Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
2.5
Hoek Brown Criterion
Barton and Bandis GSI (Hoek et. Al. 1995)
GSI (Hoek et. Al. 1995)
SCANLINE DISCONTINUITY SURVEY DATA Trend and Plunge of Scanline
Project Name: Tangir Darel Expressway Sheet No.: of Trend: Plunge:
Location: Bridge/ Left Bank Scanline No: End Coordinates: No. of Joint
Date: Start Coordinates: Northing: Northing: Sets
Slope Face: Dip o 85 Direction o 115 Easting: Easting:
Schmidt hammer "R" no.
Discontinuity No.
Persistence (m)
Water Seepage
Aperture (mm)
Distance (m)
Joint Filling
Roughness
Direction o
Remarks
Spacing
Strike
Type
Dip o
JRC
1 0.00 2 35 95 0.00 2.5 3 1 7 1 Type Aperture
2 0.25 2 37 295 0.25 3 7 1 4 1 0. Fault Zone 1. Cavernous >1m
3 0.35 2 37 295 0.10 1.25 7 1 4 1 1. Fault 2. Extremely wide 0.1-1m
4 0.80 2 40 268 0.45 <1 4 1 4 1 2. Joint 3. Very wide 10-100mm
5 1.60 2 85 120 0.80 0.25 3 1 4 1 3. Cleave 4. Wide >10mm
6 1.85 2 55 350 0.25 0.25 3 1 7 1 4. Schistosity 5. Moderately wide 2.5-10mm
7 2.10 2 90 25 0.25 0.23 2 1 4 1 5. Shear 6. Open 0.5-2.5mm
8 2.30 2 85 20 0.20 0.2 3 1 4 1 6. Fissure 7. Partly open 0.25-0.5mm
9 2.35 2 6 256 0.05 5 7 1 7 1 7. TensionCrack 8. Tight 0.1-0.25mm
10 2.48 2 76 335 0.13 3 3 1 5 1 8. Foliation 9. Very tight <0.1mm
11 2.50 2 40 98 0.02 2.5 3 1 7 1 9. Bending
12 2.63 2 86 316 0.13 2.5 3 1 7 1
Section (0 - 10 )m Jv
J1 Min Sp J1 Max Sp J1 Avg Sp
0.00 0.00 0.00
- - -
J2 Min Sp J2 Max Sp J2 Avg Sp
0.00 0.00 0.00
- - -
J3 Min Sp J3 Max Sp J3 Avg Sp
0.00 0.00 0.00
- - -
J4 Min Sp J4 Max Sp J4 Avg Sp
0.00 0.00 0.00
- - -
Jv Min Jv Max Jv Avg
0.00 0.00 0.00
Corrected RQD
100
Joint Frequency
J1 Min Fr J1 Max Fr J1 Avg Fr
0.00 0.00 0.00
J2 Min Fr J1 Max Fr J1 Avg Fr
0.00 0.00 0.00
J3 Min Fr J3 Max Fr J3 Avg Fr
0.00 0.00 0.00
J4 Min Fr J4 Max Fr J4 Avg Fr
0.00 0.00 0.00
The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) System (BIENIAWSKI 1989)
Rating 30 25 20 10
Inflow per 10 m tunnel
length (l/min.) None < 10 10 - 25 25 - 125
(Joint water press)/ (Major
0 < 0.1 0.1 < 0.2 0.2 - 0.5
Ground-water principal s)
5 Completely
General conditions Damp Wet Dripping
dry
Rating 15 10 7 4
B. RATING ADJUSTMENT FOR DISCONTINUITY ORIENTATIONS
Strike and dip orientations Very favourable Favourable Fair Unfavourable
Cohesion of rock mass (kPa) > 400 300 - 400 200 - 300 100 - 200
Friction angle of rock mass (°) > 45 35 - 45 25 - 35 15 - 25
E. GUIDELINES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF DISCONTINUITY CONDITIONS
Rating 6 5 3 1
Discontinuity length (persistence) <1m 1-3m 3 - 10 m 10 - 20 m
Rating 6 4 2 1
Separation (aperture) None < 0.1 mm 0.1 - 1.0 mm 1 - 5 mm
Rating 6 5 4 1
Weathering
Unweather Slightly Moderately Highly
ed weathered weathered weathered
Rating 6 5 3 1
Hard filling < 5 Hard filling > 5 Soft filling < 5
Infilling (gouge) None
mm mm mm
Rating 6 4 2 2
F. EFFECT OF DISCONTINUITY STRIKE AND DIP ORIENTATION IN TUNNELLING
Strike perpendicular to tunnel axis Strike parallel to tunnel axis
Drive with dip - Dip 45 - 90° Drive with dip - Dip 20 - 45° Dip 45 - 90°
Very favourable Favourable Very unfavourable
Drive against dip - Dip 45 - 90° Drive against dip - Dip 20 - 45° Dip 0 - 20° - Irrespective of strike °
Strength 12
RQD 20
Spacing 10
Condition 23
Grundwater 15
Input Strike Dip Orientation -5
values Values RMR Total 75
For this low range - uniaxial comp.
test is preferred
RMR 31.33
Flowing
15
0
Very unfavourable
-12 -5
-25
< 21
75
V II
Good
Very poor rock
Rock
V II
30 min for 1 m span
1 yr for 10
m span
Slickensided
5
0
> 20 m
3
0
> 5 mm
1
0
Decomposed
3
0
Soft filling > 5 mm
3
0