Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1512
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
And achievement motivation has impact on might not be guaranteed where there is dearth of
Academic performance of secondary school self-efficacy and motivation.
students in all subjects Mathematics to be specific However, little is known on the impact of school
with respect to gender, (Tella, 2007). Highly environment on students‟ academic performance in
motivated students performed better academically an urban city like Bauchi State. Hence it is against
than lowly motivated students. The need for this background that, the study is set out to
academic achievement is a valid factor of students' examine the role of achievement motivation and
commitment and positively correlates with self-efficacy in performance of students in
academic performance. Hence, when students have secondary school in Bauchi state.
strongly confidence in the educational system, it
becomes easier for them to perform better.Self- 1.2 Purpose of the Study
efficacy has important effects on the amount of The purpose of this study was to determine the
effort individuals apply to a given task such as relationship between achievement motivation, self-
homework. Student with high levels of self- efficacy and academic performance, among
efficacy for a given task will be resilient and secondary school students in Bauchi state. In order
persistent in the face of setbacks, while someone to achieve these goals, the following hypotheses
with low levels of self-efficacy for that task may were devised and tested:
disengage or avoid the situation, (Khalique & H0There isno significant relationship between
Singh, 2019). achievement motivation and academic
Self-efficacy reflects the extent to performance among secondary school students in
which students believe that they can Bauchi State.
successfully perform in school. It usually H0There is no significant relationship between
positively correlated with outcome expectations self-efficacy and academic performance among
but it is possible that a student‟s has high self- secondary school students in Bauchi State.
efficacy does not transform into a high H0There is no significant relationship between
academic achievement. Self-efficacy has important achievement motivation and self- efficacy among
effects on the amount of effort individuals apply to secondary school students in Bauchi State.
a given task. Someone with high levels of self-
efficacy for a given task will be resilient and II. EMPIRICAL REVIEW
persistent in the face of setbacks, while someone The study of Firouzeh, (2013), determine
with low levels of self-efficacy for that task may the relationship between academic self-efficacy,
disengage or avoid the situation, (Linnenbrink & achievement motivation, and academic
Pintrich, 2003). The confidence or strength that a procrastination with academic performance, and
student has can positively influence his/her success investigate predictive validity of them with
in learning. Students tend to avoid tasks that exceed academic performance and interaction of them with
their ability and seek tasks at which they can gender to academic performance. A sample of 200
succeed. students (100 males and 100 females) were selected
The increasing nature of poor academic by multi-stage cluster sampling from highschools
performance of secondary school students of Orumieh. All participants were asked to fill in
especially in examinations like NECO, WAEC and Lay‟s academic procrastination scale, Herman‟s
JAMB, tend to shift the blame on the teaching achievement motivation scale, and self-efficacy
methodology adopted by the teachers and poor scale. The data were analyzed using mean standard
funding from the government to produce quality deviation, t-test, and regression analyses. The result
instructional materials. However, these may not be of multiple regression analysis reveals that
the most reasons why students perform poorly in academic self-efficacy is the best predicator and
examinations. it's clear from all indications that the academic procrastination inversely is a significant
majority secondary school students have poor study predictor of academic performance. Also, extra
habit which could cause poor academic result of t-test reveals that there is no significant
performance (Tella, 2007). Hartman (2017) difference between the mean score of girls and
asserted lack of motivation may be a contributing boys in academic procrastination and academic
factor to secondary school student failure in most self-efficacy. Furthermore, the fidings of the study
subjects. The scholar went further to shed more showed a significant difference between boys and
light that unless students are well motivated and girls, in terms of the level of achievement
have strong confidence of the educational system motivation and academic performance.
else teaching and learning might not happen. The The study of Kumar & Tankha, (2020), examine
high levels of students‟ academic performance the contribution of achievement motivation and
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1513
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
psychological adjustment on the academic research and is a descriptive survey. The subjects
performance of the school students.A cross- of the study were one thousand one hundred
sectional research design was employed for the and fifty (1150) senior secondary school III
study. A sample of 283 urban adolescent school chemistry students selected from Kogi, Kwara
students participated in the study. The students and Niger States of Nigeria. The data collected
were administered measures of achievement were analyzed using descriptive and inferential
motivation and psychological adjustment. The statistics of mean, percentage and Pearson
total percentage of marks obtained in the tenth Product Moment Correlation. The findings
standard was used as the measure of academic revealed that no significant relationship existed
performance. Pearson‟s correlation coefficient and between self-efficacy and the academic
multiple hierarchical regression analysis were used achievement of the chemistry students. The study
to analyze the obtained data. SPSS version 21 was concludes that students‟ self-efficacy needs to be
used for data analysis.The results of the study complemented with a host of other factors to
revealed a significant association of achievement achieve high academic achievement in Chemistry.
motivation and educational adjustment with the It is therefore recommended that attention be
academic performance of the students. However, given to other factors necessary for better
there was no significant association between students‟ achievement in chemistry to complement
emotional and social adjustment with academic students‟ high self-efficacy, so that a combination
performance. The observations shed light on how of these factors could result in high academic
cultivating enhanced student engagement and achievement in Chemistry.
nurturing aspirations both within and outside There are numeral studies that included
classrooms may enhance the academic achievement expectancy and value components of motivation as
of school students. Thus, the findings can provide predictors of students‟ academic achievement
greater insight to teachers, psychologists, and (grades or test scores) and additionally considered
educational institutions to better plan the academic students‟ prior achievement (Steinmayr,
environment around the students. Weidinger, Schwinger, & Spinath, 2019) or their
Honicke & Broadbent, (2016) review intelligence. However, only few studies accepted
integrates 12 years of research on the relationship intelligence and prior achievement together with
between academic self-efficacy and university more than two motivational constructs as predictors
student‟s academic performance, and known of school students‟ achievement. Honicke and
cognitive and motivational variables that explain Broadbent, (2016) examined two expectancy
this relationship. The reviews report moderate components (i.e., ability self-concept and self-
correlations between these variables, but didn‟t efficacy) and eight value components (i.e., interest,
discuss mediating and moderating factors that enjoyment, usefulness, learning goals,
impact this relationship. Systematic searches were performance-approach, performance-avoidance
conducted in April 2015 of psychological, goals, and work avoidance) in most subjects.
educational, and relevant online databases for Steinmayr and Spinath (2009) investigated the role
studies investigating academic self-efficacy and of an expectancy component (ability self-concept),
performance in university populations published five value components (task values, learning goals,
between September 2003 and April 2015. Fifty- performance-approach, performance-avoidance
nine papers were eligible. Academic self-efficacy goals, and work avoidance), and students‟
moderately correlated with academic performance. achievement motives (i.e., hope for success, fear of
Several mediating and moderating factors were failure, and need for achievement) for students‟
identified, including effort regulation, deep grades. Both studies used relative weights analysis
processing strategies and goal orientations. Given to compare the predictive power of all variables
the paucity of longitudinal studies identified in this simultaneously while taking into account
review, further research into how these variables multicollinearity of the predictors (Tonidandel and
relate over time is necessary in order to establish LeBreton, 2011). Findings showed that after
causality and uncover the complex interaction controlling for differences in students„ intelligence
between academic self-efficacy, performance, and and their prior achievement – expectancy
motivational and cognitive variables that impact it. components (ability self-concept, self-efficacy)
Baanu, Oyelekan, & Olorundare, (2016) were the best motivational predictors of
study find the relationship between chemistry achievement followed by task values (
students‟ self-efficacy and their academic intrinsic/enjoyment, attainment, and utility), need
achievement in senior secondary schools in North- for achievement and learning goals (Steinmayr and
central, Nigeria. The study is an ex-post facto Spinath, 2009). However, Steinmayr and Spinath
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1514
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
(2009) who investigated the relations in three comprise a variety of motivation constructs that can
different domains did not assess all motivational be organized in two broad categories: students‟
constructs on the same level of specificity as the “beliefs about their capability to perform a task,”
achievement criteria. More precisely, students‟ also called expectancy components (e.g., ability
achievement as well as motivational beliefs and self-concepts, self-efficacy), and their
task values were assessed domain-specifically “motivational beliefs about their reasons for
(math grades, math self-concept, math task values), choosing to do a task,” also called value
whereas students‟ goals were only measured for components (e.g., task values, goals). According to
school in general (e.g., “In school it is important the social cognitive theory, students‟ motivation is
for me to learn as much as possible”) and students‟ relatively situation or context specific, (Pintrich &
achievement motives were only measured on a Schunk, 1996). To gain a comprehensive picture of
domain-general level ( “Difficult problems appeal the relation between students‟ motivation and their
to me”). Thus, the importance of goals and academic achievement, we additionally take into
achievement motives for math and German grades account a traditional personality model of
might have been underestimated because the motivation, the theory of the achievement motive
specificity levels of predictor and criterion according to which students‟ motivation is
variables did not match. Assessing students‟ goals conceptualized as a relatively stable trait. Students‟
and their achievement motives with reference to a goal orientations are wider cognitive orientations
specific subject might result in higher associations that students have toward their learning and they
with domain-specific achievement criteria reflect the reasons for doing a task.
(Sparfeldt and Rost, 2011). Achievement motivation and Self-efficacy
2.1 Theoretical Framework are developed as a result of information from four
To explain the function of achievement types of resources: mastery (enactive) experiences,
motivation and self-efficacy in student vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and
performance, social cognitive theory is found physiological states. Mastery or enactive
appropriate. This approach emphasizes the experiences are derived from what one has
important role of students‟ beliefs and their experienced are said to be the most forceful
interpretations of actual events, as well as the role reference of self-efficacy beliefs. Vicarious
of the achievement context for motivational experiences are gained by observing a model‟s
dynamics. The theory explains extensivelyhow performance and comparing it with the observer. A
learners acquire achievement motivations and self- comparatively weak source of self-efficacy is the
efficacy information from knowledge of others‟ persuasion like „I have faith in you‟ given by
performances through social comparisons. Students others. The final source of students‟ self-efficacy is
who observe similar peers learn a task may also physiological reactions which are stress, anxiety
believe that they can learn it. Such vicarious and other feelings seen as signs of physical
information typically has a weaker effect than incompetence, (Pintrich & Schunk, 1996). In
actual performance because vicariously-induced gauging self-efficacy, people assess their skills and
self-efficacy can be negated by subsequent capabilities to translate those skills into actions.
performance failure.
Baanu, Oyelekan, & Olorundare, (2016) 2.2 Conceptual Definitions
asserted that students‟ beliefs in their abilities to 2.2.1 Achievement Motivation
achieve desired goals strongly influence their Motivation has got much consideration
academic achievement. In view of this Hartman from many analysts with different mental and
(2017)infered that academic achievement and self- philosophical viewpoints in several areas of
efficacy reflects the extent to which students consideration, particularly brain research and
believe that they can successfully perform in instruction, due to its critical impact on students‟
school. Self-efficacies are usually positively learning, perseverance, and scholarly achievement.
correlated with outcome expectations but it is Secondary school students who are not propelled to
possible that a student has high self-efficacy but succeed will not work difficult. In reality, a few
low expectations about the grades earned from the analysts (Tucker, Zayco, & Herman, 2002) have
examinations, cognitive perspective on motivation recommended that as it were achievement
and reflects the cognitive metaphor of the motivation specifically influences scholarly
individual as an active and rational decision maker execution; all other components influence
in contrast to earlier behavioral models of accomplishment as it were through their impact on
motivation, (Pintrich & Schunk, 1996).Social inspiration. Ahmad and Rana (2012) found out that
cognitive models of achievement motivation inspiration impacts the scholastic execution of
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1515
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1516
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
extent to which a student, a teacher, or an represent the opinion of the respondents. The 4
institution has achieved their educational goals. point Likert rating scale was used, the responses
There are two traditional indicators of academic were scored 4, 3, 2 and 1 respectively.
performance, namely, grades and highest level of The research instrument was validated by an
educational attainment. These two indicators are expert, University of Ilorin, Nigeria for item
arguably the most important to educators, students, structure and language clarity. The reliability of the
their parents, and those people who make public questionnaire was determined using a test-retest
policy decisions. Academic performance is method of two weeks‟ interval, in which the
commonly measured by examinations or questionnaire was administered to thirty chemistry
continuous assessment, but there is no general students from another school not covered by the
agreement on how it is best tested or which aspects main study. The data obtained was subjected to
are the most important. Pearson Product Moment Correlation. A calculated
The educational psychology literature reliability coefficient of 0.72 was obtained.
decisively indicates that the psychological variables The second instrument was the result of the
have an important role in academic performance. respondents in the Senior School Certificate
Some psychological factors play an important role Examination jointly conducted. The Senior School
to promote or decline academic performance, such Certificate Examination questions were normally
as self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and taken through the basic processes of validation and
academic procrastination. So, it is very important to reliability before they were administered. Hence,
recognize that and use them to improve the the examination questions were deemed valid and
academic performance of students. reliable.
Copies of the questionnaire were directly
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY administered to the students in each of the schools
The study is a research conducted via a and retrieved same day the school was visited. The
descriptive survey. The population for the study data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis
comprised all the senior secondary school students using frequency counts, mean, standard deviation,
in Bauchi metropolis. Forty Senior school students and Pearson Product Moment Correlation was
were selected by stratified random sampling from employed to test the only hypothesis.
ten secondary schools in Bauchi State which made
up of 400 students altogether. IV. RESULTS
Two instruments were used for the study. Inordertoanalyzethedata
The first one was a researcher-designed andtestthehypothesesofthestudy,thedescriptiveindic
questionnaire named students‟ achievement esof variables (mean,
motivation and self-efficacy questionnaire SD(standarddeviation),skewness,andkurtosis)haveb
(AMSEQ) adapted fromBandura, (1986). The eenpresentedinordertocheckthenormaldistribution
instrument was subject to modificationwhich ofthedata.Skewnessandkurtosisindicessuggestthe
involved changing the response from Very True normality ofdatadistribution.
(VT), True (T), Untrue (U) and Not At All (NAA) Thecorrelations between, achievementmotivation,
to Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D) andself-efficacy with academicperformancewere
and Strongly Disagree (SD) respectively, this is calculatedusingPearson‟s correlation coefficients.
done with a believe that the response better
Table 1: Relationship between achievement motivation and academic performance among secondary school
students in Bauchi State.
Variables Mean SD r P-value
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1517
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 9 Sep 2021, pp: 1512-1519 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252
Table 2: Relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance among secondary school students in
Bauchi State.
Variables Mean SD r P-value
Table2showsthatsignificantrelationshipexistsbetwe hypothesisthatsaysthereisnosignificantrelationshipb
enself-efficacyandacademic etweenself-efficacyandacademic performance
Performance(r=.230,p=.014).Becausethep- amongsecondary school students in Bauchi stateis
valueof.014islessthan0.05.Thus,thenull thereforerejected.
Table 3: Relationship between achievement motivation and self- efficacy among secondary school students in
Bauchi State.
Variables Mean SD r P-value
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030915121519 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 1519