Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PolGov 8
PolGov 8
Have you ever wondered how disputes are settled? Say for instance, how is a conflict
between two individuals solved? How is justice served when an individual violated a law?
Where can people ask for help when the government commits violation of citizens’ rights?
These questions pertain to the interpretation and application of the law.
You have already learned that the national government is comprised of three branches,
which are co-equal and which operate under a system known as separation of powers and
checks and balances. If the legislative enacts laws and the executive implements them, what
roles does the judiciary play? This section deals with the third branch of the government—
the judiciary. In addressing the questions raised above, the judiciary exercises what is called
its judicial power.
Judicial Power
The power to decide on legal disputes is
known as judicial power. Article VIII, Section 1 of
the 1987 Constitution provides that “judicial power The judicial branch is the final
shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such safeguard of liberty. It protects the
people from someone else’s exercise
other lower courts as may be established by law.” As of abusive power, violence, or force.
provided in the same section, “it includes the duty
of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies
involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or
not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on
the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.” Hence, the central function of
the judges is to adjudicate and interpret the law.
1. Why should the independence of the judicial branch of the government be maintained
and protected?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
2. What constitutional guarantees are there to make sure the independence of the judiciary
is evident in the Philippines?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
How are disputes settled, say, in your school or in your family? How important is the
presence of a body that addresses this concern at the bigger society?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
The present judiciary is comprised of regular courts tasked to administer justice. These
are organized into four, the first two being review courts and the last two being trial courts:
• Supreme Court
• Court of Appeals
• Regional Trial Courts
• Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, and
Municipal Trial Courts in Cities
There are also special courts, which are tribunals that have limited jurisdiction over
certain cases or controversies. One example is the Shari’a Court, which has the powers similar
to the regular courts but the subjects over whom judicial powers are exercised are limited to
Muslim Filipinos (Pangalangan 2011). Another is the Court of Tax Appeals, which retains
exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal not only civil tax cases but also those that
are criminal in nature. Finally, the Sandiganbayan is a special court that has jurisdiction over
civil cases (including graft, corruption, and other offenses) committed by public officers and
employees and those in government-owned or government-controlled corporations.
Supreme Court
Head
Chief Justice
Regional Shari’a
Trial Courts District Courts
Do you agree that “justice delayed is justice denied”? Explain your answer by sharing
an example of a person you know, who has experienced delay in the administration of
justice. What does this say about Philippine society?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Read the historical overview of the Philippine judicial system at: http://d-arch.ide.go
.jp/idedp/IAL/IAL000500_003.pdf. Do and answer the following afterward.
1. Prepare a time line of important events in the development of the Philippine judiciary.
2. What are some of the early Filipino traditions that influenced the current system of
dispute settlement?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
3. How did the colonial experiences of the country influence the current judicial
system?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
b. All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any
penalty imposed in relation thereto.
d. All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher.
3. Assign temporarily judges of lower courts to other stations as public interest may
require. Such temporary assignment shall not exceed six months without the consent
of the judge concerned.
6. Appoint all officials and employees of the Judiciary in accordance with the Civil
Service Law.
Section 8 provides that “a Judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision
of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of
Justice, and a representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, a representative of the
Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative
of the private sector.”
The president shall appoint the members of the Judicial and Bar Council for a term
of four years with the consent of the Commission on Appointments. “Of the Members first
appointed, the representative of the Integrated Bar shall serve for four years, the professor
of law for three years, the retired Justice for two years, and the representative of the private
sector for one year” (Section 8, paragraph 2). Moreover, “the Council shall have the principal
function of recommending appointees to the Judiciary. It may exercise such other functions
and duties as the Supreme Court may assign to it” (Section 8, paragraph 5).
Paragraph 2 of the same section provides that the “Congress shall prescribe the
qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judge thereof unless
he is a citizen of the Philippines and a member of the Philippine Bar.”
Meanwhile, Section 9 stipulates that “the Members of the Supreme Court and judges
of the lower courts shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least three nominees
Section 11 of Article VIII mandates that the members of the Supreme Court and the
judges of lower courts shall hold office in good behavior until they reach 70 years old, or
become incapacitated to fulfill their duties. The authority to discipline judges of lower courts
is vested in the Supreme Court en banc. The judges of lower courts could also be dismissed
by a vote of a majority of the members who took part in the deliberations on the issues of
the case.
Finally, section 12 prohibits the members of the Supreme Court and of other courts to be
designated to any agency which performs quasi-judicial or administrative functions.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
2. Compare and contrast these qualifications with those of the other members of the two
other branches of the government. What are your observations?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Reflect Upon
How can you actively participate in judicial reform? What roles can you possibly
play as a student in this agenda?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Visit the Web site of Social Weather Stations at http://www.sws.org.ph or Pulse Asia
at http://www.pulseasia.ph. Research the public’s trust ratings of the Philippine judiciary
and its members. Make a comparison of trust ratings of the Supreme Court or the Chief
Justice with those of the other offices or officials of the government since 2001. What are
some of the trends and patterns that you observe?
You are a columnist in a well-known broadsheet in the Philippines. You are to write
your views and opinions on a particular issue in the Philippine justice system. Your editor will
evaluate your work based on content (relevance) and structure (grammar and organization).
You may also format your article just like how it appears in a column in the opinion/editorial
section of the newspaper.
Essential Learning
In the post-Martial Law period, the Philippine Judiciary was established as an
independent branch of the government, protected from influence by any instrumentality,
agency, or individual. This remains to be an immense challenge even at present. As the
bulwark of liberty, the independence of the judiciary must at all times be protected.
It protects the people from an oppressive individual or government. The prospect of
judicial reform has not only been a concern of the institutions of the government. The
stakeholders—including the citizens, business or private sector, and even international
governmental and nongovernmental organizations—have roles to play in this agenda.