study showed no difference in the rate of violence
between patients with major mental disorders and patients with other diagnoses.
3) Other studies suggest that the diagnosis of schizophrenia and delusional disorder,
contrary to previous empirical findings. do not predict higher rates of violence among
recently discharged psychiatric patients.
4) Along the same lines, researchers found that the crime rate among male
schizophrenic patients was almost the same as that in the general male population.
However, the crime rate among females was twice that of the general female
population, so the overall results of the study were mixed.
MR is a condition of limited ability in which an individual has a low Intelligence Quotient (IQ),
usually below 70 on a traditional intelligence test, and has difficulty adapting to everyday life;
he/she first exhibited these characteristics during the so-called developmental period-by age
18.
MR is a developmental disability that first appears in children under the age of 18. It is
defined as a level of intellectual functioning (as measured by standard intelligence tests) that
is well below average and results in significant limitations in the person's daily living skills
(adaptive functioning). Adaptive skills are a term that refers to skills needed for daily life.
Such skills include the ability to produce and understand language (communication); home-
living skills; use of community resources; health, safety, leisure, self-care, and social skills;
self-direction; functional academic skills (reading, writing, and arithmetic); and job-related
skills.
1) Genetic Factors
About 30% of cases of mental retardation is caused by hereditary factors. Mental
retardation may be caused by an inherited genetic abnormality, such as fragile X
syndrome.
(hypertension) blood poisoning (toxemia), the flow of oxygen to the fetus may be reduced,
causing brain damage and mental retardation.
Birth defects that cause physical deformities of the head, brain, and central nervous
system frequently cause mental retardation. Neural tube defect, for example, is a birth defect
in which the neural tube that forms the spinal cord does not close completely. This defect
may cause children to develop an accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid inside the skull
(hydrocephalus). Hydrocephalus can cause learning impairment by putting pressure on the
brain.
4) Environmental Factors
Ignored or neglected infants who are not provided with the mental and physical stimulation
required for normal development may suffer irreversible learning impairment. Children who
live in poverty and suffer from malnutrition, unhealthy living conditions, abuse, and improper
or inadequate medical care are at a higher risk. Exposure to lead or mercury can also cause
mental retardation. Many children have developed lead poisoning from eating the flaking
lead based paint often found in older buildings.
Criminal Behavior refers to a behavior which is criminal in nature; a behavior which violates
a law. Thus, the moment a person violates the law, he has already committed [exhibited]
criminal behavior. Criminal behavior refers to conduct of an offender that leads to and
including the commission of an unlawful act. According to Goldoozian, for human behavior to
be considered a crime, three elements are necessary;
1) Biological Factor
Heredity as a factor implies that criminal acts are unavoidable, inevitable consequences of
the bad seed or bad blood. It emphasizes genetic predisposition toward antisocial and
criminal conduct. The following are some studies and theories related to biological causes of
crime:
3) Learning Factor
Learning factor explains that criminal behavior is learned primarily by observing or listening
to people around us. The following are related learning theories, to wit:
a) Differential Association Theory (Edwin Sutherland)
b) Imitation Theory (Gabriel Tarde)
c) Identification Theory (Daniel Classer)
4) Biological Approach
5) Humanistic Approach
Humanistic approach identifies personal responsibility and feelings of self-acceptance as the
key causes of differences in personality. This perspective focuses on how humans have
evolved and adapted behaviors required for survival against various environmental
pressures over the long course of evolution.
7) Cognitive approach
Cognitive Approach looks at differences in the way people process information to explain
differences in behavior. This perspective emphasizes the role of mental processes that
underlie behavior.
The earliest causal explanation, popular during the early 1900s, portrayed criminals as so
"feebleminded" and "mentally deficient" that they could neither distinguish right from
wrong nor resist criminal impulses. This feeblemindedness hypothesis, however, lost favor
long ago as became clear that few criminals are actually mentally deficient and most
recognize, though may not follow, behavioral norms. A more recent, and more compelling.
causal explanation emphasizes the importance of intelligence especially intelligence during
childhood socialization. The socialization of children involves constant verbal communication
and comprehension of abstract symbols; therefore, children with poor verbal and cognitive
skills have greater difficulty completing the socialization process, which puts them at risk of
under controlled, antisocial behavior. Empirical studies overall have supported this
developmental hypothesis, and it fits with the especially strong correlation between verbal IQ
and crime.
A final causal explanation links IQ to crime through school performance. Less intelligent
students do less well in school, which results in academic frustration. This frustration, in turn,
weakens their attachment and commitment to schooling, and a weakened bond to school, as
per social control theory, allows for more criminal behavior. This school-performance
hypothesis has received strong support empirical studies, and it is probably the most widely
accepted explanation of the IQ-crime correlation.1591
The formal insanity defense has its beginnings in 1843, when Daniel McNaughton tried to kill
Robert Peel, the British prime minister (he shot and killed his secretary instead). At his trial,
McNaughten testified that he believed that the British government was plotting against him,
and he was acquitted of murder. The McNaughton Rule requires that a criminal defendant:
The Rule created a presumption of sanity, unless the defense proved "at the time of
committing the act, the accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of
the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing or, if he did know it,
that he did not know what he was doing was wrong." This rule was adopted in the US, and
the distinction of knowing right from wrong remained the basis for most decisions of legal
insanity.
In the United States, the next advance in the insanity defense was The Durham Rule or
"product test" adopted in 1954, which states that "... an accused is not criminally responsible
if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect". This "product test". was
overturned in 1972, largely because its ambiguous reference to "mental disease or defect"
places undue emphasis on subjective judgments by psychiatrists, and can easily lead to a
"battle of the experts”.
Many states now adopt a version of guidelines set out by the American Law Institute in 1962,
which allows the insanity defense if, by virtue of mental illness, the defendant:
(a) lacks the ability to understand the meaning of their act or
(b) cannot control their impulses. This is sometimes known as the "irresistible
impulse test".
The Test was integrated by the American Law Institute (ALI) in its Model Penal Code Test,
which improved on the M'Naghten and irresistible impulse tests. The new rule stated that a
person is not responsible for his criminal act if, as a result of the mental disease or defect, he
lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his act or to conform his conduct to
the requirements of the law. this test has been criticized for its use of ambiguous words like
"substantial capacity" and "appreciate" as there would be differences in expert testimonies
whether the accused's degree of awareness was sufficient. Objections were also made to
the exclusion of psychopaths or persons whose abnormalities are manifested only by
repeated criminal conduct. Critics observed that psychopaths cannot be deterred and thus
undeserving of punishment.
In 1984, however, the U.S. Congress repudiated this test in favor of the M'Naghten style
statutory formulation. It enacted the Comprehensive Crime Control Act which made the
appreciation test the law applicable in all federal courts. The test is similar to M'Naghten as it
relies on the cognitive test. The accused is not required to prove lack of control as in the ALI
test. The appreciation test shifted the burden of proof to the defense, limited the scope of
expert testimony, eliminated the defense of diminished capacity and provided for
commitment of accused found to be insane.
total deprivation of the will. Mere abnormality of the mental faculties will not exclude
imputability.
The issue of insanity is a question of fact for insanity is a condition of the mind, not
susceptible of the usual means of proof. As no man can know what is going on in the mind of
another, the state or condition of a person's mind can only be measured and judged by his
behavior. Establishing the insanity of accused requires opinion testimony which may be
given by a witness who is intimately acquainted with the accused, by a witness who has
rational basis to conclude that the accused was insane based on the witness' own
perception of the accused, or by a witness who is qualified as an expert, such as a
psychiatrist. The testimony or proof of the accused's insanity must relate to the time
preceding or coetaneous with the commission of the offense with which he is charged.
Paragraph 1: Any person who has committed a crime while the said person was imbecile or
insane during the commission.
When the imbecile or an insane person has committed an act which the law defines as a
felony (delito), the court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or asylums
established for persons thus afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first
obtaining the permission of the same court.
Suggested Readings:
1. People of the Philippines vs. Tibon, G.R. No. 188320, June 29, 2010.
2. People of the Philippines vs. Roger Austria Y Navarro (alias Bernie), G.R. No.
111517-19, July 31, 1996.
3. People of the Philippines vs. Fernando Madarang Y Magno, G.R. No. 132319. May
12, 2000.
4. People of the Philippines vs. Celestino Bonoan Y Cruz, G.R. No. L-45130, February
17, 1937.
Paragraph 2: A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has acted with
discernment, in which case, such minor shall be proceeded against in accordance with the
provisions of Art. 80 of this Code (Revised Penal Code).
Suggested Reading:
1. People of the Philippines vs. Morales, G.R.No. 148518, April 15, 2004.
Note: In connection to paragraph and 3, Republic 9344 otherwise known as Juvenile Justice
and Welfare Act of 2006, as amended by Republic Act 10630, raised the criminal exemption
from 9 to 15 years old. In addition, a person of this age is totally exempted, whether he/she
acted with or without discernment during the commission of crime.
Fifteen (15) years old is within the stage of adolescence the transition age which is
characterized by curiosity, tryouts, and identity crisis. These circumstances expose them to
risky and delinquent behavior. At this age, children are not yet emotionally stable and their
social judgment has not yet matured.
END OF MODULE 1
V. AGREEMENT:
Assignment should be in a handwritten form. The student must write his/her
answers in a clean yellow paper with his/her name and signature on the upper
right portion of the paper.
After that, the student will submit the assignment on the assigned face to face
class schedule.
The student must submit the activity on the day indicated.
VI. REFERENCES:
Ticao, C. J. (2004). Introduction to psychology. UP Open University
Publishing.
Questia. Trusted Online Research. Retrieved from https://www.
questia.com/library/psy-chology/other-types-of-psychology/ human-
development. 6/13/18.
Burger, J. (2000). Personality (5 ed.). Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Psychoanalytic Theory. Retrieved from http://slideplayer.com/
slide/7082718/24/images/6/Psychoanalytic+Theory%E2%
80%99s+Core+Ideas+Personality+Structure.jpg. 6/10/18.
Hjelle, L. A. & Ziegler, D. J. (1992). Personality theories (3rd ed.). McGraw-
hill, Inc.
Rathus, S. (1991). Essentials of psychology (3d ed.). Holt, Rinehart and
Winston, Inc.
Farooq. U. (2015). Sigmund Freud psychosexual theory of personality
development. Retrieved from http://www. studylecturenotes.com/basics-of so-
ciology/sigmund-freud psychosexual-theory-of-personality develop-ment.
6/25/18.
Wade, C., et. al. (2003). Canadian edition. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: H.
Holt and. Company.
King, L. (2008). The science of psychology: An appreciative view. McGraw-
Hill Publishing House.
Eysenck, H. (1966). Personality Paul, USA: West Publishing Company. and
experimental psychology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. (1)
Holman, J. & Quinn, J. (1992). Criminology: Applying theory. St