Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hypothesis Testing For Two Independent Samples

    Uploaded by

    Jessel Godelosao
    13 views1 page
    The document describes a hypothesis test comparing student performance on statistics exams between a computer-aided strategy group and a traditional strategy group. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between groups, and the alternative hypothesis is that computer-aided strategy results in better performance. With a significance level of 0.05, the independent samples t-test results in a p-value of 0.034, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, and it is concluded that computer-aided strategy leads to better exam performance than traditional strategy.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document describes a hypothesis test comparing student performance on statistics exams between a computer-aided strategy group and a traditional strategy group. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between groups, and the alternative hypothesis is that computer-aided strategy results in better performance. With a significance level of 0.05, the independent samples t-test results in a p-value of 0.034, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, and it is concluded that computer-aided strategy leads to better exam performance than traditional strategy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views1 page

    Hypothesis Testing For Two Independent Samples

    Uploaded by

    Jessel Godelosao
    The document describes a hypothesis test comparing student performance on statistics exams between a computer-aided strategy group and a traditional strategy group. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between groups, and the alternative hypothesis is that computer-aided strategy results in better performance. With a significance level of 0.05, the independent samples t-test results in a p-value of 0.034, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, and it is concluded that computer-aided strategy leads to better exam performance than traditional strategy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES

    1. Ho: computer aided strategy is the same with traditional strategy on the performance of the students in statistics
    Ha: computer aided strategy is better than traditional strategy on the performance of the students in statistics
    2. α = .05
    3. Decision Rule: Reject Ho if p-value < .05, otherwise do not reject
    Independent Samples Test

    Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

    95% Confidence Interval of the

    Sig. (2-tailed) Std. Error Difference

    F Sig. t df p-value Mean Difference Difference Lower Upper

    Score Equal variances assumed .496a .490 -2.293 18 .034 -13.300 5.801 -25.487 -1.113

    Equal variances not assumed -2.293 17.755 .034 -13.300 5.801 -25.499 -1.101

    a – indicates that equal variances is assume since p-value = .490 > .05

    4. Decision: p-value = .034 < .05 then Reject Ho


    Conclusion: computer aided strategy is better than traditional strategy on the performance of the students in statistics at 5% level of significance.

    You might also like