Professional Documents
Culture Documents
who did
From the Figure 1 above, we can see the clear gap between 2 bars, that means there may be a significant difference of average expenditure between people who did not watch the games onsite and people
who did.
Null hypothesis (H0): individuals not watched the games onsite spent the equal amount of money to individuals watched the games onsite
Alternative hypothesis (H1): individuals not watched the games onsite spent the different amount of money to individuals watched the games onsite
Table 1 Comparison of the expenditure between individuals who did not watch the games onsite and who did
Variable F p value t p value Did not watch the game Watch the game
onsite onsite
On average, individuals who watched the games onsite (M = 2284.88, SE = 146.95) spent more than those who did not watch the games onsite (M = 1733.76, SE = 92.53). This difference, -551.116,
95%CI [-891.982, -210.251], was significant at the 5% significant level t(813.839) = -3.174, p = 0.002.
The result of the t-test in Table 1 suggests that there is a difference in the mean expenditure between individuals who watched the game onsite and who did not, and those who watched the game onsite
There are number of possible explainations for why individuals who watched the game onsite spent significant higher amount of money than those who did not. For example, people watched the games
onsite would need to pay for the entrance tickets, transportations to the stadium, and the price for foods and beverages inside the stadium would be much higher.
Equal variances assumed 13.840 .000 -3.341 1167 .001 -551.116 164.947 -874.742 -227.491
Average expenditure per person
Equal variances not assumed -3.174 813.839 .002 -551.116 173.655 -891.982 -210.251