Analysis

The Path-Goal Model states that leaders can influence their followers by clarifying the path to
the goal, removing obstacles, and increasing rewards for goal attainment. The three
supervisors in the article each exhibit different leadership styles that fit into the four
leadership behaviours specified in the Path-Goal Model: directive, supportive, participative,
and achievement-oriented.

Supervisor 1 is directive, meaning they provide clear direction and guidance to their
employees. This is demonstrated by their tendency to give clear and specific instructions to
their team. This style can be effective when employees are uncertain about what is expected
of them, but can also lead to decreased employee motivation if used excessively.

Supervisor 2 is supportive, meaning they create a supportive work environment by showing

concern for their employees' well-being and showing appreciation for their work. This is
demonstrated by their tendency to be friendly and approachable, and to show genuine
concern for the welfare of their team. This style can increase employee motivation and
satisfaction, but may not be effective in achieving high levels of performance.

Supervisor 3 is achievement-oriented, meaning they set high performance standards and

challenge their employees to meet them. This is demonstrated by their tendency to set
challenging goals for their team and to hold them accountable for achieving those goals. This
style can lead to high levels of performance, but can also decrease employee motivation if
used excessively.

Based on the principle of the path-goal theory, describe why the first 2
supervisors from the "Three Shifts, Three Supervisors" article appear to be less
effective than the third one

The first two supervisors appear to be less effective than the third one because they lack the
achievement-oriented leadership behaviour, which is crucial in driving high levels of
performance.

Supervisor 1's directive style provides clear direction and guidance, but may not be enough to
motivate employees to achieve high performance levels.

Supervisor 2's supportive style creates a positive work environment, but may not challenge
employees to perform at their best.

On the other hand, Supervisor 3's achievement-oriented style sets high performance
standards, challenges employees to meet those standards, and holds them accountable for
their performance. This style can lead to higher levels of performance and increase employee
motivation, making the third supervisor the most effective in achieving the goals of the
factory.
In summary, the Path-Goal theory suggests that a leader's effectiveness depends on their
ability to create a path for followers to achieve their goals and to provide support, motivation,
and accountability along the way. The third supervisor in the article appears to be the most
effective because they exhibit the achievement-oriented behaviour, which drives high levels
of performance and motivates employees.

How does the leadership of the 3 supervisors from the "Three Shifts, Three
Supervisors" article affect the motivation of their subordinates

Supervisor 1's directive leadership style can provide clear direction and guidance to
subordinates, reducing uncertainty and confusion. However, excessive use of this style may
lead to decreased motivation as subordinates may feel micromanaged and not trusted to make
decisions on their own.

Supervisor 2's supportive leadership style can create a positive work environment and
increase employee satisfaction by showing concern for their well-being and appreciating their
work. This can lead to increased motivation among subordinates.

Supervisor 3's achievement-oriented leadership style can set high performance standards,
challenge subordinates to meet those standards, and hold them accountable for their
performance. This can lead to increased motivation among subordinates who are driven to
perform well and meet expectations. However, if the expectations are too high or if
accountability is perceived as too strict, it may lead to decreased motivation.

What changes and recommendations would you make regarding the supervision
of the three supervisors in the "Three Shifts, Three Supervisors" article

1. Balancing leadership styles: To increase the effectiveness of supervision, the three

supervisors could benefit from balancing their leadership styles. For example,
Supervisor 1 could incorporate more supportive behaviour, and Supervisor 2 could
incorporate more achievement-oriented behaviour. This would help to create a
positive work environment and drive high levels of performance.
2. Setting clear goals: To provide direction and motivation, it would be important for the
supervisors to set clear and challenging goals for their subordinates and provide
regular feedback on their progress.
3. Encouraging participation: Supervisor 3 could encourage more participation from
their subordinates by giving them the opportunity to provide input and ideas, and by
involving them in decision-making processes. This could lead to increased motivation
and job satisfaction among subordinates.
4. Providing support and resources: The supervisors could provide more support and
resources to their subordinates, such as training and development opportunities, to
help them overcome obstacles and achieve their goals.